Asian regionalism five years after the 1997/98 financial crisis: A case of ‘co-operative realism’?

Asia-Pacific Economic and Security Co-operation: New Regional Agendas

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 53-71

  Rüland, Jürgen ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b Arnold Bergstraesser Institute   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85015860201     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1057/9780230287327_4     Document Type: Chapter

References (50)

1. Acharya, A. (1997) ‘Ideas, Identity, and Institution-Building: From the ‘ASEAN Way’ to the ‘Asia-Pacific Way’, The Pacific Review, Vol. 10(3), pp. 319-46.
2. Allen, C.T. (1990) ‘Northeast Asia Centered Around Korea: Ch’oe Nam-son’s View of History’, Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 49(4), pp. 787-806.
3. Anwar, D.F. (1995) Indonesia in ASEAN. Foreign Policy and Regionalism, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore.
4. Baldwin, D.A. (ed.) (1993) ‘Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate’, Columbia University Press, New York.
5. Bowles, P. (1997) ‘ASEAN, AFTA and the New Regionalism’, Pacific Affairs, Vol. 70(2), pp. 219-34.
6. Bowles, P. (2002) ‘Asia’s Post-Crisis Regionalism: Bringing the State Back In, Keeping the (United) States Out’, Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 9(2), pp. 230-56.
7. Busse, N. (1999) ‘Social Constructivism and Southeast Asian Security’, The Pacific Review, Vol. 12(1), pp. 39-60.
8. David, H. (2002) Die ASEAN zwischen Konflikt, Kooperation und Integration, PhD Thesis. University of Rostock.
9. Dent, C.M. (1999) ‘The EU-East Asia Economic Relationship. The Persisting Weak Triadic Link?’, European Foreign Affairs Review, Vol. 4(3), pp. 371-94.
10. Dent, C.M. (2001) ‘Singapore’s Foreign Economic Policy: The Pursuit of Economic Security’, Contemporary Southeast Asia, Vol. 23(1), pp. 1-23.
11. Diamond, L. (2002) ‘Elections Without Democracy. Thinking About Hybrid Regimes’, Journal of Democracy, Vol. 13(2), pp. 20-35.
12. Dieter, H. (2000) ‘Ostasien nach der Krise: Interne Reformen, neue Finanzarchitektur und monetärer Regionalismus’, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, B 37/38/2000, 8. September 2000.
13. Dosch, J. (1996) ‘Die ASEAN-Kooperations- und Integrationsleistungen, Perspektiven’, in G. Eilenberger and M. Mols and J. Rüland (eds), Kooperation, Regionalismus und Integration im asiatisch-pazifischen Raum, Mitteilungen des Instituts für Asienkunde, Hamburg.
14. Dosch, J. (1997) Die ASEAN. Bilanz eines Erfolges. Akteure, Interessenlagen, Kooperationsbeziehungen, Abera Networks, Hamburg.
15. Fitzgerald, C.P. (1973) ‘Zum chinesischen Ethnozentrismus’, in D. Frei (ed.), Theorien der Internationalen Beziehungen, R. Piper&Co. Verlag, München.
16. Freeman, Nick J. (1999) ‘Greater Mekong Sub-Region and the “Asian Crisis”: Caught Between Scylla and Charybdis’, Southeast Asian Affairs, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, pp. 32-51.
17. Funston, J. (1999) ‘Challenges Facing ASEAN in a Modern Complex Age’, Contemporary Southeast Asia, Vol. 21(2), pp. 205-19.
18. Garofano, J. (2002) ‘Power, Institutions, and the ASEAN Regional Forum: A Security Community for Asia?’, Asian Survey, Vol. 42(2), pp. 502-21.
19. Gilson, J. (2002) Asia Meets Europe: Interregionalism and the Asia-Europe Meeting, Edwin Elgar, Cheltenham.
20. Glasenapp, H. von (1958) Indische Geisteswelt. Glaube, Dichtung und Wissenschaft Indiens, Band II, Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden.
21. Hänggi, H. (2000) Regionalism Through Interregionalism: East Asia in ASEM, unpublished paper.
22. Higgott, R. (1994) ‘Ideas, Policy Networks and Policy Co-ordination in the Asia Pacific’, The Pacific Review, Vol. 7(4), pp. 397-409.
23. Huxley, T. (1996) ‘Southeast Asia in the Study of International Relations: The Rise and Decline of a Region’, The Pacific Review, Vol. 9(2), pp. 199-228.
24. Johnston, A.I. (1996) ‘Cultural Realism and Strategy in Maoist China’, in P.J. Katzenstein (ed.), The Culture of National Security. Norms and Identity in World Politics, Columbia University Press, New York.
