Adaptation of the social dominance orientation scale into Spanish: Validation of group-based dominance and opposition to equality as underlying factors;Adaptación de la escala de orientación a la dominancia social al castellano: Validación de la Dominancia Grupal y la Oposición a la Igualdad como factores subyacentes

Revista de Psicologia Social

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 3-15

  Silván Ferrero, María del Prado ^a   Bustillos, Antonio ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE EDUCACIÓN A DISTANCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Antiigualitarismo; Group based dominance; Opposition to the equality; Orientaci n a la dominancia grupal; Palabras clave; SDO

Indexed keywords

EID: 85015424413     PISSN: 02134748     EISSN: 15793680     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1174/021347407779697485     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. ADORNO, T. W., FRENKEL-BRUNSWICK, E., LEVINSON, D. J. & SANDFORD, N.(1950) The authoritarian personality. Buenos Aires: Proyección.
2. ALTEMEYER, B.(1981). Enemies of freedom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
3. ALTEMEYER, B. (1998). The authoritarian spectra. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. BARON, R. & KENNY, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1191.
5. BENTLER, M. P. & DUDGEON, P. (1996). Covariance structure analysis: Statistical pratice, theory and directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 563–592.
6. BROWNE, M. W. & KUDECK, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assesing model fit. En K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7. BUSTILLOS, A. & SILVÁN-FERRERO, M. P. (2005). Social dominance and Authoritarianism: Differential mediation with Blatant and Subtle Prejudice. 14th General Meeting EAESP. Wuzburg: Alemania.
8. DUCKITT, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. En M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advance in Experimental Social Psychology (vol. 33, pp. 41–113). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
9. DURIEZ, B. & VAN HIEL, A. (2002). The march of modern fascism. A comparison of social dominance orientation and autho-ritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1199–1213.
10. HENRY, P. J., SIDANIUS, J., LEVIN, S. & PRATTO, F. (2005). Social Dominance Orientation, Authoritarianism, and Support for Intergroup Violence Between the Middle East and America. Political Psychology, 26, 569–583.
11. JORESKONG, K. G. & SORBOM, D. (1979). Advances in Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Models. Cambridge, MA: ABT Books.
12. JOST, J. T. & BANAJI, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33 (1), 1–27.
13. JOST, J. T., BANAJI, M. R. & NOSEK, B. A. (2004). A Decade of System Justification Theory: Accumulated Evidence of Conscious and Unconscious Bolstering of the Status Quo. Political Psychology, 25 (6), 881–920.
14. JOST, J. T. & BURGESS, D. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification motives in low status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 293–305.
15. JOST, J. T., FITZSIMONS, G. I., KAY, A. C., GREENBERG, J., KOOLE, S. L. & PYSZCZYNSKI, T. (2004). The Ideological Animal: A System Justification View. En Handbook of Experimental Existential Psychology (pp. 263–283). Nueva York: Guilford Press.
16. JOST, J. T. & HUNYADY, O. (2002). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. European Review of social Psychology, 13, 111–153.
17. JOST, J. T. & THOMPSON, E. p. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209–232.
18. LIPPA, R. & ARAD, S. (1999). Gender, personality, and prejudice: The display of authoritarianism and social dominance in interviews with college men and women. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 463–493.
19. OVERBECK, J., JOST, J. T., MOSSO, C. & FLIZIK, A. (2004). Resistant vs. acquiescent responses to ingroup inferiority as a function of social dominance orientation in the USA and Italy. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, I, 35–54.
20. PETTIGREW, T. F. & MEERTENS, R. W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 57–75.
21. PRATTO, F., LIU, J., LEVIN, S., SIDANIUS, J., SHIH, M., BACHRACH, H. & HEGARTY, P. (2000). Social dominance and the legitimization of inequality across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 369–409.
22. PRATTO, F., SIDANIUS, J., STALLWORTH, L. M & MALLE, B. F. (1994). Social Dominance Orientation: A Personality Variable Predicting Social and Political Attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.
23. PRATTO, F., STALLWORTH, L. M. & SIDANIUS, J. (1997). The gender gap: Differences in political attitudes and social dominance orientation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 49–68.
24. SIDANIUS, J., FESHBACH, S., LEVIN, S. & PRATTO, F. (1997). The interface between ethnic and national attachment: Ethnic pluralism or ethnic dominance? Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 102–133.
25. SIDANIUS, J., LEVIN, S., FEDERICO, C. M. & PRATTO, F.(2001). Legitimizing ideologies: The social dominance approach. En J. T. Jost & B. Major, Psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 307–331). Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
26. SIDANIUS, J., LEVIN, S., LIU, J. & PRATTO, F. (2000). Social dominance orientation, anti-egalitarianism and the political psychology of gender: An extension and cross-cultural replication. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30 (1), 41–67.
27. SIDANIUS, J., LIU, J., PRATTO, F. & SHAW, J. (1994). Social dominance orientation, hierarchy-attenuators and hierarchy-enhancers: Social theory and the criminal justice system. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 338–366.
28. SIDANIUS, J. & PEÑA, Y. (2002). U.S. patriotism and ideologies of group dominance: A tale of asymmetry. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 782–790.
29. SIDANIUS, J. & PRATTO, F. (1999). Social Dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge: University Press.
30. SIDANIUS, J. & PRATTO, F. (2004). Social Dominance Theory: a new synthesis. En J. Jost & J. Sidanius, Political Psychology (pp. 315–332). Nueva York: Psychology Press.
31. SIDANIUS, J., PRATTO, F. & BOBO, L. (1994). Social dominance orientation and the political psychology of gender: A case of invariance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 998–1100.
32. SIDANIUS, J., PRATTO, F. & BRIEF, D. (1995). Group dominance and the political psychology of gender: A cross-cultural comparison. Political Psychology, 16, 381–396.
33. SIDANIUS, J., PRATTO, F. & RABINOWITZ, J. L. (1994). Gender, ethnic status, and ideological asymmetry: A social dominance interpretation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25, 194–216.
34. SIDANIUS, J., PRATTO, F., VAN LAAR, C. & LEVIN, S. (2004). The Social Dominance Theory: Its Adenda and Method. Political Psychology, 25 (6), 845–800.
35. SILVÁN FERRERO, M. P. & MOINTES BERGES, B. (2004). Evaluación de la personalidad autoritaria: Estudio piloto de la escala de Altemeyer. VII European Conference on Psychological Assesment, Málaga.
36. VAN HIEL A. & MERVIELDE, I. (2002). Explaining conservative beliefs and political preferences: A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 965–976.
37. VAN HIEL, A., PANDELAERE, M. & DURIEZ, B. (2004). The impact of need for closure on conservative beliefs and racism: Differential mediation by authoritarian submission and authoritarian dominance. Personality Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 824–837.
38. WHITLEY, B. E. (1999). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 126–134.