The National Cardiovascular Data Registry Voluntary Public Reporting Program An Interim Report from the NCDR Public Reporting Advisory Group

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Volumn 67, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 205-215

  Dehmer, Gregory J ^a   Jennings, Jonathan ^b   Madden, Ruth A ^c   Malenka, David J ^d   Masoudi, Frederick A ^e   McKay, Charles R ^f   Ness, Debra L ^g   Rao, Sunil V ^h   Resnic, Frederic S ⁱ   Ring, Michael E ^j   Rumsfeld, John S ^k   Shelton, Marc E ^l   Simanowith, Michael C ^m   Slattery, Lara E ^m   Weintraub, William S ⁿ   Lovett, Ann ^o   Normand, Sharon Lise ^o  

^a TEXAS A AND M HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b HOSPITAL CORPORATION OF AMERICA   (United States)

^c LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^f HARBOR UCLA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^g National Partnership for Women and Families   (United States)

^h DUKE CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

ⁱ TUFTS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^j SACRED HEART MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^k VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^l Prairie Cardiovascular Consultants Ltd   (United States)

^m AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY   (United States)

ⁿ CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^o HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

health care reform; outcomes; quality

Indexed keywords

ANGIOTENSIN RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST; BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; DIPEPTIDYL CARBOXYPEPTIDASE INHIBITOR;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CAUSE OF DEATH; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; DECISION MAKING; DISEASE REGISTRY; EDUCATION PROGRAM; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICE; HEART FUNCTION; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR; LAW; MEDICAID; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICARE; MORTALITY; NATIONAL CARDIOVASCULAR DATA REGISTRY PROGRAM; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC REPORTING; QUALITY CONTROL; RESPONSIBILITY; VOLUNTARY PROGRAM; VOLUNTARY PUBLIC REPORTING PROGRAM; VOLUNTARY REPORTING; HOSPITAL; MEDICAL RECORD; METHODOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REGISTER; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; UNITED STATES;