25. Johnston, A.I. (1999) ‘The Myth of the ASEAN Way? Explaining the Evolution of the ASEAN Regional Forum’, in H. Haftendorn, R.O. Keohane and C.A. Wallander (eds), Imperfect Unions. Security Institutions over Time and Space, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
26. Kahler, M. (2000) ‘Legalization as a Strategy: The Asia-Pacific Case’, International Organization, Vol. 54(3), pp. 549-71.
27. Kraft, H.J.S. (2000) ‘The Autonomy Dilemma of Track Two Diplomacy in Southeast Asia’, Security Dialogue, Vol. 31(3), pp. 343-56.
28. Leifer, M. (1996) The ASEAN Regional Forum, Adelphi Paper 302, Oxford University Press/Institute for Strategic and International Studies, Oxford.
29. Levitsky, S. and Way, L.A. (2002) The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism, Journal of Democracy, Vol. 13(2), pp. 51-65.
30. Link, W. (1998) Die Neuordnung der Weltpolitik. Grundprobleme globaler Politik an der Schwelle zum 21. Jahrhundert, Beck’sche Reihe, München.
31. Maull, H.W. and Tanaka, A. (1997) ‘The Geopolitical Dimension’, in Council for Asia-Europe Co-operation (ed.), The Rationale and Common Agenda for Asia-Europe Co-operation, CAEC Task Force Reports, London.
32. McCloud, D.G. (1995) Southeast Asia. Tradition and Modernity in the Contemporary World, Westview, Boulder.
33. Möller, K. (2002) Pacific Sunset. Vom vorzeitigen Ende des ostasiatischen Jahrhundert, Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, Berlin.
34. Müller, H. (1993) Die Chance der Kooperation. Regime in den internationalen Beziehungen, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt.
35. Nesadurai, H. and Stone, D. (2000) ‘Southeast Asian Think Tanks in Regional and Global Networking’, Panorama, Vol. 1, pp. 19-36.
36. Roloff, R. (1998) ‘Globalisierung, Regionalisierung und Gleichgewicht’, in C. Masala and R. Roloff (eds), Herausforderungen der Realpolitik. Beiträge zur Theoriedebatte in der internationalen Politik, SB-Verlag, Köln.
37. Rüland, J. (1999) ‘The Future of the ASEM Process: Who, How, Why and What’, in W. Stokhof and P. van der Velde (eds), ASEM. The Asia-Europe Meeting. A Window of Opportunity, Kegan Paul, London.
38. Rüland, J. (2000) ‘ASEAN and the Asian Crisis: Theoretical and Practical Consequences for Southeast Asian Regionalism’, The Pacific Review, Vol. 13(3), pp. 421-51.
39. Rüland, J. (2002a) ‘APEC, ASEAN and EAEC - A Tale of Two Cultures of Co-operation’, in J. Rüland and E. Manske and W. Draguhn (eds) Asia-Pacific Economic Co-operation (APEC): The First Decade, RoutledgeCurzon, London.
40. Rüland, J. (2002b) ‘The Contribution of Track Two Dialogue towards Crisis Prevention’, ASIEN, Vol. 85, pp. 84-96.
41. Simon, S. (1995) ‘Realism and Neoliberalism: International Relations Theory and Southeast Asian Security’, The Pacific Review, Vol. 8(1), pp. 5-24.
42. Simon, S.W. (2002) ‘The ASEAN Regional Forum Views the Councils for Security Co-operation in the Asia Pacific: How Track II Assists Track I’, NBR Analysis, Vol. 13(4), pp. 5-23.
43. Stubbs, R. (2002) ‘ASEAN Plus Three: Emerging East Asian Regionalism?’ Asian Survey, Vol. XLII(3), pp. 440-55.
44. Suryadinata, L. (1996) Indonesia’s Foreign Policy under Suharto. Aspiring to International Leadership, Times Academic Press, Singapore.
45. Wacker, G. (2001) Die Shanghaier Organisation für Zusammenarbeit: Eurasische Gemeinschaft oder Papiertiger? Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, Berlin.
46. Wagner, C. (2002) Die ‘verhinderte’ Grossmacht? Die Aussenpolitik der Indischen Union, 1947-1998, Habil.Schrift, Universität Rostock.
47. Wendt, A. (1999) Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
48. Wesley, M. (1999) ‘The Asian Crisis and the Adequacy of Regional Institutions’, Contemporary Southeast Asia, Vol. 21(1), pp. 54-73.
49. Wolferen, K. van (1990) The Enigma of Japanese Power: People and Politics in a Stateless Nation, Knopf, New York.
50. Zimmer, H. (1976) Philosophien und Religionen Indiens, Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt.