How Has Internet Addiction Research Evolved Since the Advent of Internet Gaming Disorder? An Overview of Cyberaddictions from a Psychological Perspective

Current Addiction Reports

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 263-271

  Lopez Fernandez, Olatz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Behavioral addiction; Cyberaddictions; Internet addiction; Internet gaming disorder

Indexed keywords

EID: 85014337043     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21962952     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s40429-015-0067-6     Document Type: Review

References (94)

1. Young K, de Nabuco Abreu C. Internet addiction: a handbook and guide to evaluation and treatment. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2011. This handbook, the first to address the conceptual and psychological factors associated with IA, was written by leading IA researchers.
2. Griffiths MD. Technological addictions. Clin Psychol Forum. 1995;76:14–9. This study, the first to address technologic behavioral addiction, has inspired many studies on cyberaddictions.
3. Carbonell X, Guardiola E, Beranuy M, Bellés A. A bibliometric analysis of the scientific literature on Internet, video games, and cell phone addiction. J Med Libr Assoc. 2009;97:102–7.
4. American Psychiatric Association (APA). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). Arlington, VA: Author; 2013. The latest DSM from the APA includes IGD in section III of its appendix.
5. Petry NM, O'Brien CP. Internet gaming disorder and the DSM‐5. Addiction. 2013;108(7):1186–7. This brief editorial, the first article to address the inclusion of IGD in the DSM-5, clarifies its role in facilitating research.
6. Petry NM, Rehbein F, Gentile DA, Lemmens JS, Rumpf H, Mößle T, et al. An international consensus for assessing Internet gaming disorder using the new DSM-5 approach. Addiction. 2014;109(9):1399–406. This international paper discusses the consensus on IGD research (conceptualizing and proposing a method to evaluate IGD with items associated with the nine criteria, translated in different languages to facilitate cross-cultural research).
7. Subramaniam M. Re‐thinking Internet gaming: from recreation to addiction. Addiction. 2014;109(9):1407–8.
8. Goudriaan AE. Stepping up the game. Addiction. 2014;109(9):1409–11.
9. Ko C, Yen J. The criteria to diagnose Internet gaming disorder from causal online gamer. Addiction. 2014;109(9):1411–2.
10. Kardefelt‐Winther D. Meeting the unique challenges of assessing Internet gaming disorder. Addiction. 2014;109(9):1568–70.
11. Griffiths MD, King DL, Demetrovics Z. DSM-5 Internet gaming disorder needs a unified approach to assessment. Neuropsychiatry. 2014;4(1):1–4.
12. Griffiths MD, Pontes HM. Internet addiction disorder and Internet gaming disorder are not the same. J Addict Res Ther. 2014;5:e124.
13. Pontes HM, Griffiths MD. Assessment of Internet gaming disorder in clinical research: past and present perspectives. Clin Res Regul Aff. 2014;31(2-4):35–48.
14. Griffiths MD, Szabo A. Is excessive online usage a function of medium or activity? An empirical pilot study. J Behav Addict. 2014;3(1):74–7. This empiric study investigated whether Internet excessive use is associated with a medium or an activity, a current debate in the technologic behavioral addictions literature.
15. Petry NM, Rehbein F, Gentile DA, Lemmens JS, Rumpf H, Mößle T, et al. Moving Internet gaming disorder forward: a reply. Addiction. 2014;109(9):1412–3. This reply to comments made by several IA researchers regarding the consensual proposal of IGD conceptualization and measurement offers some clarification of IGD.
16. Suissa AJ. Cyberaddictions: toward a psychosocial perspective. Addict Behav. 2014;39(12):1914–8.
17. Laconi S, Tricard N, Chabrol H. Differences between specific and generalized problematic Internet uses according to gender, age, time spent online and psychopathological symptoms. Comput Hum Behav. 2015;48:236–44.
18. Kor A, Zilcha-Mano S, Fogel YA, Mikulincer M, Reid RC, Potenza MN. Psychometric development of the Problematic Pornography Use Scale. Addict Behav. 2014;39(5):861–8.
19. Lecardeur L. Psychopathologie du jeu multi-joueurs en ligne. Ann Med Psychol. 2013;171(8):579–86.
20. Cole SH, Hooley JM. Clinical and personality correlates of MMO gaming: anxiety and absorption in problematic Internet use. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2013;31(4):424–36.
21. Li H, Wang S. The role of cognitive distortion in online game addiction among Chinese adolescents. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2013;35(9):1468–75.
22. Kuss DJ. Internet gaming addiction: current perspectives. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2013;6:125–37.
