A Database for a Changing Economy: Review of the Occupational Information Network (O*NET)

A Database for a Changing Economy: Review of the Occupational Information Network (O*NET)

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1-215

  Tippins, Nancy T ^a   Hilton, Margaret L ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85018193985     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.17226/12814     Document Type: Book

References (251)

1. Advisory Panel for the Dictionary of Occupational Titles. (1993). The new DOT: A database of occupational titles for the twenty-first century (final report). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration.
2. National Center for O*NET Development. (2009a). O*NET products at work. Raleigh, NC: Author.
3. National Center for O*NET Development. (2009b). Production database-O*NET 14.0. Available: http://www.onetcenter.org/database.html [accessed July 2009].
4. National Center for O*NET Development. (no date). The O*NET content model. Available: http://www.onetcenter.org/content.html [accessed June 2009].
5. National Research Council. (1980). Work, jobs, and occupations: A critical review of the Dictionary of Occupational Titles. A.R. Miller, D.J. Treiman, P.S. Cain, and P.A. Roos (Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Available: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=92 [accessed May 2009].
6. U.S. Department of Labor. (2006). Strategic plan for fiscal years 2006-2011. Available: http:// www.dol.gov/_sec/stratplan/ [accessed May 2009].
7. U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration. (2008). O*NET data collection program, Office of Management and Budget clearance package supporting statement, volume 1. Raleigh, NC: Author. Available: http://www.onetcenter.org/dl_files/ omb2008/Supporting_Statement2.pdf [accessed June 2009].
8. Advisory Panel for the Dictionary of Occupational Titles. (1993). The new DOT: A database of occupational titles for the twenty-first century (final report). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration.
9. Anderson, L.E. (1997). Education, training, experience, and licensure/certification: Evidence for the reliability and validity of measures. In N.G. Peterson, M.D. Mumford, W.C. Borman, P.R. Jeanneret, E.A. Fleishman, and K.Y. Levin (Eds.), O*NET final technical report. Volume I, II, and III. Available: http://www.eric.ed.gov/ [accessed July 2009].
10. Anderson, L.E. (1999). O*NET (pp. 91-104). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
11. Arad, S., Hanson, M.A., and Schneider, R.J. (1999). O*NET (pp. 147- 174). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
12. Barrick, M.R., and Mount, M.K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
13. Benson, M.J., and Campbell, J.P. (2007). To be, or not to be linear: An expanded representation of personality and its relationship to leadership performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 232-249.
14. Borman, W.C., Kubisiak, U.C., and Schneider, R.J. (1999). Work styles. In N.G. Peterson, M.D. Mumford, W.C. Borman, P.R. Jeanneret, and E.A. Fleishman (Eds.), An occupational information system for the 21st century: The development of O*NET (pp. 213- 226). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
15. Cantor, R., and Kihlstrom, J.F. (1987). Personality and social intelligence. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
16. Carroll, J.B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Chi, M.T., Glaser, R., and Rees, E. (1983). Expertise in problem solving. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Corts, D.B., and Gowing, M.K. (1992). Dimensions of effective behavior: Executives, managers, and supervisors. Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Personnel Research and Development.
19. Costa, P.T., Jr., and McCrae, R.R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
20. Costanza, D.P., Fleishman, E.A., and Marshall-Mies, J. (1999). Knowledges. In N.G. Peterson, M.D. Mumford, W.C. Borman, P.R. Jeanneret, and E.A. Fleishman (Eds.), An occupational information system for the 21st century: The development of O*NET (pp. 71-90). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
21. Cottle, W.C. (1950). A factorial study of the multiphasic, Strong, Kuder, and Bell inventories using a population of adult males. Psychometrika, 15, 25-47.
22. Cunningham, J.W. (1988). Occupation analysis inventory. In S. Gael (Ed.), The job analysis handbook for business, industry, and government (pp. 975-990). New York: Wiley.
23. Dawis, R.V., and Lofquist, L.H. (1984). A psychological theory of work adjustment: An individual- differences model and its implications. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
24. Decker, P.J., and Nathan, B.R. (1985). Behavior modeling training: Principles and applications. New York: Praeger.
25. Dierdorff, E.C., Drewes, D.W., and Norton, J.J. (2006). O*NET tools and technology: A synopsis of data development procedures. Raleigh, NC: National Center for O*NET Development. Available: http://www.onetcenter.org/reports/T2Development.html [accessed July 2009].
26. Dvorak, B.J. (1947). The new USES General Aptitude Test Battery. Journal of Applied Psychology, 31, 372-376.
27. Fleishman, E.A. (1992). Fleishman Job Analysis Survey (F-JAS). Bethesda, MD: Management Research Institute.
28. Fleishman, E.A., and Reilly, M.E. (1992). Handbook of human abilities: Definitions, measurements, and job task requirements. Potomac, MD: Management Research Institute.
29. Fleishman, E.A., Costanza, D.P., and Marshall-Mies, J. (1999). Abilities. In N.G. Peterson, M.D. Mumford, W.C. Borman, P.R. Jeanneret, and E.A. Fleishman (Eds.), An occupational information system for the 21st century: The development of O*NET (pp. 175- 195). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
30. Geisinger, K.F., Spies, R.A., Carlson, J.F., and Plake, B.S. (Eds.). (2007). The seventeenth mental measurements yearbook. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement.
31. Goldstein, A.P., and Sorcher, M. (1974). Changing supervisory behavior. New York: Pergamon.
32. Holland, J.L., and Gottfredson, G.D. (1976). Using a typology of persons and environments to explain careers: Some extensions and clarifications. Counseling Psychologist, 6, 20-29.
33. Hough, L.M. (1992). The "big five" personality variables-construct confusion: Description versus prediction. Human Performance, 5, 139-155.
34. Jeanneret, P.R., Borman, W.C., Kubisiak, U.C., and Hanson, M.A. (1999). Generalized work activities. In N.G. Peterson, M.D. Mumford, W.C. Borman, P.R. Jeanneret, and E.A. Fleishman (Eds.), An occupational information system for the 21st century: The development of O*NET (pp. 105-125). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
35. Latham, G.P., and Saari, L.M., (1979). Application of social learning theory to training supervisors through behavioral modeling. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 239-246.
