Modeling mental speed: Decomposing response time distributions in elementary cognitive tasks and correlations with working memory capacity and fluid intelligence

Journal of Intelligence

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 1-23

  Schmitz, Florian ^a   Wilhelm, Oliver ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Diffusion model; Ex Gaussian model; Intelligence; Mental speed; Response time modeling; Working memory capacity

Indexed keywords

EID: 85015417967     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20793200     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/jintelligence4040013     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Sheppard, L.D.; Vernon, P.A. Intelligence and speed of information-processing: A review of 50 years of research. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2008, 44, 535–551. [CrossRef]
2. Jensen, A.R. Clocking the Mind: Mental Chronometer Individual Differences; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006; p. xi 272.
3. Deary, I.J.; Der, G.; Ford, G. Reaction times and intelligence differences: A population-based cohort study. Intelligence 2001, 29, 389–399. [CrossRef]
4. Eysenck, H.J. Speed of information processing, reaction time, and the theory of intelligence. In Speed of Information-Processing and Intelligence; Vernon, P.A., Ed.; Ablex Publishing: Westport, CT, USA, 1987; pp. 21–67.
5. Barrouillet, P.; Bernardin, S.; Portrat, S.; Vergauwe, E.; Camos, V. Time and cognitive load in working memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 2007, 33, 570–585. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
6. Barrouillet, P.; Portrat, S.; Camos, V. On the law relating processing to storage in working memory. Psychol. Rev. 2011, 118, 175–192. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
7. Kane, M.J.; Hambrick, D.Z.; Tuholski, S.W.; Wilhelm, O.; Payne, T.W.; Engle, R.W. The Generality of Working Memory Capacity: A Latent-Variable Approach to Verbal and Visuospatial Memory Span and Reasoning. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2004, 133, 189–217. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
8. Süß, H.-M.; Oberauer, K.; Wittmann, W.W.; Wilhelm, O.; Schulze, R. Working-memory capacity explains reasoning ability—And a little bit more. Intelligence 2002, 30, 261–288. [CrossRef]
9. Stankov, L.; Roberts, R.D. Mental speed is not the "basic" process of intelligence. Personal. Individ. Differ. 1997, 22, 69–84. [CrossRef]
10. Wilhelm, O.; Schulze, R. The relation of speeded and unspeeded reasoning with mental speed. Intelligence 2002, 30, 537–554. [CrossRef]
11. Fernandez, S.; Fagot, D.; Dirk, J.; de Ribaupierre, A. Generalization of the worst performance rule across the lifespan. Intelligence 2014, 42, 31–43. [CrossRef]
12. Hick, W. Information theory and intelligence tests. Br. J. Psychol. 1951, 4, 157–164. [CrossRef]
13. Roth, E. The speed of information processing and its relation to intelligence. Z. Exp. Angew. Psychol. 1964, 11, 616–622.
14. Williams, B.R.; Hultsch, D.F.; Strauss, E.H.; Hunter, M.A.; Tannock, R. Inconsistency in reaction time across the lifespan. Neuropsychology 2005, 19, 88–96. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
15. Doebler, P.; Scheffler, B. The relationship of choice reaction time variability and intelligence: A meta-analysis. Learn. Individ. Differ. 2016. [CrossRef]
16. Wagenmakers, E.-J.; Brown, S. On the linear relation between the mean and the standard deviation of a response time distribution. Psychol. Rev. 2007, 114, 830–841. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
17. Schmitz, F.; Teige-Mocigemba, S.; Voss, A.; Klauer, K.C. When scoring algorithms matter: Effects of working memory load on different IAT scores. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 2013, 52, 103–121. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
18. Jensen, A.R. The importance of intraindividual variation in reaction time. Personal. Individ. Differ. 1992, 13, 869–881. [CrossRef]
19. Larson, G.E.; Alderton, D.L. Reaction time variability and intelligence: A ‘worst performance’ analysis of individual differences. Intelligence 1990, 14, 309–325. [CrossRef]
20. Coyle, T.R. A review of the worst performance rule: Evidence, theory, and alternative hypotheses. Intelligence 2003, 31, 567–587. [CrossRef]
21. Unsworth, N.; Redick, T.S.; Lakey, C.E.; Young, D.L. Lapses in sustained attention and their relation to executive control and fluid abilities: An individual differences investigation. Intelligence 2010, 38, 111–122. [CrossRef]
22. Salthouse, T.A. Relations of successive percentiles of reaction time distributions to cognitive variables and adult age. Intelligence 1998, 26, 153–166. [CrossRef]
23. Ratcliff, R.; Thapar, A.; McKoon, G. Individual differences, aging, and IQ in two-choice tasks. Cogn. Psychol. 2010, 60, 127–157. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
24. Kranzler, J.H. A test of Larson and Alderton’s (1990) worst performance rule of reaction time variability. Personal. Individ. Differ. 1992, 13, 255–261. [CrossRef]
25. Baumeister, A.A. Intelligence and the “personal equation”. Intelligence 1998, 26, 255–265. [CrossRef]
26. Heathcote, A.; Popiel, S.J.; Mewhort, D. Analysis of response time distributions: An example using the Stroop task. Psychol. Bull. 1991, 109, 340–347. [CrossRef]
27. Hohle, R.H. Inferred components of reaction times as functions of foreperiod duration. J. Exp. Psychol. 1965, 69, 382–386. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
28. Luce, R.D. Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1986.
29. Ratcliff, R. A theory of memory retrieval. Psychol. Rev. 1978, 85, 59–108. [CrossRef]
30. Ratcliff, R.; Rouder, J.N. Modeling response times for two-choice decisions. Psychol. Sci. 1998, 9, 347–356. [CrossRef]
31. Borter, N.; Troche, S.; Dodonova, Y.; Rammsayer, T. A Latent Growth Curve (LGC) Analysis to Model Task Demands and the Worst Performance Rule Simultaneously. In Proceedings of the European Mathematical Psychology Group Meeting, Tübingen, Germany, 30 July–1 August 2014.
