Impacts of property accessibility and neighborhood built environment on single-unit and multiunit residential property values

Transportation Research Record

Volumn 2568, Issue , 2016, Pages 103-112

  Guo, Yuntao ^a   Agrawal, Shubham ^a   Peeta, Srinivas ^a   Somenahalli, Sekhar ^b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COSTS; HOUSING; INVESTMENTS; LAND USE; MASS TRANSPORTATION; PLANNING; URBAN TRANSPORTATION;

BUILT ENVIRONMENT; CONSUMER SURVEY; CONTRIBUTING FACTOR; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; INTERSECTION DENSITY; NEIGHBOURHOOD; PROPERTY; PROPERTY INVESTMENTS; PROPERTY VALUE; PUBLIC TRANSIT;

LOCATION;

EID: 85015711635     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: 21694052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2568-15     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Stull, W. J. Community Environment, Zoning, and the Market Value of Single-Family Homes. Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 18, 1975, pp. 535-557.
2. Pivo, G., and J. D. Fisher. The Walkability Premium in Commercial Real Estate Investments. Real Estate Economics, Vol. 39, No. 2, 2011, pp. 185-219.
3. Lewis-Workman, S., and D. Brod. Measuring the Neighborhood Benefits of Rail Transit Accessibility. In Transportation Research Record 1576, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 147-153.
4. Ryan, S. Property Values and Transportation Facilities: Finding the Transportation-Land Use Connection. Journal of Planning Literature, Vol. 13, No. 4, 1999, pp. 412-427.
5. Adair, A., S. McGreal, A. Smyth, J. Cooper, and T. Ryley. House Prices and Accessibility: The Testing of Relationships Within the Belfast Urban Area. Housing Studies, Vol. 15, No. 5, 2000, pp. 699-716.
6. Guo, Y., S. Peeta, and S. Somenahalli. The Impact of Walkable Environment on Single Family Residential Property Values. Journal of Transport and Land Use, forthcoming. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2017.824.
7. Cervero, R., and K. Kockelman. Travel Demand and the 3Ds: Density, Diversity, and Design. Transportation Research Part D, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1997, pp. 199-219.
8. Chen, Y., S. Ravulaparthy, K. Deutsch, P. Dalal, S. Y. Yoon, T. Lei, K. G. Goulias, R. M. Pendyala, C. R. Bhat, and H.-H. Hu. Development of Indicators of Opportunity-Based Accessibility. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2255, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011, pp. 58-68.
9. Fujita, M. Urban Economic Theory: Land Use and City Size. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1989.
10. Wassmer, R. W., and M. C. Baass. Does a More Centralized Urban Form Raise Housing Prices? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Vol. 25, No. 2, 2006, pp. 439-462.
11. Gibbons, S., and S. Machin. Valuing School Quality, Better Transport, and Lower Crime: Evidence from House Prices. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2008, pp. 99-119.
12. Bartholomew, K., and R. Ewing. Hedonic Price Effects of Pedestrian- and Transit-Oriented Development. Journal of Planning Literature, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2011, pp. 18-34.
13. John, B. Mass Transportation, Apartment Rent, and Property Values. Journal of Real Estate Research, Vol. 12, No. 1, 1996, pp. 1-8.
14. Song, Y., and G. Knaap. Measuring the Effects of Mixed Land Uses on Housing Values. Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 34, No. 6, 2004, pp. 663-680.
15. Martínez, L. M., and J. M. Viegas. Effects of Transportation Accessibility on Residential Property Values: Hedonic Price Model in the Lisbon, Portugal, Metropolitan Area. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2115, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 127-137.
16. Aurand, A. Density, Housing Types, and Mixed Land Use: Smart Tools for Affordable Housing? Urban Studies, Vol. 47, No. 5, 2010, pp. 1015-1036.
17. Kang, L., and J. Fricker. Bicyclist Commuters' Choice of On-Street Versus Off-Street Route Segments. Transportation, Vol. 40, 2013, pp. 887-902.
18. Luo, W., and Y. Qi. An Enhanced Two-Step Floating Catchment Area (E2SFCA) Method for Measuring Spatial Accessibility to Primary Care Physicians. Heath and Place, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2009, 1100-1107.
19. Petheram, S. J., A. C. Nelson, M. Miller, and R. Ewing. Use of the Real Estate Market to Establish Light Rail Station Catchment Areas: Case Study of Attached Residential Property Values in Salt Lake County, Utah, by Light Rail Station Distance. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2357, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2013, pp. 95-99.
20. Ewing, R., and S. Hamidi. Measuring Urban Sprawl and Validating Sprawl Measures. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.; Ford Foundation, New York; Smart Growth America, Washington, D.C. http://gis.cancer.gov/tools/urban-sprawl/. Accessed Oct. 8, 2015.
21. Song, Y., L. Merlin, and D. Rodriguez. Comparing Measures of Urban Land Use Mix. Computers, Environment, and Urban Systems, Vol. 42, 2013, pp. 1-13.
22. Manaugh, K., and T. Kreider. What Is Mixed Use? Presenting an Interaction Method for Measuring Land Use Mix. Journal of Transport and Land Use, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2013, pp. 63-72.
23. Brasington, D. Which Measures of School Quality Does the Housing Market Value? Journal of Real Estate Research, Vol. 18, No. 3, 1999, pp. 395-413.
24. Tobler, W. R. A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region. Economic Geography, Vol. 46, 1970, pp. 234-240.
25. Frank, L. D., J. Sallis, B. Saelens, L. Leary, K. Cain, T. Conway, and P. Hess. The Development of a Walkability Index: Application to the Neighborhood Quality of Life Study. British Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol. 44, No. 13, 2010, pp. 924-933.
26. Shyr, O., D. Andersson, J. Wang, T. Huang, and O. Liu. Where Do Home Buyers Pay Most for Relative Transit Accessibility? Hong Kong, Taipei, and Kaohsiung Compared. Urban Studies, Vol. 50, No. 12, 2013, pp. 2553-2568.
27. Ibeas, Á., R. Cordera, L. dell'Olio, P. Coppola, and A. Dominguez. Modelling Transport and Real-Estate Values Interactions in Urban Systems. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 24, 2012, pp. 370-382.
28. Halvorsen, R., and R. Palmquist. The Interpretation of Dummy Variables in Semilogarithmic Equations. American Economic Review, Vol. 70, No. 3, 1980, pp. 474-475.
29. Glaeser, E. L., and J. Gyourko. The Impact of Building Restrictions on Housing Affordability. Economic Policy Review, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2003, pp. 21-39.
30. School Information. My School, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. http://www.myschool.edu.au/. Accessed June 2, 2015.
31. Dai, D. Racial/Ethnic and Socioeconomic Disparities in Urban Green Space Accessibility: Where to? Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 102, No. 4, 2011, pp. 234-244.
32. Washington, S. P., M. G. Karlaftis, and F. L. Mannering. Statistical and Econometric Methods for Transportation Data Analysis. CRC Press, New York, 2010.
33. Guo, Y., and S. Peeta. Rail-Truck Multimodal Freight Collaboration: Truck Freight Carrier Perspectives in the United States. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 141, No. 11, 2015, pp. 1-11.
34. Kang, L., Y. Xiong, and F. Mannering. Statistical Analysis of Pedestrian Perceptions of Sidewalk Level of Service in the Presence of Bicycles. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 53, 2013, pp. 10-21.