The acquisition of Japanese modality during study abroad

Japanese Modality: Exploring its Scope and Interpretation

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 231-258

  Watanabe, Suwako ^a   Iwasaki, Noriko ^b  

^a PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85015223296     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1057/9780230245754     Document Type: Chapter

References (42)

1. Bardovi-Harlig, K. and Z. Dornyei (1998). Do language learners recognize pragmatic violations? Pragmatic versus grammatical awareness in instructed learning. TESOL Quarterly 32(2), 233-62.
2. Barron, A. (2003). Acquisition in Interlanguage Pragmatics: Learning How to do Things with Words in a Study Abroad Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
3. Breiner-Sanders, K., P. Lowe, Jr, J. Miles and E. Swender (2000). ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines-speaking, revised. Foreign Language Annals 33(1), 13-18.
4. Chafe, W. and J. Danielewicz (1987). Properties of spoken and written language. In: Horowitz, R. and Samuels, S.J. (eds), Comprehending Oral and Written Language. New York: Academic Press: 83-113.
5. Dewey, D. P. (2005). Maximizing learning during study abroad: some research-based programmatic suggestions. Study Abroad: Rethinking our Whys and Hows. Occasional Papers, Association of Teachers of Japanese,7,3-11.
6. Dittmar, N. and H. Terborg (1991). Modality and second language learning: a challenge for linguistic theory. In: Huebner, T. and Ferguson, C. A. (eds), Cross Currents in Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theories. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 347-84.
7. Freed, B. F. (1995). Second Language Acquisition in a Study Abroad Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
8. Halliday, M.A.K. (1970). Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English. Foundations of Language 6, 322-61.
9. Huebner, T. (1995). The effects of overseas language programs: report on a case study of an intensive Japanese course. In: Freed, B. F. (ed.), Second Language Acquisition in a Study Abroad Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 171-93.
10. Iwasaki, N. (2005). A year abroad in Japan: participants' perspectives. Study Abroad: Rethinking our Whys and Hows. Occasional Papers, Association of Teachers of Japanese, 7, 12-23.
11. Iwasaki, N. (2007). Assessing progress towards the advanced level Japanese after a year abroad: focus on individual participants. Japanese Language and Literature 41(2), 271-96.
12. Iwasaki, N. (In press). Style shifts among Japanese learners before and after study abroad in Japan: becoming active social agents in Japanese. Applied Linguistics.
13. Jorden, E. H. and M. Noda (1987). Japanese: the Spoken Language, Part 1. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
14. Kärkkäinen, E. (1992). Modality as a strategy in interaction: epistemic modality in the language of native and non-native speakers of English. In: Bouton, L.F. and Kachru, Y. (eds), Pragmatics and Language Learning (Monograph Series 3). Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Division of English as an International Language: 197-216.
15. Kasper, G. (1998). Interlanguage pragmatics. In: Byrnes, H. (ed.), Learning Foreign and Second Languages: Perspectives in Research and Scholarship (Teaching Languages, Literatures, and Cultures 1). New York: Modern Language Association: 183-208.
16. Kasper, G. and S. Blum-Kulka (1993). Interlanguage Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Kurotaki, M. (2002). Chuukan gengo to shite no Epistemic Modality ni kansuru ichi koosatsu: Bunpooka no hookoosei to shuutoku junjo to no kakawari kara [A Study of Epistemic Modality as Interlanguage: Direction of Gammaticalization and Acquisition Order]. Eigo Hyoogen Kenkyuu 19, 37-49.
18. Kurotaki, M. (2005). Deontic kara epistemic e no huhensei to sootaisei: Modariti no nitiei-taisyoo kenkyuu [Universality and Relativity of the Developmental Order from Deontic to Epistemic: a Comparative Study of English and Japanese Modality]. Tokyo: Kurosio.
