Interactions between journal attributes and authors' willingness to wait for editorial decisions

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 63, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1213-1225

  Rousseau, Sandra ^a,b   Rousseau, Ronald ^b,c,d  

^a HUBrussel Faculty of Economics and Management   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c Associatie KULeuven   (Belgium)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

informetrics

Indexed keywords

DISCRETE CHOICE; EDITORIAL BOARD; HIGH QUALITY; IMPACT FACTOR; INFORMETRICS; INTERACTION EFFECT; PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS;

SURVEYS;

FACTOR ANALYSIS;

EID: 84861337117     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.22637     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Alberini, A., Longo, A., &, Veronesi, M., (2006). Basic statistical models for stated choice studies. In, B.J. Kanninen, (Ed.), Valuing environmental amenities using Stated choice studies (pp. 203-227). New York: Springer-Verlag.
2. Abt, H.A., (1987). Are articles by well-known astronomers accepted for publication more readily than other articles? Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 99, 439-441.
3. Amaya-Amaya, M., Gerard, K., &, Ryan, M., (2008). Discrete choice experiments in a nutshell. In, M. Ryan, K. Gerard, &, M. Amaya-Amaya, (Eds.), Using discrete choice experiments to value health and health care (pp. 13-46). New York: Springer.
4. Becher, T., (1994). The significance of disciplinary differences. Studies in Higher Education, 19 (2), 151-161.
5. Björk, B.-C., &, Holmström, J., (2006). Benchmarking scientific journals from the submitting author's viewpoint. Learned Publishing, 19 (2), 147-155.
6. Christie, M., Warren, J., Hanley, N., Murphy, K., Wright, R., Hyde T., &, Lyons, N., (2004). Developing measures for valuing changes in biodiversity: Final report. Peterborough, UK: Joint Nature Conservation Committee.
7. Day, B., Bateman, I.J., Carson, R.T., Dupont, D., Louviere, J.J., Morimoto, S., Scarpa, R., &, Wang, P., (2012). Ordering effects and choice set awareness in repeat-response stated preference studies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 63 (1), 73-91.
8. Desjardins, Y., (2011). The work continues. Chronica Horticulturae, 51 (1), 3-4.
9. Egghe, L., &, Rousseau, R., (2000). The influence of publication delays on the observed aging distribution of scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51 (2), 158-165.
10. Ferrini, S., &, Scarpa, R., (2007). Designs with a priori information for nonmarket valuation with choice experiments: A Monte Carlo study. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 53 (3), 342-363.
11. Hanley, N., Mourato, S., &, Wright, R.E., (2001). Choice modeling approaches: A superior alternative for environmental valuation? Journal of Economic Surveys, 15 (3), 435-462.
12. Hanley, N., Wright, R.E., &, Koop G., (2002). Modelling recreation demand using choice experiments: Climbing in Scotland. Environmental & Resource Economics, 22 (3), 449-466.
13. Heintzelman, M., &, Nocetti, D., (2009). Where should we submit our manuscript? An analysis of journal submission strategies. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 9 (1), Article 39. Retrieved from
14. Hicks. D., (2004). The four literatures of social science. In, H.F. Moed, W. Glänzel, &, U. Schmoch, (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 473-495). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
15. Ida, T., &, Horiguchi Y., (2008). Consumer benefits of public services over FTTH in Japan: Comparative analysis of provincial and urban areas by using discrete choice experiment. The Information Society, 24, 1-17.
16. Leyman, A., Vandevelde, K., Van Rossem, R., &, Groenvynck, H., (2011). Senior onderzoekers aan het woord. [Senior researchers' opinions] Ghent, Belgium: Human Researchers in Research.
17. Louviere, J.J., &, Hensher, D.A., (1982). On the design and analysis of simulated choice or allocation experiments in travel choice modelling. Transportation Research Record, 890, 11-17.
18. Louviere, J.J., Hensher, D.A., &, Swait, J.D., (2000). Stated choice methods: Analysis and application. New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Louviere, J.J., &, Woodworth, G., (1983). Design and analysis of stimulated choice experiments or allocation experiments: An approach based on aggregate data. Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 350-367.
20. Nicholas, D., Jamali, H.R., &, Rowlands, I., (2006). On the tips of their tongues: Authors and their views on scholarly publishing. Learned Publishing, 19 (3), 193-203.
21. Rousseau, S., &, Vranken, L., (2011). The impact of information on the willingness-to-pay for labeled organic food products (HUB research paper 2011/04). Brussels, Belgium: HUB.
22. Sãreide, K., &, Winter, D.C., (2010). Global survey of factors influencing choice of surgical journal for manuscript submission. Surgery, 147 (4), 475-480.
23. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., Thornhill, A., Booij, M., &, Verckens, J.P., (2011). Methoden en technieken van onderzoek. [Research methods and techniques] Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Pearson Education Benelux.
24. Schaffner, A., (2002). Swiss Medical Weekly-One year at sea after major overhaul. Swiss Medical Weekly, 132 (3), 3.
25. Street, D.J., Burgess, L., &, Louviere, J.J., (2005). Quick and easy choice sets: Constructing optimal and nearly optimal stated choice experiments. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 22, 459-470.
26. Thompson, P.J., (2007). How to choose the right journal for your manuscript. Chest, 132, 1073-1076.
27. Yu, G., Yu, D., &, Li, Y., (2004). The universal expression of periodical average publication delay at steady state. Scientometrics, 60 (2), 121-129.