Effects of atmospheric correction and pansharpening on LULC classification accuracy using WorldView-2 imagery

Information Processing in Agriculture

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 25-36

  Lin, Chinsu ^a   Wu, Chao Cheng ^b   Tsogt, Khongor ^a   Ouyang, Yen Chieh ^c   Chang, Chein I ^d  

^a NATIONAL CHIAYI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIPEI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL CHUNG HSING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^d University of Marylandw Baltimore County   (United States)

Author keywords

LULC; Maximum likelihood classifier (MLC); Object based image analysis; Pixel based image analysis; Remote sensing; Support vector machine (SVM)

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; GLOBAL WARMING; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; LAND USE; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; PIXELS; REMOTE SENSING;

ATMOSPHERIC CORRECTIONS; BIODIVERSITY REDUCTIONS; CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY; LAND USE AND LAND COVER; LULC; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD CLASSIFIERS; MULTISPECTRAL IMAGES; OBJECT BASED IMAGE ANALYSIS;

SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

EID: 85016999726     PISSN: 22143173     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.inpa.2015.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. [1] Feddema, J.J., Oleson, K.W., Bonan, G.B., Mearns, L.O., Buja, L.E., Meehl, G.A., et al. The importance of land-cover change in simulating future climates. Science 310 (2005), 1674–1678.
2. [2] Pielke, R.A. Sr., Land use and climate change. Science 310 (2005), 1625–1626.
3. [3] Pielke, R.A. Sr., Pitman, A., Niyogi, D., Mahmood, R., McAlpine, C., Hossain, F., et al. Land use/land cover changes and climate: modeling analysis and observational evidence. WIREs Clim Change 2 (2011), 828–850.
4. [4] Brown, S., Lugo, A.E., Chapman, J., Biomass of tropical tree plantations and its implications for the global carbon budget. Can J Forest Res 16 (1986), 390–394.
5. [5] Lin, C., Lin, C.H., Comparison of carbon sequestration potential in agricultural and afforestation farming systems. Sci Agric 70:2 (2013), 93–101.
6. [6] Nemani, R.R., Keeling, C.D., Hashimoto, H., Jolly, W.M., Piper, S.C., Tucker, C.J., et al. Climate-driven increases in global terrestrial net primary production from 1982 to 1999. Science 300 (2003), 1560–1563.
7. [7] Girardin, C.A.J., Malhi, Y., Aragao, L.E.O.C., Mamani, M., Huaraca-Huasco, W., Durand, L., et al. Net primary productivity allocation and cycling of carbon along a tropical forest elevational transect in the Peruvian Andes. Glob Change Biol 16:12 (2010), 3176–3192.
8. [8] Lin C, Dugarsuren N. Deriving the temporal and spatial pattern of net primary productivity in terrestrial ecosystems of Mongolia using MODIS NDVI Imageries and CASA model. Photogramm Eng Rem Sens 2015; in press.
9. 2 and climate to carbon storage by ecosystems of the United States. Science 287 (2000), 2004–2006.
10. [10] Nemani, R.R., White, M., Thornton, P., Nishida, K., Reddy, S., Jenkins, S., et al. Recent trends in hydrologic balance have enhanced the terrestrial carbon sink in the United States. Geophys Res Lett, 29(10), 2002, 106.
11. [11] Ahl, D.E., Gower, S.T., Mackay, D.S., Burrows, S.N., Norman, J.M., Diak, G.R., The effects of aggregated land cover data on estimating NPP in northern Wisconsin. Remote Sens Environ 97 (2005), 1–14.
12. [12] Turner, D.P., Ritts, W.D., Cohen, W.B., Gower, S.T., Running, S.W., Zhao, M., et al. Evaluation of MODIS NPP and GPP products across multiple biomes. Remote Sens Environ 102 (2006), 282–292.
