The hermeneutic side of responsible research and innovation

Journal of Responsible Innovation

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 274-291

  Grunwald, Armin ^a  

^a KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

hermeneutic assessment; meaning; NEST; orientation; techno futures

Indexed keywords

EID: 85016877933     PISSN: 23299460     EISSN: 23299037     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/23299460.2014.968437     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Audi, R. 1999. The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. 2nd ed. 377. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Borup, M., N., Brown, K., Konrad, and H., Van Lente. 2006. “The Sociology of Expectations in Science and Technology.” Special Issue. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 (3–4): 285–298.
3. Brown, J., B., Rappert, and A., Webster, eds. 2000. Contested Futures. A Sociology of Prospective Techno-Science. Burlington: Ashgate.
4. Coenen, C. 2010. “Deliberating Visions: The Case of Human Enhancement in the Discourse on Nanotechnology and Convergence.” In Governing Future Technologies. Nanotechnology and the Rise of an Assessment Regime, edited by M., Kaiser, M., Kurath, S., Maasen, and C., Rehmann-Sutter, 73–88. Dordrecht: Springer.
5. Coenen, C., M., Schuijff, M., Smits, P., Klaassen, L., Hennen, M., Rader, G., Wolbring. 2009. Human Enhancement. Brussels: European Parliament. http://www.itas.fzk.de/deu/lit/2009/coua09a.pdf
6. Coenen, C., and E., Simakova. 2013. “STS Policy Interactions, Technology Assessment and the Governance of Technovisionary Sciences.” Science, Technology & Innovation Studies 9 (2): 3–20.
7. Drexler, K. E., 1986. Engines of Creation–The Coming Era of Nanotechnology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Dupuy, J.-P., 2007. “Complexity and Uncertainty: A Prudential Approach to Nanotechnology.” In Nanoethics. The Ethical and Social Implications of Nanotechnology, edited by F., Allhoff, P., Lin, J., Moor, and J., Weckert, 119–132. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
9. Dupuy, J.-P., and A., Grinbaum. 2004. “Living with Uncertainty: Toward the Ongoing Normative Assessment of Nanotechnology.” Techné 8 (2): 4–25.
10. ETC Group. 2003. From Genomes to Atoms. The Big Down. Atomtech: Technologies Converging at the Nano-Scale. Winnipeg, MB: ETC Group. www.etcgroup.org
11. Ferrari, A., C., Coenen, and A., Grunwald. 2012. “Visions and Ethics in Current Discourse on Human Enhancement.” Nanoethics 6 (3): 215–229. doi:10.1007/s11569-012-0155-1
12. Fiedeler, U., C., Coenen, S. R., Davies, and A., Ferrari, eds. 2010. Understanding Nanotechnology: Philosophy, Policy and Publics. Heidelberg: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft.
13. Gransche, B., 2014. “Das vorausschauende Denken. Philosophie und Zukunftsforschung jenseits von Statistik und Kalkül.” PhD diss., University of Heidelberg.
14. Grunwald, A. 2007. “Converging Technologies: ‘Visions, Increased Contingencies of the Conditio Humana, and Search for Orientation’.” Futures 39 (4): 380–392.
15. Grunwald, A. 2009a. “Vision Assessment Supporting the Governance of Knowledge–The Case of Futuristic Nanotechnology.” In The Social Integration of Science. Institutional and Epistemological Aspects of the Transformation of Knowledge in Modern Society, edited by G., Bechmann, V., Gorokhov, and N., Stehr, 147–170. Berlin: edition sigma.
16. Grunwald, A. 2009b. “Technology Assessment.” In Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences, edited by A., Meijers, 1103–1146. Vol. 9, of the Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
17. Grunwald, A. 2010. “From Speculative Nanoethics to Explorative Philosophy of Nanotechnology.” NanoEthics 4 (2): 91–101.
