Drivers of society-nature relations in the Anthropocene and their implications for sustainability transformations

Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability

Volumn 26-27, Issue , 2017, Pages 32-36

  Pichler, Melanie ^a   Schaffartzik, Anke ^a   Haberl, Helmut ^a   Görg, Christoph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KLAGENFURT   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOCENE; ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE; LITERATURE REVIEW; NATURE-SOCIETY RELATIONS; POLITICS; RESOURCE USE; SUSTAINABILITY;

EID: 85014822146     PISSN: 18773435     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.017     Document Type: Review

References (64)

1. 1 Steffen, W., Persson, Å., Deutsch, L., Zalasiewicz, J., Williams, M., Richardson, K., Crumley, C., Crutzen, P., Folke, C., Gordon, L., et al. The Anthropocene: from global change to planetary stewardship. AMBIO 40 (2011), 739–761.
2. 2• Biermann, F., Bai, X., Bondre, N., Broadgate, W., C-TA, Chen, Dube, O.P., Erisman, J.W., Glaser, M., van der Hel, S., Lemos, M.C., Down to earth: contextualizing the Anthropocene. Glob Environ Change 39 (2016), 341–350 The contribution criticizes the global and monolithic framing of the Anthropocene concept and calls for a regional and social contextualization of the debate to increase social and policy relevance. It argues that the notion of humanity as a driving force does not do justice to the diversity of local and regional contexts.
3. 3 Crutzen, P., Stoermer, E., The Anthropocene IGBP Newsletter, 41. 2000, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden [no volume].
4. 4 Lewis, S.L., Maslin, M.A., Defining the Anthropocene. Nature 519 (2015), 171–180.
5. 5 Zalasiewicz, J., Waters, C.N., Williams, M., Barnosky, A.D., Cearreta, A., Crutzen, P., Ellis, E., Ellis, M.A., Fairchild, I.J., Grinevald, J., et al. When did the Anthropocene begin? A mid-twentieth century boundary level is stratigraphically optimal. Quat Int 383 (2015), 196–203.
6. 6 Waters, C.N., Zalasiewicz, J., Summerhayes, C., Barnosky, A.D., Poirier, C., Gałuszka, A., Cearreta, A., Edgeworth, M., Ellis, E.C., Ellis, M., The Anthropocene is functionally and stratigraphically distinct from the Holocene. Science, 351, 2016, aad2622.
7. 7 Ruddiman, W.F., Ellis, E.C., Kaplan, J.O., Fuller, D.Q., Defining the epoch we live in. Science 348 (2015), 38–39.
8. 8 Foley, S.F., Gronenborn, D., Andreae, M.O., Kadereit, J.W., Esper, J., Scholz, D., Pöschl, U., Jacob, D.E., Schöne, B.R., Schreg, R., et al. The Palaeoanthropocene – the beginnings of anthropogenic environmental change. Anthropocene 3 (2013), 83–88.
9. 9 Crutzen, P.J., Geology of mankind. Nature, 415, 2002 23–23.
10. 10• Fischer-Kowalski, M., Krausmann, F., Pallua, I., A sociometabolic reading of the Anthropocene: modes of subsistence, population size and human impact on earth. Anthr Rev 1 (2014), 8–33 The article provides a social ecology reading of the Anthropocene through focusing on the social metabolism of human societies. The authors differentiate between three sociometabolic regimes (hunter gatherers, agrarian and industrial) and argue that energy intensity through the onset of fossil fuel use represents a dividing line for human impact on the Earth system.
11. 11• Steffen, W., Broadgate, W., Deutsch, L., Gaffney, O., Ludwig, C., The trajectory of the Anthropocene: the great acceleration. Anthr Rev 2 (2015), 81–98 The article updates the ‘Great Acceleration’ graphs to the year 2010 and for the first time challenges global aggregates by differentiating between OECD countries, emerging economies and the rest of the world. A major finding is that despite most of the population growth took place in the non-OECD countries, the major share of consumption remains with the OECD countries.
12. 12 Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F.S., Lambin, E.F., Lenton, T.M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H.J., et al. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461 (2009), 472–475.