36. Lesgold, A.M. (1984). Acquiring expertise. In J.R. Anderson and S.M. Kosslyn (Eds.), Tutorials in learning and memory: Essays in honor of Gordon Bower. New York: Freeman.
37. Lohman, D.F. (1994a). Component scores as residual variation (or why the intercept correlates best). Intelligence, 19, 1-11.
38. Lohman, D.F. (1994b). Implication of cognitive psychology for ability testing: Three critical assumptions. In M.G. Rumsey, C.B. Walker, and J.H. Harris (Eds.), Personnel selection and classification (pp. 145-172). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. McCloy, R.A., Waugh, G., Medsker, G., Wall, J., Rivkin, D., and Lewis, P. (1999). Determining the occupational reinforcer patterns for O*NET occupational units (Volumes I and II). Raleigh, NC: National Center for O*NET Development. Available: http://www.onetcenter.org/reports/ORP.html [accessed July 2009].
40. McCormick, E.J., Jeanneret, P.R., and Meecham, R.C. (1969). The development and background of the Position Analysis Questionnaire (PAQ). (Tech. Rep. #5). Lafayette, IN: Purdue University, Occupational Research Center.
41. McCormick, E.J., Jeanneret, P.R., and Mecham, R.C. (1972). A study of job characteristics and job dimensions as based on the Position Analysis Questionnaire (PAQ). Journal of Applied Psychology, 56, 347-368.
42. Meehl, P.E., and Golden, R. (1982). Taxonomic methods. In P. Kendall and J. Butcher (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in clinical psychology (pp. 127-181). New York: Wiley.
43. Morgan, R.L., Hunt, E.S., and Carpenter, J.M. (1990). Classification of instructional programs.
44. Mumford, M.D., Peterson, N.G., and Childs, R.A. (1999). Basic and cross-functional skills. In N.G. Peterson, M.D. Mumford, W.C. Borman, P.R. Jeanneret, and E.A. Fleishman (Eds.), An occupational information system for the 21st century: The development of O*NET (pp. 49-69). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
45. National Center for O*NET Development. (1998). Appendix D: The development of the O*NET) analyst database. Raleigh, NC: Author. Available: http://www.onetcenter.org/reports/appendix_d.html [accessed November 2009].
46. National Center for O*NET Development. (2003). Summary report: Updating the detailed work activities. Raleigh, NC: Author. Available: http://www.onetcenter.org/dl_files/DWA_ summary.pdf [accessed July 2009].
47. National Research Council. (1980). Work, jobs, and occupations: A critical review of the Dictionary of Occupational Titles. A.R. Miller, D.J. Treiman, P.S. Cain, and P.A. Roos (Eds.).Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Available: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=92 [accessed May 2009].
48. Peterson, N.G., Mumford, M.D., Borman, W.C., Jeanneret, P.R., Fleishman, E.A., and Levin, K.Y. (Eds.). (1997). O*NET Final Technical Report (Vols. 1-3). Salt Lake City: Utah Department of Employment Security, on behalf of the U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration. Available: http://www.eric.ed.gov/ [accessed March 2009].
49. Peterson, N.G., Mumford, M.D., Borman, W.C., Jeanneret, P.R., and Fleishman, E.A. (Eds.). (1999). An occupational information system for the 21st century: The development of O*NET. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
50. Peterson, N.G., Mumford, M.D., Borman, W.C., Jeanneret, P.R., Fleishman, E.A., Levin, K.Y., Campion, M.A., Mayfield, M.S., Morgeson, F.P., Pearlman, K., Gowing, M.K., Lancaster, A.R., Silver, M.B., and Dye, D.M. (2001). Understanding work using the O*NET): Implications for practice and research. Personnel Psychology, 54, 451-492.
51. Rounds, J., Armstrong, P.I., Liao, H., Rivkin, D., and Lewis, P. (2008a). Second generation occupational value profiles for the O*NET system: Summary. Raleigh, NC: National Center for O*NET Development. Available: http://www.onetcenter.org/reports/ SecondOVP_Summary.html [accessed July 2009].
52. Rounds, J., Armstrong, P.I., Liao, H., Lewis, P. and Rivkin, D. (2008b). Second generation occupational interest profiles for the O*NET system: Summary. Available: http://www.onetcenter.org/reports/SecondOIP_Summary.html [accessed July 2009].
53. Sager, C.E. (1997). O*NET final technical report, volumes I, II and III. Salt Lake City: Utah State Department of Workforce Services on behalf of the U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration. Available: http://www.eric.ed.gov/ [accessed July 2009].
54. Sager, C.E. (1999). O*NET (pp. 197-211). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
55. Sager, C.E., Mumford, M.D., Baughman, W.A., and Childs, R.A. (1999). O*NET (pp. 227-235). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
56. Strong, M.H., Jeanneret, P.R., McPhail, S.M., Blakley, B.R., and D'Egidio, E.L. (1999). Work context: Taxonomy and measurement of the work environment. In N.G. Peterson, M.D. Mumford, W.C. Borman, P.R. Jeanneret, and E.A. Fleishman (Eds.), An occupational information system for the 21st century: The development of O*NET (pp. 127-145). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
57. U.S. Department of Labor. (1991). Dictionary of occupational titles (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
58. Advisory Panel for the Dictionary of Occupational Titles. (1993). The new DOT: A database of occupational titles for the twenty-first century (final report). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration.
59. Calig, J., and Ewald, K. (2009). O*NET and workforce development: Assessing opportunities. Paper prepared for the Panel to Review the O*NET). Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/Ewald%20and%20Calig %20paper.pdf [accessed June 2009].
60. Ewald, K. (2009). O*NET and workforce development: Assessing opportunities. Presentation to the Panel to Review the O*NET). Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/Ewald%20Power%20point.pdf [accessed June 2009].
61. Janis, L. (2009). Summary of responses to Les Janis survey on use of O*NET in career development. Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/Janis%20Survey%20 Summary%20Responses.pdf [accessed June 2009].
62. Karman, S. (2009). Definition of disability: What compels SSA to use DO*NET), March 26. Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/Karman%20Power%20point.pdf [accessed June 2009].
