Core domains for clinical research in acute respiratory failure survivors: An international modified Delphi consensus study

Critical Care Medicine

Volumn 45, Issue 6, 2017, Pages 1001-1010

  Turnbull, Alison E ^a,b,c   Sepulveda, Kristin A ^a,b   Dinglas, Victor D ^a,b   Chessare, Caroline M ^a,b   Bingham, Clifton O ^b   Needham, Dale M ^a,b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical trials; Disability evaluation; Follow up studies; Intensive care; Patient outcome assessment

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADULT RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME; AGED; ARTICLE; CAREGIVER; CLINICAL RESEARCH; COGNITION; CONSENSUS; DELPHI STUDY; ENDURANCE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEARING; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INFECTION SENSITIVITY; LUNG FUNCTION; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; MUSCLE FUNCTION; NERVE FUNCTION; PAIN; PHYSICAL CAPACITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL RESILIENCE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RECURRENT INFECTION; SELF CONCEPT; SURVIVAL; SURVIVOR; TASTE DISORDER; DISABILITY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RESPIRATORY FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; DELPHI TECHNIQUE; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RESEARCH DESIGN; RESPIRATORY INSUFFICIENCY; SURVIVORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 85017182525     PISSN: 00903493     EISSN: 15300293     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002435     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Zimmerman JE, Kramer AA, Knaus WA: Changes in hospital mortality for United States intensive care unit admissions from 1988 to 2012. Crit Care 2013; 17:R81
2. Herridge MS, Cheung AM, Tansey CM, et al; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group: One-year outcomes in survivors of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2003; 348:683-693
3. Fan E, Dowdy DW, Colantuoni E, et al: Physical complications in acute lung injury survivors: A two-year longitudinal prospective study. Crit Care Med 2014; 42:849-859
4. Pandharipande PP, Girard TD, Jackson JC, et al; BRAIN-ICU Study Investigators: Long-term cognitive impairment after critical illness. N Engl J Med 2013; 369:1306-1316
5. Huang M, Parker AM, Bienvenu OJ, et al; National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network: Psychiatric symptoms in acute respiratory distress syndrome survivors: A 1-Year National Multicenter Study. Crit Care Med 2016; 44:954-965
6. Angus DC, Carlet J; 2002 Brussels Roundtable Participants: Surviving intensive care: A report from the 2002 Brussels Roundtable. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29:368-377
7. Angus DC, Mira JP, Vincent JL: Improving clinical trials in the critically ill. Crit Care Med 2010; 38:527-532
8. Spragg RG, Bernard GR, Checkley W, et al: Beyond mortality: Future clinical research in acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010; 181:1121-1127
9. Lieu TA, Au D, Krishnan JA, et al; Comparative Effectiveness Research in Lung Diseases Workshop Panel: Comparative effectiveness research in lung diseases and sleep disorders: Recommendations from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011; 184:848-856
10. Needham DM, Davidson J, Cohen H, et al: Improving long-term outcomes after discharge from intensive care unit: Report from a stakeholders' conference. Crit Care Med 2012; 40:502-509
11. Deutschman CS, Ahrens T, Cairns CB, et al; Critical Care Societies Collaborative/USCIITG Task Force on Critical Care Research: Multisociety task force for critical care research: Key issues and recommendations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012; 185: 96-102
12. Carson SS, Goss CH, Patel SR, et al; American Thoracic Society Comparative Effectiveness Research Working Group: An official American Thoracic Society research statement: Comparative effectiveness research in pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 188:1253-1261
13. Turnbull AE, Rabiee A, Davis WE, et al: Outcome measurement in ICU survivorship research from 1970 to 2013: A scoping review of 425 publications. Crit Care Med 2016; 44:1267-1277
14. Needham DM: Understanding and improving clinical trial outcome measures in acute respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2014; 189:875-877
15. Robinson KA, Davis WE, Dinglas VD, et al: A systematic review finds limited data on measurement properties of instruments measuring outcomes in adult intensive care unit survivors. J Clin Epidemiol 2017; 82:37-46
16. Clarke M: Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews. Trials 2007; 8:39
17. Williamson PR, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, et al: Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: Issues to consider. Trials 2012; 13:132
18. Dwan K, Altman DG, Arnaiz JA, et al: Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias. PLoS One 2008; 3:e3081
19. Kirkham JJ, Dwan KM, Altman DG, et al: The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews. BMJ 2010; 340:c365
20. Boers M, Kirwan JK, Tugwell PT, et al: OMERACT Handbook. Ottowa, ON, Canada, OMERACT, 2015
21. Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials: Search Results: Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials Initiative (COMET). 2016. Available at: http://www.comet-initiative.org/studies/searchresults?guid=79a21fb5-4236-45a5-a63c-0db9398351a0. September 11, 2016
22. Boers M, Kirwan JR, Wells G, et al: Developing core outcome measurement sets for clinical trials: OMERACT filter 2.0. J Clin Epidemiol 2014; 67:745-753
23. Dalkey N, Helmer O: An experimental application of the DELPHI method to the use of experts. Manag Sci 1963; 9:458-467
24. Khan F, Pallant JF: Use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to identify preliminary comprehensive and brief core sets for multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29:205-213
25. Salinas J, Sprinkhuizen SM, Ackerson T, et al: An international standard set of patient-centered outcome measures after stroke. Stroke 2016; 47:180-186
26. van't Hooft J, Duffy JMN, Daly M, et al: A core outcome set for evaluation of interventions to prevent preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 127:49-58
27. Kirkham JJ, Gorst S, Altman DG, et al: Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement. PLoS Med 2016; 13:e1002148
28. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute: PCORI's Stakeholders|PCORI. Available at: http://www.pcori.org/fundingopportunities/what-we-meanengagement/pcoris-stakeholders. Accessed September 8, 2016
29. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: The Effective Health Care Program Stakeholder Guide-Chapter 3. 2014. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/evidence-based-reports/stakeholderguide/index.html. Accessed September 8, 2016
30. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al; GRADE Working Group: What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ 2008; 336:995-998
31. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al: GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64:395-400
32. Bartlett SJ, Hewlett S, Bingham CO 3rd, et al; OMERACT RA Flare Working Group: Identifying core domains to assess flare in rheumatoid arthritis: An OMERACT international patient and provider combined Delphi consensus. Ann Rheum Dis 2012; 71:1855-1860
33. Hanekom S, Van Aswegen H, Plani N, et al: Developing minimum clinical standards for physiotherapy in South African intensive care units: The nominal group technique in action. J Eval Clin Pract 2015; 21:118-127
34. Prinsen CA, Vohra S, Rose MR, et al: How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a "Core Outcome Set"-a practical guideline. Trials 2016; 17:449
35. Lavrakas PJ: Response Order Effects. In: Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications, 2008. Available at: http://methods.sagepub.com/reference/encyclopediaof-survey-research-methods/n488.xml. Accessed September 17, 2016
36. Kon AA, Davidson JE, Morrison W, et al: Shared decision-making in intensive care units. Executive summary of the American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society Policy Statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016; 193:1334-1336
37. Mulla SM, Maqbool A, Sivananthan L, et al: Reporting of IMMPACTrecommended core outcome domains among trials assessing opioids for chronic non-cancer pain. Pain 2015; 156:1615-1619
38. Copsey B, Hopewell S, Becker C, et al: Appraising the uptake and use of recommendations for a common outcome data set for clinical trials: A case study in fall injury prevention. Trials 2016; 17:131
39. Tunis SR, Clarke M, Gorst SL, et al: Improving the relevance and consistency of outcomes in comparative effectiveness research. J Comp Eff Res 2016; 5:193-205
40. Gargon E, Gurung B, Medley N, et al: Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: A systematic review. PLoS One 2014; 9:e99111
41. Harman NL, Bruce IA, Kirkham JJ, et al: The importance of integration of stakeholder views in core outcome set development: Otitis media with effusion in children with cleft palate. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0129514
42. Turnbull AE, Sahetya SK, Needham DM: Aligning critical care interventions with patient goals: A modified Delphi study. Heart Lung 2016; 45:517-524
43. Major ME, Kwakman R, Kho ME, et al: Surviving critical illness: What is next? An expert consensus statement on physical rehabilitation after hospital discharge. Crit Care 2016; 20:354
44. Ruhl AP, Lord RK, Panek JA, et al: Health care resource use and costs of two-year survivors of acute lung injury. An observational cohort study. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2015; 12:392-401
45. Wolkewitz M, Cooper BS, Bonten MJ, et al: Interpreting and comparing risks in the presence of competing events. BMJ 2014; 349:g5060
46. van Walraven C, McAlister FA: Competing risk bias was common in Kaplan-Meier risk estimates published in prominent medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol 2016; 69:170-3.e8
47. Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, et al; PROMIS Cooperative Group: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63:1179-1194
48. Hodgson CL, Turnbull AE, Iwashyna TJ, et al: Clinician and researcher perspectives on core domains in evaluating post-discharge patient outcomes after acute respiratory failure. Phys Ther J 2016; In Press