18. Grunwald, A. 2011. “Energy Futures: Diversity and the Need for Assessment.” Futures 43 (2011): 820–830. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2011.05.024
19. Grunwald, A. 2012a. Technikzukünfte als Medium von Zukunftsdebatten und Technikgestaltung. Karlsruhe: KIT Scientific.
20. Grunwald, A. 2012b. “Synthetic Biology: Moral, Epistemic and Political Dimensions of Responsibility.” In Proceed with Caution?–Concept and Application of the Precautionary Principle in Nanobiotechnology, edited by R., Paslack, J. S., Ach, B., Luettenberg, and K., Weltring, 243–259. Münster: LIT Verlag.
21. Grunwald, A. 2012c. Responsible Nanobiotechnology–Philosophy and Ethics. Singapore: Pan Stanford.
22. Grunwald, A. 2013a. “Techno-visionary Sciences: Challenges to Policy Advice.” Science, Technology and Innovation Studies 9 (2): 21–38.
23. Grunwald, A. 2013b. “Modes of Orientation Provided by Futures Studies: Making Sense of Diversity and Divergence.” European Journal of Futures Studies 15: 30. doi:10.1007/s40309-013-0030-5
24. Grunwald, A., and P., Hocke-Bergler. 2010. “The Risk Debate on Nanoparticles: Contribution to a Normalisation of the Science/Society Relationship?” In Governing Future Technologies. Nanotechnology and the Rise of an Assessment Regime, edited by M., Kaiser, M., Kurath, S., Maasen, and C., Rehmann-Sutter, 157–177. Dordrecht: Springer.
25. Guston, D. H., 2014. “Understanding ‘Anticipatory Governance’.” Social Studies of Science 44 (2): 218–242.
26. Harris, J. 2010. Enhancing Evolution: The Ethical Case for Making Better People. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27. Heinrichs, D., K., Krellenberg, B., Hansjürgens, and F., Martínez, eds. 2012. Risk Habitat Megacity. Heidelberg: Springer.
28. Joy, B. 2000. “Why the Future does not Need Us.” Wired Magazine 8 (4): 238–263.
29. Karafyllis, N. C., 2009. “Facts or Fiction? A Critique on Vision Assessment as a Tool for Technology Assessment.” In Evaluating New Technologies, edited by P., Sollie, and M., Düwell, 93–117. Vol. 3, of The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology. Dordrecht: Springer.
30. Keller, R. 2005. “Wissenssoziologische Diskursanalyse als interpretative Analytik.” In Die diskursive Konstruktion von Wirklichkeit. Zum Verhältnis von Wissenssoziologie und Diskursforschung, edited by R., Keller, 49–75. Konstanz: UVK.
31. Keller, R. 2011. “The Sociology of Knowledge Approach to Discourse (SKAD).” Human Studies 34 (1): 43–65.
32. Kurzweil, R. 2005. The Singularity is Near. When Humans Transcend Biology. New York: Viking.
33. Lösch, A. 2010. “Visual Dynamics: The Defuturization of the Popular ‘Nano-discourse’ as an Effect of Increasing Economization.” In Governing Future Technologies. Nanotechnology and the Rise of an Assessment Regime, edited by M., Kaiser, M., Kurath, S., Maasen, and C., Rehmann-Sutter, 89–108. Dordrecht: Springer.
34. Macnaghten, P., S. R., Davies, and N., Kearnes. 2010. “Narrative and Public Engagement: Some Findings from the DEEPEN Project.” In Understanding Public Debate on Nanotechnologies, edited by R., Von Schomberg and S. R., Davies, 13–30. Brussels: European Commission (EUR 24169).
35. Munich Re. 2002. Nanotechnology–What is in Store for Us? Accessed November 12, 2006. http://www.munichre.com/publications/302–03534_en.pdf
36. Niles, J. D., 1999. Homo Narrans: The Poetics and Anthropology of Oral Literature. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
37. Nordmann, A. 2004. Converging Technologies–Shaping the Future of European Societies. Brussels: European Commission.
38. Nordmann, A. 2007a. “If and Then: A Critique of Speculative Nanoethics.” NanoEthics 1 (1): 31–46.
