Willingness-to-pay for natural, organic, and conventional foods: The effects of information and meaningful labels

Food Policy

Volumn 68, Issue , 2017, Pages 214-232

  McFadden, Jonathan R ^a   Huffman, Wallace E ^b  

^a ECONOMIC RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^b IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Experimental auctions; Food labels; Information effects; Organic foods; Random nth price auction; Natural foods

Indexed keywords

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FOOD INDUSTRY; FOOD MARKET; FOOD POLICY; PRICE DYNAMICS; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 85015456999     PISSN: 03069192     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.02.007     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Aertsens, J., Mondelaers, K., Verbeke, W., Buysse, J., Van Huylenbroeck, G., The influence of subjective and objective knowledge on attitude, motivations and consumption of organic food. Brit. Food J. 113:11 (2011), 1353–1378.
2. Anstine, J., Organic and all natural: do consumers know the difference? J. Appl. Econ. Pol. 26:1 (2007), 15–27.
3. Ariely, D., Loewenstein, G., Prelec, D., Coherent arbitrariness: stable demand curves without stable preferences. Quart. J. Econ. 118:1 (2003), 73–106.
4. Batte, M.T., Hooker, N.H., Haab, T.C., Beaverson, J., Putting their money where their mouths are: consumer willingness to pay for multi-ingredient, processed organic food products. Food Pol. 32:2 (2007), 145–159.
5. Bazoche, P., Combris, P., Giraud-Héraud, E., Pinto, A.S., Bunte, F., Tsakiridou, E., Willingness to pay for pesticide reduction in the EU: nothing but organic? Euro. Rev. Agricult. Econ. 41:1 (2014), 87–109.
6. Becker, G., DeGroot, M., Marschak, J., Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behav. Sci. 9:3 (1964), 226–232.
7. Benny, E., “Natural” modifications: the FDA's need to promulgate an official definition of “natural” that includes genetically modified organisms. The George Washing. Law Rev. 80:5 (2012), 1504–1526.
8. Bernard, J.C., Zhang, C., Gifford, K., An experimental investigation of consumer willingness to pay for non-GM foods when an organic option is present. Agricult. Resour. Econ. Rev. 35:2 (2006), 374–385.
9. Bernard, J.C., Bernard, D.J., What is it about organic milk? An experimental analysis. Am. J. Agricult. Econ. 91:3 (2009), 826–836.
10. Bernard, J.C., Bernard, D.J., Comparing parts with the whole: willingness to pay for pesticide-free, non-GM, and organic potatoes and sweet corn. J. Agricult. Resour. Econ. 35:3 (2010), 457–475.
11. Carlson, A., Jaenicke, E., 2016. Changes in retail organic price premiums from 2004 to 2010. Economic Research Report No. 209. United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
12. Chang, J.B., Lusk, J.L., Fairness and food choice. Food Pol. 34:6 (2009), 483–491.
13. Chang, J.B., Lusk, J.L., Norwood, F.B., The price of happy hens: a hedonic analysis of retail egg prices. J. Agricult. Resour. Econ. 35:3 (2010), 406–423.
14. Corrigan, J.R., Rousu, M.C., Posted prices and bid affiliation: evidence from experimental auctions. Am. J. Agricult. Econ. 88:4 (2006), 1078–1090.
15. Dettmann, R.L., Dimitri, C., Who's buying organic vegetables? Demographic characteristics of U.S. consumers. J. Food Prod. Market. 16:1 (2009), 79–91.
16. Dimitri, C., Dettmann, R.L., Organic food consumers: what do we really know about them?. Brit. Food J. 114:8 (2012), 1157–1183.
17. FMI, 2014. U.S. Grocery Shopper Trends 2014. Report. Food Marketing Institute.
18. Gifford, K., Bernard, J.C., The impact of message framing on organic food purchase likelihood. J. Food Distrib. Res. 35:3 (2004), 19–28.
19. Gifford, K., Bernard, J.C., Influencing consumer purchase likelihood of organic food. Int. J. Cons. Stud. 30:2 (2006), 155–163.
20. Gifford, K., Bernard, J.C., The effect of information on consumers' willingness to pay for natural and organic chicken. Int. J. Cons. Stud. 35:3 (2011), 282–289.
21. Glennerster, R., Takavarasha, K., Running Randomized Evaluations: A Practical Guide. 2013, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
22. Govindasamy, R., Italia, J., Predicting willingness-to-pay a premium for organically grown fresh produce. J. Food Distrib. Res. 30:July (1999), 44–53.
