User preferences regarding autonomous vehicles

Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies

Volumn 78, Issue , 2017, Pages 37-49

  Haboucha, Chana J ^a   Ishaq, Robert ^a   Shiftan, Yoram ^a  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Autonomous vehicles; Car sharing; Discrete choice; Latent variables; User preference

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY; FLEET OPERATIONS;

DISCRETE CHOICE; ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS; LATENT VARIABLE; PUBLIC TRANSIT; RANDOM UTILITY MODEL; STATED PREFERENCES; USER PREFERENCE; VEHICLE CHOICE;

AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES;

CAR USE; COMMUTING; DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; FACTOR ANALYSIS; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; TRAVEL DEMAND;

ISRAEL; NORTH AMERICA;

EID: 85014604290     PISSN: 0968090X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2017.01.010     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Abou-zeid, M., Ben-akiva, M., Bierlaire, M., Choudhury, C., Hess, S., 2010. Attitudes and value of time heterogeneity. In: De Voorde, E.V., Vanelslander, T. (Eds.), Applied Transport Economics: A Management and Policy Perspective. De Boeck, pp. 523–545.
2. Accenture, 2011. Consumers in US and UK frusterated with intelligent devices that frequently crash.
3. Amazon.com Inc., 2015. Amazon Mechanical Turk. Amazon. Retrieved from .
4. Atasoy, B., Glerum, A., Bierlaire, M., Attitudes towards mode choice in Switzerland. disP – Plann. Rev. 49:2 (2013), 101–117, 10.1080/02513625.2013.827518.
5. Bansal, P., Kockelman, K.M., Singh, A., Assessing public opinions of and interest in new vehicle technologies: an Austin perspective. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 67 (2016), 1–14, 10.1016/j.trc.2016.01.019.
6. Ben-akiva, M., Bolduc, D., Walker, J., 2001. Specification, Identification, & Estimation of the Logit Kernel (or Continuous Mixed Logit) Model. Cambridge.
7. Bierlaire, M., 2014. Biogeme: A free package for the estimation of discrete choice models. EPFL. Retrieved from .
8. Caldwell, P., 2014. Autonomous cars: will drivers buy them? Retrieved from .
9. Casley, S.V., Jardim, A.S., Quartulli, A.M., A Study of Public Acceptance of Autonomous Cars. 2013, Worcester Polytechnic Institute.
10. Devarasetty, M., Burris, W.A., et al. Can psychological variables help predict the use of prices managed lanes? Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 22 (2014), 25–38.
11. Ewing, G., Sarigollu, E., Assessing consumer preferences for clean-fuel vehicles: a discrete choice experiment. J. Public Policy Market. 19:1 (2000), 106–118.
12. Fagnant, D.J., Kockelman, K., Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 77 (2015), 167–181, 10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.003.
13. Fagnant, D.J., Kockelman, K.M., The travel and environmental implications of shared autonomous vehicles, using agent-based model scenarios. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 40 (2014), 1–13, 10.1016/j.trc.2013.12.001.
14. Fraedrich, E., Lenz, B., 2014. Automated driving- Individual and societal aspects entering the debate. In: 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C.
15. Howard, D., Dai, D., 2014. Public perceptions of self-driving cars: the case of Berkeley, California. In: 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C.
16. IBM, 2015. SPSS AMOS. Retrieved from .
17. Jensen, A.F., Cherchi, E., de Dios Ortúzar, J., A long panel survey to elicit variation in preferences and attitudes in the choice of electric vehicles. Transportation, 41, 2014 Retrieved from .
18. Kim, J.-H., Chung, J.-H., Kim, T., The effect of psychological traits on mode choice behaviour: an application to a new water transit system in Seoul, Korea. Transp. Plann. Technol. 36:6 (2013), 547–566, 10.1080/03081060.2013.830891.
19. KPMG, 2012. Self-driving cars: The next revolution. New York. Retrieved from .
20. KPMG, 2013. Self-Driving Cars : Are we ready? Retrieved from .
21. Kyriakidis, M., Happee, R., De Winter, J.C.F., Public opinion on automated driving : Results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents. Transp. Res. Part F, 2015 Retrieved from .
22. Levin, M.W., Boyles, S.D., 2015. Effects of autonomous vehicle ownership on trip, mode and route choice. In: 94th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C.
23. Megens, I.C.H., Vehicle Users' Preferences Concerning Automated Driving: Implications for Transportation and Market Planning. 2014, Eindhoven University of Technology.
24. Missel, J., 2014. Ipsos Mori loyalty automotive survey. Retrieved July 12, 2015, from .
25. Payre, W., Cestac, J., Delhomme, P., Intention to use a fully automated car: attitudes and a priori acceptability. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 27 (2014), 252–263 Retrieved from .
26. Qualtrics LLC, 2015. Qualtrics. Retrieved from .
27. Roehrich, G., Consumer innovativeness: concepts and measurements. J. Bus. Res. 57:6 (2004), 671–677, 10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00311-9.
28. Rubin, J., Choosing Transit: The Influence of Past Travel Behavior, Attitudes and Habits on Present Choices. 2011, University of California, Berkeley.
29. SAS Institute, 2014. SAS. Retrieved from .
30. Schoettle, B., Sivak, M., 2014. Public opinion about self-driving vehicles in China, India, Japan, The U.S., The U.K., and Australia. Michigan.
31. Train, K., Discrete Choice Models With Simulation. 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
32. Yvkoff, L., 2012. Many car buyers show interest in autonomous car tech. Retrieved from .