39. Nordmann, A. 2007b. “Entflechtung–Ansätze zum ethisch-gesellschaftlichen Umgang mit der Nanotechnologie.” In Nano–Chancen und Risiken aktueller Technologien, edited by A., Gazsó, S., Greßler, and F., Schiemer, 215–229. Vienna: Springer.
40. Nordmann, A. 2010. “A Forensics of Wishing: Technology Assessment in the Age of Technoscience.” Poiesis & Praxis: International Journal of Technology Assessment and Ethics of Science 7 (1–2): 5–15.
41. Nordmann, A. 2014. “Responsible Innovation, the Art and Craft of Future Anticipation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 87–98.
42. Owen, R., J., Bessant, and M., Heintz, eds. 2013. Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. London: Wiley. http://eu.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-1119966361.html
43. Paschen, H., and T., Petermann. 1992. “Technikfolgenabschätzung–ein strategisches Rahmenkonzept für die Analyse und Bewertung von Technikfolgen.” In Technikfolgen-Abschätzung als Technikforschung und Politikberatung, edited by T., Petermann, 19–42. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
44. Radinkovic, Z., 2011. “Hermeneutik der Zukunft.” PhD diss., University of Stuttgart.
45. Ricoeur, P. 1981. Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences: Essays on Language, Action and Interpretation. London: Cambridge University Press.
46. Rip, A., T., Misa, and J., Schot, eds. 1995. Managing Technology in Society. London: Pinter.
47. Roache, R. 2008. “Ethics, Speculation, and Values.” NanoEthics 2 (3): 317–327.
48. Roco, M. C., and W. S., Bainbridge, eds. 2002. Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
49. Sandel, M. 2007. The Case against Perfection. Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
50. Schmidt, J. C., 2008. “Unbestimmtheitssignaturen der Nanotechnologie.” In Nanobiotechnologien–Philosophische, anthropologische und ethische Fragen, edited by K. Köchy, M., Norwig, and G., Hofmeister. Freiburg: Verlag Karl Alber.
51. Schmid, G., H., Ernst, W., Grünwald, A., Grunwald, H., Hofmann, P., Janich, H., Krug, et al. 2006. Nanotechnology–Perspectives and Assessment. Berlin: Springer.
52. Selin, C. 2007. “Expectations and the Emergence of Nanotechnology.” Science, Technology and Human Values 32 (2): 196–220.
53. Selin, C. 2008. “The Sociology of the Future: Tracing Stories of Technology and Time.” Sociology Compass 2 (6): 1878–1895.
54. Siune, K., E., Markus, M., Calloni, U., Felt, A., Gorski, A., Grunwald, A., Rip, V., de Semir, and S., Wyatt. 2009. Challenging Futures of Science in Society. MASIS Expert Group. Brussels: European Commission.
55. Storrs Halls, J. 2000. “Utility Fog. The Stuff that Dreams are made of.” In Nanotechnology: Molecular Speculations on Global Abundance, edited by B. C., Crandall, 161–184. Cambridge: MIT Press.
56. Torgersen, H. 2013. “TA als hermeneutische Unternehmung.” Technikfolgenabschätzung–Theorie und Praxis 22 (2): 75–80.
57. Van der Burg, S. 2014. “On the Hermeneutic Need for Future Anticipation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 99–102.
58. Von Schomberg, R. 2012. “Prospects for Technology Assessment in a Framework of Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren: Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methoden, edited by M., Dusseldorp and R., Beecroft, 39–62, Wiesbaden: Springer.
59. Von Schomberg, R. 2013. “A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by R., Owen, J., Bessant, and M., Heintz, 51–70. London: Wiley.
60. Von Schomberg, R., and S., Davies, eds. 2010. Understanding Public Debate on Nanotechnologies. Brussels: European Commission (EUR 24169).
61. Zülsdorf, T. B., C., Coenen, A., Ferrari, U., Fiedeler, C., Milburn, and M., Wienroth, eds. 2011. Quantum Engagements: Social Reflections of Nanoscience and Emerging Technologies. Heidelberg: AKA GmbH.