Fostering scientists’ data sharing behaviors via data repositories, journal supplements, and personal communication methods

Information Processing and Management

Volumn 53, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 871-885

  Kim, Youngseek ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cyberinfrastructure; Data repository; Data reuse; Data sharing; e Science; Institutional theory

Indexed keywords

MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; SURVEYS;

CYBER INFRASTRUCTURES; DATA REPOSITORIES; DATA REUSE; DATA SHARING; E-SCIENCES; INSTITUTIONAL THEORY;

DECISION THEORY;

EID: 85017153283     PISSN: 03064573     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2017.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Ajzen, I., The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process 52:2 (1991), 179–211.
2. Ajzen, I., Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 32:4 (2002), 665–683.
3. Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M., The influence of attitudes on behavior. Albarracin, D., Johnson, B.T., Zanna, M.P., (eds.) Handbook of attitudes and attitude change, 2005, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 173–221.
4. Atkins, D.E., Cyberinfrastructure for research. Issues in Science and Technology 22:2 (2006), 9–10.
5. Battilana, J., Agency and institutions: The enabling role of individuals' social position. Organization 13:5 (2006), 653–676, 10.1177/1350508406067008.
6. Blumenthal, D., Campbell, E.G., Gokhale, M., Yucel, R., Clarridge, B., Hilgartner, S., & Holtzman, N.A., Data withholding in genetics and the other life sciences: Prevalences and predictors. Academic Medicine 81:2 (2006), 137–145, 10.1097/00001888-200602000-00008.
7. Borgman, C.L., Scholarship in the digital age: Information, infrastructure, and the internet. 2007, MIT Press, Cambridge.
8. Borgman, C.L., The digital future is now: A call to action for the humanities. Digital Humanities Quarterly 3:4 (2009), 1–30.
9. Borgman, C.L., Research Data: who will share what, with whom, when, and why? Paper presented at the Fifth China – North America Library Conference, Beijing, China. 2010.
10. Borgman, C.L., The conundrum of sharing research data. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63:6 (2012), 1059–1078, 10.1002/asi.22634.
11. Briney, K., Goben, A., Zilinski, L., Do you have an institutional data policy? A review of the current landscape of library data services and institutional data policies. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication 3:2 (2015), 1–25.
12. Brown, C., The changing face of scientific discourse: Analysis of genomic and proteomic database usage and acceptance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54:10 (2003), 926–938, 10.1002/asi.10289.
13. Budros, A., The mean and lean firm and downsizing: Causes of involuntary and voluntary downsizing strategies. Sociological Forum 17:2 (2002), 307–342, 10.1023/a:1016093330881.
14. Campbell, E.G., Bendavid, E., Data-sharing and data-withholding in genetics and the life sciences: Results of a national survey of technology transfer officers. J Health Care Law Policy 6:2 (2003), 241–255.
15. Campbell, E.G., Clarridge, B.R., Gokhale, N.N., Birenbaum, L., Hilgartner, S., Holtzman, N.A., Data withholding in academic genetics – Evidence from a national survey. Journal of the American Medical Association 287:4 (2002), 473–480, 10.1001/jama.287.4.473.
16. Celli, F., Ghosh, A., Alam, F., Riccardi, G., In the mood for sharing contents: Emotions, personality and interaction styles in the diffusion of news. Information Processing & Management 52:1 (2016), 93–98, 10.1016/j.ipm.2015.08.002.
17. Choudhury, G.S., Case study in data curation at Johns Hopkins University. Library Trends 57:2 (2008), 211–220.
18. Cragin, M.H., Palmer, C.L., Carlson, J.R., Witt, M., Data sharing, small science and institutional repositories. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society a-Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences 368:1926 (2010), 4023–4038, 10.1098/rsta.2010.0165.
19. Crall, A.W., Newman, G.J., Jarnevich, C.S., Stohlgren, T.J., Waller, D.M., Graham, J., Improving and integrating data on invasive species collected by citizen scientists. Biological Invasions 12:10 (2010), 3419–3428, 10.1007/s10530-010-9740-9.
20. DiMaggio, P.J., Powell, W.W., The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48:2 (1983), 147–160, 10.2307/2095101.
21. ERC. (2012). Commission recommendation on access to and preservation of scientific information. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/recommendation-access-and-preservation-scientific-information_en.pdf.
