Rare earth at Bearlodge: anthropocentric and biocentric perspectives of mining development in a multiple use landscape

Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 189-199

  Jenkins, Jeffrey ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Anthropocentric; Biocentric; Environmental assessment; Extractive industries; Land use conflict; Q method

Indexed keywords

COMMON PROPERTY RESOURCE; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; INCOME; LAND USE CONFLICT; MINING; RARE EARTH ELEMENT; RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT; STAKEHOLDER;

ALBANY COUNTY [WYOMING]; BLACK HILLS NATIONAL FOREST; SOUTH DAKOTA; UNITED STATES; WYOMING;

EID: 85017524127     PISSN: 21906483     EISSN: 21906491     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13412-016-0412-7     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Ali S (2014) Social and environmental impact of the rare earth industries. Resources 3:123–134. doi:10.3390/resources3010123
2. Bridge G (2000) The social regulation of resource access and environmental impact: production, nature and contradiction in the US copper industry. Geoforum 31:237–256
3. Bridge G (2004) Conteste terrain: mining and the environment. Annu Rev Environ Resour 29:205–259. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.28.011503.163434
4. Brody D (2012) Citizen involvement in environmental bureaucratic decision--making: communicative action in forest service nepa projects. Thesis, University of Washington
5. Brown SR (1971) The forced-free distinction in q technique. J Educ Meas:283–287
6. Cairns R, Sallu SM, Goodman S (2014) Questioning calls to consensus in conservation: a Q study of conservation discourses on Galápagos. Environ Conserv 41:13–26
7. Clagett N (2013) A rare opportunity: Streamlining permitting for rare earth materials within the united states. Journal of Energy and Environmental Law
8. Clarke J, McCool D (1996) Staking out the terrain: Power and performance among natural resource agencies. SUNY Press
9. Crist E (2014) Ptolemaic environmentalism. In: Keeping the wild. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp. 16–30
10. Cuppen E, Breukers S, Hisschemöller M, Bergsma E (2010) Q methodology to select participants for a stakeholder dialogue on energy options from biomass in the Netherlands. Ecol Econ 69:579–591
11. Dietz T, Fitzgerald M, Shwom R (2005) Environmental values—annual review of environmental. Resources 30:335–372
12. Dizard J (1999) Going wild: hunting, animal rights, and the contested meaning of nature. University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst
13. Doak DF, Bakker VJ, Goldstein BE, Hale B (2014) What is the future of conservation? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 29:77–81. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2013.10.013
14. Duane T (1998) Shaping the sierra: nature, culture, and conflict in the changing west. University of California Press, Berkeley
15. DuPuis M, Vandergeest P (1996) Creating the countryside. Temple University Press, Philadelphia
16. Eyvindson K, Kangas A, Hujala T, Leskinen P (2015) Likert versus Q-approaches in survey methodologies: discrepancies in results with same respondents. Quality & Quantity 49:509–522
17. Flawn P (1966) Geology and the new conservation movement. Science 151
18. Geores M (1998) The historic role of the forest community in sustaining the Black Hills National Forest as a complex common property multiple use resource. Mt Res Dev:83–94
19. Glacken CJ (1973) Traces on the rhodian shore: nature and culture in western thought from ancient times to the end of the eighteenth century. University of California Press, Berkeley
20. Grabbatin B, Rossi J (2012) Political ecology: nonequilibrium science and nature-society research. Geography Compass 6:275–289
21. Gruber JS (2011) Perspectives of effective and sustainable community-based natural resource management: an application of Q methodology to forest projects. Conserv Soc 9:159
22. Huber MT, Emel J (2009) Fixed minerals, scalar politics the weight of scale in conflicts over the ‘1872 mining law’ in the United States. Environment and Planning A 41:371–388
23. Hunter ML, Redford KH, Lindenmayer DB (2014) The complementary niches of anthropocentric and biocentric conservationists. Conserv Biol 28:641–645. doi:10.1111/cobi.12296
