Fe de errores: “Recomendaciones de fluidoterapia perioperatoria para la cirugía abdominal mayor. Revisión de las recomendaciones de la Vía RICA. Parte I: Fundamentos fisiológicos” [Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2017;64(6):328–338](S0034935617300592)(10.1016/j.redar.2017.02.008);Erratum to: “Perioperative fluid therapy recommendations for major abdominal surgery. Via RICA recommendations revisited. Part I: Physiological background” [Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2017;64(6):328-338](S0034935617300592)(10.1016/j.redar.2017.02.008);Perioperative fluid therapy recommendations for major abdominal surgery. Via RICA recommendations revisited. Part I: Physiological background;Recomendaciones de fluidoterapia perioperatoria para la cirugía abdominal mayor. Revisión de las recomendaciones de la Vía RICA. Parte I: Fundamentos fisiológicos

Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion

Volumn 64, Issue 6, 2017, Pages 328-338

  Ripolles Melchor J ^a   Chappell, D ^b   Espinosa, A ^c   Mhyten, M G ^d   Abad Gurumeta, A ^a   Bergese, S D ^e   Casans Frances R ^f   Calvo Vecino, J M ^g  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO INFANTA LEONOR   (Spain)

^b LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c BAHRAIN DEFENCE FORCE HOSPITAL   (Bahrain)

^d UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON HOSPITALS   (United Kingdom)

^e THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY WEXNER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^f HOSPITAL CLÍNICO UNIVERSITARIO LOZANO BLESA   (Spain)

^g UNIVERSITY OF SALAMANCA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRYSTALLOID; ISOTONIC SOLUTION;

ABDOMEN; BODY FLUID COMPARTMENT; COLLOID; DRUG EFFECTS; FLUID THERAPY; GLYCOCALYX; HEART OUTPUT; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; METABOLIC DISORDER; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS; SURGERY; THERAPEUTIC USE; VASCULAR ENDOTHELIUM;

ABDOMEN; BODY FLUID COMPARTMENTS; CARDIAC OUTPUT; COLLOIDS; ENDOTHELIUM, VASCULAR; FLUID THERAPY; GLYCOCALYX; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; ISOTONIC SOLUTIONS; PERIOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; WATER-ELECTROLYTE IMBALANCE;

EID: 85016589233     PISSN: 00349356     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.redar.2017.06.002     Document Type: Erratum

References (116)

1. 1 Weiser, T.G., Regenbogen, S.E., Thompson, K.D., Haynes, A.B., Lipsitz, S.R., Berry, W.R., et al. An estimation of the global volume of surgery: A modelling strategy based on available data. Lancet. 372 (2008), 139–144.
2. 2 Pearse, R.M., Moreno, R.P., Bauer, P., Pelosi, P., Metnitz, P., Spies, C., et al. Mortality after surgery in Europe: A 7 day cohort study. Lancet. 380 (2012), 1059–1065.
3. 3 Pearse, R.M., Harrison, D.A., James, P., Watson, D., Hinds, C., Rhodes, A., et al. Identification and characterisation of the high-risk surgical population in the United Kingdom. Crit Care., 10, 2006, R81.
4. 4 Khuri, S.F., Henderson, W.G., DePalma, R.G., Mosca, C., Healey, N.A., Kumbhani, D.J., Determinants of long-term survival after major surgery and the adverse effect of postoperative complications. Ann Surg. 242 (2005), 326–341 discussion 341-3.
5. 5 Rhodes, A., Cecconi, M., Hamilton, M., Poloniecki, J., Woods, J., Boyd, O., et al. Goal-directed therapy in high-risk surgical patients: A 15-year follow-up study. Intensive Care Med. 36 (2010), 1327–1332.
6. 6 Kehlet, H., Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth. 78 (1997), 606–617.
7. 7 Scott, M.J., Baldini, G., Fearon, K.C., Feldheiser, A., Feldman, L.S., Gan, T.J., et al. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for gastrointestinal surgery, part 1: Pathophysiological considerations. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 59 (2015), 1212–1231.
8. 8 Zhuang, C.L., Ye, X.Z., Zhang, X.D., Chen, B.C., Yu, Z., Enhanced recovery after surgery programs versus traditional care for colorectal surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum. 56 (2013), 667–678.
