Birds of a Feather Do Flock Together: Behavior-Based Personality-Assessment Method Reveals Personality Similarity Among Couples and Friends

Psychological Science

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 276-284

  Youyou, Wu ^a,b   Stillwell, David ^c   Schwartz, H Andrew ^d   Kosinski, Michal ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^d Stony Brook University   (United States)

^e STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

close relationships; personality assessment; reference group effect; similarity; social network

Indexed keywords

ADULT; FEMALE; FRIEND; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; PERSONALITY; PSYCHOLOGY; SEXUALITY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; FEMALE; FRIENDS; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; PERSONALITY; SEXUAL PARTNERS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85015652482     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0956797616678187     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Alford J. R., Hatemi P. K., Hibbing J. R., Martin N. G., Eaves L. J., (2011). The politics of mate choice. The Journal of Politics, 73, 362–379.
2. Altmann T., Sierau S., Roth M., (2013). I guess you’re just not my type. Journal of Individual Differences, 34, 105–117.
3. Anderson C., Keltner D., John O. P., (2003). Emotional convergence between people over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1054–1068.
4. Beer A., Watson D., McDade-Montez E., (2013). Self-other agreement and assumed similarity in neuroticism, extraversion, and trait affect: Distinguishing the effects of form and content. Assessment, 20, 723–737.
5. Botwin M. D., Buss D. M., Shackelford T. K., (1997). Personality and mate preferences: Five factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 65, 107–136.
6. Buss D. M., (1984a). Marital assortment for personality dispositions: Assessment with three different data sources. Behavior Genetics, 14, 111–123.
7. Buss D. M., (1984b). Toward a psychology of person-environment (PE) correlation: The role of spouse selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 361–377.
8. Buss D. M., Craik K. H., (1983). The act frequency approach to personality. Psychological Review, 90, 105–126.
9. Caspi A., Herbener E. S. S., Ozer D. J. J., (1992). Shared experiences and the similarity of personalities: A longitudinal study of married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 281–291.
10. Costa P. T., McCrae R. R., (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual (Vol. 4). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
11. Credé M., Bashshur M., Niehorster S., (2010). Reference group effects in the measurement of personality and attitudes. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 390–399.
12. Davis J. L., Rusbult C. E., (2001). Attitude alignment in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 65–84.
13. Donnellan M. B., Conger R. D., Bryant C. M., (2004). The Big Five and enduring marriages. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 481–504.
14. Donnellan M. B., Lucas R. E., (2008). Age differences in the Big Five across the life span: Evidence from two national samples. Psychology and Aging, 23, 558–566.
15. Eysenck H. J., (1990). Genetic and environmental contributions to individual differences: The three major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality, 58, 245–261.
16. Farnadi G., Sushmita S., Sitaraman G., Ton N., De Cock M., Davalos S., (2014). A multivariate regression approach to personality impression recognition of vloggers. Proceedings of the 2014 ACM Multi Media on Workshop on Computational Personality Recognition (pp. 1–6). Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2659526&dl=ACM&coll=DL&CFID=863560964&CFTOKEN=93316611
17. Funder D. C., Kolar D. C., Blackman M. C., (1995). Agreement among judges of personality: Interpersonal relations, similarity, and acquaintanceship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 656–672.
18. Gaunt R., (2006). Couple similarity and marital satisfaction: Are similar spouses happier? Journal of Personality, 74, 1401–1420.
19. Goldberg L. R., Johnson J. A., Eber H. W., Hogan R., Ashton M. C., Cloninger C. R., Gough H. G., (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84–96.
20. Heine S. J., Buchtel E. E., Norenzayan A., (2008). What do cross-national comparisons of personality traits tell us? The case of conscientiousness. Psychological Science, 19, 309–313.
21. Heine S. J., Lehman D. R., Peng K. P., Greenholtz J., (2002). What’s wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales?: The reference-group effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 903–918.
22. Hirsh J. B., Peterson J. B., (2009). Personality and language use in self-narratives. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 524–527.
23. Hoerl A. E., Kennard R. W., (1970). Ridge regression: Biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics, 12, 55–67.
24. Kalmijn M., (2005). Attitude alignment in marriage and cohabitation: The case of sex-role attitudes. Personal Relationships, 12, 521–535.
25. Kosinski M., Stillwell D., Graepel T., (2013). Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 110, 5802–5805.
26. Lee K., Ashton M. C., Pozzebon J. A., Visser B. A., Bourdage J. S., Ogunfowora B., (2009). Similarity and assumed similarity in personality reports of well-acquainted persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 460–472.
27. Martinsson P. G., Rokhlin V., Tygert M., (2011). A randomized algorithm for the decomposition of matrices. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, 30, 47–68.
28. McCrae R. R., Martin T. A., Hrebícková M., Urbánek T., Boomsma D. I., Willemsen G., Costa P. T., Jr. (2008). Personality trait similarity between spouses in four cultures. Journal of Personality, 76, 1137–1164.
29. McPherson M., Smith-Lovin L., Cook J. M., (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.
30. Mehl M. R., Gosling S. D., Pennebaker J. W., (2006). Personality in its natural habitat: Manifestations and implicit folk theories of personality in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 862–877.
31. Ozer D. J., Benet-Martínez V., (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421.
32. Park G. J., Schwartz H. A., Eichstaedt J. C., Kern M. L., Kosinski M., Stillwell D. J.,.. Seligman M. E. P., (2014). Automatic personality assessment through social media language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 934–952.
33. Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Lee J.-Y., Podsakoff N. P., (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.
34. Ramírez-Esparza N., Mehl M. R., Álvarez-Bermúdez J., Pennebaker J. W., (2009). Are Mexicans more or less sociable than Americans? Insights from a naturalistic observation study. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 1–7.
35. Rushton J. P., Bons T. A., (2005). Mate choice and friendship in twins: Evidence for genetic similarity. Psychological Science, 16, 555–559.
36. Schwartz H. A., Eichstaedt J. C., Kern M. L., Dziurzynski L., Ramones S. M., Agrawal M.,.. Ungar L. H., (2013). Personality, gender, and age in the language of social media: The open-vocabulary approach. PLoS ONE, 8(9), Article e73791. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073791
37. Schwartz S. H., (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In Zanna M. P., (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
38. Soto C. J., John O. P., Gosling S. D., Potter J., (2011). Age differences in personality traits from 10 to 65: Big Five domains and facets in a large cross-sectional sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 330–348.
39. Sumner C., Byers A., Boochever R., Park G. J., (2012). Predicting Dark Triad personality traits from Twitter usage and a linguistic analysis of tweets. In Tao D., Wani M. A., Khoshgoftaar T., Zhu X., Seliya N., (Eds.), Proceedings: 2012 11th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications, ICMLA 2012 (Vol. 2, pp. 386–393). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE.
40. Tausczik Y. R., Pennebaker J. W., (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, 24–54.
41. Tibshirani R., (1996). Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B: Statistical Methodology, 58, 267–288.
42. Watson D., Beer A., McDade-Montez E., (2014). The role of active assortment in spousal similarity. Journal of Personality, 82, 116–129.
43. Watson D., Hubbard B., Wiese D., (2000a). General traits of personality and affectivity as predictors of satisfaction in intimate relationships: Evidence from self- and partner-ratings. Journal of Personality, 68, 413–449.
44. Watson D., Hubbard B., Wiese D., (2000b). Self-other agreement in personality and affectivity: The role of acquaintanceship, trait visibility, and assumed similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 546–558.
45. Watson D., Klohnen E. C., Casillas A., Simms E. N., Haig J., Berry D. S., (2004). Match makers and deal breakers: Analyses of assortative mating in newlywed couples. Journal of Personality, 72, 1029–1068.
46. Wood A. M., Brown G. D. A., Maltby J., Watkinson P., (2012). How are personality judgments made? A cognitive model of reference group effects, personality scale responses, and behavioral reactions. Journal of Personality, 80, 1275–1311.
47. Youyou W., Kosinski M., Stillwell D. J., (2015). Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 112, 112–116.