63. Levine, J., Nottingham, J., Paige, B., and Lewis, P. (2001). Transitioning O*NET to the Standard Occupational Classification. Available: http://www.onetcenter.org/reports/ TRreport_xwk.html [accessed June 2009].
64. Lewis, P., and Rivkin, D. (2009). O*NET program briefing. Presentation to the Panel to Review the O*NET). Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/Rivkin%20and%20Lewis%20O*NET%20Center%20 presentation.pdf [accessed November 2009].
65. Lewis, P., Russos, H., and Frugoli, P. (2001). O*NET occupational listings, database 3.0. Available: http://www.onetcenter.org/dl_files/3_1Intro.pdf [accessed July 2009].
66. National Center for O*NET Development. (2006a). Updating the O*NET-SOC taxonomy. Raleigh, NC: Author. Available: http://www.onetcenter.org/dl_files/UpdatingTaxonomy_ Summary.pdf [accessed June 2009].
67. National Center for O*NET Development. (2006b). New and emerging occupations methodology development report. Available: http://www.onetcenter.org/reports/NewEmerging.html [accessed June 2009].
68. National Center for O*NET Development. (2009). New and emerging occupations of the 21 st century: Updating the O*NET-SOC taxonomy. Available: http://www.onetcenter.org/reports/UpdatingTaxonomy2009.html [accessed July 2009].
69. National Research Council. (1980). Work, jobs, and occupations: A critical review of the Dictionary of Occupational Titles. A.R. Miller, D.J. Treiman, P.S. Cain, and P.A. Roos (Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Available: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=92 [accessed May 2009].
70. Office of Management and Budget. (1999). SOC Federal Register notice. Available: http:// www.bls.gov/soc/soc_sept.htm [accessed June 2009].
71. Office of Management and Budget. (2009). 2010 Standard Occupational Classification (SOC): Final decisions: Notice. Federal Register, 74 (12), 3920-3936. Available: http://www.bls.gov/soc/soc2010final.pdf [accessed May 2009].
72. Reamer, A., Carnevale, C., Nyegaard, K.D., Judy, R., Poole, K., Alssid, J., Stevens, D., Reedy, E.J., Dorrer, J., and Weeks, G. (2009). Comments in response to ETA proposed O*NET data collection program. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/Andrew%20Reamer%20Comments%20on%20O*NET.pdf [accessed November 2009].
73. Sommers, D. (2009). O*NET and the Standard O*NET). March 26. Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/Sommers.O*NET%20Panel%20Statement.pdf [accessed July 2009].
74. U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration. (2008). O*NET data collection program, Office of Management and Budget clearance package supporting statement, Volume 1. Raleigh, NC: Author. Available: http://www.onetcenter.org/dl_files/ omb2008/Supporting_Statement2.pdf [accessed June 2009].
75. American Association for Public Opinion Research. (2008). Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. Available: http://www.aapor.org/uploads/Standard_Definitions_04_08_Final.pdf [accessed July 2009].
76. Berzofsky, M., Welch, B., Williams, R., and Biemer, P. (2008). Using a model-aided sampling paradigm instead of a traditional sampling paradigm in a nationally representative establishment survey. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI Press.
77. Butler, S.K., and Harvey, R.J. (1988). A comparison of holistic versus decomposed ratings of Position Analysis Questionnaire work dimensions. Personnel Psychology, 41, 761-771.
78. Conrad, F. (2009). Sources of error in cognitive interviews. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73, 32-55.
79. Cornelius, E.T., and Lyness, K.S. (1980). A comparison of holistic and decomposed judgment strategies in job analysis by job incumbents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 155-163.
80. Couper, M. (2008). Designing effective web surveys. New York: Cambridge University Press.
81. Couper, M., Lessler, J., Martin, E., Martin, J., Presser, S., Rothgeb, J., and Singer, E. (2004). Methods for testing and evaluating survey questionnaires. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.
82. Dawis, R.V., and Lofquist, L.H. (1984). A psychological theory of work adjustment: An individual differences model and its applications. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
83. Dierdorff, E.C., and Morgeson, F.P. (in press). Effects of descriptor specificity and observability on incumbent work analyst ratings. Personnel Psychology.
84. Dierdorff, E.C., and Wilson, M.A. (2003). A meta-analysis of job analysis reliability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 635-646.
85. Donsbach, J., Tsacoumis, S., Sager, C., and Updegraff, J. (2003). O*NET analyst occupational abilities ratings: Procedures. Raleigh, NC: National Center for O*NET Development. Available: http://www.onetcenter.org/reports/AnalystProc.html [accessed July 2009].
86. Fleishman, E.A. (1992). The Fleishman-Job Analysis Survey (F-JAS). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
87. Fleishman, E.A., and Mumford, M.D. (1988). The abilities requirement scales. In S. Gael (Ed.), The job analysis handbook for business, industry, and government. New York: Wiley.
88. Forsyth, B.H., and Lessler, J.T. (1991). Cognitive laboratory methods: A taxonomy. In P.P. Biemer, R.M. Groves, L.E. Lyberg, N.A. Mathoiwetz, and S. Sudman (Eds.), Measurement errors in surveys (pp. 393-418). New York: Wiley.
89. Gottfredson, G.D., and Holland, J.L. (1989). Dictionary of Holland occupational codes. Second edition. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
90. Gustafson, S.B., and Rose, A. (2003). Investigating O*NET's suitability for the Social Security Administration's disability determination process. Journal of Forensic Vocational Analysis, 6, 3-15.
91. Handel, M. (2009). The O*NET content model: Strengths and limitations. Paper prepared for the Panel to Review the O*NET). Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/MHandel%20O*NET%20Issues.pdf [accessed July 2009].
92. Harvey, R.J. (2009a). The O*NET: Flaws, fallacies, and folderol. Presentation to the Panel to Review the O*NET), April 17. Available: http:// www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/O*NET_RJHarvey_Presentation.pdf [accessed August 2009].
93. Harvey, R.J. (2009b). The O*NET: Do too abstract titles + unverifiable holistic ratings + questionable raters + low agreement + inadequate sampling + aggregation bias = (a) validity, (b) reliability, (c) utility, or (d) none of the above? Paper prepared for the Panel to Review the O*NET). Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/O*NET_RJHArvey_Paper1.pdf [accessed July 2009].