9. 9 Levy, N., Mills, P., Mythen, M., Is the pursuit of DREAMing (drinking, eating and mobilising) the ultimate goal of anaesthesia?. Anaesthesia. 71 (2016), 1008–1012.
10. 10 Casans Frances, R., Ripolles Melchor, J., Abad-Gurumeta, A., Longas Valien, J., Calvo Vecino, J.M., The role of the anaesthesiologist in enhanced recovery programs. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 63 (2016), 273–288.
11. 11 Grupo de Trabajo de la Vía Clínica de Recuperación Intensificada en Cirugía Abdominal (RICA). Vía Clínica de Recuperación Intensificada en Cirugía Abdominal (RICA). Madrid: Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad; 2015.
12. 12 Voldby, A.W., Brandstrup, B., Fluid therapy in the perioperative setting-A clinical review. J Intensive Care., 4, 2016, 27.
13. 13 Edwards, M.R., Mythen, M.G., Fluid therapy in critical illness. Extrem Physiol Med., 3, 2014, 16.
14. 14 Bellamy, M.C., Wet, dry or something else?. Br J Anaesth. 97 (2006), 755–757.
15. 15 Minto, G., Mythen, M.G., Perioperative fluid management: Science, art or random chaos?. Br J Anaesth. 114 (2015), 717–721.
16. 16 Brandstrup, B., Tonnesen, H., Beier-Holgersen, R., Hjortso, E., Ording, H., Lindorff-Larsen, K., et al. Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: Comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens: A randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 238 (2003), 641–648.
17. 17 Nisanevich, V., Felsenstein, I., Almogy, G., Weissman, C., Einav, S., Matot, I., Effect of intraoperative fluid management on outcome after intraabdominal surgery. Anesthesiology. 103 (2005), 25–32.
18. 18 Holte, K., Kehlet, H., Fluid therapy and surgical outcomes in elective surgery: A need for reassessment in fast-track surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 202 (2006), 971–989.
19. 19 Kulemann, B., Timme, S., Seifert, G., Holzner, P.A., Glatz, T., Sick, O., et al. Intraoperative crystalloid overload leads to substantial inflammatory infiltration of intestinal anastomoses-A histomorphological analysis. Surgery. 154 (2013), 596–603.
20. 20 Chan, S.T., Kapadia, C.R., Johnson, A.W., Radcliffe, A.G., Dudley, H.A., Extracellular fluid volume expansion and third space sequestration at the site of small bowel anastomoses. Br J Surg. 70 (1983), 36–39.
21. 21 Marjanovic, G., Villain, C., Juettner, E., zur Hausen, A., Hoeppner, J., Hopt, U.T., et al. Impact of different crystalloid volume regimes on intestinal anastomotic stability. Ann Surg. 249 (2009), 181–185.
22. 22 Yerram, P., Karuparthi, P.R., Misra, M., Fluid overload and acute kidney injury. Hemodial Int. 14 (2010), 348–354.
23. 23 Brandstrup, B., Fluid therapy for the surgical patient. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 20 (2006), 265–283.
24. 24 Strunden, M.S., Heckel, K., Goetz, A.E., Reuter, D.A., Perioperative fluid and volume management: Physiological basis, tools and strategies. Ann Intensive Care., 1, 2011, 2.
25. 25 Starling, E.H., On the absorption of fluids from the connective tissue spaces. J Physiol. 19 (1896), 312–326.
26. 26 Iijima, T., Complexity of blood volume control system and its implications in perioperative fluid management. J Anesth. 23 (2009), 534–542.
27. 27 Rehm, M., Zahler, S., Lotsch, M., Welsch, U., Conzen, P., Jacob, M., et al. Endothelial glycocalyx as an additional barrier determining extravasation of 6% hydroxyethyl starch or 5% albumin solutions in the coronary vascular bed. Anesthesiology. 100 (2004), 1211–1223.
28. 28 Curry, F.R.E., Microvascular solute and water transport. Microcirculation. 12 (2005), 17–31.
29. 29 Becker, B.F., Chappell, D., Bruegger, D., Annecke, T., Jacob, M., Therapeutic strategies targeting the endothelial glycocalyx: Acute deficits, but great potential. Cardiovasc Res. 87 (2010), 300–310.
