Gender, Pair Composition and Computer Versus Paper Presentations of an English Language Task

Educational Psychology

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 33-43

  Keogh, Teresa ^a   Barnes, Peter ^a   Joiner, Richard ^a   Littleton, Karen ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85015872593     PISSN: 01443410     EISSN: 14695820     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/014434100110362     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. BARBIERI, S., and LIGHT, P., 1992. Interaction, gender and performance on a computer-based problem solving task. Learning and Instruction, 2: 199–213.
2. CAMP, T., 1997. The incredible shrinking pipeline. Communications of the ACM, 40: 103–111.
3. CORSTON, R., and COLMAN, A.M., 1996. Gender and social facilitation effects on computer competence and attitudes toward computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14: 171–183.
4. CULLEY, L., 1988. Girls, boys and computers. Educational Studies, 14: 3–8.
5. CULLEY, L., 1993. “ Gender equity and computing in secondary schools: issues and strategies for teachers ”. In Computers into Classrooms: more questions than answers, Edited by: BENYON, J., and MACKAY, H., 147–159. London: Falmer Press.
6. DALTON, D.W., 1990. The effects of co-operative learning strategies on achievement and attitudes during an interactive video. Journal of Computer Based Instruction, 17: 8–16.
7. GROSSEN, M., and LIENGME, M.-J., Social Comparison and Negotiation of Expertise in Peer Interaction. Paper presented at the 5th European Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction. August31, Aix-en-Provence. -5 September
8. HUGET, P., CHAMBRES, P., and BLAYE, A., 1994. “ Interactive learning: does social presence explain the results? ”. In Group and Interactive Learning, Edited by: FOOT, H.C., HOWE, C.J., ANDERSON, A., TOLMIE, A.K., and WARDEN, D.A., 437–444. Southampton, Boston: Computational Mechanics Publications.
9. HUGHES, M., BRACKENRIDGE, A., BIBBY, A., and GREENHOUGH, P., 1988. “ Girls, boys and turtles: gender effects in young children learning with LOGO ”. In Girls and Computers, Bedford Way Papers 34 Edited by: HOYLES, C., 31–39. London: University of London, Institute of Education.
10. JANSSEN REINEN, I.A.M., and PLOMP, TJ. 1997. Information technology and gender equality: a contradiction in terminus. Computers & Education, 28: 65–78.
11. JOINER, R., MESSER, D., LIGHT, P., and LITTLETON, K., 1998. The effects of gender, expectations of success and social comparison on children's performance on a computer-based task. Educational Psychology, 18: 319–325.
12. LEE, M., 1993. Gender, group composition and peer interaction in computer-based co-operative learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 9: 549–577.
13. LIENGME BESSIRE, M.-J., GROSSEN, M., IANNACCONE, A., and PERRET-CLERMONT, A.-N., 1994. “ Social comparison of expertise; interactional patterns and dynamics of instruction ”. In Group and Interactive Learning, Edited by: FOOT, H.C., HOWE, C.J., ANDERSON, A., TOLMIE, A.K., and WARDEN, D.A., 471–478. Southampton, Boston: Computational Mechanics Publications.
14. LIGHT, P., LITTLETON, K., BALE, S., JOINER, R., and MESSER, D., 2000. Gender and social comparison effects in computer based learning. Learning and Instruction.
15. LITTLETON, K., 1996. “ Girls and information technology ”. In Equity in the Classroom: towards effective pedagogy for girls and boys, Edited by: MURPHY, P., and GIPPS, C., London: Falmer Press.
16. LITTLETON, K., and LIGHT, P., 1999. Learning with Computers, London: Routledge.
17. LITTLETON, K., LIGHT, P., JOINER, R., MESSER, D., and BARNES, P., 1992. Pairing and gender effects on children's computer based learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 7: 311–324.
18. MONTEIL, J.-M., 1993. Soi et le Contexte, Paris: Alcan.
19. MURPHY, P., and GIPPS, C., 1996. Equity in the Classroom: towards effective pedagogy for girls and boys, London: Falmer Press.
20. NEWTON, P., and BECK, E., 1993. “ Computing an ideal occupation for women? ”. In Computers in Classrooms: more questions than answers, Edited by: BENYON, J., and MACKAY, H., 130–146. London: Falmer Press.
21. PHEASEY, K., and UNDERWOOD, G., 1994. “ Collaboration and discourse during computer-based problem solving ”. In Group and Interactive Learning, Edited by: FOOT, H.C., HOWE, C.J., ANDERSON, A., TOLMIE, A.K., and WARDEN, D.A., 105–112. Southampton, Boston: Computational Mechanics Publications.
22. ROBINSON-STAVELY, K., and COOPER, J., 1990. Mere presence, gender and reactions to computers: studying human computer interaction in social context. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26: 168–183.
23. SIANN, G., and MACLEOD, H., 1986. Computers and children of primary school age: issues and questions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 17: 133–144.
24. SIANN, G., MACLEOD, H., GLISSOV, P., and DURNDELL, A., 1990. The effect of computer use on gender differences in attitudes to computers. Computers and Education, 14: 183–191.
25. UNDERWOOD, G., JINDAL, N., and UNDERWOOD, J., 1994. Gender differences and effects of co-operation in a computer based language task. Educational Research, 36: 63–74.
26. UNDERWOOD, G., MCCAFFREY, M., and UNDERWOOD, J., 1990. Gender differences in a computer-based language task. Educational Research, 32: 44–49.
27. UNDERWOOD, G., and UNDERWOOD, J., 1998. Children's interactions and learning outcomes with interactive talking books. Computers and Education, 30: 95–102.
28. VERBA, M., and WINNYKAMEN, F., 1992. Expert-novice interactions: in¯ uence of power status. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 7: 61–71.
29. WHITLEY, B.E., 1997. Gender differences in computer-related attitudes and behaviour: a meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behaviour, 13: 1–22.
30. YELLAND, N.J., 1994. The strategies and interactions of young children with LOGO tasks. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 10: 33–49.