22. Faniel, I.M., Kriesberg, A., Yakel, E., Social scientists' satisfaction with data reuse. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 67:6 (2016), 1404–1416, 10.1002/asi.23480.
23. Federer, L.M., Lu, Y.L., Joubert, D.J., Welsh, J., Brandys, B., Biomedical data sharing and reuse: Attitudes and practices of clinical and scientific research staff. Plos One, 10(6), 2015, 10.1371/journal.pone.0129506.
24. Field, A., Discovering statistics using SPSS. 3rd ed., 2009, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
25. Fienberg, S.E., Sharing statistical data in the biomedical and health sciences: Ethical, institutional, legal, and professional dimensions. Annual Review of Public Health 15 (1994), 1–18.
26. FOSTER. (2016). Open science definition. Retrieved from https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/foster-taxonomy/open-science-definition.
27. Gefen, D., Straub, D.W., Boudreau, M.-C., Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the AIS 4:7 (2000), 1–77.
28. Gewin, V., DATA SHARING An open mind on open data. Nature 529:7584 (2016), 117–119.
29. Ghobadi, S., D'Ambra, J., Modeling high-quality knowledge sharing in cross-functional software development teams. Information Processing & Management 49:1 (2013), 138–157, 10.1016/j.ipm.2012.07.001.
30. Grewal, R., Dharwadkar, R., The role of the institutional environment in marketing channels. Journal of Marketing 66:3 (2002), 82–97, 10.1509/jmkg.66.3.82.18504.
31. Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., Multivariate data analysis. 6th ed., 2006, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
32. Hey, T., Hey, J., e-Science and its implications for the library community. Library Hi Tech 24:4 (2006), 515–528, 10.1108/07378830610715383.
33. Hey, T., Trefethen, A.E., The UK e-science core programme and the grid. Future Generation Computer Systems 18:8 (2002), 1017–1031, 10.1016/s0167-739x(02)00082-1.
34. Huang, S.L., Lin, S.C., Chan, Y.C., Investigating effectiveness and user acceptance of semantic social tagging for knowledge sharing. Information Processing & Management 48:4 (2012), 599–617, 10.1016/j.ipm.2011.07.004.
35. Karasti, H., Baker, K.S., Millerand, F., Infrastructure time: Long-term matters in collaborative development. Computer Supported Cooperative Work-the Journal of Collaborative Computing 19:3-4 (2010), 377–415, 10.1007/s10606-010-9113-z.
36. Kim, Y., Burns, C.S., Norms of data sharing in biological sciences: The roles of metadata, data repository, and journal and funding requirements. Journal of Information Science 42:2 (2016), 230–245.
37. Kim, Y., Stanton, J.M., Institutional and individual influences on scientists' data sharing practices. Journal of Computational Science Education 3:1 (2012), 47–56.
38. Kim, Y., Stanton, J.M., Institutional and individual factors affecting scientists' data-sharing behaviors: A multilevel analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2016, 1–24, 10.1002/asi.23424.
39. Kim, Y., Zhang, P., Understanding data sharing behaviors of STEM researchers: The roles of attitudes, norms, and data repositories. Library & Information Science Research 37:3 (2015), 189–200.
40. Levy, Y., Assessing the value of e-learning systems. 2006, Information Science Publishing, Hershey, PA.
41. Li, Y.M., Liao, T.F., Lai, C.Y., A social recommender mechanism for improving knowledge sharing in online forums. Information Processing & Management 48:5 (2012), 978–994, 10.1016/j.ipm.2011.10.004.
42. Liotta, L.A., Lowenthal, M., Mehta, A., Conrads, T.P., Veenstra, T.D., Fishman, D.A., et al. Importance of communication between producers and consumers of publicly available experimental data. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 97:4 (2005), 310–314.
43. Loder, E., Groves, T., The BMJ requires data sharing on request for all trials. Bmj-British Medical Journal, 350, 2015, 10.1136/bmj.h2373.
44. Louis, K.S., Jones, L.M., Campbell, E.G., Sharing in science. American Scientist 90:4 (2002), 304–307, 10.1511/2002.27.3289.
45. Marcial, L.H., Hemminger, B.M., Scientific Data Repositories on the Web: An Initial Survey. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61:10 (2010), 2029–2048, 10.1002/asi.21339.
46. McCullough, B.D., McGeary, K.A., Harrison, T.D., Do economics journal archives promote replicable research. Canadian Journal of Economics 41:4 (2008), 1406–1420.
47. McGrath, P.J., Scientists, business, and the state, 1890-1960. 2002, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.
48. Molloy, J.C., The open knowledge foundation: Open data means better science. PLoS Biol, 9(12), 2011, e1001195.
49. NCI. (2006). NCI data sharing policy. Retrieved from http://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/docs/data_sharing_policy.pdf.
50. NIH. (2003). NIH data sharing policy and implementation guidance. Retrieved from http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/data_sharing/data_sharing_guidance.htm.
51. NIH. (2007). NIH data sharing information. Retrieved from http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/data_sharing/.
52. NSF. (2010). Scientists seeking NSF funding will soon be required to submit data management plans. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=116928.
53. NSF. (2012). Field of science and engineering codes and definitions. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/fedsupport/method/survmats/instruct/part_i/fieldtab.htm.
54. Piwowar, H.A., Foundational studies for measuring the impact, prevalence, and patterns of publicly sharing biomedical research data. 2010, University of Pittsburgh Ph.D.
55. Piwowar, H.A., Becich, M.J., Bilofsky, H., Crowley, R.S., Towards a data sharing culture: Recommendations for leadership from academic health centers. Plos Medicine 5:9 (2008), 1315–1319.
56. Piwowar, H.A., Chapman, W.W., A review of journal policies for sharing research data. Paper presented at the International Conference on Electronic Publishing, 2008.
57. Piwowar, H.A., Chapman, W.W., Public sharing of research datasets: A pilot study of associations. Journal of Informetrics 4:2 (2010), 148–156, 10.1016/j.joi.2009.11.010.
58. Piwowar, H. A., & Vision, T. J. (2013). Data reuse and the open data citation advantage. Peerj, 1, e175.
59. Rathi, V.K., Strait, K.M., Gross, C.P., Hrynaszkiewicz, I., Joffe, S., Krumholz, H.M., Predictors of clinical trial data sharing: Exploratory analysis of a cross-sectional survey. Trials, 15, 2014, 10.1186/1745-6215-15-38.
60. RCUK. (2016). Concordat on open research data launched. July 28, Retrieved from http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/media/news/160728/.
61. Rezaeibagha, F., Mu, Y., Distributed clinical data sharing via dynamic access-control policy transformation. International Journal of Medical Informatics 89 (2016), 25–31, 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.02.002.
62. Savage, C.J., Vickers, A.J., Empirical study of data sharing by authors publishing in PLoS journals. Plos One 4:9 (2009), 1–3.
63. Scott, W.R., Institutions and organizations: ideas and interests, 2007.
64. Sedberry, G.R., Fautin, D.G., Feldman, M., Fornwall, M.D., Goldstein, P., Guralnick, R.P., OBIS-USA a data-sharing legacy of the census of marine life. Oceanography 24:2 (2011), 166–173.
65. Sorani, M.D., Yue, J.K., Sharma, S., Manley, G.T., Ferguson, A.R., Cooper, S.R., et al. Genetic data sharing and privacy. Neuroinformatics 13:1 (2015), 1–6, 10.1007/s12021-014-9248-z.
66. Suddaby, R., Challenges for institutional theory. Journal of Management Inquiry 19:1 (2010), 14–20, 10.1177/1056492609347564.
67. Tabachnick, B.G., Fidell, L.S., Using multivariate statistics. 4th ed., 2000, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA.
68. Tenopir, C., Allard, S., Douglass, K., Aydinoglu, A.U., Wu, L., Read, E., et al. Data sharing by scientists: Practices and perceptions. Plos One 6:6 (2011), 1–21.
69. Tenopir, C., Dalton, E.D., Allard, S., Frame, M., Pjesivac, I., Birch, B., et al. Changes in data sharing and data reuse practices and perceptions among scientists worldwide. Plos One, 10(8), 2015, 10.1371/journal.pone.0134826.
70. Teo, H.H., Wei, K.K., Benbasat, I., Predicting intention to adopt interorganizational linkages: An institutional perspective. Mis Q. 27:1 (2003), 19–49.
71. Uhlir, P.F., Information gulags, intellectual straightjackets, and memory holes: Three principles to guide the preservation of scientific data. Data Science Journal 10 (2010), 1–5.
72. Veltri, P., Cannataro, M., Tradigo, G., Sharing mass spectrometry data in a grid-based distributed proteomics laboratory. Information Processing & Management 43:3 (2007), 577–591, 10.1016/j.ipm.2006.10.008.
73. Vickers, A.J., Whose data set is it anyway? Sharing raw data from randomized trials. Trials 7:15 (2006), 1–6.
74. Wallis, J.C., Rolando, E., Borgman, C.L., If we share data, will anyone use them? Data sharing and reuse in the long tail of science and technology. Plos One, 8(7), 2013, 10.1371/journal.pone.0067332.
75. Witt, M., Institutional repositories and research data curation in a distributed environment. Library Trends 57:2 (2008), 191–201.
76. WT. (2015). Open access policy, August.
77. Zimmerman, A., Not by metadata alone: The use of diverse forms of knowledge to locate data for reuse. International Journal on Digital Libraries 7:1–2 (2007), 5–16.