23. Greene, C., Dimitri, C., Lin, B.H., McBride, W., Oberholtzer, L., Smith, T., 2009. Emerging issues in the U.S. organic industry. Economic Information Bulletin No. 55. United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
24. Hamilton, S.F., Zilberman, D., Green markets, eco-certification, and equilibrium fraud. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 52:3 (2006), 627–644.
25. Harris, E.A., Strom, S., Walmart to Sell Organic Food, Undercutting Big Brands. 2014, The New York Times: B9, B9.
26. He, N., Bernard, J.C., Differences in WTP and consumer demand for organic and non-GM fresh and processed foods. Agricult. Resour. Econ. Rev. 40:2 (2011), 218–232.
27. Howard, P.H., Organic industry structure. Media-N: J. New Media Caucus, 5(3), 2009.
28. Huang, C.L., Consumer preferences and attitudes towards organically grown produce. Euro. Rev. Agricult. Econ. 23:3 (1996), 331–342.
29. Huang, C.L., Lin, B.-H., A hedonic analysis of fresh tomato prices among regional markets. Rev. Agricult. Econ. 29:4 (2007), 783–800.
30. Huffman, W.E., Shogren, J.F., Rousu, M., Tegene, A., Consumer willingness to pay for genetically modified food labels in a market with diverse information: evidence from experimental auctions. J. Agricult. Resour. Econ 28:3 (2003), 481–502.
31. Huffman, W.E., Rousu, M., Shogren, J.F., Tegene, A., The effects of prior beliefs and learning on consumers acceptance of genetically modified foods. J. Econ. Behav. Organiz. 63:1 (2007), 193–206.
32. Jaenicke, E., Dimitri, C., Oberholtzer, L., Retailer decisions about organic imports and organic private labels. Am. J. Agricult. Econ. 93:2 (2011), 597–603.
33. Jolly, D.A., Schultz, H.G.K., Diaz-Knauf, V., Johal, J., Organic foods: consumer attitudes and use. Food Technol. 43:11 (1989), 60–66.
34. Klonsky, K., Comparison of production costs and resource use for organic and conventional production systems. Am. J. Agricult. Econ. 94:2 (2012), 314–321.
35. Kuminoff, N.V., Wossink, A., Why isn't more US farmland organic?. J. Agricul. Econ. 61:2 (2010), 240–258.
36. Lin, B.-H., Smith, T.A., Huang, C.L., Organic premiums of U. S. fresh produce. Renew. Agricult. Food Syst. 23:3 (2008), 208–216.
37. Lin, B.-H., Yen, S.T., Huang, C.L., Smith, T.A., U.S. demand for organic and conventional fresh fruits: the roles of income and price. Sustainability 1:3 (2009), 464–478.
38. Lusk, J.L., Shogren, J.F., Experimental Auctions: Methods and Applications in Economic and Marketing Research. 2007, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
39. Maddala, G., Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics Econometric Society Monographs in Quantitative Economics, vol. 3, 1983, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
40. Maguire, K.B., Owens, N., Simon, N.B., The price premium for organic babyfood: a hedonic analysis. J. Agricult. Resour. Econ. 29:1 (2004), 132–149.
41. Maguire, K.B., Owens, N., Simon, N.B., Focus on babies: a note on parental attitudes and preferences for organic babyfood. J. Agribus. 24:2 (2006), 187–195.
42. McBride, W.D., Greene, C., Foreman, L., Ali, M., 2015. The Profit Potential Of Certified Organic Field Crop Production. Economic Research Report No. 188. United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
43. Meas, T., Hu, W., Batte, M.T., Woods, T.A., Ernst, S., Substitutes or complements? Consumer preference for local and organic food attributes. Am. J. Agricult. Econ. 97:4 (2015), 1044–1071.
44. Menkhaus, D.J., Borden, G.W., Whipple, G.D., Hoffman, E., Field, R.A., An empirical application of experimental economics in marketing research. J. Agricult. Resour. Econ. 17:1 (1992), 44–55.
45. Milgrom, P., Roberts, J., Relying on the information of interested parties. The RAND J. Econ. 17:1 (1986), 18–32.
46. Misra, S.K., Huang, C.L., Ott, S.L., Consumer willingness to pay for pesticide-free fresh produce. West. J. Agricult. Econ. 16:2 (1991), 218–227.
47. Nassauer, S., Wal-Mart to drop wild oats organic food brand. Wall Street J., 2016 (Business Section).
48. National Organic Program, 2002. Organic Production and Handling Requirements. 7 CFR Part 205.
49. Negowetti, N.E., A national “natural” standard for food labeling. Maine Law Rev. 65:2 (2013), 581–604.