24. Jenkins J (2011) The reproduction of the Klamath Basin: struggle for water in a changing landscape. Association of Pacific Coast Geographers 73:1–10
25. Justus J, Colyvan M, Regan H, Maguire L (2009) Buying into conservation: intrinsic versus instrumental value. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24(4):187–191
26. Kareiva P, Marvier M (2012) What is conservation science? Bioscience 62:962–969. doi:10.1525/bio.2012.62.11.5
27. Kareiva P, Marvier M, Lalasz R (2012) Conservation in the anthropocene: Beyond solitude and fragility
28. Killingsworth M, Palmer J (2012) The environmental impact statement and the rhetoric of democracy. In: Killingsworth M, Palmer J (eds) Ecospeak: rhetoric and environmental politics in america. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale
29. Kingsnorth P (2014) Rise of the neo-greens. In: Keeping the wild. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp. 3–9
30. Kirsch S (2014) Mining capitalism: the relationship between corporations and their critics. University of California Press, Oakland
31. Lave R (2012) Neoliberalism and the production of environmental knowledge. Environment and Society: Advances in Research 3:19–38. doi:10.3167/ares.2012.030103
32. Lave R, Mirowski P, Randalls S (2010) Introduction: STS and neoliberal science. Soc Stud Sci 40:659–675
33. Lemos MC, Agrawal A (2006) Environmental governance. Annu Rev Environ Resour 31:297–325. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.31.042605.135621
34. Marris E (2011) Rambunctious garden: saving nature in a post-wild world. Bloomsbury, New York
35. Martin GP (2008) ‘Ordinary people only’: knowledge, representativeness, and the publics of public participation in healthcare. Sociology of health & illness 30:35–54
36. Marvier M, Kareiva P (2014) The evidence of values underlying ‘new conservation’. Trends in Ecology and Evolution
37. McCarthy J (2007) Rural geography: globalizing the countryside. Prog Hum Geogr 32:129
38. Milcu AI, Sherren K, Hanspach J, Abson D, Fischer J (2014) Navigating conflicting landscape aspirations: application of a photo-based Q-method in Transylvania (Central Romania). Land Use Policy 41:408–422
39. Neff MW (2011) What research should be done and why? Four competing visions among ecologists. Front Ecol Environ 9:462–469
40. O’Connor J (1998) The second contradiction of capitalism. In: O’Connor J (ed) Natural causes: essays in ecological marxism. Guilford Press, New York
41. Perrow C (2011) Normal accidents: living with high risk technologies. Princeton University Press, Princeton
42. Reed MS et al (2009) Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. J Environ Manag 90:1933–1949. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001
43. Robbins P (2000) The practical politics of knowing: state environmental knowledge and local political economy. Econ Geogr 76:126–144
44. Robbins P (2006) The politics of barstool biology: environmental knowledge and power in greater Northern Yellowstone. Geoforum 37:185–199. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.11.011
45. Robbins P, Meehan K, Gosnell H, Gilbertz S (2009) Writing the new west: a critical review. Rural Sociol 74:356–382
46. Rodriguez-Pineros S, Focht W, Lewis DK, Montgomery D (2012) Incorporating values into community-scale sustainable forest management plans: an application of Q methodology. Small-scale forestry 11:167–183
47. Schmolck P (2014) PQMethod Manual. Retrieved June 15, 2015: http://schmolck.org/qmethod/pqmanual.htm
48. Shinneman D, Baker W (1997) Nonequilibrium dynamics between catastrophic disturbances and old-growth forests in ponderosa pine landscapes of the Black Hills. Conserv Biol 11:1276–1288
49. Soule M (2013) The “new conservation”. Conserv Biol 27:895–897. doi:10.1111/cobi.12147
50. Stephenson W (1935) Technique of factor analysis. Nature
51. Stephenson W (1952) Some observations on Q technique. Psychol Bull 49:483
52. Walker P, Fortmann L (2003) Whose landscape? A political ecology of the ‘exurban’ Sierra. Cult Geogr 10:469–491. doi:10.1191/1474474003eu285oa
53. Webler T, Danielson S, Tuler S (2009) Using Q Method to Reveal Social Perspectives in Environmental Research. Greenfield, MA: Social and Environmental Research Institute
54. Worster D (1992) Cowboy ecology. Under Western Skies: Nature and History in the American West, pp 34–52
55. Worster D (1994) Nature’s economy: a history of ecological ideas. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge