The EU-East Asia economic relationship: The persisting weak triadic link?

European Foreign Affairs Review

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 371-394

  Dent, Christopher M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LINCOLN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85015911478     PISSN: 13846299     EISSN: 18758223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.54648/eerr1999037     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. See P. Hirst and G. Thompson, Globalization in Question (Polity Press, London 1996).
2. Ohmae also applied the term to firms that had dispersed their activities over the Triad regions; K. Ohmae, Triad Power: The Coming Shape of Global Competition (Free Press, New York 1985).
3. behaviour of, or decisions made by another. See S. Strange, States and Markets (Pinter, London 1994).
4. See for example, J. Hart, Rival Capitalism (Cornell University Press, Ithaca 1992);
5. L. Thurow, Head to Head: The Coming Economic Battle Among Japan, Europe and America (Nicholas Brealey, London 1992);
6. M. Albert, Capitalism Against Capitalism (Whurr, London 1993);
7. P. Krugman, 'America the boastful', 77 (3) Foreign Affairs (1998) 32-45;
8. M. Zuckerman, 'A second American century', 77(3) Foreign Affairs (1998) 18-31;
9. See M. Silberschmidt, The United States and Europe: Rivals and Partners (Thames and Hudson, London 1972);
10. L. Tsoukalis (ed.), Europe, America and the World Economy (Blackwell, Oxford 1986);
11. C. M. Dent, 'The Trans-Atlantic economic space: filling the vacuum of towards the final frontier?', 96 (2) European Business Review (1996) 4-12;
12. K. Featherstone, and R. Ginsberg, The United States and the European Union in the 1990s (MacMillan, London 1996);
13. M. Kahler and W. Link, Europe andAmerica: A Return to History (Council on Foreign Relations Press, New York 1996);
14. J. Peterson, Europe andAmerica: The Prospectsfor Partnership (Routledge, London 1996);
15. W. H. Reinicke, Deepening the Atlantic: Towards a New Transatlantic Marketplace? (Bertelsmann Foundation, Gütersloh 1996);
16. B. Hocking and M. Smith, Beyond Foreign Economic Policy: The United States, the Single European Market and the Changing World Economy (Pinter, London 1997);
17. M. Smith, 'Competitive cooperation and EU-US relations: can the EU be a strategic partner for the US in the world political economy', 5 (4) Journal of European Public Policy (1998) 561-577
18. ; J. Peterson and M. G. Cowles, 'Clinton, Europe and economic diplomacy: what makes the EU different?', 11 (3) Governance (1998) 251-271;
19. E. Philippart and P. Winand (eds.), Policy-Making and Decision-Making in United States-European Union Relations (Manchester University Press, Manchester 1999).
20. See P. Drysdale, 'Open regionalism: a key to East Asia's economic future', Pacific Economic Papers, No. 197, (Australia-Japan Research Centre, 1991);
21. A. Elek, 'Trade policy options for the Asia-Pacific region in the 1990s: the potential of open regionalism', 82 (2) American Economic Review (1992) 74-78;
22. C. F. Bergsten, 'APEC and world trade: a force for worldwide liberalization', 73 (3) Foreign Affairs (1994) 20-26;
23. P. Drysdale and A. Elek, 'The APEC experiment: an open economic organization in the Asia-Pacific', 23 (4-6) International Journal of Social Economics (1996) 164-187.
24. P. Drysdale, D. Vines and B. House, 'Europe and East Asia: a shared global agenda?', in P. Drysdale and D. Vines (eds.), Europe, EastAsia andAPEC: A Shared GlobalAgenda? (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1998).
25. S. Haggard and A. Maclntyre, 'The political economy of the Asian economic crisis', 5 (3) Review ofInternational Political Economy (1998) 381-392.
26. sis' effects upon the region has been patchy. See, World Bank, The East Asian Miracle: Economic Growth and Public Policy (Oxford University Press, Oxford 1993).
27. R. Wade, 'The Asian debt-and development crisis of 1997-?: causes and consequences', 26 (8) World Development (1998) 1535-1553.
28. R. Higgott, 'The Asian economic crisis: a study in the politics of resentment', 3 (3) New Political Economy (1998) 333-356.
29. dent loans to Thai, Indonesian and South Korean banks and business in the first place. See C. Johnson, 'Economic crisis in East Asia: the clash of capitalisms', 22 Cambridge Journal of Economics (1998) 653-661 at 654.
30. See C. M. Dent, The European Union and East Asia: An Economic Relationship (Routledge, London 1999).
31. See C. Kindleberger, The World in Depression: 1929-1939 (University of California Press, Berkeley 1973);
32. S. D. Krasner, 'State power and the structure of international trade', 28 (3) World Politics (1976) 317-348;
33. D. A. Lake, 'British and American hegemony compared: lessons for the current era of decline', in M. Fry (ed.) History, the White House and the Kremlin: Statesmen as Historians (Pinter, London 1991).
34. J-P. Lehmann, 'European and Asian Policies on Trade and Investment: Past Perspectives - Future Prospects', paper given at the 'Beyond Liberalization: Making Economic Policy in Europe and the Asia-Pacific' Conference, 15-16 October 1998, European University Institute, Florence, Italy.
35. See C. M. Dent, 'Economic relations between the EU and East Asia: past, present and future', 32 (I) Intereconomics (1997) 7-13.
36. See for example, OL Segal, 'Thinking strategically about ASEM; the subsidiarity question', 10 (1) The Pacific Review (1997) 124-134
37. and G. Segal, 'A New ASEM agenda: a report on the British Council's meeting 'Asia and Europe: societies in transition', 19-22 March 1998', 11 (4) The Pacific Review (199%) 561-572.
38. C. Randerson and C. M. Dent, 'Korean and Japanese foreign direct investment in Europe: an examination of comparable and contrasting patterns', 20 (2)Asian Studies Review (1996) 45-70.
39. T. Bourke, Japan and the Globalization of European Integration (Dartmouth, Aldershot 1996).