13. 13 Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockstrom, J., Cornell, S.E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E.M., Biggs, R., Carpenter, S.R., de Vries, W., de Wit, C.A., et al. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347, 2015 1259855–1259855.
14. 14 Mumby, P.J., Chollett, I., Bozec, Y.-M., Wolff, N.H., Ecological resilience, robustness and vulnerability: how do these concepts benefit ecosystem management?. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 7 (2014), 22–27.
15. 15 Adger, N., Hodbod, J., Ecological and social resilience. Atkinson, G., Dietz, S., Neumayer, E., Agarwala, M., (eds.) Handbook of Sustainable Development, 2014, Edward Elgar, 91–104.
16. 16 Glavovic, B., Limburg, K., Liu, K.-K., Emeis, K.-C., Thomas, H., Kremer, H., Avril, B., Zhang, J., Mulholland, M., Glaser, M., et al. Living on the margin in the Anthropocene: engagement arenas for sustainability research and action at the ocean–land interface. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 14 (2015), 232–238.
17. 17 Berkes, F., Folke, C., Colding, J., Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience. 2000, Cambridge University Press.
18. 18 Young, O.R., Berkhout, F., Gallopin, G.C., Janssen, M.A., Ostrom, E., van der Leeuw, S., The globalization of socio-ecological systems: an agenda for scientific research. Glob Environ Change 16 (2006), 304–316.
19. 19 Bai, X., Van Der Leeuw, S., O'Brien, K., Berkhout, F., Biermann, F., Brondizio, E.S., Cudennec, C., Dearing, J., Duraiappah, A., Glaser, M., Plausible and desirable futures in the Anthropocene: a new research agenda. Glob Environ Change 39 (2016), 351–362.
20. 20•• Malm, A., Hornborg, A., The geology of mankind? A critique of the Anthropocene narrative. Anthr Rev 1 (2014), 62–69 From a political ecology perspective, this article challenges the Anthropocene narrative of humanity as a geological force. The authors call for a closer look at the inequalities and differences within humanity, especially since the Industrial Revolution, as decisive drivers of the ecological crisis.
21. 21 Brondizio, E.S., O'Brien, K., Bai, X., Biermann, F., Steffen, W., Berkhout, F., Cudennec, C., Lemos, M.C., Wolfe, A., Palma-Oliveira, J., et al. Re-conceptualizing the Anthropocene: a call for collaboration. Glob Environ Change 39 (2016), 318–327.
22. 22 Jahn, T., Hummel, D., Schramm, E., Nachhaltige Wissenschaft im Anthropozän. GAIA: Ecol Perspect Sci Soc 24 (2015), 92–95.
23. 23 Lövbrand, E., Beck, S., Chilvers, J., Forsyth, T., Hedrén, J., Hulme, M., Lidskog, R., Vasileiadou, E., Who speaks for the future of earth? How critical social science can extend the conversation on the Anthropocene. Glob Environ Change 32 (2015), 211–218.
24. 24 Biermann, F., The Anthropocene: a governance perspective. Anthr Rev 1 (2014), 57–61.
25. 25 Johnson, E., Morehouse, H., Dalby, S., Lehman, J., Nelson, S., Rowan, R., Wakefield, S., Yusoff, K., After the Anthropocene: politics and geographic inquiry for a new epoch. Prog Hum Geogr 38 (2014), 439–456.
26. 26 Hamilton, C., Bonneuil, C., Gemenne, F., (eds.) The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis, 2015, Routledge.
27. 27 Fischer-Kowalski, M., Weisz, H., The archipelago of social ecology and the island of the vienna school. Haberl, H., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Krausmann, F., Winiwarter, V., (eds.) Social Ecology. Society-Nature Relations Across Time and Space, 2016, Springer International Publishing, 3–28.
28. 28 Fischer-Kowalski, M., Haberl, H., Social metabolism: a metric for biophysical growth and degrowth. Martinez-Alier, J., (eds.) Handbook of Ecological Economics, 2015, Edward Elgar Publishing, 100–138.
29. 29 Fischer-Kowalski, M., Erb, K.-H., Core concepts and heuristics. Haberl, H., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Krausmann, F., Winiwarter, V., (eds.) Social Ecology. Society-Nature Relations Across Time and Space, 2016, Springer, 29–61.
