Trends in U.S. Cardiovascular Care: 2016 Report From 4 ACC National Cardiovascular Data Registries

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Volumn 69, Issue 11, 2017, Pages 1427-1450

  Masoudi, Frederick A ^a,b   Ponirakis, Angelo ^c   de Lemos, James A ^d   Jollis, James G ^e   Kremers, Mark ^f   Messenger, John C ^a   Moore, John W M ^g   Moussa, Issam ^h   Oetgen, William J ^c   Varosy, Paul D ⁱ   Vincent, Robert N ^j   Wei, Jessica ^c   Curtis, Jeptha P ^k   Roe, Matthew T ^l   Spertus, John A ^m  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Department of Medicine   (United States)

^c AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f Novant Health Heart Vascular Institute   (United States)

^g RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^h ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^j EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^k YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^l DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^m Mid America Heart Institute   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

acute coronary syndromes; congenital heart disease; implantable cardioverter defibrillators; percutaneous coronary intervention; quality of care

Indexed keywords

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CAUSE OF DEATH; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; DISABILITY; DISEASE REGISTRY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; REVIEW; TREND STUDY; UNITED STATES; AGED; CARDIOLOGY; CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMALE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; REGISTER; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TRENDS; VERY ELDERLY;

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARDIOLOGY; DEFIBRILLATORS, IMPLANTABLE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; REGISTRIES;