30. 30 Donati, A., Domizi, R., Damiani, E., Adrario, E., Pelaia, P., Ince, C., From macrohemodynamic to the microcirculation. Crit Care Res Pract., 2013, 2013, 892710.
31. 31 Frati-Munari, A.C., [Medical significance of endothelial glycocalyx] Spanish. Arch Cardiol Mex. 83 (2013), 303–312.
32. 32 Chawla, L.S., Ince, C., Chappell, D., Gan, T.J., Kellum, J.A., Mythen, M., et al. Vascular content, tone, integrity, and haemodynamics for guiding fluid therapy: A conceptual approach. Br J Anaesth. 113 (2014), 748–755.
33. 33 Chappell, D., Jacob, M., Hofmann-Kiefer, K., Conzen, P., Rehm, M., A rational approach to perioperative fluid management. Anesthesiology. 109 (2008), 723–740.
34. 34 Rehm, M., Haller, M., Orth, V., Kreimeier, U., Jacob, M., Dressel, H., et al. Changes in blood volume and hematocrit during acute preoperative volume loading with 5% albumin or 6% hetastarch solutions in patients before radical hysterectomy. Anesthesiology. 95 (2001), 849–856.
35. 35 Jacob, M., Bruegger, D., Rehm, M., Stoeckelhuber, M., Welsch, U., Conzen, P., et al. The endothelial glycocalyx affords compatibility of Starling's principle and high cardiac interstitial albumin levels. Cardiovasc Res. 73 (2007), 575–586.
36. 36 Hu, X., Weinbaum, S., A new view of Starling's hypothesis at the microstructural level. Microvasc Res. 58 (1999), 281–304.
37. 37 Adamson, R.H., Lenz, J.F., Zhang, X., Adamson, G.N., Weinbaum, S., Curry, F.E., Oncotic pressures opposing filtration across non-fenestrated rat microvessels. J Physiol. 557:Pt 3 (2004), 889–907.
38. 38 Van den Berg, B.M., Vink, H., Spaan, J.A., The endothelial glycocalyx protects against myocardial edema. Circ Res. 92 (2003), 592–594.
39. 39 Chappell, D., Jacob, M., Hofmann-Kiefer, K., Bruegger, D., Rehm, M., Conzen, P., et al. Hydrocortisone preserves the vascular barrier by protecting the endothelial glycocalyx. Anesthesiology. 107 (2007), 776–784.
40. 40 Collins, S.R., Blank, R.S., Deatherage, L.S., Dull, R.O., Special article: The endothelial glycocalyx: Emerging concepts in pulmonary edema and acute lung injury. Anesth Analg. 117 (2013), 664–674.
41. 41 Becker, B.F., Chappell, D., Jacob, M., Endothelial glycocalyx and coronary vascular permeability: The fringe benefit. Basic Res Cardiol. 105 (2010), 687–701.
42. 42 Bruegger, D., Jacob, M., Rehm, M., Loetsch, M., Welsch, U., Conzen, P., et al. Atrial natriuretic peptide induces shedding of endothelial glycocalyx in coronary vascular bed of guinea pig hearts. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 289 (2005), H1993–H1999.
43. 43 Landis, E.M., Heteroporosity of the capillary wall as indicated by cinematographic analysis of the passage of dyes. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 116 (1964), 765–773.
44. 44 Lord, J.M., Midwinter, M.J., Chen, Y.F., Belli, A., Brohi, K., Kovacs, E.J., et al. The systemic immune response to trauma: An overview of pathophysiology and treatment. Lancet. 384 (2014), 1455–1465.
45. 45 Rehm, M., Bruegger, D., Christ, F., Conzen, P., Thiel, M., Jacob, M., et al. Shedding of the endothelial glycocalyx in patients undergoing major vascular surgery with global and regional ischemia. Circulation. 116 (2007), 1896–1906.
46. 46 Chappell, D., Westphal, M., Jacob, M., The impact of the glycocalyx on microcirculatory oxygen distribution in critical illness. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 22 (2009), 155–162.