30. 30 Fischer-Kowalski, M., Schaffartzik, A., Energy availability and energy sources as determinants of societal development in a long-term perspective [Internet]. MRS Energy Sustain: Rev J, 2, 2015.
31. 31 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change: Working Group III Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change., 2014, Cambridge University Press.
32. 32 Moore, J.W., Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital. 2015, Verso.
33. 33• Malm, A., Fossil Capital: the Rise of Steam-power and the Roots of Global Warming. 2016, Verso The book links the use of fossil energy to the expansion of capitalist production and consumption that began in Britain with the rise of steam power. It concludes that a transition from fossil energy to renewables would imply a radical shift in the current economic order.
34. 34 Mitchell, T., Carbon Democracy: Political Power in the Age of Oil. 2013, Verso.
35. 35 Di Muzio, T., Carbon Capitalism: Energy, Social Reproduction and World Order. 2015, Rowman & Littlefield International.
36. 36 Hornborg, A., Towards an ecological theory of unequal exchange: articulating world system theory and ecological economics. Ecol Econ 25 (1998), 127–136.
37. 37 Kelly, A.B., Peluso, N.L., Frontiers of commodification: state lands and their formalization. Soc Nat Resour 28 (2015), 473–495.
38. 38•• Brad, A., Schaffartzik, A., Pichler, M., Plank, C., Contested territorialization and biophysical expansion of oil palm plantations in Indonesia. Geoforum 64 (2015), 100–111 Through a combination of quantitative material flow accounting and qualitative policy analysis, the article links societal drivers and biophysical processes to understand the expansion of palm oil plantations in Indonesia. The concept of territorialization is used to explain this link and to distinguish two periods of palm oil expansion since the 1960s.
39. 39•• Brand, U., “Transformation” as a new critical orthodoxy: the strategic use of the term “transformation” does not prevent multiple crises. GAIA: Ecol Perspect Sci Soc 25 (2016), 23–27 From a political ecology perspective, the article evaluates existing proposals for sustainability transformations and analyses obstacles to policy change. These obstacles are linked to a lack of questioning power relations and the drivers of ecological change. Furthermore, the author introduces a distinction between a strategic and an analytical concept of transformation.
40. 40 Newell, P., The politics of green transformations in capitalism. Scoones, I., Leach, M., Newell, P., (eds.) The Politics of Green Transformations, 2015, Routledge, 68–85.
41. 41 Brand, U., Görg, C., Hirsch, J., Wissen, M., Conflicts in Environmental Regulation and the Internationalisation of the State: Contested Terrains. 2008, Routledge.
42. 42 Koch, M., Capitalism and Climate Change: Theoretical Discussion, Historical Development and Policy Responses. 2011, Palgrave Macmillan.
43. 43 Haberl, H., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Krausmann, F., Martinez-Alier, J., Winiwarter, V., A socio-metabolic transition towards sustainability? Challenges for another great transformation. Sustain Dev 19 (2011), 1–14.
44. 44 Temper, L., Who gets the HANPP (human appropriation of net primary production)? Biomass distribution and the bio-economy in the Tana Delta, Kenya. J Political Ecol, 23, 2016, 411.
45. 45 Dietz, K., Engels, B., Pye, O., Brunnengräber, A., (eds.) The Political Ecology of Agrofuels, 2015, Routledge.
46. 46 Hornborg, A., The political ecology of the technocene. Uncovering ecologically unequal exchange in the world-system. Hamilton, C., Bonneuil, C., Gemenne, F., (eds.) The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis, 2015, Routledge, 57–69.
47. 47 Chancel, L., Piketty, T., Carbon and Inequality: from Kyoto to Paris Trends in the Global Inequality of Carbon Emissions (1998-2013) & Prospects for an Equitable Adaptation Fund [Internet]. 2015, Paris School of Economics.
48. 48• Brand, U., Wissen, M., Crisis and continuity of capitalist society-nature relationships: the imperial mode of living and the limits to environmental governance. Rev Int Political Econ 20 (2013), 687–711 The article introduces the concept of an ‘imperial mode of living’ to analyze the fossilist patterns of production and consumption that are deeply rooted in everyday and institutional practices in the Global North (and increasingly also in the emerging countries of the Global South) and imply a disproportional claim on global resources, sinks and labour power.
