Appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization and trends in utilization,patient selection, and appropriateness ofpercutaneous coronary intervention

JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

Volumn 314, Issue 19, 2015, Pages 2045-2053

  Desai, Nihar R ^a,b   Bradley, Steven M ^b   Parzynski, Craig S ^c   Nallamothu, Brahmajee K ^d   Chan, Paul S ^e   Spertus, John A ^f   Patel, Manesh R ^g   Ader, Jeremy ^h   Soufer, Aaron ^a   Krumholz, Harlan M ^a   Curtis, Jeptha P ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b YALE NEW HAVEN HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^f Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY   (United States)

^h DUKE CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIANGINA PECTORIS AGENT;

AGED; ARTICLE; COMORBIDITY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DISEASE REGISTRY; DISEASE SEVERITY; DRUG USE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; NON ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PATIENT SELECTION; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGRAM APPROPRIATENESS; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; SYMPTOM; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREND STUDY; UNSTABLE ANGINA PECTORIS; ANGINA PECTORIS; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STANDARDS; TRENDS; UTILIZATION;

AGED; ANGINA PECTORIS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MYOCARDIAL REVASCULARIZATION; PATIENT SELECTION; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 84947474860     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.13764     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Patel MR, Dehmer GJ, Hirshfeld JW, Smith PK, Spertus JA. ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC 2009 Appropriateness Criteria for Coronary Revascularization: a report by the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriateness Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology Endorsed by the American Society of Echocardiography, the Heart Failure Society of America, and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J AmColl Cardiol. 2009;53(6):530-553.
2. Proceedings from the National Summit on Overuse. Joint Commission website. http://www .jointcommission.org/assets/1/6/National-Summit-Overuse.pdf. September 24, 2012. Accessed June 15, 2015.
3. Chan PS, Patel MR, Klein LW, et al. Appropriateness of percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA. 2011;306(1):53-61.
4. Bradley SM, Maynard C, Bryson CL. Appropriateness of percutaneous coronary interventions inWashington State. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012;5(4):445-453.
5. Winslow R, Carreyrou J. Heart treatment overused. Wall Street Journal. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304760604576428323005864648. July 6, 2011. Accessed July 2, 2015.
6. Kliff S. Inappropriate heart procedures are expensive and risky-And studies show thousands happen every year. Washington Post. http://www .washingtonpost.com/news/wonkblog/wp/2012/08/08/inappropriate-heart-procedures-Are-expensive-And-risky-And-studies-show-thousands-happen-every-year?. August 8, 2012. Accessed July 2, 2015.
7. Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Five Things Physicians and Patients Should Question. ChoosingWiselywebsite. http://www.choosingwisely.org/societies/society-for-cardiovascular-Angiography-And-interventions/. Accessed October 26, 2015.
8. Blue Cross Blue Shield ofMichigan. 2014 Hospital Pay-for-Performance Program. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan. https://www.bcbsm.com/content/dam/public/Providers/Documents/value/p4p-hospital-cqi-performance-index-guide.pdf. February 2014. Accessed June 20, 2015.
9. New York State Medicaid Update. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Coverage Guidelines. New York State Department of Health website. https://www .health.ny.gov/health-care/medicaid/program/update/2013/2013-06.htm#ous. Accessed June 20, 2015.
10. WeintraubWS, McKay CR, Riner RN, et al; American College of Cardiology Database Committee. The American College of Cardiology National Database: progress and challenges. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29(2):459-465.
11. Brindis RG, Fitzgerald S, Anderson HV, Shaw RE, WeintraubWS, Williams JF. The American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry (ACC-NCDR): building a national clinical data repository. J AmColl Cardiol. 2001;37(8):2240-2245.
12. Patel MR, Spertus JA, Brindis RG, et al; American College of Cardiology Foundation. ACCF proposed method for evaluating the appropriateness of cardiovascular imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46(8):1606-1613.
13. Patel MR, Dehmer GJ, Hirshfeld JW, Smith PK, Spertus JA. ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/SCCT 2012 Appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization focused update: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J AmColl Cardiol. 2012;59(9):857-881.
14. Hendel RC, PatelMR, Allen JM, et al. Appropriate use of cardiovascular technology: 2013 ACCF appropriate use criteria methodology update: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation appropriate use criteria task force. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(12):1305-1317.
15. Nagin DS. Analyzing developmental trajectories: a semiparametric, group-based approach. Psychol Methods. 1999;4(2):139-157.
16. Bradley SM, Rao SV, Curtis JP, et al. Change in hospital-level use of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention and periprocedural outcomes: insights from the national cardiovascular data registry. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014; 7(4):550-559.
17. CochranWG. Some methods for strengthening the common chi-squared tests. Biometrics. 1954;10 (4):417-451. doi:10.2307/3001616.
18. Armitage P. Tests for linear trends in proportions and frequencies. Biometrics. 1955;11(3): 375-386. doi:10.2307/3001775.
19. Jonckheere A. A distribution-free k-sample test against ordered alternatives. Biometrika. 1954;41: 133-145.
20. Sidak Z. Rectangular confidence regions for means of multivariate normal distributions. J Am Stat Assoc. 1967;62(318):626-633.
21. Bradley SM, Bohn CM, Malenka DJ, et al. Temporal trends in percutaneous coronary intervention appropriateness: insights from the Clinical Outcomes Assessment Program. Circulation. 2015;132(1):20-26.
22. Boden WE, ORourke RA, Teo KK, et al; COURAGE Trial Research Group. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(15):1503-1516.
23. Frye RL, August P, Brooks MM, et al; BARI 2D Study Group. A randomized trial of therapies for type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(24):2503-2515.
24. Chan PS, Jones PG, Arnold SA, Spertus JA. Development and validation of a short version of the Seattle angina questionnaire. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014;7(5):640-647.