Erratum: “Aging increases cell-to-cell transcriptional variability upon immune stimulation”(Science(2020)366:6472 (eaba3487)Doi:10.1126/science.aah4115);Aging increases cell-to-cell transcriptional variability upon immune stimulation

Science

Volumn 355, Issue 6332, 2017, Pages 1433-1436

  Martinez Jimenez, Celia Pilar ^a,b   Eling, Nils ^a,c   Chen, Hung Chang ^a   Vallejos, Catalina A ^c,d   Kolodziejczyk, Aleksandra A ^b,c   Connor, Frances ^a   Stojic, Lovorka ^a   Rayner, Timothy F ^a   Stubbington, Michael J T ^c   Teichmann, Sarah A ^b,c   De La Roche, Maike ^a   Marioni, John C ^a,b,c   Odom, Duncan T ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^c EUROPEAN BIOINFORMATICS INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

T LYMPHOCYTE RECEPTOR; LYMPHOCYTE ANTIGEN RECEPTOR; TRANSCRIPTOME;

AGING; CELLS AND CELL COMPONENTS; GENE; GENE EXPRESSION; HETEROGENEITY; IMMUNE RESPONSE; IMMUNE SYSTEM; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEIN; RNA; RODENT;

AGED; AGING; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CD4+ T LYMPHOCYTE; CELL POPULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EFFECTOR CELL; GENE EXPRESSION; IMMUNOSTIMULATION; LIFESPAN; MEMORY T LYMPHOCYTE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RNA SEQUENCE; T LYMPHOCYTE ACTIVATION; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION; TRANSCRIPTOMICS; UPREGULATION; ANIMAL; C57BL MOUSE; CELL AGING; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS; IMMUNOLOGICAL MEMORY; IMMUNOLOGY; LYMPHOCYTE ACTIVATION; MALE; METABOLISM; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS;

ANIMALIA; MAMMALIA; MUS;

AGING; ANIMALS; CD4-POSITIVE T-LYMPHOCYTES; CELL AGING; GENETIC VARIATION; IMMUNOLOGIC MEMORY; LYMPHOCYTE ACTIVATION; MALE; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; RECEPTORS, ANTIGEN, T-CELL; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, RNA; SINGLE-CELL ANALYSIS; TRANSCRIPTOME;

EID: 85016584336     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.aba3487     Document Type: Erratum

References (20)

1. L. N. Booth, A. Brunet, Mol. Cell 62, 728-744 (2016).
2. J. M. Zahn et al., PLOS Genet. 3, e201 (2007).
3. S. A. McCarroll et al., Nat. Genet. 36, 197-204 (2004).
4. N. Mirza, K. Pollock, D. B. Hoelzinger, A. L. Dominguez, J. Lustgarten, Aging Cell 10, 853-867 (2011).
5. R. Bahar et al., Nature 441, 1011-1014 (2006).
6. L. A. Warren et al., Aging Cell 6, 775-782 (2007).
7. H. J. Kim, H. Cantor, Cancer Immunol. Res. 2, 91-98 (2014).
8. D. Brawand et al., Nature 478, 343-348 (2011).
9. I. G. Romero, I. Ruvinsky, Y. Gilad, Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 505-516 (2012).
10. G. H. Perry et al., Genome Res. 22, 602-610 (2012).
11. T. Shay et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 2946-2951 (2013).
12. R. Yuan, L. L. Peters, B. Paigen, ILAR J. 52, 4-15 (2011).
13. C. A. Vallejos, S. Richardson, J. C. Marioni, Genome Biol. 17, 70 (2016).
14. M. Asmal et al., Immunity 19, 535-548 (2003).
15. M. S. Kowalczyk et al., Genome Res. 25, 1860-1872 (2015).
16. I. den Braber et al., Immunity 36, 288-297 (2012).
17. Y. Buganim et al., Cell 150, 1209-1222 (2012).
18. C. P. Martinez-Jimenez, D. T. Odom, Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 37, 27-35 (2016).
19. J. P. de Magalhães, J. Curado, G. M. Church, Bioinformatics 25, 875-881 (2009).
20. J. J. Goronzy, C. M. Weyand, Nat. Immunol. 14, 428-436 (2013).