Peer review: Still king in the digital age

Learned Publishing

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 15-21

  Nicholas, David ^a   Watkinson, Anthony ^b   Jamali, Hamid R ^b   Herman, Eti ^b   Tenopir, Carol ^c   Volentine, Rachel ^c   Allard, Suzie ^c   Levine, Kenneth ^c  

^a TOMSK STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^b CIBER RESEARCH LTD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929470768     PISSN: 09531513     EISSN: 17414857     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1087/20150104     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. CICS/CIBER. Trust and Authority in Scholarly Communications in the Digital Era (2013). Available at: http://ciber-research.eu/download/20140115-Trust_Final_Report.pdf
2. Nicholas, D., Watkinson, A., Volentine, R., Allard, S., Levine, K., Tenopir, C., and Herman, E. 2014. Trust and authority in scholarly communications in the light of the digital transition: Setting the scene for a major study. Learned Publishing, 27(2): 121–134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/20140206
3. Corritore, C.L., Kracher, B., and Wiedenbeck, S. 2003. On-line trust: concepts, evolving themes, a model. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 58(6): 737–758. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00041-7
4. Grabner-Kräuter, S. and Kaluscha, E.A. (2003). Empirical research in on-line trust: a review and critical assessment. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 58(6): 783–812. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00043-0
5. Steen, R.G., Casadevall, A., and Fang, F. C. 2013. Why has the number of scientific retractions increased? PLOS ONE, 8(7): e68397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068397
6. Eysenbach, G. 2011. Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13(4): e123. http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2012
7. Thelwall, M., Haustein, S., Larivière, V., & Sugimoto, C. R. 2013. Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services. PLOS ONE, 8(5): e64841.
8. Haustein, S., Peters, I., Sugimoto, C. R., Thelwall, M., and Larivière, V. (2014). Tweeting biomedicine: an analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(4), 656–669.
9. Lozano, G.A., Larivière, C., and Gingras, Y. 2012. The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers’ citations in the digital age. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(11): 2140–2145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.22731