94. Harvey, R.J., and Wilson, M.A. (2000). Yes Virginia, there is an objective reality in job analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 829-854.
95. Hubbard, M., McCloy, R., Campbell, J., Nottingham, J., Lewis, P., Rivkin, D., and Levine, J. (2000). Revision of O*NET data collection instruments. Raleigh, NC: National Center for O*NET Development. Available: http://www.onetcenter.org/reports/Data_appnd.html [accessed September 2009].
96. Krueger, R. (1988). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
97. Lewis, P., and Rivkin, D. (2009a). O*NET program briefing. Presentation to the Panel to Review the O*NET), February 3rd. Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/Rivkin%20and%20Lewis%20O*NET%20 Center%20presentation.pdf [accessed July 2009].
98. Lewis, P., and Rivkin, D. (2009b). Criteria considered when selecting occupations for future O*NET data collection waves. Document submitted to the Panel to Review the O*NET). Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/Criteria%20for%20Data%20Collection%20Occupation%20Selection.pdf [accessed July 2009].
99. Lievens, F., and Sanchez, J.I. (2007). Can training improve the quality of inferences made by raters in competency modeling? A quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92 (3), 812-819.
100. Lievens, F., Sanchez, J.I., and DaCorte, W. (2004). Easing the inferential leap in competency modeling: The effects of task-related information and subject matter expertise. Personnel Psychology, 57 (4), 847-879.
101. National Center for O*NET Development and RTI. (2009a). O*NET survey and sampling questions, 4-01-09. Written response to questions from the Panel to Review the O*NET). Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/O*NET_Survey_Sampling_Questions.pdf [accessed July 2009].
102. National Center for O*NET Development and RTI. (2009b). Responses to questions from the 4/17 /09 O*NET meeting. Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/ National_O*NET_Response_re_Additional_Statistics_and_Survey_Methods_Questions.pdf [accessed July 2009].
103. National Center for O*NET Development and RTI. (2009c). O*NET data collection program: Statistical procedures for deviant case detection. Written response to questions from the Panel to Review the O*NET). Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/Deviance%20Testing%20Procedures.pdf [accessed June 2009].
104. National Center for O*NET Development. (no date). Questionnaires. Available: http://www.onetcenter.org/questionnaires.html [accessed July 2009].
105. Peterson, N.G., Mumford, M.D., Borman, W.C., Jeanneret, P.R, and Fleishman, E.A. (Eds.). (1999). An occupational information system for the 21 st century: The development of O*NET. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
106. Peterson, N.G., Mumford, M.D., Borman, W.C., Jeanneret, P.R., Fleishman, E.A., and Levin, K.Y. (1997). O*NET final technical report. Volumes I-III. Salt Lake City: Utah State Department of Workforce Services, on behalf of the U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration. Available: http://eric.ed.gov [accessed June 2009].
107. Peterson, N.G., Owens-Kurtz, C., Hoffman, R. G., Arabian, J.M., and Wetzel, D.C. (1990). Army synthetic validation project. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral Sciences.
108. Research Triangle Institute. (2008). O*NET data collection program, PDF questionnaires. Available: https://onet.rti.org/pdf/index.cfm [accessed July 2009].
109. Sager, C. (1997). O*NET final technical report, volumes I, II and III. Salt Lake City: Utah State Department of Workforce Services on behalf of the U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration. Available: http://eric.ed.gov [accessed July 2009].
110. Sanchez, J.I., and Levine, E.L. (2000). Accuracy or consequential validity: Which is the better standard for job analysis data? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 809-818.
111. Sanchez, J.I., Prager, I., Wilson, A., and Viswesvaran, C. (1998). Understanding within-job title variance in job-analytic ratings. Journal of Business and Psychology, 12, 407-420.
112. Sanchez, J.I., Zamora, A., and Viswesvaran, C. (1997). Moderators of agreement between incumbent and nonincumbent ratings of job characteristics. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70, 209-218.
113. Tsacoumis, S. (2009a). O*NET analyst ratings. Presentation to the Panel to Review the O*NET). Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/O*NET_Suzanne_Tsacoumis_Presentation.pdf [accessed May 2009].
114. Tsacoumis, S. (2009b). Responses to Harvey's criticisms of HumRRO*NET analysts' ratings. Paper provided to the Panel to Review the O*NET). Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/Response%20to %20RJ%20Harvey%20Criticism.pdf [accessed August 2009].
115. Tsacoumis, S., and Van Iddekinge, C. (2006). A comparison of incumbent and analyst ratings of O*NET skills. Available: http://www.onetcenter.org/reports/SkillsComp.html [accessed August 2009].
116. U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration. (2008). O*NET data collection program, Office of Management and Budget clearance package supporting statement, Volumes I and II. Raleigh, NC: Author. Available: http://www.onetcenter.org/dl_files/omb2008/Supporting_Statement2.pdf [accessed June 2009].
117. Van Iddekinge, C., Tsacoumis, S., and Donsbach, J. (2003). A preliminary analysis of occupational task statements from the O*NET data collection program. Raleigh, NC: National Center for O*NET Development. Available: http://www.onetcenter.org/dl_files/ TaskAnalysis.pdf [accessed July,2009].
118. Willis, G. (2005). Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
119. Willison, S., and Tsacoumis, S. (2009). O*NET analyst occupational abilities ratings: Analysis cycle 9 results. Available: http://www.onetcenter.org/reports/Wave9.html [accessed August 2009].
120. Allemang, D., and Hendler, J. (2008). Semantic web for the working ontologist: Effective modeling in RDFS and OWL. Amsterdam: Morgan Kaufmann.
121. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., and Lassila, O. (2001). The semantic web. Scientific American Magazine. May.
122. Bizer, C., Heese, R., Mochol, M., Oldakowski, R., Tolksdorf, R., and Eckstein, R. (2005). The impact of semantic web technologies on job recruitment processes. In O.K. Ferstl, E.J. Sinz, S. Eckert, and T. Isselhorst (Eds.), Wirtschaftsinformatik 2005: eEconomy, eGovernment, eSociety (pp. 1367-1381). Heidelburg: Physica-Verlag HD.
