Metrics to measure open geospatial data quality

Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship

Volumn 68, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Xia, Jingfeng ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858758678     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10921206     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.29173/istl1542     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ballou, D.P. & Pazer, H.L. 1985. Modeling data and process quality in multi-input, multi-output information systems. Management Science 31 (2): 150-162.
2. Brody, T., Carr, L., Gingras, Y., Hajjem, C., Harnad, S. & Swan, A. 2007. Incentivizing the Open Access Research Web: Publication-Archiving, Data-Archiving and Scientometrics. CTWatch Quarterly 3(3). [Internet]. [Cited 2011 Oct 3]. Available from: http://www.ctwatch.org/quarterly/articles/2007/08/incentivizing-the-open-access-research-web
3. Brown, C.S., Goodwin, P.C. & Sorger, P.K. 2000. Image metrics in the statistical analysis of DNA microarray data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98 (16): 8944-8949.
4. Domeniconi, C., Gunopulos, D., Ma, S., Yan, B., Al-Razgan, M. & Papadopoulos, D. 2007. Locally adaptive metrics for clustering high dimensional data. Journal of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 14: 63-97.
5. Evans, J.A. & Reimer, J. 2009. Open access and global participation in science. Science 323 (5917): 1025.
6. Gray, J. 2010. Open geoprocessing standards and open geospatial data. Open Knowledge Foundation Blog [Internet]. [Cited 2011 Oct 3]. Available from: http://blog.okfn.org/2010/06/21/open-geoprocessing-standards-and-open-geospatial-data
7. Harley, S. 2000. Accountants divided: research selectivity and academic accounting labour in UK universities. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 11: 549-582.
8. Harnad, S. 2007. The open access citation advantage: quality advantage or quality bias? [Internet]. [Cited 2011 Oct 3]. Available from: http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/191-The-Open-Access-Citation-Advantage-Quality-Advantage-Or-Quality-Bias.html
9. Huang, K., Lee, Y. & Wang, R. 1999. Quality Information and Knowledge. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10. Kerrien, S. et al. 2007. IntAct - Open source resources for molecular interaction data. Nucleic Acids Research 35: D561-565. [Internet]. [Cited 2011 Oct 3]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1751531
11. Laudon, K.C. 1986. Data quality and due process in large interorganizational record systems. Communications of the ACM 29 (1): 4-11.
12. Lindsey, S., Raghavendra, C. & Sivalingam, K.M. 2002. Data gathering algorithms in sensor networks using energy metrics. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 13 (9): 924-935.
13. Loshin, D. 2010. Monitoring Data Quality Performance: Using Data Quality Metrics, Informatica White Paper [Internet]. [Cited 2011 Oct 3]. Available from: http://it.ojp.gov/docdownloader.aspx?ddid=999
14. McKay, S. 2003. Quantifying quality: Can quantitative data (metrics) explain the 2001 RAE ratings for social policy and administration? Social Policy & Administration 37 (5): 444-467.
15. Palmer, J.W. 2002. Web site usability, design, and performance metrics. Information Systems Research 13 (2): 151-167.
16. Pipino, L.L., Lee, Y.W. & Wang, R.Y. 2002. Data quality assessment. Communications of the ACM 45 (4): 211-218.
17. Redman, T.C., ed. 1996. Data Quality for the Information Age. Boston, MA: Artech House.
18. Steiniger, S. & Hunter, A.J.S. n.d. Free and open source GIS software for building a spatial data infrastructure [Internet]. [Cited 2011 Oct 3]. Available from: http://sourceforge.net/projects/jump-pilot/files/w_other_freegis_documents/articles/sstein_hunter_fosgis4sdi_v10_final.pdf/download?use_mirror=voxel
19. Taylor, J. 1995. A statistical analysis of the 1992 research assessment exercise. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A 158 (2): 241-261.
20. Wand, Y. & Wang, R.Y. 1996. Anchoring data quality dimensions in ontological foundations. Communications of the ACM 39 (11): 86-95.
21. Wang, R.Y. 1998. A product perspective on total data quality management. Communications of the ACM 41 (2): 58-65.
22. Xia, J., Myers, R.L. & Wilhiote, S.K. 2011. Multiple open access availability and citation impact. Journal of Information Science 37 (1): 19-28.