47. 47 Rehm, M., Orth, V., Kreimeier, U., Thiel, M., Haller, M., Brechtelsbauer, H., et al. Changes in intravascular volume during acute normovolemic hemodilution and intraoperative retransfusion in patients with radical hysterectomy. Anesthesiology. 92 (2000), 657–664.
48. 48 Serrano, A.B., Candela-Toha, A.M., Zamora, J., Vera, J., Muriel, A., del Rey, J.M., et al. Preoperative hydration with 0.9% normal saline to prevent acute kidney injury after major elective open abdominal surgery: A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 33 (2016), 436–443.
49. 49 Norberg, A., Hahn, R.G., Li, H., Olsson, J., Prough, D.S., Borsheim, E., et al. Population volume kinetics predicts retention of 0.9% saline infused in awake and isoflurane-anesthetized volunteers. Anesthesiology. 107 (2007), 24–32.
50. 50 Norberg, A., Rooyackers, O., Segersvard, R., Wernerman, J., Leakage of albumin in major abdominal surgery. Crit Care., 20, 2016, 113.
51. 51 Kenne, E., Lindbom, L., Imaging inflammatory plasma leakage in vivo. Thromb Haemost. 105 (2011), 783–789.
52. 52 Jacob, M., Chappell, D., Rehm, M., The third space–Fact or fiction?. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 23 (2009), 145–157.
53. 53 Rahbari, N.N., Zimmermann, J.B., Schmidt, T., Koch, M., Weigand, M.A., Weitz, J., Meta-analysis of standard, restrictive and supplemental fluid administration in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 96 (2009), 331–341.
54. 54 Lamke, L.O., Nilsson, G.E., Reithner, H.L., Water loss by evaporation from the abdominal cavity during surgery. Acta Chir Scand. 143 (1977), 279–284.
55. 55 Jacob, M., Chappell, D., Conzen, P., Finsterer, U., Rehm, M., Blood volume is normal after pre-operative overnight fasting. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 52 (2008), 522–529.
56. 56 Muller, L., Briere, M., Bastide, S., Roger, C., Zoric, L., Seni, G., et al. Preoperative fasting does not affect haemodynamic status: A prospective, non-inferiority, echocardiography study. Br J Anaesth. 112 (2014), 835–841.
57. 57 Taniguchi, H., Sasaki, T., Fujita, H., Preoperative management of surgical patients by shortened fasting time: A study on the amount of total body water by multi-frequency impedance method. Int J Med Sci. 9 (2012), 567–574.
58. 58 Moore, F.D., Shires, G.T., Moderation. Anesth Analg. 47 (1968), 506–508.
59. 59 Jie, H.Y., Ye, J.L., Zhou, H.H., Li, Y.X., Perioperative restricted fluid therapy preserves immunological function in patients with colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 20 (2014), 15852–15859.
60. 60 Peng, N.H., Gao, T., Chen, Y.Y., Xi, F.C., Zhang, J.J., Li, N., et al. Restricted intravenous fluid regimen reduces fluid redistribution of patients operated for abdominal malignancy. Hepatogastroenterology. 60 (2013), 1653–1659.
61. 61 Doherty, M., Buggy, D.J., Intraoperative fluids: How much is too much?. Br J Anaesth. 109 (2012), 69–79.
62. 62 Varadhan, K.K., Lobo, D.N., A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of intravenous fluid therapy in major elective open abdominal surgery: Getting the balance right. Proc Nutr Soc. 69 (2010), 488–498.
63. 63 Garutti I, de Nadal M, Schiraldi R, Acosta F, Aldecoa C. Guías clínicas para la optimización hemodinámica perioperatoria de los pacientes adultos durante la cirugía no cardíaca. Madrid: Solutions CM; 2015.
64. 64 Camacho Navarro, L.H., Bloomstone, J.A., Costa Auler, J.O.JJr., Cannesson, M., Della Rocca, G., Gan, T.J., et al. Perioperative fluid therapy: A statement from the international Fluid Optimization Group. Perioper Med (Lond)., 4, 2015, 3.
65. 65 Thacker, J.K., Mountford, W.K., Ernst, F.R., Krukas, M.R., Mythen, M.M., Perioperative fluid utilization variability and association with outcomes: Considerations for enhanced recovery efforts in sample US surgical populations. Ann Surg. 263 (2016), 502–510.
