Early career researchers and their publishing and authorship practices

Learned Publishing

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 205-217

  Nicholas, David ^a   Rodríguez Bravo, Blanca ^b   Watkinson, Anthony ^a   Boukacem Zeghmouri, Cherifa ^c   Herman, Eti ^a   Xu, Jie ^d   Abrizah, Abdullah ^e   Świgoń, Marzena ^f  

^a CIBER RESEARCH LTD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEÓN   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^d WUHAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA   (Malaysia)

^f UNIVERSITY OF WARMIA AND MAZURY IN OLSZTYN   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85016589095     PISSN: 09531513     EISSN: 17414857     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/leap.1102     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Borrego, Á., & Anglada, L. (2016). Faculty information behaviour in the electronic environment: Attitudes towards searching, publishing and libraries. New Library World, 117(3/4), 173-185. https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-11-2015-0089
2. Brand, A., Allen, L., Altman, M., Hlava, M., & Scott, J. (2015). Beyond authorship: Attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing, 28(2), 151-155. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150211
3. Brechelmacher, A., Park, E., Ates, G., & Campbell, D. F. (2015). The rocky road to tenure - Career paths in academia. In T. Fumasoli, G. Goastellec, & B. M. Kehm (Eds.), Academic work and careers in Europe: Trends, challenges, perspectives (pp. 13-40). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
4. Cusick, A. (2015). Research training as occupational socialization: Doing research and becoming researchers. Asian Social Science, 11(2), 252. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n2p252
5. Dance, A. (2012). Authorship: Who’s on first? Nature, 489(7417), 591-593. https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7417-591a
6. Elliott, K. C., Settles, I. H., Montgomery, G. M., Brassel, S. T., Cheruvelil, K. S., & Soranno, P. A. (2017). Honorary authorship practices in environmental science teams: Structural and cultural causes and solutions. Accountability in Research, 24(2), 80-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2016.1251320
7. Jamali, H. R., Nicholas, D., Watkinson, A., Herman, E., Tenopir, C., Levine, K., … Nichols, F. (2014). How scholars implement trust in their reading, citing and publishing activities: Geographical differences. Library & Information Science Research, 36(3), 192-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2014.08.002
8. Kornhaber, R. A., McLean, L. M., & Baber, R. J. (2015). Ongoing ethical issues concerning authorship in biomedical journals: An integrative review. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 10, 4837. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S87585
9. Müller, R. (2012). Collaborating in life science research groups: The question of authorship. Higher Education Policy, 25(3), 289-311. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2012.11
10. Müller, R. (2014a). Racing for what? Anticipation and acceleration in the work and career practices of academic life science postdocs. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum Qualitative Social Research, 15(3).
11. Müller, R. (2014b). Postdoctoral life scientists and supervision work in the contemporary university: A case study of changes in the cultural norms of science. Minerva, 52(3), 329-349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-014-9257-y
12. Nature Publishing Group and Palgrave MacMillan. (2015). Author insights - Initial findings. Retrieved from https://figshare.com/articles/Author_Insights_2015_survey/1425362
13. Nicholas, D., Boukacem-Zeghmouri, C., Rodríguez Bravo, B., Xu, J., Watkinson, A., Abrizah, A., … Swigon, M. (2017). Where and how early career researchers find scholarly information. Learned Publishing, 30(1), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1087
14. Nicholas, D., Herman, E., & Jamali, H. R. (2015). Emerging reputation mechanisms for scholars: A literature-based theoretical framework of scholarly activities and a state-of-the-art appraisal of the social networking services used by scholars, to build, maintain and showcase their reputation. Seville, Spain: European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. Retrieved from http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC94955/jrc94955.pdf.
15. Nicholas, D., Jamali, H. R., Watkinson, A., Herman, E., Tenopir, C., Volentine, R., … Levine, K. (2015). Do younger researchers assess trustworthiness differently when deciding what to read and cite and where to publish? International Journal of Knowledge Content Development and Technology, 5(2), 67-92. https://doi.org/10. 5865/IJKCT.2015.5.2.045
16. Nicholas, D., & Rowlands, I. (2011). Social media use in the research workflow. Information Services and Use, 31(1-2), 61-83. https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-2011-0623
17. Nicholas, D., Watkinson, A., Jamali, H. R., Herman, E., Tenopir, C., Volentine, R., … Levine, K. (2015). Peer review: Still king in the digital age. Learned Publishing, 28(1), 15-21. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150104
18. Nicholas, D., Watkinson, A., Volentine, A., Allard, S., Levine, K., Tenopir, C., & Herman, E. (2014). Trust and authority in scholarly communications in the light of the digital transition: Setting the scene for a major study. Learned Publishing, 27(2), 121-134. https://doi.org/10.1087/20140206
19. Pepermans, G., & Rousseau, S. (2014). The decision to submit to a journal: Another example of a valence-consistent shift? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(6), 1372-1383. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23491
20. Poli, S. (2016, 10 May). The annual conference of the German Association for HE research [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://srheblog.com/2016/05/10/the-annual-conference-ofthe-german-association-for-he-research/
21. Rousseau, S., & Rousseau, R. (2012). Interactions between journal attributes and authors’ willingness to wait for editorial decisions. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(6), 1213-1225. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22637
22. Rowlands, I., & Nicholas, D. (2005). Scholarly communication in the digital environment: The 2005 survey of journal author behaviour and attitudes. Aslib Proceedings, 57(6), 481-497. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012530510634226
23. Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D., Russell, B., Canty, N., & Watkinson, A. (2011). Social media use in the research workflow. Learned Publishing, 24(3), 183-195. https://doi.org/10.1087/20110306
24. Tenopir, C., Allard, S., Douglass, K., Aydinoglu, A. U., Wu, L., Read, E., … Frame, M. (2011). Data sharing by scientists: Practices and perceptions. PLoS One, 6(6), e21101. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021101
25. Tenopir, C., Dalton, E., Fish, A., Christian, L., Jones, M., & Smith, M. (2016). What motivates authors of scholarly articles? The importance of journal attributes and potential audience on publication choice. Publications, 4(3), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications4030022
26. Tenopir, C., Levine, K., Allard, S., Christian, L., Volentine, R., Boehm, R., … Watkinson, A. (2015). Trustworthiness and authority of scholarly information in a digital age: Results of an international questionnaire. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(10), 2344-2361. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi. 23598
27. Van Dalen, H. P., & Henkens, K. (2012). Intended and unintended consequences of a publish-or-perish culture: A worldwide survey. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(7), 1282-1293. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22636
28. Watkinson, A., Nicholas, D., Thornley, C., Herman, E., Jamali, H. R., Volentine, R., … Tenopir, C. (2016). Changes in the digital scholarly environment and issues of trust: An exploratory, qualitative analysis. Information Processing & Management, 52(3), 446-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2015.10.002
29. Wolff, C., Rod, A. B., & Schonfeld, R. C. (2016a). Ithaka S+R US faculty survey 2015. New York, NY: Ithaka S+R. Retrieved from http://sr. ithaka.org/?p=277685.
30. Wolff, C., Rod, A. B., & Schonfeld, R. C. (2016b, 15 June). UK survey of academics 2015: Ithaka S+R|Jisc|RLUK [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://www.sr.ithaka.org/publications/uk-surveyof-academics-2015/