123. Bohring, H., and Auer, S. (2005). Mapping XML to OWL ontologies. Abstract available: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.59.8897 [accessed July 2009].
124. Butler, S. (2009). Improving the usability of O*NET. Presentation to the Panel to Review the O*NET). Available: http://www7.national academies.org/cfe/O*NET_Scott_Butler_Presentation.pdf [accessed May 2009].
125. Cyganiak, R., and Jentzch, A. (2009). The linking open data dataset cloud. Available: http:// richard.cyganiak.de/2007/10/lod/ [accessed August 2009].
126. Davis, S. (2007). GIS for web developers: Adding "where" to your web applications. Lewisville, TX: Pragmatic Bookshelf.
127. Dierdorff, E.C., Drewes, D.W., and Norton, J.J. (2006). O*NET tools and technology: A synopsis of data development procedures. Raleigh, NC: National Center for O*NET Development. Available: http://www.onetcenter.org/reports/T2Development.html [accessed July 2009].
128. Graybill, B. (2009). O*NET). Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/Graybill%20Power%20point.pdf [accessed July 2009].
129. Hunt, B. (2008a). Save the pixel: The art of simple web design. Available: http://savethepixel.org/save_the_pixel_ch1.pdf [accessed July 2009].
130. Hunt, B. (2008b). Web design from scratch: Basics. Available: http://webdesignfromscratch.com/basics.php [accessed May 2009].
131. Janis, L. (2009). O*NET uses in career guidance. Presentation to the Panel to Review the O*NET). Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/Janis%20Power%20point.pdf [accessed July 2009].
132. Lewis, P.M., and Rivkin, D.R. (2009a). O*NET program briefing, February 3. Presentation to the Panel to Review the O*NET). Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/Rivkin%20and%20Lewis%20O*NET%20 Center%20presentation.pdf [accessed July 2009].
133. Lewis, P.M., and Rivkin, D.R. (2009b). General user feedback on O*NET. Presentation to the Panel to Review the O*NET), March 26. Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/Rivkin%20and%20Lewis%20Power%20point.pdf [accessed March 2009)]
134. National Center for O*NET Development. (2009). O*NET products at work. Raleigh, NC: Author.
135. Powers, S. (2003). Practical RDF. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly.
136. Sadler, E. (2009). Small pieces loosely joined: An argument for publishing O*NET as linked data. Presentation to the Panel to Review the O*NET). Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/O*NET_Elizabeth_Sadler_ Presentation.pdf [accessed July 2009].
137. Schroeder, D., Joubert, D., Meyer, P., Steinhauser, L., and Walker, A. (2009). Report and recommendations on web 2.0 and social software federal knowledge management working group of the federal knowledge management initiative. Available: http://wiki.nasa.gov/cm/wiki/?id=7733 [accessed December 2009].
138. Ta'eed, C. (2009). Essential principles for good web design. Available: http://psd.tutsplus.com/ designing-tutorials/9-essential-principles-for-good-web-design/ [accessed May 2009].
139. Tufte, E. (1990). Envisioning information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
140. U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration. (2008). O*NET data collection program, Office of Management and Budget clearance package supporting statement, Volumes I and II. Raleigh, NC: Author. Available: http://www.onetcenter.org/dl_files/omb2008/Supporting_Statement2.pdf [accessed June 2009].
141. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Web Workgroup. (2008). Environmental Protection Agency Web 2.0 whitepaper. Washington, DC: Author.
142. World Wide Web Consortium. (2009). W3C semantic web activity. Available: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/ [accessed May 2009].
143. Calig, J., and Ewald, K. (2009). O*NET and workforce development: Assessing opportunities. Paper prepared for the Panel to Review the O*NET). Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/Ewald%20and%20Calig %20paper.pdf [accessed July 2009].
144. Clark, H. (2009). TO*NET). Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/Clark-TORQ%20paper.pdf [accessed July 2009].
145. Dierdorff, E.C., Norton, J.J., Drewes, D.D., Kroustalis, C.M., Rivkin, D., and Lewis, P. (2009). Greening of the world of work: Implications for O*NET-SOC and new and emerging occupations. Available: http://www.onetcenter.org/reports/Green.html [accessed July 2009].
146. Dorman, R. (2009). Manpower's use of O*NET. Presentation to the NRC Panel to Review the Occupational Information Network. Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/ cfe/Dorman%20Power%20point.pdf [accessed November 2009].
147. Ewald, K. (2009). O*NET and workforce development: Assessing opportunities. Presentation to the NRC Panel to Review the Occupational Information Network. Available: http:// www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/Ewald%20Power%20point.pdf [accessed July 2009].
148. Froeschle, R. (2009). O*NET DWAs and market driven talent development model. Presentation to the Panel to Review the O*NET). Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/Froeschle%20Power%20point.pdf [accessed July 2009].
149. Ginsburg, R., and Robinson, D. (2006). Illinois' future workforce: Will there be enough workers with the right skills? DeKalb: Northern Illinois University and the Center for Tax and Budget Accountability. Available: http://www.stateofworkingillinois.niu.edu/ swil/pubs/2006_Future_Workforce:PolicyBrief.pdf [accessed July 2009].
150. Graybill, B. (2009a). O*NET). Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/Graybill%20Power%20point.pdf [accessed July 2009].
151. Graybill, B. (2009b). Uses of O*NET by State of California-January 2009. Document provided to the Panel to Review the O*NET). Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/Graybill%20current%20uses%20paper.pdf [accessed July 2009].
152. Hanser, L.M., Campbell, J., Pearlman, K., Petho, F., Plewes, T., and Spenner, K. (2008). Final report of the Panel on the Department of Defense Human Capital Strategy. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
153. Janis, L. (2009a). O*NET uses in career guidance. Presentation to the Panel to Review the O*NET). Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/Janis%20Power%20point.pdf [accessed July 2009].
154. Janis, L. (2009b). Summary of responses to Les Janis Survey on use of O*NET in career development. Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/Janis%20Survey%20S ummary%20Responses.pdf [accessed July 2009].
155. National Center for Education Statistics. (no date). The Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Classification of Instructional Programs (CIP). Available: http:// nces.ed.gov/ipeds/cipcode/Default.aspx?y=55 [accessed July 2009].
