The changing face of scientific discourse: Analysis of genomic and proteomic database usage and acceptance

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 54, Issue 10, 2003, Pages 926-938

  Brown, Cecelia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATABASE SYSTEMS; DNA; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY;

SCIENTIFIC COMMUNICATION;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

EID: 0042674160     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.10289     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Bartlett, J. (2002). The oral tradition of bioinformatics expertise. Proceedings of the 65th annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 39, 452-453.
2. Baxenvanis, A.D. (2002). The molecular biology database collection: 2002 update. Nucleic Acids Research, 30(1), 1-12.
3. Brooks, T. (2002). Peripatetic preprints in particle physics. Proceedings of the 65th annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 39, 452-453.
4. Brown, C.M. (2001a). The coming of age of E-prints in the literature of physics. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship-Referred Articles Section. 31 (Summer 2001). Available Online: http://www.istl.org/01-summer/.
5. Brown, C.M. (2001b). The E-volution of preprints in the scholarly communication of physicists and astronomers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 52(3), 187-200.
6. Brown, C.M. (2003). The usage and acceptance of electronic preprints in the literature of chemistry. The Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54(5), 362-371.
7. Burks, C., Cinkosky, M.J., Gilna, P., Hayden, J.E., Abe, Y., Atencio, E.J., Barnhouse, S., Benton, D., Buenafe, C.A., Cumella, K.E., Davidson, D.B., Emmert, D.B., Faulkner, M.J., Fickett, J.W., Fisher, W.M., Good, M., Home, D.A., Houghton, F.K., Kelkar, P.M., Kelley, T.A., Kelly, M., King, M.A., Langan, B.J., Lauer, J.T., Lopez, N., Lynch, C., Lynch, J., Marchi, J.B., Marr, T.G., Martinez, F.A., McLeod, M.J., Medvick, P.A., Mishra, S.K., Moore, J., Munk, C.A., Mondragon, S.M., Nasseri, K.K., Nelson, D., Nelson, W., Nguyen, T., Reiss, G., Rice, J., Ryals, J., Salazar, M.D., Stelts, S.R., Trujillo, B.L., Tomlinson, L.J., Weiner, M.G., Welch, F.J., Wiig, S.E., Yudin, K., & Zins, L.B. (1990). Gen-Bank: Current status and future directions. Methods in Enzymology, 183, 3-22.
8. Cho, A. (2000). Distorted galaxies point to dark matter. Science, 287(5460), 1899-1901.
9. Curl, S.R. (2001). Subramanyam revisited: Creating a new model for information literacy instruction. College & Research Libraries, 62(5), 455-464.
10. Garvey, W.D., Lin, N., & Tomita, K. (1979). Research studies in patterns of scientific communication; III, Information-exchange processes associated with the production of journal articles. In W.D. Garvey (Ed.), Communication: The essence of science. Facilitating information exchange among librarians, scientists, engineers and students (pp. 202-224). New York: Pergamon.
11. Hilgartner, S. (1995). Biomolecular databases: New communication regimes for biology? Science Communication, 17(2), 240-263.
12. Hurd, J.M. (1996). Models of scientific communication systems. In S.Y. Crawford, J.M. Hurd, A.C. Weller (Eds.), From print to electronic: The transformation of scientific communication (pp. 9-33). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
13. Journal Citation Reports. (1989-2000). Philadelphia, PA: Institute for Scientific Information.
14. Marshall, E. (1990). Data sharing: A declining ethic? Science, 248(4958), 952-957.
15. McCain, K.W. (1991). Communication, competition, and secrecy: The production and dissemination of research-related information in genetics. Science, Technology & Human Values, 16(4), 491-516.
16. McCain, K.W. (1995). Mandating sharing: Journal policies in the natural sciences. Science Communication 16(4), 403-432.
17. McCain, K.W. (2000). Sharing digitized research-related information on the World Wide Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51(14), 1321-1327.
18. National Center for Biotechnology Information. (2002a). GenBank over-view. [On-line]. Available: http://www.ncbi.nih.gov/Genbank/Genbank-Overview.html.
19. National Center for Biotechnology Information. (2002b). BLAST over-view. [On-line], Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/blast_overview.html.
20. National Library of Medicine. (2003). MeSH subject headings. [On-line], Available: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/MBrowser.html.
21. Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics. (2002). Protein Data Bank. [On-line]. Available: http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/.
22. Subramanyam, K. (1979). Scientific literature. In A. Kent, H. Lancour, & J.E. Daily (Eds.), The encyclopedia of library and information science (vol. 26, p. 394). New York: Marcel Dekker.
23. Skallerup, H.R. (1955). Some aspects of state academy of science publications. Science. 121(3156), 904-905.
24. Tenopir, C., & King, D.K. (2000). Towards electronic journals: Realities for scientists, librarians, and publishers (p. 91). Washington, DC: SLA Publishing.
25. Weinberg, R. A. (1993). Reflections on the current state of data and reagent exchange among biomedical researchers. In Responsible science: Ensuring the integrity of the research process, vol. 2, National Academy of Sciences, Committee on Science, Engineering and Public Policy, Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research (pp. 66-78). Washington, DC: National Academy.