13. [13] Gehrung, J., Scholz, Y., The application of simulated NPP data in improving the assessment of the spatial distribution of biomass in Europe. Biomass Bioenerg 33 (2009), 712–720.
14. [14] Tang, G., Beckage, B., Smith, B., Miller, P.A., Estimating potential forest NPP, biomass and their climatic sensitivity in New England using a dynamic ecosystem model. Ecosphere, 1(6), 2010, art18.
15. [15] Pachavo, G., Murwira, A., Remote sensing net primary productivity (NPP) estimation with the aid of GIS modelled shortwave radiation (SWR) in a Southern African Savanna. Int J Appl Earth Obs 30 (2014), 217–226.
16. [16] Yang, H., Mu, S., Li, J., Effects of ecological restoration projects on land use and land cover change and its influences on territorial NPP in Xinjiang, China. Catena 115 (2014), 85–95.
17. [17] Hollinger, D.Y., Maclaren, J.P., Beets, P.N., Turland, J., Carbon sequestration by New Zealand's plantation forests. New Zeal J For Sci 23 (1993), 194–208.
18. [18] Isagi, Y., Kawahara, T., Kamo, K., Ito, H., Net production and carbon cycling in a bamboo Phyllostachys pubescens stand. Plant Ecol 130 (1997), 41–52.
19. [19] Shively, G.E., Zelek, C.A., Midmore, D.J., Nissen, T.M., Carbon sequestration in a tropical landscape: an economic model to measure its incremental cost. Agrofor Syst 60 (2004), 189–197.
20. [20] UN-REDD Programme. The UN-REDD Programme Strategy 2011–2015, The United Nations Collaborative Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries. Geneva, Switzerland: UN-REDD Programme Secretariat; 2009. p. 5–14.
21. [21] Salimon, C.I., Putz, F.E., Menezes-Filho, L., Anderson, A., Silveira, M., Brown, I.F., et al. Estimating state-wide biomass carbon stocks for e REDD plan in Acre, Brazil. For Ecol Manage 262 (2011), 555–560.
22. [22] Yanai, A.M., Fearnside, P.M., de Alencastro Graça, P.M.L., Nogueira, E.M., Avoided deforestation in Brazilian Amazonia: simulating the effect of the Juma sustainable development reserve. For Ecol Manage 282 (2012), 78–91.
23. [23] Veldkamp, A., Lambin, E.F., Predicting land-use change. Agric Ecosyst Environ 85 (2001), 1–6.
24. [24] de Paul Obade, V., Lal, R., Assessing land cover and soil quality by remote sensing and geographical information systems (GIS). Catena 104 (2013), 77–92.
25. [25] Cockx, K., Van de Voorde, T., Canters, F., Quantifying uncertainty in remote sensing-based urban land-use mapping. Int J Appl Earth Obs 31 (2014), 154–166.
26. [26] Setturu, B., Rajan, K.S., Ramachandra, T.V., Land surface temperature responses to land use land cover dynamics. Geoinfor Geostat Overview, 1, 2013, 4.
27. [27] Moffett, K.B., Gorelick, S.M., A method to calculate heterogeneous evapotranspiration using submeter thermal infrared imagery coupled to a stomatal resistance submodel. Water Resour Res, 48, 2012, W01545.
28. [28] Inamdar, A.K., French, A., Hook, S., Vaughan, G., Luckett, W., Land surface temperature retrieval at high spatial and temporal resolutions over the southwestern United States. J Geophys Res, 113, 2008, D07107.
29. [29] Kolios, S., Stylios, C.D., Identification of land cover/land use changes in the greater area of the Preveza peninsula in Greece using Landsat satellite data. Appl Geogr 40 (2013), 150–160.
30. [30] Vanonckelen, S., Lhermitte, S., Van Rompaey, A., The effect of atmospheric and topographic correction on pixel-based image composites: improved forest cover detection in mountain environments. Int J Appl Earth Obs 35 (2015), 320–328.
31. [31] Berra, E.F., Fontana, D.C., Pereira, R.S., Accuracy of forest stem volume estimation by TM/Landsat Imagery with different geometric and atmospheric correction methods. Int J Appl Sci Technol 4:3 (2014), 108–116.