DEFIBRILLATORS, IMPLANTABLE; HOSPITALS; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORD LINKAGE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; REGISTRIES; RESEARCH DESIGN; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84959325269     PISSN: 07351097     EISSN: 15583597     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. G.J. Dehmer, J.P. Drozda Jr., R.G. Brindis, and et al. Public reporting of clinical quality data: an update for cardiovascular specialists J Am Coll Cardiol 63 2014 1239 1245
2. D.M. Shahian, T. Silverstein, A.F. Lovett, R.E. Wolf, and S.L. Normand Comparison of clinical and administrative data sources for hospital coronary artery bypass graft surgery report cards Circulation 115 2007 1518 1527
3. E.L. Hannan, M.J. Racz, J.G. Jollis, and E.D. Peterson Using Medicare claims data to assess provider quality for CABG surgery: does it work well enough? Health Serv Res 31 1997 659 678
4. B.G. Hammill, L.H. Curtis, G.C. Fonarow, and et al. Incremental value of clinical data beyond claims data in predicting 30-day outcomes after heart failure hospitalization Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 4 2011 60 67
5. P.C. Tang, M. Ralston, M.F. Arrigotti, and et al. Comparison of methodologies for calculating quality measures based on administrative data versus clinical data from an electronic health record system: implications for performance measures J Am Med Inform Assoc 14 2007 10 15
6. Lansky D. Public reporting of health care quality: principles for moving forward. Health Affairs Blog. Available at: http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2012/04/09/public-reporting-of-health-care-quality-principles-for-moving-forward/. Accessed September 12, 2015.
7. J.P. Drozda Jr., E.P. Hagan, M.J. Mirro, and et al. ACCF 2008 health policy statement on principles for public reporting of physician performance data: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Writing Committee to Develop Principles for Public Reporting of Physician Performance Data J Am Coll Cardiol 51 2008 1993 2001
8. D.M. Shahian, F.H. Edwards, J.P. Jacobs, and et al. Public reporting of cardiac surgery performance: part 1 - history, rationale, consequences Ann Thorac Surg 92 Suppl 3 2011 S2 S11
9. H.M. Krumholz, R.G. Brindis, J.E. Brush, and et al. Standards for statistical models for public reporting of health outcomes Circulation 113 2006 456 462
10. American College of Cardiology. Quality improvement for institutions: data powering performance. Available at: http://cvquality.acc.org/NCDR-Home.aspx. Accessed September 12, 2015.
11. American College of Cardiology. Quality improvement for institutions: published research. Available at: http://cvquality.acc.org/en/NCDR-Home/Research/Published-Research.aspx. Accessed September 12, 2015.
12. W.A. Zoghbi, A.M. Gillis, and J.J. Marshall President's page: public reporting of cardiovascular care: an opportunity to shape the future J Am Coll Cardiol 61 2013 590 593
13. J.M. Austin, A.K. Jha, P.S. Romano, and et al. National hospital ratings systems share few common scores and may generate confusion instead of clarity Health Aff 34 2015 423 430
14. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Physician compare. Available at: https://www.medicare.gov/physiciancompare/search.html. Accessed September 1, 2015.
15. R. Terlutter, S. Bidmon, and J. Röttl Who uses physician-rating websites? Differences in sociodemographic variables, psychographic variables, and health status of users and nonusers of physician-rating websites J Med Internet Res 16 2014 e97
16. N.S. Bardach, J.H. Hibbard, F. Greaves, and R.A. Dudley Sources of traffic and visitors' preferences regarding online public reports of quality: web analytics and online survey results J Med Internet Res 17 2015 e102
17. National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago. National survey examines perceptions of health care provider quality. Available at: http://www.norc.org/NewsEventsPublications/PressReleases/Pages/national-survey-examines-perceptions-of-health-care-provider-quality.aspx. Accessed September 12, 2015.
18. The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. Finding quality doctors: how Americans evaluate provider quality in the United States: research highlights. Available at: http://www.apnorc.org/projects/Pages/HTML%20Reports/finding-quality-doctors.aspx. Accessed September 12, 2015.
19. M.L. Metersky Point: will public reporting of health-care quality measures inform and educate patients? Yes Chest 140 2011 1115 1117
20. J.T. Kullgren, and R.M. Werner Counterpoint: will public reporting of health-care quality measures inform and educate patients? No Chest 140 2011 1117 1120 discussion 1120-2
21. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Hospital compare. Available at: https://www.medicare.gov/hospitalcompare/search.html. Accessed August 12, 2015.
22. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicare provider utilization and payment data: physician and other supplier. Available at: https://www.cms.gov/research-statistics-data-and-systems/statistics-trends-and-reports/medicare-provider-charge-data/physician-and-other-supplier.html. Accessed September 7, 2014.
23. The Leapfrog Group. Available at: http://www.leapfroggroup.org/. Accessed August 21, 2015.
24. The Healthcare Bluebook. Available at: https://healthcarebluebook.com. Accessed July 26, 2015.
25. D.S. Likosky, W.C. Nugent, and C.S. Ross Improving outcomes of cardiac surgery through cooperative efforts: the Northern New England Experience Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 9 2005 119 121
26. Clinical Outcomes Assessment Program (COAP). Available at: http://www.COAP.org. Accessed August 29, 2015.
27. D.M. Shahian, S.L. Normand, D.F. Torchiana, and et al. Cardiac surgery report cards: comprehensive review and statistical critique Ann Thorac Surg 72 2001 2155 2168
28. D.M. Shahian, D.F. Torchiana, R.J. Shemin, and et al. The Massachusetts cardiac surgery report card: implications of statistical methodology Ann Thorac Surg 80 2005 2106 2113