66. 66 Soni, N., British Consensus Guidelines on Intravenous Fluid Therapy for Adult Surgical Patients (GIFTASUP): Cassandra's view. Anaesthesia. 64 (2009), 235–238.
67. 67 Awad, S., Allison, S.P., Lobo, D.N., The history of 0.9% saline. Clin Nutr. 27 (2008), 179–188.
68. 68 Li, H., Sun, S.R., Yap, J.Q., Chen, J.H., Qian, Q., 0.9% saline is neither normal nor physiological. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 17 (2016), 181–187.
69. 69 Reid, F., Lobo, D.N., Williams, R.N., Rowlands, B.J., Allison, S.P., (Ab)normal saline and physiological Hartmann's solution: A randomized double-blind crossover study. Clin Sci (Lond). 104 (2003), 17–24.
70. 70 Wilkes, N.J., Woolf, R., Mutch, M., Mallett, S.V., Peachey, T., Stephens, R., et al. The effects of balanced versus saline-based hetastarch and crystalloid solutions on acid-base and electrolyte status and gastric mucosal perfusion in elderly surgical patients. Anesth Analg. 93 (2001), 811–816.
71. 71 Lobo, D.N., Bostock, K.A., Neal, K.R., Perkins, A.C., Rowlands, B.J., Allison, S.P., Effect of salt and water balance on recovery of gastrointestinal function after elective colonic resection: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 359 (2002), 1812–1818.
72. 72 Hansen, P.B., Jensen, B.L., Skott, O., Chloride regulates afferent arteriolar contraction in response to depolarization. Hypertension. 32 (1998), 1066–1070.
73. 73 Wilcox, C.S., Regulation of renal blood flow by plasma chloride. J Clin Invest. 71 (1983), 726–735.
74. 74 Chowdhury, A.H., Cox, E.F., Francis, S.T., Lobo, D.N., A randomized, controlled, double-blind crossover study on the effects of 2-L infusions of 0.9% saline and plasma-lyte(R) 148 on renal blood flow velocity and renal cortical tissue perfusion in healthy volunteers. Ann Surg. 256 (2012), 18–24.
75. 75 Orbegozo Cortes, D., Gamarano Barros, T., Njimi, H., Vincent, J.L., Crystalloids versus colloids: Exploring differences in fluid requirements by systematic review and meta-regression. Anesth Analg. 120 (2015), 389–402.
76. 76 Krajewski, M.L., Raghunathan, K., Paluszkiewicz, S.M., Schermer, C.R., Shaw, A.D., Meta-analysis of high- versus low-chloride content in perioperative and critical care fluid resuscitation. Br J Surg. 102 (2015), 24–36.
77. 77 Reddy, S.K., Young, P.J., Beasley, R.W., Mackle, D.M., McGuinness, S.P., McArthur, C.J., et al. Overview of the study protocols and statistical analysis plan for the Saline versus Plasma-Lyte 148 for Intravenous Fluid Therapy (SPLIT) research program. Crit Care Resusc. 17 (2015), 29–36.
78. 78 Young, P., Bailey, M., Beasley, R., Henderson, S., Mackle, D., McArthur, C., et al. Effect of a buffered crystalloid solution vs saline on acute kidney injury among patients in the intensive care unit: The SPLIT randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 314 (2015), 1701–1710.
79. 79 Reddy, S., Weinberg, L., Young, P., Crystalloid fluid therapy. Crit Care., 20, 2016, 59.
80. 80 Vincent, J.L., de Backer, D., Saline versus balanced solutions: Are clinical trials comparing two crystalloid solutions really needed?. Crit Care., 20, 2016, 250.
81. 81 Padhi, S., Bullock, I., Li, L., Stroud, M., Intravenous fluid therapy for adults in hospital: Summary of NICE guidance. BMJ., 347, 2013, f7073.
82. 82 Marx, G., Schindler, A.W., Mosch, C., Albers, J., Bauer, M., Gnass, I., et al. Intravascular volume therapy in adults: Guidelines from the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 33 (2016), 488–521.
83. 83 Van Regenmortel, N., Jorens, P.G., Malbrain, M.L., Fluid management before, during and after elective surgery. Curr Opin Crit Care. 20 (2014), 390–395.
