Technology versus biology: the limits of pre-implantation genetic screening: Better methods to detect the origin of aneuploidy in pre-implantation embryos could improve the success rate of artificial reproduction

EMBO Reports

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 670-672

  Adashi, Eli Y ^a   McCoy, Rajiv C ^b  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL FACTOR;

ANEUPLOIDY; BIOLOGY; BLASTOCYST; CONGENITAL DISORDER; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; FIRST TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; GENE TECHNOLOGY; GENETIC DISORDER; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMAN; HUMAN EMBRYO; INFERTILITY THERAPY; LIVE BIRTH; MEIOSIS; MITOSIS; NOTE; PREGNANCY TERMINATION; PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; GENETICS; NIDATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

ANEUPLOIDY; EMBRYO IMPLANTATION; GENETIC TESTING; HUMANS; MEIOSIS; PREIMPLANTATION DIAGNOSIS;

EID: 85016616638     PISSN: 1469221X     EISSN: 14693178     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.15252/embr.201743941     Document Type: Note

References (10)

1. Beaudet AL (2015) Preimplantation genetic screens. Science 349: 1423
2. Chang J, Boulet SL, Jeng G, Flowers L, Kissin DM (2016) Outcomes of in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic diagnosis: an analysis of the United States Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance Data, 2011–2012. Fertil Steril 105: 394–400
3. Greco E, Minasi MG, Fiorentino F (2015) Healthy babies after intrauterine transfer of mosaic aneuploid blastocysts. N Engl J Med 373: 2089–2090
4. Rossant J (2015) Mouse and human blastocyst-derived stem cells: vive les differences. Development 142: 9–12
5. McCoy RC, Demko ZP, Ryan A, Banjevic M, Hill M, Sigurjonsson S, Rabinowitz M, Petrov DA (2015) Evidence of selection against complex mitotic-origin aneuploidy during preimplantation development. PLoS Genet 11: e1005601
6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2013) Assisted reproductive technology: national summary report. http://www.cdc.gov/art/pdf/2013-report/art_2013_national_summary_report.pdf
7. Munne S, Grifo J, Wells D (2016) Mosaicism: “survival of the fittest” versus “no embryo left behind”. Fertil Steril 105: 1146–1149
8. Lee E, Illingworth P, Wilton L, Chambers GM (2015) The clinical effectiveness of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy in all 24 chromosomes (PGD-A): systematic review. Hum Reprod 30: 473–483
9. Kushnir VA, Darmon SK, Albertini DF, Barad DH, Gleicher N (2016) Effectiveness of in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening: a reanalysis of United States assisted reproductive technology data 2011–2012. Fertil Steril 106: 75–79
10. Bolton H, Graham SJ, Van der Aa N, Kumar P, Theunis K, Fernandez Gallardo E, Voet T, Zernicka-Goetz M (2016) Mouse model of chromosome mosaicism reveals lineage-specific depletion of aneuploid cells and normal developmental potential. Nat Commun 7: 11165