Effectiveness of group-based self-management education for individuals with Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review with meta-analyses and meta-regression

Diabetic Medicine

Volumn 34, Issue 8, 2017, Pages 1027-1039

  Odgers Jewell, K ^a   Ball, L E ^b   Kelly, J T ^a   Isenring, E A ^a   Reidlinger, D P ^a   Thomas, R ^a  

^a BOND UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE; HEMOGLOBIN A1C; LIPID; TRIACYLGLYCEROL; GLYCOSYLATED HEMOGLOBIN; HEMOGLOBIN A1C PROTEIN, HUMAN;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BLOOD PRESSURE; BODY MASS; BODY WEIGHT; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); EDUCATION PROGRAM; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; GROUP BASED SELF MANAGEMENT EDUCATION; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; LIFESTYLE; LIPID BLOOD LEVEL; META ANALYSIS; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT EDUCATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SELF CARE; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; WAIST CIRCUMFERENCE; BLOOD; BODY WEIGHT LOSS; BODY WEIGHT MAINTENANCE; COMPLICATION; EDUCATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; GROUP STRUCTURE; HEALTHY LIFESTYLE; HYPERGLYCEMIA; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIMODALITY CANCER THERAPY; OBESITY; PATIENT CARE; PEER GROUP; PSYCHOSOCIAL CARE;

BODY WEIGHT MAINTENANCE; COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; GLYCATED HEMOGLOBIN A; GROUP STRUCTURE; HEALTHY LIFESTYLE; HUMANS; HYPERGLYCEMIA; MIDDLE AGED; OVERWEIGHT; PATIENT CARE TEAM; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PEER GROUP; PSYCHOSOCIAL SUPPORT SYSTEMS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; SELF-MANAGEMENT; WEIGHT LOSS;

