Successful implementation of technological innovations in health care organizations

Handbook of Smart Homes, Health Care and Well-Being

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 179-189

  Wouters, Eveline J M ^a   Weijers, Thea C M ^a,b   Finch, Tracy L ^c  

^a FONTYS UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^b ROYAL DUTCH KENTALIS   (Netherlands)

^c NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Acceptance; Implementation; Normalization Process theory; Technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 85016810530     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-01583-5_68     Document Type: Chapter

References (27)

1. Anderson JG (2007) Social, ethical and legal barriers to e-health [Review]. Int J Med Inform 76(5-6):480-483. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.09.016
2. Bush M, Lederer AL, Li X, Palmisano J, Rao S (2009) The alignment of information systems with organizational objectives and strategies in health care. Int J Med Inform 78(7):446-456. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.02.004
3. Christensen MC, Remler D (2009) Information and communications technology in U.S. health care: why is adoption so slow and is slower better? [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. J Health Polit Policy Law 34(6):1011-1034. doi:10.1215/03616878-2009-034
4. Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13:319-339
5. Finch TL, Mair FS, O’Donnell C, Murray E, May CR (2012) From theory to ‘measurement’ in complex interventions: methodological lessons from the development of an e-health normalisation instrument [Comparative Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. BMC Med Res Methodol 12:69. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-69
6. Finch TL, Rapley T, Girling M, Mair FS, Murray E, Treweek S,. .. May CR (2013) Improving the normalization of complex interventions: measure development based on normalization process theory (NoMAD): study protocol [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. Implement Sci 8:43. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-43
7. Holden RJ (2011) What stands in the way of technology-mediated patient safety improvements?: a study of facilitators and barriers to physicians’ use of electronic health records [Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural]. J Patient Saf 7(4):193-203. doi:10.1097/PTS.0b013e3182388cfa
8. Ketikidis P, Dimitrovski T, Lazuras L, Bath PA (2012) Acceptance of health information technology in health professionals: an application of the revised technology acceptance model. Health Informatics J 18(2):124-134. doi:10.1177/1460458211435425
9. Koch S (2006) Home telehealth-current state and future trends [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t review]. Int J Med Inform 75(8):565-576. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.09.002
10. Koller M, Aaronson NK, Blazeby J, Bottomley A, Dewolf L, Fayers P,. .. West K (2007) Translation procedures for standardised quality of life questionnaires: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) approach [Evaluation Studies]. Eur J Cancer 43(12):1810-1820. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2007.05.029
11. Li J, Talaei-Khoei A, Seale H, Ray P, MacIntyre CR (2013) Health care provider adoption of eHealth: systematic literature review. Interact J Med Res 2(1), e7. doi:10.2196/ijmr.2468
12. Lluch M (2011) Healthcare professionals’ organisational barriers to health information technologies-a literature review [Review]. Int J Med Inform 80(12):849-862. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.09.005
13. Mair FS, May C, O’Donnell C, Finch T, Sullivan F, Murray E (2012) Factors that promote or inhibit the implementation of e-health systems: an explanatory systematic review [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t review]. BullWorld Health Organ 90(5):357-364. doi:10.2471/BLT.11.099424
14. May C (2006) A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care [Evaluation Studies Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. BMC Health Serv Res 6:86. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-6-86
15. May C, Finch T (2009) Implementing, embedding, and integrating practices: an outline of normalization process theory. Sociology 43:535
16. May C, Finch T, Mair F, Ballini L, Dowrick C, Eccles M,. .. Heaven B (2007) Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the normalization process model [Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. BMC Health Serv Res 7:148. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-7-148
17. May CR, Mair F, Finch T, MacFarlane A, Dowrick C, Treweek S,. .. Montori VM (2009) Development of a theory of implementation and integration: normalization process theory. Implement Sci 4:29. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-29
18. May C, Finch T, Ballini L, MacFarlane A, Mair F, Murray E,. .. Rapley T (2011) Evaluating complex interventions and health technologies using normalization process theory: development of a simplified approach and web-enabled toolkit. BMC Heal Serv Res 11(1):245
19. Murray E, Treweek S, Pope C, MacFarlane A, Ballini L, Dowrick C,. .. May C (2010) Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. BMC Med 8:63. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-8-63
20. sMurray E, Burns J, May C, Finch T, O’Donnell C, Wallace P, Mair F (2011) Why is it difficult to implement e-health initiatives? A qualitative study [Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural]. Implement Sci 6:6. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-6
21. Nieboer ME, van Hoof J, van Hout AM, Aarts S, Wouters EJM (2014) Professional values, technology and future health care: the view of health care professionals in The Netherlands. Technol Soc 39:10-17
22. Niemeijer A, Frederiks B, Depla M, Eefsting J, Hertogh C (2013) The place of surveillance technology in residential care for people with intellectual disabilities: is there an ideal model of application. J Intellect Disabil Res 57(3):201-215. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01526.x
23. Peek STM, Wouters EJM, van Hoof J, Luijkx KG, Boeije HR, Vrijhoef HJM (2014) Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform 83(4):235-248
24. Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A,. .. Hensley M (2011) Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda [Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural]. Adm Policy Ment Health 38(2):65-76. doi:10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7
25. Sanders C, Rogers A, Bowen R, Bower P, Hirani S, Cartwright M,. .. Newman SP (2012) Exploring barriers to participation and adoption of telehealth and telecare within the whole system demonstrator trial: a qualitative study [Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. BMC Health Serv Res 12:220. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-12-220
26. Van Gemert-Pijnen JE, Nijland N, van Limburg M, Ossebaard HC, Kelders SM, Eysenbach G, Seydel ER (2011) A holistic framework to improve the uptake and impact of eHealth technologies [Review]. J Med Internet Res 13(4), e111. doi:10.2196/jmir.1672
27. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q 27:425-478