156. National Center for O*NET Development. (2003). Summary report: Updating the detailed work activities. Available: http://www.onetcenter.org/reports/DWA_summary.html [accessed November 2009].
157. National Center for O*NET Development. (2006). Updating the O*NET-SOC taxonomy. Raleigh, NC: Author. Available: http://www.onetcenter.org/dl_files/UpdatingTaxonomy_ Summary.pdf [accessed July 2009].
158. National Center for O*NET Development. (no date, a). O*NET Resource Center: What's new. Available: http://www.onetcenter.org/whatsnew.html#2009060201 [accessed June 2009].
159. National Center for O*NET Development. (no date, b). Browse by in-demand industry cluster: Education. Available: http://online.onetcenter.org/find/indemand?i=EDU&g=Go [accessed June 2009].
160. National Research Council. (2008). Research evidence related to future skill demands: A workshop summary. Margaret Hilton, Rapporteur. Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
161. Office of Management and Budget. (2009). 2010 Standard Occupational Classification (SOC): Final decisions: Notice. Federal Register, 74 (12), 3920-3936. Available: http://www.bls.gov/soc/soc2010final.pdf [accessed June 2009].
162. Tsacoumis, S. (2007). The feasibility of using O*NET to study skill changes. Paper presented to the National Research Council Workshop on Research Evidence Related to Future Skill Demands. Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/Future_Skill_ Demands_Commissioned_Papers.html [accessed May 2009].
163. U.S. Department of Labor. (2009). ETA mission statement. Available: http://www.doleta.gov/etainfo/mission.cfm [accessed May 2009].
164. Anderson, L. (2009). Uses of O*NET in human resource management. Presentation to the Panel to Review the O*NET). Available: http:// www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/Anderson%20Power%20point.pdf [accessed July 2009].
165. Anderson, L., Cronins, C., Martin, C., Swetharanyan, S., and Weingart, E. (2007). Entry-level transportation construction workforce shortages. Report provided to Florida Department of Transportation, FDOT Contract # BDF05. Available: http://144.171.11.107/Main/ Public/Blurbs/159590.aspx [accessed October 2009].
166. Anderson, L., Morath, R., Light, E., and Wilken, J.A. (2004). Estimating the dollar utility of changes in job performance due to seasonal allergic rhinitis and its treatment. Human Performance, 17, 43-69.
167. Andreassi, J.K., and Thompson, C.A. (2007). Dispositional and situational sources of control: Relative impact on work-family conflict and positive spillover. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 722-740.
168. Coaster, J.A., and Christiansen, N.D. (2009). Effects of occupational requirements on the validity of personality tests. Presented at the Annual Conference of SIOP, April, New Orleans.
169. Converse, P.D., O*NET: Issues and an application in career guidance. Personnel Psychology, 57, 451-487.
170. D'Egidio, E.L. (2002). Building a job component validity model using job analysis data from the occupational information network. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 62 (11-B), 5416.
171. DeLuca, D., and Hirsh, W. (2009, March 5). Comments on the O*NET). Letter from the Workforce Sciences Group at Mercer to the Panel to Review the O*NET). Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/Mercer%20Associates%20Comments%20on%20O*NET.pdf [accessed July 2009].
172. Dierdorff, E. (2009). Improving O*NET: Perspectives on the content model. Presentation to the Panel to Review the O*NET). Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/O*NET_Erich_Dierdorff_Presentation.pdf [accessed July 2009].
173. Dorman, R. (2009). Manpower's use of O*NET. Presentation to the Panel to Review the O*NET). Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/Dorman%20Power%20point.pdf [accessed July 2009].
174. Handel, M. (2009). The O*NET content model: Strengths and limitations. Presentation to the Panel to Review the O*NET). Available: http:// www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/O*NET_Michael_Handel_Presentation.pdf [accessed July 2009].
175. Harvey, R.J. (2009, April). The O*NET: Do too-abstract titles + unverifiable holistic ratings + questionable raters + low agreement + inadequate sampling + aggregation bias = (a) validity, (b) reliability, (c) utility, or (d) none of the above? Paper prepared for the Panel to Review the O*NET). Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/O*NET_RJHArvey_Paper1.pdf [accessed July 2009].
176. Jeanneret, P.R. (2009). Use of O*NET in job analysis. Presentation to the Panel to Review the O*NET). Available: http://www7.national academies.org/cfe/Jeanneret%20PP.pdf [accessed July 2009].
177. Jeanneret, P.R., and Strong, M.H. (2003). Linking O*NET job analysis information to job requirement predictors: An O*NET application. Personnel Psychology, 56, 465-492.
178. Johnson, J.W., Carter, G.W., and Dorsey, D.W. (2003, April). Linking O*NET descriptors to occupational aptitudes using job component validation. Paper presented at the 18th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando, FL.
179. Karman, S. (2009). Definition of disability: What compels SSA to use DO*NET). Workshop on Uses of O*NET, March 26. Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/ Karman%20Power%20point.pdf [accessed June 2009].
180. LaPolice, C.C., Carter, G.W., and Johnson, J.W. (2008). Linking O*NET descriptors to occupational literacy requirements using job component validation. Personnel Psychology, 61, 405-442.
181. Liu, C., Spector, P.E., and Jex, S.M. (2005). The relation of job control with job strains: A comparison of multiple data sources. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 325-337.
182. Morgeson, F. (2009). Thoughts about O*NET. Presentation to the Panel to Review the O*NET). Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/O*NET_Fred_Morgeson_Presentation.pdf [accessed July 2009].
183. National Center for O*NET Development. (2009a). O*NET products at work 2009. Raleigh, NC: Author.
184. National Center for O*NET Development. (2009b). Sample spotlight: Profiles of O*NET users. Raleigh, NC: Author.
185. National Research Council. (1999). The changing nature of work: Implications for occupational analysis. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
186. Peterson, N.G., Mumford, M.D., Borman, W.C., Jeanneret, P.R., and Fleishman, E.A. (1999). An occupational information system for the 21 st century: The development of O*NET. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
187. Peterson, N.G., Mumford, M.D., Borman, W.C., Jeanneret, P.R., Fleishman, E.A., Levin, K.Y., Campion, M.A., Mayfield, M.S., Morgeson, F.P., Pearlman, K., Gowing, M.K., Lancaster, A.R., Silver, M.B., and Dye, D.M. (2001). Understanding work using the occupational information network (O*NET): Implications for practice and research. Personnel Psychology, 54, 451-492.
