Why Blinding? How Blinding? A Theory of Blinding and Its Application to Institutional Corruption

Blinding as a Solution to Bias: Strengthening Biomedical Science, Forensic Science, and Law

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 25-38

  Robertson, Christopher T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Blinding; Conflicts of interest; Expert witnesses; First Amendment; Free speech; Institutional corruption; Juries; Masking; Randomization

Indexed keywords

EID: 85015289233     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00002-4     Document Type: Chapter

References (48)

1. American Medical Association, n.d. Code of Medical Ethics. Retrieved from: http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics/code-medical-ethics.page?.
2. I. Ayres (2001) Should campaign donors be identified? Regulation 24 12-17.
3. I. Ayres and J. Bulow (1998) The donation booth: mandating donor anonymity to disrupt the market for political influence. Stanford Law Review 1259 837-891.
4. D.M. Cain, G. Loewenstein and D.A. Moore (2011) When sunlight fails to disinfect: understanding the perverse effects of disclosing conflicts of interest. Journal of Consumer Research 37 836-857.
5. P.D. Carrington (1992) One law: the role of legal education in the opening of the legal profession since 1776. Florida Law Review 44 501.
6. J.S. Cecil and T.E. Willging (1993) Court-Appointed Experts: Defining the Role of Experts Appointed under Federal Rule of Evidence 706. Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center
7. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. 2010. (p. 310): (U.S. Supreme Court).
8. J. Dana and G. Loewenstein (2003) A social science perspective on gifts to physicians from industry. Journal of the American Medical Association 290 252-255.
9. S. Fiedler (2012) Bad apples and dirty barrels: outliers and systematic institutional failures. Lab Dispatches, Combined 1 & 2 144.
10. J.S. Fishkin, R.C. Luskin and R. Jowell (2000) Deliberative polling and public consultation. Parliamentary Affairs 53 657-666.
11. A. Hamilton, J. Madison and J. Jay (2003) T. Ball (Eds) The Federalist New York, NY: New American Library
12. L. Hand (1901) Historical and practical considerations regarding expert testimony. Harvard Law Review 12 40-58.
13. V.P. Hans (2007) Judges, juries, and scientific evidence. Journal of Law and Policy 16 19.
14. J.C. Harsanyi (1955) Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility. Journal of Political Economy 63 316.
15. D. Hume (1985) E. Mossner (Eds) A Treatise of Human Nature New York, NY: Penguin
16. T.J. Kaptchuk (1998) Intentional ignorance: a history of blind assessment and placebo controls in medicine. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 72 389-433.
17. P.S. Karlan (2003) Elections and change under voting with dollars. California Law Review 91 705-722.
18. A.S. Kesselheim, C.T. Robertson, J.A. Myers, S.L. Rose, V. Gillet, K.M. Ross, et al. (2012) A randomized study of how physicians interpret research funding disclosures. New England Journal of Medicine 367 1119-1127.
19. D. Korn and S. Ehringhaus (2007) The Scientific Basis of Influence and Reciprocity: A Symposium Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges
20. M. Kouchaki (2013) Professionalism and moral behavior: does a professional self-conception make one more unethical? Edmond J. Safra Working Papers http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2243811 Retrieved from
21. L. Lessig (2011) Republic, Lost: How Money Corrupts Congress—and a Plan to Stop it. Twelve
22. S. Levmore (1996) The anonymity tool. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 144 2191-2236.
23. D.W. Light (2013) Strengthening the theory of institutional corruptions: broadening, clarifying, and measuring. Edmond J. Safra Working Papers http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2236391 Retrieved from
24. D.H. Lowenstein (2004) When is a campaign contribution a bribe? W.C. Heffernan, J. Kleinig (Eds) Private and Public Corruption Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. 127-171.
25. A. Lundh, S. Sismondo, J. Lexchin, O.A. Busuioc and L. Bero (2012) Industry sponsorship and research outcome. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 12
26. J.H. Marks (2013) The Perils of Public-Private Partnerships. Edmond J. Safra Research Lab Blog: Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics
27. R.E. Nisbett and T.D. Wilson (1977) Telling more than we can know—verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review 84 231-259.
28. E. Pronin, D.Y. Lin and L. Ross (2002) The bias blind spot: perceptions of bias in self versus others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28 369-381.
29. B.M. Psaty and R.L. Prentice (2010) Minimizing bias in randomized trials: the importance of blinding. Journal of the American Medical Association 304 793-794.
30. J. Rawls (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press
31. D.M. Risinger, M.J. Saks, W.C. Thompson and R. Rosenthal (2002) The Daubert/Kumho implications of observer effects in forensic science: hidden problems of expectation and suggestion. California Law Review 1-56.
32. C. Robertson (2010) Blind expertise. New York University Law Review 85 174-257.
33. C. Robertson (2011) Biased advice. Emory Law Journal 60 653.
34. C. Robertson, S. Rose and A.S. Kesselheim (2012) Effect of financial relationships on the behaviors of health care professionals: a review of the evidence. The Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 452-466.
35. C. Robertson and D.V. Yokum (2012) The effect of blinded experts on juror verdicts. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 9 765-794.
36. M.A. Rodwin (2012) Conflicts of interest, institutional corruption, and pharma: an agenda for reform. Journal of Law Medicine and Ethics 40 511-522.
37. R. Rosenthal (1978) How often are our numbers wrong? American Psychologist 33 1005-1008.
38. K.J. Rothman (1993) Conflict-of-interest—the new McCarthyism in science. Journal of the American Medical Association 269 2782-2784.
39. S. Sah and G. Loewenstein (2015) Conflicted advice and second opinions: benefits, but unintended consequences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 130 89-107.
40. S. Sah, G. Loewenstein and D.M. Cain (2013) The burden of disclosure: increased compliance with distrusted advice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 104(2), 289-304.
41. K.F. Schulz and D.A. Grimes (2002) Blinding in randomised trials: hiding who got what. The Lancet 359 696-700.
42. K. Silverstein and B. Williams (2013) Membership Has Its Privileges: Donor Perks and the Atlantic Council. Edmond J. Safra Research Lab Blog http://ethics.harvard.edu/blog/membership-has-its-privileges Retrieved from
43. A. Smith (1984) The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund
44. D.F. Thompson (1995) Ethics in Congress: From Individual to Institutional Corruption. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution
45. United States v Sun-Diamond Growers of California. 1999. U.S. (p. 398): (U.S. Supreme Court).
46. A. Vermeule (2001) Veil of ignorance rules in constitutional law. Yale Law Journal 111 399-433.
47. T.D. Wilson and N. Brekke (1994) Mental contamination and mental correction: unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. Psychological Bulletin 116 117.
48. L. Wood, M. Egger, L.L. Gluud, K.F. Schulz, P. Jüni, D.G. Altman, et al. (2008) Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study. British Medical Journal 336 601-605.