EID: 85016294011     PISSN: 07423071     EISSN: 14645491     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/dme.13340     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Diabetes Australia. National Evidence Based Guideline for Patient Education in Type 2 Diabetes. Sydney: Diabetes Australia Guideline Development Consortium (DAGDC), 2009.
2. Adolfsson ET, Starrin B, Smide B, Wikblad K. Type 2 diabetic patients’ experiences of two different educational approaches – a qualitative study. Int J Nurs Stud 2008; 45: 986–994.
3. Ellis SE, Speroff T, Dittus RS, Brown A, Pichert JW, Elasy TA. Diabetes patient education: a meta-analysis and meta-regression. Patient Educ Couns 2004; 52: 97–105.
4. Norris SL, Lau J, Smith SJ, Schmid CH, Engelgau MM. Self-management education for adults with Type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control. Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 1159–1171.
5. Mensing CR, Norris SL. Group education in diabetes: effectiveness and implementation. Diabetes Spectr 2003; 16: 96–103.
6. Steinsbekk A, Rygg L, Lisulo M, Rise MB, Fretheim A. Group based diabetes self-management education compared to routine treatment for people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. A systematic review with meta-analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 2012; 12: 1.
7. World Health Organization (WHO). Peer Support Programmes in Diabetes: Report of a WHO consultation 5–7 November 2007. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2008.
8. Deakin T, McShane CE, Cade JE, Williams R. Group based training for self-management strategies in people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; (2): CD003417.
9. Chrvala CA, Sherr D, Lipman RD. Diabetes self-management education for adults with Type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review of the effect on glycemic control. Patient Educ Couns 2016; 99: 926–943.
10. Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, Bouter LM, Kristjansson E, Grimshaw J et al. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62: 1013–1020.
11. Seo H-J, Kim KU. Quality assessment of systematic reviews or meta-analyses of nursing interventions conducted by Korean reviewers. BMC Med Res Methodol 2012; 12: 1.
12. Mikton C, Butchart A. Child maltreatment prevention: a systematic review of reviews. Bull World Health Organ 2009; 87: 353–361.
13. Higgins JP, Green S eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester: Wiley, 2008.
14. The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, 2014.
15. Thompson SG, Higgins J. How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? Stat Med 2002; 21: 1559–1573.
16. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP, 2015.
17. Dalmau Llorca MR, Garcia Bernal G, Aguilar Martin C, Palau Galindo A. [Group versus individual education for type-2 diabetes patients]. Aten primaria 2003; 32: 36–41.
18. Lozano ML, Armale MJ, Tena Domingo I, Sanchez Nebra C. [The education of type-2 diabetics: why not in groups?] Aten primaria 1999; 23: 485–492.
19. Miselli V, Monzali E, Accorsi P, Bedogni C, Pagliani U, Zappavigna A et al. [Group care intervention on patients with Type 2 diabetes]. G It Diabetol Metab 2009; 29: 189–196.
20. Gallotti C, Rovelli R, Moraca R, Pellegrino C, Pacileo G, Tenconi MT. [Self help and mutual aid groups: effectiveness in Type 2 diabetes]. G It Diabetol Metab 2003; 23: 69–76.
21. Pennings-Van der Eerden L, Ripken T, Van Heijst P, Schrijvers A. Evaluation of the impact of a patient education programme for NIDDM patients on knowledge, self-care behaviour, metabolic control and lipid profiles. Gedrag Gezondheid 1991; 19: 246–260.
22. Huisman S, de Gucht V, Maes S, Schroevers M, Chatrou M, Haak H. Self-regulation and weight reduction in patients with Type 2 diabetes: a pilot intervention study. Patient Educ Couns 2009; 75: 84–90.
23. Gagliardino JJ, Lapertosa S, Pfirter G, Villagra M, Caporale JE, Gonzalez CD et al. Clinical, metabolic and psychological outcomes and treatment costs of a prospective randomized trial based on different educational strategies to improve diabetes care (PRODIACOR). Diabet Med 2013; 30: 1102–1111.
24. Sperl-Hillen J, Beaton S, Fernandes O, Von Worley A, Vazquez-Benitez G, Hanson A et al. Are benefits from diabetes self-management education sustained? Am J Manag Care 2013; 19: 104–112.
25. Sperl-Hillen J, Beaton S, Fernandes O, Von Worley A, Vazquez-Benitez G, Parker E et al. Comparative effectiveness of patient education methods for Type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 2011; 171: 2001–2010.
26. Toobert DJ, Strycker LA, King DK, Barrera M Jr, Osuna D, Glasgow RE. Long-term outcomes from a multiple-risk-factor diabetes trial for Latinas: Viva Bien!. Trans Behav Med 2011; 1: 416–426.
27. Smith SM, Paul G, Kelly A, Whitford DL, O'Shea E, O'Dowd T. Peer support for patients with Type 2 diabetes: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2011; 342: d715.
28. King P, Peacock I, Donnelly R. The UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS): clinical and therapeutic implications for Type 2 diabetes. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1999; 48: 643–648.
29. Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HAW, Matthews DR, Manley SE, Cull CA et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of Type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ 2000; 321: 405–412.
30. Hemmingsen B, Lund SS, Gluud C, Vaag A, Almdal TP, Wetterslev J. Targeting intensive glycaemic control versus targeting conventional glycaemic control for Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; (6): CD008143.pub2.
31. Colagiuri S, Dickinson S, Girgis S, Colagiuri R. National Evidence Based Guideline for Blood Glucose Control in Type 2 Diabetes. Canberra: Diabetes Australia and the National Health and Medical Research Council, 2009.
32. Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, Diamant M, Ferrannini E, Nauck M et al. Management of hyperglycemia in Type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care 2012; 35: 1364–1379.
33. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Overweight and Obesity in Adults, Adolescents and Children in Australia. Melbourne: NHMRC, 2013.
34. Franz MJ. Weight loss interventions and outcomes: Type 2 diabetes. J Obes Weight Loss Ther 2015; doi:10.4172/2165-7904.S5-005.
35. Look AHEAD Research Group. Cardiovascular effects of intensive lifestyle intervention in Type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 145–154.
36. Han TS, Leer EM, Seidell JC, Lean ME. Waist circumference as a screening tool for cardiovascular risk factors: evaluation of receiver operating characteristics (ROC). Obes Res 1996; 4: 533–547.
37. National Vascular Disease Prevention Alliance (NVDPA). Guidelines for the Management of Absolute Cardiovascular Disease Risk. Melbourne: Stroke Foundation, 2012. Available at https://strokefoundation.org.au/What-we-do/Treatment-programs/Clinical-guidelines/Guidelines-for-the-assessment-and-management-of-absolute-CVD-risk Last accessed 28 July 2016.
38. Gleeson-Kreig JM. Self-monitoring of physical activity effects on self-efficacy and behavior in people with Type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ 2006; 32: 69–77.
39. Barlow J, Wright C, Sheasby J, Turner A, Hainsworth J. Self-management approaches for people with chronic conditions: a review. Patient Educ Couns 2002; 48: 177–187.
40. International Diabetes Federation (IDF). Global Guidelines for Type 2 Diabetes. Brussels: IDF Clinical Guidelines Taskforce, 2012.
41. Funk SG, Tornquist EM, Leeman J, Miles MS, Harrell JS, editors. Key Aspects of Preventing and Managing Chronic Illness. New York: Springer, 2001.
42. Macdonald W, Rogers A, Blakeman T, Bower P. Practice nurses and the facilitation of self-management in primary care. J Adv Nurs 2008; 62: 191–199.
43. Thorne SE, Paterson BL. Health care professional support for self-care management in chronic illness: insights from diabetes research. Patient Educ Couns 2001; 42: 81–90.
44. Tang TS, Brown MB, Funnell MM, Anderson RM. Social support, quality of life, and self-care behaviors among African Americans with Type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ 2008; 34: 266–276.
45. Williams GC, McGregor HA, King D, Nelson CC, Glasgow RE. Variation in perceived competence, glycemic control, and patient satisfaction: relationship to autonomy support from physicians. Patient Educ Couns 2005; 57: 39–45.
46. Boothroyd R, Fisher E. Peers for progress: promoting peer support for health around the world. Family Pract 2010; 27: 62–68.
47. Caro J, Fisher E. A solution might be within people with diabetes themselves. Family Pract 2010; 27(Suppl. 1): i1–i2.
48. 1c remain after 5 years – a follow up of an educational intervention focusing on patients’ personal understandings of Type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2008; 81: 50–55.
49. Odgers-Jewell K, Isenring E, Thomas R, Reidlinger DP. Process evaluation of a patient-centred, patient-directed, group-based education program for the management of Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nutr Diet 2016; doi:10.1111/1747-0080.12327.