32. [32] Ghosh, A., Joshi, P.K., Hyperspectral imagery for disaggregation of land surface temperature with selected regression algorithms over different land use land cover scenes. ISPRS J Photogram 96 (2014), 76–93.
33. [33] Wu, P., Shen, H., Zhang, L., Göttsche, F.M., Integrated fusion of multi-scale polar-orbiting and geostationary satellite observations for the mapping of high spatial and temporal resolution land surface temperature. Remote Sens Environ 156 (2015), 169–181.
34. [34] Deidda, M., Sanna, G., Pre-processing of high resolution satellite images for sea bottom classification. Ital J Remote Sens 44:1 (2012), 83–95.
35. [35] Ahmad, A., Quegan, S., Analysis of maximum likelihood classification on multispectral data. Appl Math Sci 6:129 (2012), 6425–6436.
36. [36] Tzotsos, A., Argialas, D., Support vector machine classification for object-based image analysis. Blaschke, T., Lang, S., Hay, G.J., (eds.) Object-Based Image Analysis – Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography, 2008, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Germany, 663–677.
37. [37] Adler-Golden SM, Matthew MW, Bernstein LS, Levine RY, Berk A, Richtsmeier SC, et al. Atmospheric correction for short-wave spectral imagery based on MODTRAN4. In: Proc. SPIE, Imaging Spectrometry V, vol. 3753 Denver, CO, USA; 1999. p. 61–9.
38. [38] Matthew MW, Adler-Golden SM, Berk A, Richtsmeier SC, Levine RY, Bernstein LS, et al. Status of atmospheric correction using a MODTRAN4-based algorithm. In: Proc. SPIE, Algorithms for Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Ultraspectral Imagery VI, vol. 4049; 2000. p. 199–207.
39. [39] Keller, J., Bojinski, S., Prevot, A.S.H., Simultaneous retrieval of aerosol and surface optical properties using data of the Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer (MISR). Remote Sens Environ 107 (2007), 120–137.
40. [40] Fernández-Mansoa, O., Fernández-Manso, A., Quintanoc, C., Estimation of aboveground biomass in Mediterranean forests by statistical modelling of ASTER fraction images. Int J Appl Earth Obs 31 (2014), 45–56.
41. [41] Magendran, T., Sanjeevi, S., Hyperion image analysis and linear spectral unmixing to evaluate the grades of iron ores in parts of Noamundi, Eastern India. Int J Appl Earth Obs 26 (2014), 413–426.
42. [42] Moses, W.J., Gitelson, A.A., Perk, R.L., Gurlin, D., Rundquist, D.C., Leavitt, B.C., et al. Estimation of chlorophyll-a concentration in turbid productive waters using airborne hyperspectral data. Water Res 46 (2012), 993–1004.
43. [43] Zhang, Y., Understanding image fusion. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 70:6 (2004), 657–661.
44. [44] Wald, L., Ranchin, T., Mangolini, M., Fusion of satellite images of different spatial resolutions: assessing the quality of resulting images. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 63:6 (1997), 691–699.
45. [45] Ranchin, T., Wald, L., Fusion of high spatial and spectral resolution images: the ARSIS concept and its implementation. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 66:1 (2000), 49–61.
46. [46] Zhang Y, Mishra RK. A review and comparison of commercially available pan-sharpening techniques for high resolution satellite image fusion. In: Proc. IGARSS’12. Proceedings of Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 2012 IEEE International. Munich, Germany, vol. 1; 2012. p.182–5.
47. [47] Du, Q., Younan, N.H., King, R., Shah, V.P., On the performance evaluation of pan-sharpening techniques. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 4:4 (2007), 518–522.
48. [48] Baatz, M., Schäpe, A., Multiresolution segmentation – an optimization approach for high quality multi-scale image segmentation. Strobl, J., et al. (eds.) Angewandte Geographische Infor-mationsverarbeitung XII, 2000, Wichmann, Heidelberg, 12–23.