EID: 85015244496     PISSN: 07351097     EISSN: 15583597     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.12.005     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. 1 Moussa, I., Hermann, A., Messenger, J.C., et al. The NCDR CathPCI Registry: a US national perspective on care and outcomes for percutaneous coronary intervention. Heart 99 (2013), 297–303.
2. 2 American College of Cardiology. NCDR Hospital Registries. Available at: http://cvquality.acc.org/NCDR-Home/Registries/Hospital-Registries.aspx. Accessed January 16, 2017.
3. 3 American College of Cardiology. NCDR Outpatient Registries. Available at: http://cvquality.acc.org/NCDR-Home/Registries/Outpatient-Registries.aspx. Accessed January 16, 2017.
4. 4 Masoudi, F.A., Ponirakis, A., Yeh, R.W., et al. Cardiovascular care facts: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry: 2011. J Am Coll Cardiol 62 (2013), 1931–1947.
5. 5 Holmes, D.R. Jr., Nishimura, R.A., Grover, F.L., et al., for the STS/ACC TVT Registry. Annual outcomes with transcatheter valve therapy: from the STS/ACC TVT Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 66 (2015), 2813–2823.
6. 6 Messenger, J.C., Ho, K.K., Young, C.H., et al., for the NCDR Science and Quality Oversight Committee Data Quality Workgroup. The National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) Data Quality Brief: the NCDR Data Quality Program in 2012. J Am Coll Cardiol 60 (2012), 1484–1488.
7. 7 Bonow, R.O., Masoudi, F.A., Rumsfeld, J.S., et al. ACC/AHA classification of care metrics: performance measures and quality metrics: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures. J Am Coll Cardiol 52 (2008), 2113–2117.
8. 8 Massachusetts Data Analysis Center, Department of Health Care Policy. Adult percutaneous coronary intervention in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Fiscal Year 2013 report (October 1, 2012 through September 30, 2013): hospital risk-standardized in-hospital mortality rates. Available at: http://www.massdac.org/wp-content/uploads/PCI-FY2013.pdf. Accessed January 16, 2017.
9. 9 Blue Cross Blue Shield Blue Care Network of Michigan. Data collected through NCDR and BMC2 platforms. 2017. Available at: https://bmc2.org/pci-data-collection. Accessed January 16, 2017.
10. 10 Dehmer, G.J., Jennings, J., Madden, R.A., et al. The National Cardiovascular Data Registry Voluntary Public Reporting Program: an interim report from the NCDR Public Reporting Advisory Group. J Am Coll Cardiol 67 (2016), 205–215.
11. 11 Dehmer, G.J., Drozda, J.P. Jr., Brindis, R.G., et al. Public reporting of clinical quality data: an update for cardiovascular specialists. J Am Coll Cardiol 63 (2014), 1239–1245.
12. 12 American College of Cardiology. CardioSmart: Find Your Heart a Home. 2016. Available at: https://www.cardiosmart.org/Heart-Basics/Find-Your-Heart-a-Home. Accessed January 16, 2017.
13. 13 Harder B, Comorow A. Methodology change will credit hospitals for transparency, reduce reputation. U.S. News & World Report Second Opinion. March 4, 2016. Available at: http://health.usnews.com/health-news/blogs/second-opinion/articles/2016-03-04/methodology-change-will-credit-hospitals-for-transparency-reduce-reputation. Accessed January 16, 2017.
14. 14 Olmstead MG, Geisen E, Murphy J, et al. Methodology. U.S. News & World Report Best Children's Hospitals 2014–15. U.S. News & World Report. 2014. Available at: http://www.usnews.com/pubfiles/2014_BCH_methodology_report.pdf. Accessed January 16, 2017.
15. 15 Lewis, M.J., Kennedy, K.F., Ginns, J., et al. Procedural success and adverse events in pulmonary artery stenting: insights from the NCDR. J Am Coll Cardiol 67 (2016), 1327–1335.
16. 16 Friedman, D.J., Singh, J.P., Curtis, J.P., et al. Comparative effectiveness of CRT-D versus defibrillator alone in HF patients with moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 66 (2015), 2618–2629.
17. 17 Brilakis, E.S., Banerjee, S., Karmpaliotis, D., et al. Procedural outcomes of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry). J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 8 (2015), 245–253.
18. 18 Peterson, E.D., Dai, D., DeLong, E.R., et al., for the NCDR Registry Participants. Contemporary mortality risk prediction for percutaneous coronary intervention: results from 588,398 procedures in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 55 (2010), 1923–1932.
19. 19 Rao, S.V., McCoy, L.A., Spertus, J.A., et al. An updated bleeding model to predict the risk of post-procedure bleeding among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a report using an expanded bleeding definition from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 6 (2013), 897–904.
20. 20 Tsai, T.T., Patel, U.D., Chang, T.I., et al. Validated contemporary risk model of acute kidney injury in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Cath-PCI Registry. J Am Heart Assoc, 3, 2014, e001380.
21. 21 Strauss, C.E., Porten, B.R., Chavez, I.J., et al. Real-time decision support to guide percutaneous coronary intervention bleeding avoidance strategies effectively changes practice patterns. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 7 (2014), 960–967.
22. 22 Chan, P.S., Patel, M.R., Klein, L.W., et al. Appropriateness of percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA 306 (2011), 53–61.
23. 23 Desai, N.R., Bradley, S.M., Parzynski, C.S., et al. Appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization and trends in utilization, patient selection, and appropriateness of percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA 314 (2015), 2045–2053.
24. 24 Sherwood, M.W., Brennan, J., Ho, K.K., et al. The impact of extreme-risk cases on hospitals’ risk-adjusted percutaneous coronary intervention mortality ratings. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 8 (2015), 10–16.
25. 25 Borden, W.B., Maddox, T.M., Tang, F., et al. Impact of the 2014 expert panel recommendations for management of high blood pressure on contemporary cardiovascular practice: insights from the NCDR PINNACLE Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 64 (2014), 2196–2203.
26. 26 Shah, R.U., de Lemos, J.A., Wang, T.Y., et al. Post-hospital outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock: findings from the NCDR. J Am Coll Cardiol 67 (2016), 739–747.
27. 27 Patel, M.R., Dehmer, G.J., Hirshfeld, J.W., et al. ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/SCCT 2012 appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization focused update: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography [Published correction appears in J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:1336]. J Am Coll Cardiol 59 (2012), 857–881.
28. 28 McClellan, M.B., Tunis, S.R., Medicare coverage of ICDs. N Engl J Med 352 (2005), 222–224.
29. 29 Hammill, S.C., Stevenson, L.W., Kadish, A.H., et al. Review of the registry's first year, data collected, and future plans. Heart Rhythm 4 (2007), 1260–1263.
30. 30 Peterson, E.D., Roe, M.T., Chen, A.Y., et al. The NCDR ACTION Registry-GWTG: transforming contemporary acute myocardial infarction clinical care. Heart 96 (2010), 1798–1802.