49. 49 Steffen, W., Broadgate, W., Deutsch, L., Gaffney, O., Ludwig, C., The trajectory of the Anthropocene: the great acceleration. Anthr Rev 2 (2015), 81–98.
50. 50 Chen, J., Wu, Y., Wen, J., Cheng, S., Wang, J., Regional differences in China's fossil energy consumption: an analysis for the period 1997–2013 [Internet]. J Clean Prod 142 (2017), 578–588.
51. 51 Sanches-Pereira, A., Tudeschini, L.G., Coelho, S.T., Evolution of the Brazilian residential carbon footprint based on direct energy consumption. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 54 (2016), 184–201.
52. 52 Friis, C., Nielsen, J.Ø., Otero, I., Haberl, H., Niewöhner, J., Hostert, P., From teleconnection to telecoupling: taking stock of an emerging framework in land system science. J Land Use Sci 11 (2016), 131–153.
53. 53 Güneralp, B., Seto, K.C., Ramachandran, M., Evidence of urban land teleconnections and impacts on hinterlands. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 5 (2013), 445–451.
54. 54 Niewöhner, J., Østergaard Nielsen, J., Gasparri, I., Gou, Y., Hauge, M., Joshi, N., Schaffartzik, A., Sejersen, F., Seto, K.C., Shughrue, C., Conceptualizing distal drivers in land use competition [Internet]. Niewöhner, J., Bruns, A., Hostert, P., Krueger, T., Østergaard Nielsen, J., Haberl, H., Lauk, C., Lutz, J., Müller, D., (eds.) Land Use Competition, 2016, Springer International Publishing, 21–40.
55. 55•• Schaffartzik, A., Mayer, A., Gingrich, S., Eisenmenger, N., Loy, C., Krausmann, F., The global metabolic transition: regional patterns and trends of global material flows, 1950–2010. Glob Environ Change 26 (2014), 87–97 The article provides differentiated evidence on accelerating resource use through distinguishing six world regions (Former Soviet Union, Western Industrial, Asia, Middle East and North Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean, Sub-Saharan Africa). Domestic resource extraction is compared with trade flows to identify net-importers and net-exporters of natural resources.
56. 56 Erb, K.-H., Krausmann, F., Lucht, W., Haberl, H., Embodied HANPP: mapping the spatial disconnect between global biomass production and consumption. Ecol Econ 69 (2009), 328–334.
57. 57 Andreucci, D., Radhuber, I.M., Limits to “counter-neoliberal” reform: mining expansion and the marginalisation of post-extractivist forces in Evo Morales's Bolivia. Geoforum, 2015 [in press].
58. 58 Kill, J.E., The role of voluntary certification in maintaining the ecologically unequal exchange of wood pulp: the Forest Stewardship Council's certification of industrial tree plantations in Brazil. J Political Ecol, 23, 2016, 435.
59. 59 Corbera, E., Problematizing REDD+ as an experiment in payments for ecosystem services. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 4 (2012), 612–619.
60. 60 Fairhead, J., Leach, M., Scoones, I., Green grabbing: a new appropriation of nature?. J Peasant Stud 39 (2012), 237–261.
61. 61 Leach, M., Scoones, I., Carbon Conflicts and Forest Landscapes in Africa. 2015, Routledge.
62. 62 Bridge, G., Resource geographies 1: making carbon economies, old and new. Prog Hum Geogr 35 (2011), 820–834.
63. 63• Scoones, I., Leach, M., Newell, P., (eds.) The Politics of Green Transformations, 2015, Routledge The volume discusses the political potentials and barriers for green transformations on different scales. From different perspectives, the authors argue for the necessity of both top-down (i.e. alliances between state and business elites) as well as bottom-up (i.e. grassroots innovations and civil society mobilizations).
64. 64 Pichler, M., Staritz, C., Küblböck, K., Plank, C., Raza, W., Ruiz Peyré, F., (eds.) Fairness and Justice in Natural Resource Politics, 2016, Routledge.