49. [49] Mercier G, Lennon M. Support vector machines for hyperspectral image classification with spectral-based kernels. In: Proc. IGARSS’03. Proceedings of Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 2003 IEEE International. Toulouse, France, vol. 1; 2003. p.288–90.
50. [50] Hsu, C.W., Chang, C.C., Lin, C.J., A practical guide to support vector classification. Technical report, 2010, Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Taiwan University.
51. [51] Huang, C., Davis, L.S., Townshend, J.R.G., An assessment of support vector machines for land cover classification. Int J Remote Sens 23:4 (2002), 725–749.
52. [52] Widjaja, D., Varon, C., Dorado, A.C., Suykens, J.A., Van Huffel, S., Application of kernel principal component analysis for single-lead-ECG-derived respiration. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 59:4 (2012), 1169–1176.
53. [53] Gaspar, P., Carbonell, J., Oliveirá, J.L., On the parameter optimization of support vector machines for binary classification. J Integr Bioinf, 9(3), 2012, 201.
54. [54] Ko, B.C., Cheong, K.H., Nam, J.Y., Fire detection based on vision sensor and support vector machines. Fire Saf J 44 (2009), 322–329.
55. [55] Petropoulos, G.P., Kontoes, C., Keramitsoglou, I., Burnt area delineation from a uni-temporal perspective based on Landsat TM imagery classification using support vector machines. Int J Appl Earth Obs 13 (2011), 70–80.
56. [56] Koetz, B., Morsdorf, F., van der Linden, S., Curt, T., Allgöwer, B., Multi-source land cover classification for forest fire management based on imaging spectrometry and LiDAR data. For Ecol Manag 256 (2008), 263–271.
57. [57] Hsu, C.W., Lin, C.J., A comparison of methods for multiclass support vector machines. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 13 (2002), 415–425.
58. [58] Vach, W., The dependence of Cohen's kappa on the prevalence does not matter. J Clin Epidemiol 58:7 (2005), 655–661.
59. [59] Allouche, O., Tsoar, A., Kadmon, R., Test the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). J Appl Ecol 43 (2006), 1223–1232.
60. [60] Apfeldorfer, C., Ulrich, K., Jones, G., Goodwin, D., Collins, S., Schenck, E., et al. Object orientated automated image analysis: quantitative and qualitative estimation of inflammation in mouse lung. Diagn Pathol, 3(Suppl. 1), 2008, S16.
61. [61] Goldszal, A.F., Davatzikos, C., Pham, D.L., Yan, M.X., Bryan, N.R., Resnick, S.M., An image-processing system for qualitative and quantitative volumetric analysis of brain images. J Comput Assist Tomogr 22:5 (1998), 827–837.
62. [62] Xia, J., Metrics to measure open geospatial data quality. Issues Sci Technol Librarianship, 68, 2012.
63. [63] Feyzizadeh, B., Helali, H., Comparison pixel-based, object-oriented methods and effective parameters in classification land cover/land use of west province Azerbaijan. Phys Geogr Res Q 71 (2010), 73–84.
64. [64] Srivastava, P.K., Han, D., Rico-Ramirez, M.A., Bray, M., Islam, T., Selection of classification techniques for land use/land cover change investigation. Adv Space Res 50 (2012), 1250–1265.
65. [65] Duro, D.C., Franklin, S.E., Dubé, M.G., A comparison of pixel-based and object-based image analysis with selected machine learning algorithms for the classification of agricultural landscapes using SPOT-5 HRG imagery. Remote Sens Environ 118 (2012), 259–272.
66. [66] Crabtree, R., Potter, C., Mullen, R., Sheldon, J., Huang, S., Harmsen, J., et al. A modeling and spatio-temporal analysis framework for monitoring environmental change using NPP as an ecosystem indicator. Remote Sens Environ 113 (2009), 1486–1496.