Corrigendum to “The importance of the electrical contact between specimen and testing fixture in evaluating the electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of carbon materials” [Carbon 117, (2017) 427–436](S000862231730221X)(10.1016/j.carbon.2017.02.091);The importance of the electrical contact between specimen and testing fixture in evaluating the electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of carbon materials

Carbon

Volumn 117, Issue , 2017, Pages 427-436

  Eddib, Asma A ^a   Chung, D D L ^a  

^a the State University of New York   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON FIBERS; CARBON NANOFIBERS; ELECTRIC CONTACTS; ELECTROMAGNETIC PULSE; ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE INTERFERENCE; FIBERS; FIXTURES (TOOLING); GRAPHITE; MAGNETIC SHIELDING; MATERIALS TESTING; SHIELDING; SIGNAL INTERFERENCE;

ABSORPTION LOSS; CARBON MATERIAL; ELECTRICAL CONTACTS; ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERFERENCE SHIELDING EFFECTIVENESS; FLEXIBLE GRAPHITE; PREFERRED ORIENTATIONS; SHIELDING EFFECTIVENESS; SHORT FIBER;

ELECTROMAGNETIC SHIELDING;

EID: 85014880966     PISSN: 00086223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.05.054     Document Type: Erratum

References (18)

1. [1] Geetha, S., Kumar, K.K., Rao, Satheesh, Chepuri, R.K., Vijayan, M., Trivedi, D.C., EMI shielding: methods and materials - a review. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 112:4 (2009), 2073–2086.
2. [2] Kausar, A., Rafique, I., Muhammad, B., Electromagnetic interference shielding of polymer/nanodiamond, polymer/carbon nanotube, and polymer/nanodiamond-carbon nanotube nano-bifiller composites: a review. Polym. Plastics Technol. Eng., 56(4), 2017 (Pages Ahead of Print).
3. [3] Shui, X., Chung, D.D.L., Submicron diameter nickel filaments and their polymer-matrix composites. J. Mater Sci. 35 (2000), 1773–1785.
4. [4] Dhakate, S.R., Subhedar, K.M., Singh, B.P., Polymer nanocomposite foam filled with carbon nanomaterials as an efficient electromagnetic interference shielding material. RSC Adv. 5:54 (2015), 43036–43057.
5. [5] Wang, Y., Jing, X., Intrinsically conducting polymers for electromagnetic interference shielding. Polym. Adv. Technol. 16:4 (2005), 344–351.
6. [6] Chung, D.D.L., Electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of carbon materials. Carbon 39:2 (2001), 279–285.
7. [7] Chung, D.D.L., Carbon materials for structural self-sensing, electromagnetic shielding and thermal interfacing. Carbon 50 (2012), 3342–3353.
8. [8] Cao, M., Wang, X., Cao, W., Yuan, J., Ultrathin graphene: electrical properties and highly efficient electromagnetic interference shielding. J. Mater Chem. C 3:26 (2015), 6589–6599.
9. [9] Hong, X., Chung, D.D.L., Carbon nanofiber mats for electromagnetic interference shielding. Carbon, 111, 2017 529–527.
10. [10] Kim, T., Chung, D.D.L., Mats and fabrics for electromagnetic interference shielding. J. Mater Eng. Perf. 15:3 (2006), 295–298.
11. [11] Luo, X., Chung, D.D.L., Electromagnetic interference shielding reaching 130 dB using flexible graphite. Carbon 34:10 (1996), 1293–1294.
12. [12] Muthusamy, S., Chung, D.D.L., Carbon fiber cement-based materials for electromagnetic interference shielding. ACI Mater J. 107:6 (2010), 602–610.
13. [13] Wen, S., Chung, D.D.L., Electromagnetic interference shielding reaching 70 dB in steel fiber cement. Cem. Concr. Res. 34:2 (2004), 329–332.
14. [14] Cao, J., Chung, D.D.L., Use of fly ash as an admixture for electromagnetic interference shielding. Cem. Concr. Res. 34:10 (2004), 1889–1892.
15. [15] Chung, D.D.L., A review of exfoliated graphite. J. Mater Sci. 51 (2016), 554–568.
16. [16] Shui, X., Frysz, C.A., Chung, D.D.L., Solvent cleansing of the surface of carbon filaments and its benefit to the electrochemical behavior. Carbon 33:12 (1995), 1681–1698.
17. [17] Shui, X., Chung, D.D.L., Electrical resistivity of submicron-diameter carbon-filament compacts. Carbon 39:ER11 (2001), 1717–1722.
18. [18] Wang, S., Kowalik, D.P., Chung, D.D.L., Self-sensing attained in carbon fiber polymer-matrix structural composites by using the interlaminar interface as a sensor. Smart Mater Struct. 13:3 (2004), 570–592.