19. Labov, W. (1972). Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia, Pa: University of Pennsylvania Press.
20. Marriott, H. (1995). The acquisition of politeness patterns by exchange students in Japan. In:Freed, B.F.(ed.), Second Language Acquisition in a Study Abroad Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 197-224.
21. Masuoka, T. (1991). Grammar of Modality. Tokyo:Kurosio.
22. Maynard, S. (1993). Discourse Modality: Subjectivity, Emotion and Voice in the Japanese Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
23. Maynard, S. (1997). Japanese Communication: Language and Thought in Context. Honolulu, Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press.
24. Maynard, S. (2005). Expressive Japanese: a Reference Guide to Sharing Emotion and Empathy. Honolulu, Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press.
25. Miyazaki, K., T. Adachi, H. Noda and S. Takanashi (2002). Modaliti. Tokyo: Kurosio.
26. Mori, J. (1999). Well I may be exaggerating but...: self-qualifying clauses in negotiation of opinions among Japanese speakers. Human Studies 22, 447-73.
27. Nagata, R. and R. Ohama (2001). The relationships among uses of the Japanese conjunction kedo. Nihongo Kyoiku 110, 62-71.
28. Nakau, M. (1994). Ninchi imiron no genri [Principles of Cognitive Semantics]. Tokyo: Taishukan.
29. Nakayama, T. and K. Ichihashi-Nakayama (1997). Japanese kedo:discourse genre and grammaticization. In: Sohn, H. and Haig, J. (eds), Japanese/Korean Linguistics, vol. 6. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications: 607-18.
30. Nihongo Kizyutu Bunpō Kenkyūkai (2003). Gendai Nihongo Bunpoo 4, No. 8 Modality. Tokyo:Kurosio.
31. Nitta, Y. (1989). Gendai nihongobun no modariti no taikei to koozoo. In: Nitta, Y. and Masuoka, T. (eds), Nihongo no modariti [Modality in Japanese]. Tokyo: Kurosio: 1-56.
32. Ono, M. (2001). The communicative function of to omou. Nihongo Kyoiku, 110, 22-31.
33. Oshima, Y. (1993). Chuugokugo/kankokugo-wasya ni okeru nihongono modariti shuutoku ni kansuru kenkyuu [Acquisition of Japanese Modality by Chinese and Korean Learners]. Nihongo Kyoiku, 81, 93-103.
34. Salsbury, T. and K. Bardovi-Harlig (2000). Oppositional talk and the acquisition of modality in L2 English. In: Swierzbin, B., Morris, F., Anderson, M.E., Klee, C. A. and Tarone, E. (eds), Social and Cognitive Factors in Second Language Acquisition, Selected Proceedings of the 1999 Second Language Research Forum (SLRF). Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla Press: 57-76.
35. Sawyer, M. (1992). The development of pragmatics in Japanese as a second language: the sentence-final particle ne. In: Kasper, G. (ed.), Pragmatics of Japanese: a Native and Target Language. Honolulu, Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press: 83-125.
36. Siegal, M. (1995). Individual differences and study abroad: women learning Japanese in Japan. In: Freed, B. F. (ed.), Second Language Acquisition in a Study Abroad Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 225-44.
37. Siegal, M. (1996). The role of learner subjectivity in second language sociolinguistic competency: Western women learning Japanese. Applied Linguistics 17(3), 356-82.
38. Swender, E., K. E. Breiner-Sanders, L. M. Laughlin, P. Lowe, Jr and J. Miles (1999). ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview Tester Training Manual. New York: ACTFL Inc.
39. Tokieda, M. (1941). Kokugogaku genron [The Principles of Japanese Linguistics]. Tokyo: Iwanami.
40. Uchida, A. (2001). A study on sentences ending with-kedo: the relation between their characteristics and discourse function. Nihongo Kyoiku 109, 40-9.
41. Watanabe, S. (2003). Cohesion and coherence strategies in paragraph and extended discourse in Japanese Oral Proficiency Interview. Foreign Language Annals 33(4), 555-65.
42. Yoshimi, D. R. (1999). L1 language socialization as a variable in the use of ne by L2 learners of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 31, 1513-25.