188. Reiter-Palmon, R., Brown, M., Sandall, D.L., Buboltz, C., and Nimps, T. (2006). Development of an O*NET web-based job analysis and its implementation in the U.S. Navy: Lessons learned. Human Resource Management Review, 16, 294-309.
189. Ryan, A.M., and Pearlman, K. (2009). Summary of responses to survey on use of O*NET in human resource management and job analysis. Paper prepared for the Panel to Review the O*NET). Available: http://nrc51/xpedio/groups/ dbasse/documents/websupport/051750.pdf [accessed July 2009].
190. Styer, J. (2009). 2008 O*NET). Workshop on Uses of O*NET, March 26. Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/Styer.ASVAB%20Action%20%20Story.pdf [accessed July 2009].
191. Taylor, P.J., Li, W., Shi, K., and Borman, W.C. (2008). The transportability of job information across countries. Personnel Psychology, 61, 69-111.
192. Tsacoumis, S. (2009). Responses to Harvey's criticisms of HumRRO*NET analysts' ratings. Paper prepared for the Panel to Review the O*NET). Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/Response%20to %20RJ%20Harvey%20Criticism.pdf [accessed July 2009].
193. U.S. Department of Labor. (2008). O*NET data collection program, Office of Management and Budget clearance package supporting statement, Volume 1. Raleigh, NC: Author. Available: http://www.onetcenter.org/dl_files/omb2008/Supporting_Statement2.pdf [accessed June 2009].
194. Astrue, M.J. (2008, December 23). Establishment of the Occupational Information Development Advisory Panel. Federal Register, 73(247), 78864. Available: http://www.social security.gov/oidap/Documents/federal_register/federal_register.htm [accessed November 2009].
195. Cannelongo, J.M. (2009). Statement to the Social Security Advisory Board. Available: http:// www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/Social%20Security%20Advisory%20Board%20 Presentation.pdf [accessed September 2009].
196. Fleishman, E.A., and Quaintance, M.K. (1984). Taxonomies of human performance. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
197. Fleishman, E.A., and Reilly, M.E. (1992). Handbook of human abilities. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
198. Government Accounting Office. (2002a, July 11). SSA disability programs: Fully updating disability criteria has implications for program design. Available: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d02919t.pdf [accessed November 2009].
199. Government Accounting Office. (2002b, August). SSA and VA disability programs reexamination of disability criteria needed to help ensure program integrity. Available: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d02597.pdf [accessed November 2009].
200. Guion, R.M., and Highhouse, S. (2006). Essentials of personnel assessment and selection. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
201. Gustafson, S.B., and Rose, A. (2003). Investigating O*NET's suitability for the Social Security Administration's disability determination process. Journal of Forensic Vocational Analysis, 6, 3-15.
202. Harvey, R.J. (2009). The O*NET: Do too abstract titles + unverifiable holistic ratings + questionable raters + low agreement + inadequate sampling + aggregation bias = (a) validity, (b) reliability, (c) utility, or (d) none of the above? Paper prepared for the Panel to Review the O*NET). Available: http://www7.national academies.org/cfe/O*NET_RJHArvey_Paper1.pdf [accessed July 2009].
203. Hogan, J. (1991). Structure of physical performance in occupational tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 495-507.
204. Institute of Medicine. (1998). The Social Security Administration's decision process: A framework for research, 2nd interim report. Committee to Review the Social Security Administration's Disability Decision Process Research, G.S. Wunderlich and D.P. Rice (Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
205. Institute of Medicine. (2002). The dynamics of disability: Measuring and monitoring disability. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
206. Karman, S. (2009). Definition of disability: What compels SSA to use DO*NET). Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/Karman%20Power%20point.pdf. [accessed June 2009].
207. Lechner, D., Cannelongo, J., and Keener, J. (2002). Feasibility of internet-based training and reliability of internet-trained analysts. Submitted by Aguirre International under Department of Labor Contract BB-12266-02-03. Washington, DC: Aguirre International.
208. National Center for O*NET Development. (no date). Questionnaires. Available: http://www.onetcenter.org/questionnaires.html [accessed July 2009].
209. National Center for O*NET Development. (1998). Appendix D: The development of the O*NET) analyst database. Raleigh, NC: Author. Available: http://www.onetcenter.org/reports/appendix_d.html [accessed November 2009].
210. Social Security Administration. (2008). Physical residual functional capacity assessment. Form SSA-4734-BK (08-2008). Washington, DC: Author.
211. Social Security Administration, Office of Disability. (1999, June 30). Policy instruction DDSAL-507. Washington, DC: Author.
212. Social Security Administration Occupational Information Advisory Panel. (2009). Content model and classification recommendations for the Social Security Administration Occupational Information System. Available: http://www.socialsecurity.gov/oidap/Documents/ Occupational%20Information%20Development%20Advisory%20Panel.pdf [accessed November 2009].
213. Social Security Advisory Board. (2001, January). Charting the future of Social Security's disability programs: The need for fundamental change. Available: http://www.ssab.gov/ Publications/Disability/disabilitywhitepap.pdf [accessed November 2009].
214. Woods, J. (2009, January 13). Testimony to the Social Security Advisory Board. Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/Woods%20Testimony%20to%20SSA.pdf [accessed January 2010]. Unpublished document provided to the Panel to Review the Occupational Information Network.
215. Advisory Panel for the Dictionary of Occupational Titles. (1993). The new DOT: A database of occupational titles for the twenty-first century (final report). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration.
216. Andreassi, J.K., and Thompson, C.A. (2007). Dispositional and situational sources of control: Relative impact on work-family conflict and positive spillover. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 722-740.
217. Autor, D.H., and Handel, M. (2009). Putting tasks to the test: Human capital, job tasks and wages. Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, May.
218. Autor, D.H., Levy, F., and Murnane, R.J. (2003). The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118 (3), 1279-1333.
219. Blinder, A. (2007). How many U.S. jobs might be offshorable? Princeton University Center for Economic Policy Studies Working Paper No. 142, March. Available: http://www.princeton.edu/ceps/workingpapers/142blinder.pdf [accessed December 2009].