32. Leth-Steensen, C.; Elbaz, Z.K.; Douglas, V.I. Mean response times, variability, and skew in the responding of ADHD children: A response time distributional approach. Acta Psychol. 2000, 104, 167–190. [CrossRef]
33. Ratcliff, R.; Murdock, B.B. Retrieval processes in recognition memory. Psychol. Rev. 1976, 83, 190–214. [CrossRef]
34. Ratcliff, R.; Tuerlinckx, F. Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaching to dealing with contaminant reaction and parameter variability. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2002, 9, 438–481. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
35. Van Ravenzwaaij, D.; Brown, S.; Wagenmakers, E.-J. An integrated perspective on the relation between response speed and intelligence. Cognition 2011, 119, 381–393. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
36. Ratcliff, R.; Schmiedek, F.; McKoon, G. A diffusion model explanation of the worst performance rule for reaction time and IQ. Intelligence 2008, 36, 10–17. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
37. Spieler, D.H. Modelling age-related changes in information processing. Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol. 2001, 13, 217–234. [CrossRef]
38. Schmiedek, F.; Oberauer, K.; Wilhelm, O.; Suess, H.-M.; Wittmann, W.W. Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2007, 136, 414–429. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
39. Sternberg, S. The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders’ method. Acta Psychol. Amst. 1969, 30, 276–315. [CrossRef]
40. Sternberg, S. High speed scanning in human memory. Science 1966, 153, 652–654. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
41. Voss, A.; Nagler, M.; Lerche, V. Diffusion models in experimental psychology: A practical introduction. Exp. Psychol. 2013, 60, 385–402. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
42. Lerche, V.; Voss, A. Retest reliability of the parameters of the Ratcliff diffusion model. Psychol. Res. 2016. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
43. Matzke, D.; Wagenmakers, E.-J. Psychological interpretation of the ex-Gaussian and shifted Wald parameters: A diffusion model analysis. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2009, 16, 798–817. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
44. Roberts, R.D.; Stankov, L. Individual differences in speed of mental processing and human cognitive abilities: Toward a taxonomic model. Learn. Individ. Differ. 1999, 11, 1–120. [CrossRef]
45. Wilhelm, O.; Hildebrandt, A.; Oberauer, K. What is working memory capacity, and how can we measure it? Front. Psychol. 2013, 4, 433. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
46. Conway, A.R.A.; Kane, M.J.; Bunting, M.F.; Hambrick, D.Z.; Wilhelm, O.; Engle, R.W. Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2005, 12, 769–786. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
47. Wilhelm, O.; Schroeders, U.; Schipolowski, S. Berliner Test zur Erfassung Fluider und Kristalliner Intelligenz für Die 8. Bis 10. Jahrgangsstufe (BEFKI 8–10); Hogrefe: Göttingen, Germany, 2014.
48. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2016.
49. Massidda, D. Retimes: Reaction Time Analysis. R Package Version 0.1–2. Available online: https://CRAN. R-project.org/package=retimes (accessed on 21 March 2016).
50. Wagenmakers, E.-J.; van der Maas, H.L.J.; Grasman, R.P.P.P. An EZ-diffusion model for response time and accuracy. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2007, 14, 3–22. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
51. Revelle, W. Psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research, 1.5.1.; Northwestern University: Evanston, IL, USA, 2015.
52. Muthén, L.K.; Muthén, B.O. Mplus User’s Guide, 7th ed.; Muthén & Muthén: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2012.
53. Van Zandt, T. How to fit a response time distribution. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2000, 7, 424–465. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
54. Van Ravenzwaaij, D.; Oberauer, K. How to use the diffusion model: Parameter recovery of three methods: Ez, fast-dm, and DMAT. J. Math. Psychol. 2009, 53, 463–473. [CrossRef]
55. Ratcliff, R.; Childers, R. Individual Differences and Fitting Methods for the Two-Choice Diffusion Model of Decision Making. Decision 2015. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
56. Lerche, V.; Voss, A.; Nagler, M. How many trials are required for parameter estimation in diffusion modeling? A comparison of different optimization criteria. Behav. Res. Methods 2016. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
57. Botvinick, M.M.; Braver, T.S.; Barch, D.M.; Carter, C.S.; Cohen, J.D. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol. Rev. 2001, 108, 624–652. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
58. Tukey, J.W. Exploratory Data Analysis; Addison-Wesley Reading: Boston, MA, USA, 1977.
59. Eid, M.; Nussbeck, F.W.; Geiser, C.; Cole, D.A.; Gollwitzer, M.; Lischetzke, T. Structural equation modeling of multitrait-multimethod data: Different models for different types of methods. Psychol. Methods 2008, 13, 230–253. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
60. Chuderski, A. When are fluid intelligence and working memory isomorphic and when are they not? Intelligence 2013, 41, 244–262. [CrossRef]
61. Danthiir, V.; Wilhelm, O.; Roberts, R.D. Further evidence for a multifaceted model of mental speed: Factor structure and validity of computerized measures. Learn. Individ. Differ. 2012, 22, 324–335. [CrossRef]
62. Danthiir, V.; Wilhelm, O.; Schulze, R.; Roberts, R.D. Factor structure and validity of paper-and-pencil measures of mental speed: Evidence for a higher-order model? In Intelligence; Wilhelm, O., Engle, R.W., Eds.; Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2005; Volume 33, pp. 491–514.