84. 84 Futier, E., Constantin, J.M., Petit, A., Chanques, G., Kwiatkowski, F., Flamein, R., et al. Conservative vs restrictive individualized goal-directed fluid replacement strategy in major abdominal surgery: A prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg. 145 (2010), 1193–1200.
85. 85 Lobo, S.M., Ronchi, L.S., Oliveira, N.E., Brandao, P.G., Froes, A., Cunrath, G.S., et al. Restrictive strategy of intraoperative fluid maintenance during optimization of oxygen delivery decreases major complications after high-risk surgery. Crit Care., 15, 2011, R226.
86. 86 Lai, C.W., Starkie, T., Creanor, S., Struthers, R.A., Portch, D., Erasmus, P.D., et al. Randomized controlled trial of stroke volume optimization during elective major abdominal surgery in patients stratified by aerobic fitness. Br J Anaesth. 115 (2015), 578–589.
87. 87 Challand, C., Struthers, R., Sneyd, J.R., Erasmus, P.D., Mellor, N., Hosie, K.B., et al. Randomized controlled trial of intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy in aerobically fit and unfit patients having major colorectal surgery. Br J Anaesth. 108 (2012), 53–62.
88. 88 Greenberg, S., Tung, A., But is it safe? Hydroxyethyl starch in perioperative care. Anesth Analg. 120 (2015), 519–521.
89. 89 Una Orejon, R., del Huercio Martinez, I., Casinello Ogea, C., del Prado Ureta Tolsada, M., Una Orejon, S., Intraoperatorive hydroxyethyl starch: A safe therapy or a poison?. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 63 (2016), 588–659.
90. 90 Garrioch, S.S., Gillies, M.A., Which intravenous fluid for the surgical patient?. Curr Opin Crit Care. 21 (2015), 358–363.
91. 91 Ripolles, J., Espinosa, A., Casans, R., Tirado, A., Abad, A., Fernandez, C., et al. Colloids versus crystalloids in objective-guided fluid therapy, systematic review and meta-analysis. Too early or too late to draw conclusions. Braz J Anesthesiol. 65 (2015), 281–291.
92. 92 Raiman, M., Mitchell, C.G., Biccard, B.M., Rodseth, R.N., Comparison of hydroxyethyl starch colloids with crystalloids for surgical patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 33 (2016), 42–48.
93. 93 Ripolles-Melchor, J., Fries, D., Chappell, D., Colloidophobia. Minerva Anestesiol. 82 (2016), 1039–1042.
94. 94 Myburgh, J.A., Mythen, M.G., Resuscitation fluids. N Engl J Med. 369 (2013), 2462–2463.
95. 95 Lobo, D.N., Stanga, Z., Aloysius, M.M., Wicks, C., Nunes, Q.M., Ingram, K.L., et al. Effect of volume loading with 1 liter intravenous infusions of 0.9% saline, 4% succinylated gelatine (Gelofusine) and 6% hydroxyethyl starch (Voluven) on blood volume and endocrine responses: A randomized, three-way crossover study in healthy volunteers. Crit Care Med. 38 (2010), 464–470.
96. 96 Jacob, M., Chappell, D., Hofmann-Kiefer, K., Helfen, T., Schuelke, A., Jacob, B., et al. The intravascular volume effect of Ringer's lactate is below 20%: A prospective study in humans. Crit Care., 16, 2012, R86.
97. 97 Guerin, L., Monnet, X., Teboul, J-L., Monitoring volume and fluid responsiveness: From static to dynamic indicators. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 27 (2013), 177–185.
98. 98 Jacob, M., Chappell, D., Reappraising Starling: The physiology of the microcirculation. Curr Opin Crit Care. 19 (2013), 282–289.
99. 99 Kanda, H., Hirasaki, Y., Iida, T., Kanao, M., Toyama, Y., Kunisawa, T., et al. Effect of fluid loading with normal saline and 6% hydroxyethyl starch on stroke volume variability and left ventricular volume. Int J Gen Med. 8 (2015), 319–324.
100. 100 Wu, C.Y., Chan, K.C., Cheng, Y.J., Yeh, Y.C., Chien, C.T., Effects of different types of fluid resuscitation for hemorrhagic shock on splanchnic organ microcirculation and renal reactive oxygen species formation. Crit Care., 19, 2015, 434.