50. Nielsen Company, 2015. We Are What We Eat: Healthy Eating Trends Around the World, Report. January, 2015.
51. Non-GMO Project, 2016. Non-GMO Project Standard. Version 13 < http://www.nongmoproject.org/wp-content/uploads/Non-GMO-Project-Standard.pdf> (accessed 5-14-2016).
52. Onken, K.A., Bernard, J.C., Pesek, John D. Jr., Comparing willingness to pay for organic, natural, locally grown, and state marketing program promoted foods in the mid-Atlantic region. Agricult. Resour. Econ. Rev. 40:1 (2011), 33–47.
53. Organic Trade Association, 2016. U.S. Organic Sales Post New Record of $43.3 Billion in 2015. Press Release. May, 2016.
54. Park, T.A., Lohr, L., Supply and demand factors for organic produce. Am. J. Agricult. Econ. 78:3 (1996), 647–655.
55. Public Law 114-216, 2016. An Act to Reauthorize and Amend the National Sea Grant College Program Act, and For Other Purposes. National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard. 130 Stat. 834. July 29, 2016.
56. Roosen, J., Fox, J.A., Hennessy, D.A., Schreiber, A., Consumers' valuation of insecticide use restrictions: an application to apples. J. Agricult. Resour. Econ. 23:2 (1998), 367–384.
57. Rousseau, S., Vranken, L., Green market expansion by reducing information asymmetries: evidence for labeled organic food products. Food Pol. 40 (2013), 31–43.
58. Rousu, M., Huffman, W.E., Shogren, J.F., Tegene, A., Effects and value of verifiable information in a controversial market: evidence from lab auctions of genetically modified food. Econ. Inq. 45:3 (2007), 409–432.
59. Shogren, J., Margolis, M., Koo, C., List, J., A random nth-price auction. J. Econ. Behav. Organiz. 46:4 (2001), 409–421.
60. Smith, T.A., Huang, C.L., Lin, B.-H., Estimating organic premiums in the U.S. fluid milk’ market. Renew. Agricult. Food Syst. 24:3 (2009), 197–204.
61. Stzrok, J.L., Huffman, W.E., Willingness to pay for organic food products and organic purity: experimental evidence. AgBioForum 18:3 (2015), 345–353.
62. Thompson, G.D., Consumer demand for organic foods: what we know and what we need to know. Am. J. Agricult. Econ. 80:5 (1998), 1113–1118.
63. Thompson, G.D., Kidwell, J., Explaining the choice of organic produce: cosmetic defects, prices, and consumer preferences. Am. J. Agricult. Econ. 80:2 (1998), 277–287.
64. Thompson, S., Artificially “natural”: class action lawsuits attack misleading “natural” claims in FDA's absence. Ind. Law Rev. 47:3 (2014), 893–918.
65. USDA-ERS, 2016. Organic Market Overview < http://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/natural-resources-environment/organic-agriculture/organic-market-overview.aspx> (accessed 5-14-2016).
66. USDA-FSIS, 2005. Food Standards and Labeling Policy Book, Report. United States Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service.
67. US-HHS-FDA, 1991. Food Labeling: Nutrient Content Claims, General Principles, Petitions, Definitions of Terms. 56 Fed. Reg. 60,421, 60,466. United States Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration.
68. US-HHS-FDA, 2015. Use of the Term “natural” in the Labelling of Human Food Products; Request for Information and Comments.” 80 Fed. Reg. 69,905, 69,909. United States Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration.
69. USDA-NASS, 2010. Organic Production Survey (2008). Volume 3, Special Studies, part 2. United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service.
70. USDA-NASS, 2012. 2011 Certified Organic Production Survey, Report. United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service.
71. USDA-NASS, 2016a. Organic Survey (2014). Volume 3, Special Studies, Part 4. United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service.
72. USDA-NASS, 2016b. “Quick Stats 2.0” Website < https://quickstats.nass.usda.gov> (accessed 5-14-2016).
73. Vickrey, W.S., Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. J. Fin. 16:1 (1961), 8–37.
74. Yue, C., Alfnes, F., Jensen, H.H., Discounting spotted apples: investigating consumers' willingness to accept cosmetic damage in an organic product. J. Agricult. Appl. Econ. 41:1 (2009), 29–46.
75. Zhang, F., Huang, C.L., Lin, B.-H., Epperson, J.E., Modeling fresh organic produce consumption with scanner data: a generalized double hurdle model approach. Agribusiness 24:4 (2008), 510–522.