29. D.M. Shahian, F.L. Grover, R.P. Anderson, and F.H. Edwards Quality measurement in adult cardiac surgery: introduction Ann Thorac Surg 83 2007 1 2
30. T.G. Ferris, and D.F. Torchiana Public release of clinical outcomes data - online CABG report cards N Engl J Med 363 2010 1593 1595
31. J.M. Hafner, S.C. Williams, R.G. Koss, and et al. The perceived impact of public reporting hospital performance data: interviews with hospital staff Int J Qual Health Care 23 2011 697 704
32. M.A. Cavender, K.E. Joynt, C.S. Parzynski, and et al. State mandated public reporting and outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States Am J Cardiol 115 2015 1494 1501
33. T.F. Boyden, K.E. Joynt, L. McCoy, and et al. Collaborative quality improvement versus public reporting for percutaneous coronary intervention: a comparison of PCI in New York versus Michigan Am Heart J 170 2015 1227 1233
34. F.S. Resnic, and F.G. Welt The public health hazards of risk avoidance associated with public reporting of risk-adjusted outcomes in coronary intervention J Am Coll Cardiol 53 2009 825 830
35. K.E. Joynt, D.M. Blumenthal, E.J. Orav, and et al. Association of public reporting for percutaneous coronary intervention with utilization and outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries with acute myocardial infarction JAMA 308 2012 1460 1468
36. M. Chassin, E. Hannan, and B. DeBuono Benefits and hazards of reporting medical outcomes publicly N Engl J Med 334 1996 394 398
37. W.H. Ettinger, S.M. Hylka, R.A. Phillips, and et al. When things go wrong: the impact of being a statistical outlier in publicly reported coronary artery bypass graft surgery mortality data Am J Med Qual 23 2008 90 95
38. R.M. Werner, and D.A. Asch The unintended consequences of publicly reporting quality information JAMA 293 2005 1239 1244
39. M.N. Marshall, P.G. Shekelle, S. Leatherman, and R.H. Brook The public release of performance data: What do we expect to gain? A review of the evidence JAMA 283 2000 1866 1874
40. B.J. Potter, R.W. Yeh, and D.S. Pinto Public reporting of PCI outcomes: for better or for worse Curr Cardiol Rep 16 2014 500
41. J.A. Spertus, and M.I. Furmann Translating evidence into practice: are we neglecting the neediest? Arch Int Med 167 2007 987 988
42. F.S. Resnic, S.L. Normand, T.C. Piemonte, and et al. Improvement in mortality risk prediction after percutaneous coronary intervention through the addition of a "compassionate use" variable to the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI dataset: a study from the Massachusetts Angioplasty Registry J Am Coll Cardiol 57 2011 904 911
43. E.D. Peterson The need for "compassionate provider profiling" refining risk assessment for percutaneous coronary intervention J Am Coll Cardiol 57 2011 912 913
44. R. Lilford, and P. Pronovost Using hospital mortality rates to judge hospital performance: a bad idea that just won't go away BMJ 340 2010 c2016
45. M.W. Sherwood, J.M. Brennan, K.K. Ho, and et al. The impact of extreme-risk cases on hospitals' risk-adjusted percutaneous coronary intervention mortality ratings J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 8 2015 10 16
46. K.G. Barringhaus, K. Zelevinsky, A. Lovett, and et al. Impact of independent data adjudication on hospital-specific estimates of risk-adjusted mortality following percutaneous coronary interventions in Massachusetts Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 4 2011 92 98
47. H.M. Krumholz, Y. Wang, J.A. Mattera, and et al. An administrative claims model suitable for profiling hospital performance based upon 30-day mortality rates among patients with an acute myocardial infarction Circulation 113 2006 1683 1692
48. Hibbard J, Sofaer S. Best practices in public reporting no. 1: how to effectively present health care performance data to consumers. Available at: http://archive.ahrq.gov/professionals/quality-patient-safety/quality-resources/tools/pubrptguide1/pubrptguide1.html. Accessed August 1, 2015.
49. Hibbard J, Sofaer S. Best practices in public reporting no. 2: maximizing consumer understanding of public comparative quality reports: effective use of explanatory information. Available at: http://archive.ahrq.gov/professionals/quality-patient-safety/quality-resources/tools/pubrptguide2/pubrptguide2.html. Accessed August 1, 2015.
50. M.J. Mack, M. Herbert, S. Prince, and et al. Does reporting of coronary artery bypass grafting from administrative databases accurately reflect actual clinical outcomes? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 129 2005 1309 1317
51. J.G. Jollis, M. Ancukiewicz, E.R. DeLong, and et al. Discordance of databases designed for claims payment versus clinical information systems, implications for outcomes research Ann Intern Med 118 1993 844 850
52. L.I. Iezzoni, S.M. Foley, J. Daley, and et al. Comorbidities, complications, and coding bias. Does the number of diagnosis codes matter in predicting in-hospital mortality? JAMA 267 1992 2197 2203
53. L.I. Iezzoni Assessing quality using administrative data Ann Intern Med 127 1997 666 674
54. L.G. Glance, A.W. Dick, T.M. Osler, and D.B. Mukamel Accuracy of hospital report cards based on administrative data Health Serv Res 41 2006 1413 1437
55. J.C. Messenger, K.K. Ho, C.H. Young, and et al. The National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) data quality brief: the NCDR data quality program in 2012 J Am Coll Cardiol 60 2012 1484 1488
56. J.M. Brennan, J.P. Curtis, D. Dai, and et al. Enhanced mortality risk prediction with a focus on high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: results from 1,208,137 procedures in the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry) J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 6 2013 790 799
57. J.J.H. Hibbard, J. Stockard, and M. Tusler Hospital performance reports: impact on quality, market share, and reputation Health Aff 24 2005 1150 1160