220. Blinder, A.S., and Krueger, A.B. (2009). Alternative measures of offshorability: A survey approach. Princeton University Center for Economic Policy Studies Working Paper No. 190, August. Available: http://www.princeton.edu/ceps/workingpapers/190blinder.pdf [accessed November 2009].
221. Card, D. (1990). The impact of the Mariel Boatlift on the Miami labor market. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 43, 245-257.
222. Cortes, P. (2008). The effect of low-skilled immigration on U.S. prices: Evidence from CPI data. Journal of Political Economy, 116 (3), 381-422.
223. Dierdorff, E.C., and Ellington, J.K. (2008). It's the nature of the work: Examining behaviorbased sources of work-family conflict across occupations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 883-892.
224. Dierdorff, E.C., and Morgeson, F.P. (2007). Consensus in work role requirements: The influence of discrete occupational context on role expectations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1228-1241.
225. Dierdorff, E.C., and Morgeson, F.P. (2009). Effects of descriptor specificity and observability on incumbent work analyst ratings. Personnel Psychology, 62, 601-628.
226. Dierdorff, E.C., and Rubin, R.S. (2007). Carelessness and discriminability in work role requirement judgments: Influences of role ambiguity and cognitive complexity. Personnel Psychology, 60, 597-625.
227. Dierdorff, E.C., Rubin, R.S., and Morgeson, F.P. (2009). The milieu of managerial work: An integrative framework linking work context to role requirements. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 972-988.
228. Dustmann, C., Ludsteck, J., and Schönberg, U. (in press). Revisiting the German wage structure. Quarterly Journal of Economics.
229. Felstead, A., Gallie, D., Green, F., and Zhou, Y. (2007). Skills at work, 1986 to 2006. ESRC Centre on Skills, Knowledge and Organisational Performance, University of Oxford.
230. Goos, M., Manning, A., and Salomons, A. (2009). Job polarization in Europe. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 99 (2), 58-63.
231. Handel, M.J. (2007). A new survey of workplace skills, technology, and management practices (STAMP): Background and descriptive statistics. Paper presented at Workshop on Research Evidence Related to Future Skill Demands, National Academies, Washington, DC. Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/Future_Skill_Demands_Michael_ Handel_Paper.pdf [accessed July 2009].
232. Handel, M.J. (2008a). Measuring job content: Skills, technology, and management practices. Institute for Research on Poverty Discussion Paper No. 1357-08. Madison: University of Wisconsin.
233. Handel, M.J. (2008b). What do people do at work? A profile of U.S. Jobs from the Survey of Workplace Skills, Technology, and Management Practices (STAMP). Paper presented at the Labor Seminar, Wharton School of Management, University of Pennsylvania.
234. Handel, M.J. (2009). The ONET content model: Strengths and limitations. Paper prepared for the Panel to Review the Occupational Information Network (ONET). Available: http://nrc51/xpedio/groups/dbasse/documents/websupport/051537.doc [accessed July 2009].
235. Howell, D.R., and Wolff, E.N. (1991). Trends in the growth and distribution of skills in the U.S. workplace, 1960-1985. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 41, 486-502.
236. Hubbard, M., McCloy, R., Campbell, J., Nottingham, J., Lewis, P., Rivkin, D., and Levine, J. (2000). Revision of ONET data collection instruments. Raleigh, NC: National Center for ONET Development. Available: http://www.onetcenter.org/reports/Data_appnd.html [accessed September 2009].
237. Liu, C., Spector, P.E., and Jex, S.M. (2005). The relation of job control with job strains: A comparison of multiple data sources. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 325-337.
238. Morgeson, F.P., Reider, M.H., and Campion, M.A. (2005). Selecting individuals in team settings: The importance of social skills, personality characteristics, and teamwork knowledge. Personnel Psychology, 58, 583-611.
239. National Center for ONET Development. (no date). Questionnaires. Available: http://www.onetcenter.org/questionnaires.html [accessed July 2009].
240. National Research Council. (2007). Putting people on the map: Protecting confidentiality with linked social-spatial data. Panel on Confidentiality and Data Access Arising from the Integration of Remotely Sensed and Self-Identifying Data. M.P. Gutmann and P.C. Stern (Eds.). Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
241. National Research Council. (2008). Research on future skill demands: A workshop summary. M. Hilton, Rapporteur. Center for Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
242. National Research Council. (2009). Protecting student records and facilitating education research. M. Hilton, Rapporteur. Committee on National Statistics and Center for Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
243. Peri, G., and Sparber, C. (in press). Task specialization, immigration and wages. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics.
244. Peterson, N.G., Mumford, M.D., Borman, W.C., Jeanneret, P.R, and Fleishman, E.A. (1999). An occupational information system for the 21 st century: The development of ONET. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
245. Peterson, N.G., Mumford, M.D., Borman, W.C., Jeanneret, P.R., Fleishman, E.A., Levin, K.Y., Campion, M.A., Mayfield, M.S., Morgeson, F.P., Pearlman, K., Gowing, M.K., Lancaster, A.R., Silver, M.B., and Dye, D.M. (2001). Understanding work using the occupational information network (ONET): Implications for practice and research. Personnel Psychology, 54, 451-492.
246. Smith, T., and Rivkin, J.W. (2008). A replication study of Alan Blinder's "How many U.S. jobs might be offshorable?" Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 08-104, June. Available: http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/5975.html [accessed November 2009].
247. Spitz-Oener, A. (2006). Technical change, job tasks and rising educational demands: Looking outside the wage structure. Journal of Labor Economics, 24 (2), 235-270.
248. Tracey, J.B., Sturman, M.C., and Tews, M.J. (2007). Ability versus personality: Factors that predict employee job performance. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 48 (3), 313-322.
249. U.S. Department of Labor. (1972). Handbook for analyzing jobs. Washington, DC: Author, Manpower Administration.
250. U.S. Department of Labor. (1991). Dictionary of occupational titles: Revised fourth edition. Washington, DC: Author, Employment and Training Administration.
251. Wiita, N.E., and Palmer, H.T. (2009, April). ONET in-demand occupations: Estimating skill levels for success. Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology.