A compensatory control account of meritocracy

Journal of Social and Political Psychology

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 313-334

  Goode, Chris ^a   Keefer, Lucas A ^b   Molina, Ludwin E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Compensatory control; Ideology; Meritocracy; Social mobility; System justification

Indexed keywords

EID: 85015534123     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21953325     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5964/jspp.v2i1.372     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
2. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3-5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980
3. Chen, E. S., & Tyler, T. R. (2001). Cloaking power: Legitimizing myths and the psychology of the advantaged. In A. Y. Lee-Chai & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The use and abuse of power: Multiple perspectives on the causes of corruption (pp. 241-261). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
4. Cheung, G. W., & Lau, R. S. (2008). Testing mediation and suppression effects of latent variables: Bootstrapping with structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 296-325. doi:10.1177/1094428107300343
5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Cotterill, S., Sidanius, J., Bhardwaj, A., & Kumar, V. (2014). Ideological support for the Indian caste system: Social dominance orientation, right-wing authoritarianism and karma. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 2, 98-116. doi:10.5964/jspp.v2i1.171
7. Cutright, K. M. (2012). The beauty of boundaries: When and why we seek structure in consumption. The Journal of Consumer Research, 38, 775-790. doi:10.1086/661563
8. Greenaway, K. H., Louis, W. R., & Hornsey, M. J. (2013). Loss of control increases belief in precognition and belief in precognition increases control. PLoS ONE, 8, Article e71327. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071327
9. Hardin, C. D., & Higgins, E. T. (1996). How social verification makes the subjective objective. In R. M. Sorrentino & T. E. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (pp. 28-84). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
10. Haslam, S. A., Ellemers, N., Reicher, S. D., Reynolds, K. J., & Schmitt, M. T. (2010). The social identity perspective tomorrow: Opportunities and avenues for advance. In T. Postmes & N. R. Branscombe (Eds.), Rediscovering social identity (pp. 357-379). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
11. Hochschild, J. L. (1995). Facing up to the American dream: Race, class, and the soul of a nation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12. Jackman, M. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
13. Jonas, E., McGregor, I., Klackl, J., Agroskin, D., Fritsche, I., Holbrook, C., … Quirin, M. (2014). Threat and defense: From anxiety to approach. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 219-286. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-800052-6.00004-4
14. Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
15. Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881-919. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x
16. Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307-337. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600
17. Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2002). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (pp. 111-153). Hove, United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis.
18. Jost, J. T., & van der Toorn, J. (2012). System justification theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & T. E. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 313-343). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Kay, A. C., & Eibach, R. P. (2013). Compensatory control and its implications for ideological extremism. Journal of Social Issues, 69, 564-585. doi:10.1111/josi.12029
20. Kay, A. C., Gaucher, D., Napier, J. L., Callan, M. J., & Laurin, K. (2008). God and the government: Testing a compensatory control mechanism for the support of external systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 18-35. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.18
21. Kay, A. C., Laurin, K., Fitzsimons, G. M., & Landau, M. J. (2014). A functional basis for structure-seeking: Exposure to structure promotes willingness to engage in motivated action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 486-491. doi:10.1037/a0034462
22. Kay, A. C., Moscovitch, D. A., & Laurin, K. (2010). Randomness, attributions of arousal, and belief in God. Psychological Science, 21, 216-218. doi:10.1177/0956797609357750
23. Kay, A. C., Sullivan, D., & Landau, M. J. (2014). The psychological importance of beliefs in control and order: Historical and contemporary perspectives in social and personality psychology. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), APA handbook of social and personality psychology (pp. 309-337). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
24. Kay, A. C., Whitson, J. A., Gaucher, D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Compensatory control: Achieving order through the mind, our institutions, and the heavens. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 264-268. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01649.x
25. Kluegel, J. R., & Smith, E. R. (1986). Beliefs about inequality: Americans’ view of what is and what ought to be. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
26. Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., & Keltner, D. (2009). Social class, sense of control, and social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 992-1004. doi:10.1037/a0016357
27. Lane, R. E. (1959). The fear of equality. The American Political Science Review, 53, 35-51. doi:10.2307/1951729
28. Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York, NY: Plenum.
29. Levine, T. R., & Hullett, C. R. (2002). Eta squared, partial eta squared, and misreporting of effect size in communication research. Human Communication Research, 28, 612-625. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00828.x
30. Lipset, S. M. (1979). The first new nation: The United States in historical and comparative perspective. New York, NY: Norton.
31. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
32. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (2010). Cultures and selves: A cycle of mutual constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 420-430. doi:10.1177/1745691610375557
33. McClosky, H., & Zaller, J. (1984). The American ethos: Public attitudes toward capitalism and democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. National Women’s Law Center. (2012). Women can’t afford unfair pay today. Retrieved from http://www.nwlc.org/resource/women-cant-afford-unfair-pay-today
35. Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. (2014). Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 184-188. doi:10.1177/0963721414531598
36. Pearlin, L. I., Lieberman, M. A., Menaghan, E. G., & Mullan, J. T. (1981). The stress process. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 22, 337-356. doi:10.2307/2136676
37. PEW Research Center. (2012). Economic mobility and the American dream: Where do we stand in the wake of the great recession? Retrieved from http://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/reports/2011/05/19/economic-mobility-and-the-american-dream-where-do-we-stand-in-the-wake-of-the-great-recession1
38. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
39. Raddatz, F. J. (Ed.). (1981). The Marx-Engels correspondence: The personal letters, 1844-1877: A selection. London, United Kingdom: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
40. Rothschild, Z. K., Landau, M. J., Sullivan, D., & Keefer, L. A. (2012). A dual-motive model of scapegoating: Displacing blame to reduce guilt or increase control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1148-1163. doi:10.1037/a0027413
41. Seligman, M. E. P., & Maier, S. F. (1967). Failure to escape traumatic shock. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74, 1-9. doi:10.1037/h0024514
42. Shepherd, S., Kay, A. C., Landau, M. J., & Keefer, L. A. (2011). Evidence for the specificity of control motivations in worldview defense: Distinguishing compensatory control from uncertainty management and terror management processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 949-958. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.026
43. Sidanius, J. (1993). The psychology of group conflict and the dynamics of oppression: A social dominance perspective. In S. Iyengar & W. J. McGuire (Eds.), Explorations in political psychology (pp. 183-219). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
44. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
45. Son Hing, L. S., Bobocel, D. R., & Zanna, M. P. (2002). Meritocracy and opposition to affirmative action: Making concessions in the face of discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 493-509. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.3.493
46. Stephens, N. M., Fryberg, S. A., Markus, H. R., Johnson, C. S., & Covarrubias, R. (2012). Unseen disadvantage: How American universities’ focus on independence undermines the academic performance of first-generation college students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1178-1197. doi:10.1037/a0027143
47. Sullivan, D., Landau, M. J., & Rothschild, Z. K. (2010). An existential function of enemyship: Evidence that people attribute influence to personal and political enemies to compensate for threats to control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 434-449. doi:10.1037/a0017457
48. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago, IL: Nelson Hall.
49. U.S. Census Bureau. (2011). Income, expenditures, poverty, and wealth. Statistical Abstract of the United States. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/cats/income_expenditures_poverty_wealth.html
50. Weber, M. (2002). The protestant ethic and the ‘spirit’ of capitalism. New York, NY: Penguin.