101. 101 Santry, H.P., Alam, H.B., Fluid resuscitation: Past, present, and the future. Shock. 33 (2010), 229–241.
102. 102 Chen, G., You, G., Wang, Y., Lu, M., Cheng, W., Yang, J., et al. Effects of synthetic colloids on oxidative stress and inflammatory response in hemorrhagic shock: Comparison of hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4, hydroxyethyl starch 200/0.5, and succinylated gelatin. Crit Care., 17, 2013, R141.
103. 103 Mahmood, A., Gosling, P., Barclay, R., Kilvington, F., Vohra, R., Splanchnic microcirculation protection by hydroxyethyl starches during abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 37 (2009), 319–325.
104. 104 Ozciftci, S., Gamli, M., Ornek, D., Horasanli, E., Dikmen, B., Canpolat, O., et al. An evaluation of the effects of perioperatively administered fluids on ischemia/reperfusion injury. Pak J Med Sci. 31 (2015), 1349–1354.
105. 105 Cui, Y., Sun, B., Wang, C., Liu, S., Li, P., Shi, J., et al. Effects of different types of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) on microcirculation perfusion and tissue oxygenation in patients undergoing liver surgery. Int J Clin Exp Med. 7 (2014), 631–639.
106. 106 Kimberger, O., Arnberger, M., Brandt, S., Plock, J., Sigurdsson, G.H., Kurz, A., et al. Goal-directed colloid administration improves the microcirculation of healthy and perianastomotic colon. Anesthesiology. 110 (2009), 496–504.
107. 107 Volta, C.A., Alvisi, V., Campi, M., Marangoni, E., Alvisi, R., Castellazzi, M., et al. Influence of different strategies of volume replacement on the activity of matrix metalloproteinases: An in vitro and in vivo study. Anesthesiology. 106 (2007), 85–91.
108. 108 Wilson, M.A., Chou, M.C., Spain, D.A., Downard, P.J., Qian, Q., Cheadle, W.G., et al. Fluid resuscitation attenuates early cytokine mRNA expression after peritonitis. J Trauma. 41 (1996), 622–627.
109. 109 Wong, Y.L., Lautenschlager, I., Dombrowsky, H., Zitta, K., Bein, B., Krause, T., et al. Hydroxyethyl starch (HES 130/0.4) impairs intestinal barrier integrity and metabolic function: Findings from a mouse model of the isolated perfused small intestine. PLoS One., 10, 2015, e0121497.
110. 110 Feldheiser, A., Pavlova, V., Bonomo, T., Jones, A., Fotopoulou, C., Sehouli, J., et al. Balanced crystalloid compared with balanced colloid solution using a goal-directed haemodynamic algorithm. Br J Anaesth. 110 (2013), 231–240.
111. 111 Yates, D.R., Davies, S.J., Milner, H.E., Wilson, R.J., Crystalloid or colloid for goal-directed fluid therapy in colorectal surgery. Br J Anaesth. 112 (2014), 281–289.
112. 112 Perner, A., Haase, N., Guttormsen, A.B., Tenhunen, J., Klemenzson, G., Aneman, A., et al. Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 versus Ringer's acetate in severe sepsis. N Engl J Med. 367 (2012), 124–134.
113. 113 Serpa Neto, A., Veelo, D.P., Peireira, V.G., de Assunção, M.S., Manetta, J.A., Espósito, D.C., et al. Fluid resuscitation with hydroxyethyl starches in patients with sepsis is associated with an increased incidence of acute kidney injury and use of renal replacement therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. J Crit Care. 29 (2014), 185.e1–185.e7.
114. 114 De Hert, S., de Baerdemaeker, L., Why hydroxyethyl starch solutions should NOT be banned from the operating room. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 46 (2014), 336–341.
115. 115 Kancir, A.S., Pleckaitiene, L., Hansen, T.B., Ekelof, N.P., Pedersen, E.B., Lack of nephrotoxicity by 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 during hip arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 121 (2014), 948–958.
116. 116 Kancir, A.S., Johansen, J.K., Ekeloef, N.P., Pedersen, E.B., The effect of 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 on renal function, arterial blood pressure, and vasoactive hormones during radical prostatectomy: A randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 120 (2015), 608–618.