How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a "Core Outcome Set" - a practical guideline

Trials

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Prinsen, Cecilia A C ^a   Vohra, Sunita ^b   Rose, Michael R ^c   Boers, Maarten ^a,d   Tugwell, Peter ^e   Clarke, Mike ^f   Williamson, Paula R ^g   Terwee, Caroline B ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^c KING S COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center   (Netherlands)

^e UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^f QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

^g UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

COMET; Core Outcome Set; COSMIN; Delphi study; Guideline; Instrument selection; Outcome measurement instrument; Outcomes research

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTENT VALIDITY; CORE OUTCOME SET; CRITERION RELATED VALIDITY; CROSS CULTURAL VALIDITY; DECISION MAKING; FACE VALIDITY; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; MEASUREMENT ERROR; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; STRUCTURAL VALIDIDTY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; DELPHI STUDY;

DELPHI TECHNIQUE; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC;

EID: 84987619233     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17456215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-016-1555-2     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Chalmers I, Glasziou P. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet. 2009;374:86-9.
2. Williamson PR, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M, Devane D, Gargon E, et al. Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider. Trials. 2012;13:132.
3. Gorst SL, Gargon E, Clarke M, Blazeby JM, Altman DG, Williamson PR. Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0146444.
4. COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments. COSMIN website. Available from http://www.cosmin.nl/. Accessed 25 Apr 2016.
5. Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials. COMET website. Available from http://www.comet-initiative.org/. Accessed 31 Aug 2016.
6. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:737-45.
7. Clarke M. Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews. Trials. 2007;8:39.
8. Schmitt J, Apfelbacher C, Spuls PI, Thomas KS, Simpson EL, Furue M, et al. The Harmonizing Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) Roadmap: a methodological framework to develop core sets of outcome measurements in dermatology. J Invest Dermatol. 2014;135:24-30.
9. Prinsen CAC, Vohra S, Rose MR, King-Jones S, Ishaque S, Bhaloo Z, et al. Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative: protocol for an international Delphi study to achieve consensus on how to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a 'core outcome set'. Trials. 2014;15:247.
10. OMERACT Handbook. Available from http://www.omeract.org/pdf/OMERACT_Handbook.pdf. Accessed 25 Apr 2016.
11. Boers M, Kirwan JR, Wells GA, Beaton DE, Gossec L, D'Agostino MA, et al. Developing core outcome measurement sets for clinical trials: OMERACT filter 2.0. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67:745-53.
12. Adams D, Liu Y, Bhaloo Z, Hansraj N, Hartling L, Vohra S. Primary Outcomes Reporting in Trials (PORTal): a systematic review of pediatric randomized controlled trials. (accepted by J Clin Epidemiol, 2016). 2013. in press.
13. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19:539-49.
14. Murphy MK, Black NA, Lamping DL, McKee CM, Sanderson CF, Askham J, et al. Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. Health Technol Assess. 1998;2:1-88.
15. Chiarotto A, Deyo RA, Terwee CB, Boers M, Buchbinder R, Corbin TP, et al. Core outcome domains for clinical trials in non-specific low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2015;24:1127-42.
16. Verhagen AP, de Vet HC, de Bie RA, Kessels AG, Boers M, Bouter LM, et al. The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:1235-41.
17. Jones J, Hunter D. Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ. 1995;311:376-80.
18. Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Group, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford. Available from http://www.cosmin.nl/images/upload/files/PROM%20Gp%20filtersOCTOBER%202010FINAL.pdf. Accessed 05 Sep 2016.
19. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34-42.
20. The Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. http://www.apa.org/science/programs/testing/standards.aspx. Accessed 25 Apr 2016.
21. Gargon E, Gurung B, Medley N, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M, et al. Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2014;9:e99111.