23. Hilgard J, Engelhardt CR, Bartholow BD. Individual differences in motives, preferences, and pathology in video games: the gaming attitudes, motives, and experiences scales (GAMES). Front Psychol. 2013;4:1–13.
24. Bailey K, West R, Kuffel J. What would my avatar do? Gaming, pathology, and risky decision making. Front Psychol. 2013;4:1–10.
25. Metcalf O, Pammer K. Impulsivity and related neuropsychological features in regular and addictive first person shooter gaming. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014;17(3):147–52.
26. Kneer J, Rieger D, Ivory JD, Ferguson C. Awareness of risk factors for digital game addiction: interviewing players and counselors. Int J Ment Heal Addict. 2014;12(5):585–99.
27. Marco C, Chóliz M. Tratamiento cognitivo-conductual de la adicción a videojuegos de rol online: Fundamentos de propuesta de tratamiento y estudio de caso. Anales de Psicología. 2014;30(1):46–55.
28. Spekman MLC, Konijn EA, Roelofsma PHMP, Griffiths MD. Gaming addiction, definition and measurement: a large-scale empirical study. Comput Hum Behav. 2013;29(6):2150–5.
29. Laier C, Pawlikowski M, Pekal J, Schulte FP, Brand M. Cybersex addiction: experienced sexual arousal when watching pornography and not real-life sexual contacts makes the difference. J Behav Addict. 2013;2(2):100–7.
30. Egan V, Parmar R. Dirty habits? Online pornography use, personality, obsessionality, and compulsivity. J Sex Marital Ther. 2013;39(5):394–409.
31. Laier C, Schulte FP, Brand M. Pornographic picture processing interferes with working memory performance. J Sex Res. 2013;50(7):642–52.
32. Laier C, Pekal J, Brand M. Cybersex addiction in heterosexual female users of internet pornography can be explained by gratification hypothesis. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014;17(8):505–11.
33. Ballester-Arnal R, Castro-Calvo J, Gil-Llario M, Giménez-García C. Relationship status as an influence on cybersex activity: cybersex, youth, and steady partner. J Sex Marital Ther. 2014;40(5):444–56.
34. Chaney MP, Burns-Wortham C. The relationship between online sexual compulsivity, dissociation, and past child abuse among men who have sex with men. J LGBT Issues Couns. 2014;8(2):146–63.
35. Woods J. Group analytic therapy for compulsive users of internet pornography. Psychoanal Psychother. 2013;27(4):306–18.
36. Riemersma J, Sytsma M. A new generation of sexual addiction. Sex Addiction Compulsivity. 2013;20(4):306–22.
37. Baek YM, Bae Y, Jang H. Social and parasocial relationships on social network sites and their differential relationships with users’ psychological well-being. Cyberpsychol Behav and Soc Netw. 2013;16(7):512–17.
38. Tzavela EC, Mavromati FM. Online social networking in adolescence: associations with development, well-being and internet addictive behaviors. Int J Child Adolesc Health. 2013;6(4):411–20.
39. Balakrishnan V, Shamim A. Malaysian Facebookers: motives and addictive behaviors unraveled. Comput Hum Behav. 2013;29(4):1342–9.
40. Uysal R, Satici SA, Akin A. Mediating effect of Facebook® addiction on the relationship between subjective vitality and subjective happiness. Psychol Rep. 2013;113(3):948–53.
41. Wu AMS, Cheung VI, Ku L, Hung EPW. Psychological risk factors of addiction to social networking sites among Chinese smartphone users. J Behav Addict. 2013;2(3):160–6.
42. De Cock R, Vangeel J, Klein A, Minotte P, Rosas O, Meerkerk G. Compulsive use of social networking sites in Belgium: prevalence, profile, and the role of attitude toward work and school. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014;17(3):166–71.
43. Tsitsika AK, Tzavela EC, Janikian M, Ólafsson K, Iordache A, Schoenmakers TM, et al. Online social networking in adolescence: patterns of use in six European countries and links with psychosocial functioning. J Adolesc Health. 2014;55(1):141–7.
44. Wong ILK, So EMT. Internet gambling among high school students in Hong Kong. J Gambl Stud. 2014;30(3):565–76.
45. Critselis E, Janikian M, Paleomilitou N, Oikonomou D, Kassinopoulos M, Kormas G, et al. Internet gambling is a predictive factor of Internet addictive behavior among Cypriot adolescents. J Behav Addict. 2013;2(4):224–30.
46. McCormack A, Shorter GW, Griffiths MD. Characteristics and predictors of problem gambling on the Internet. Int J Ment Heal Addict. 2013;11(6):634–57.
47. Fawcett J. The human condition and behavioral addictions. Psychiatr Ann. 2014;44(8):362.
48. Duroy D, Gorse P, Lejoyeux M. Characteristics of online compulsive buying in Parisian students. Addict Behav. 2014;39(12):1827–30.
49. Rose S, Dhandayudham A. Towards an understanding of Internet-based problem shopping behavior: the concept of online shopping addiction and its proposed predictors. J Behav Addict. 2014;3(2):83–9.
50. Young KS. Treatment outcomes using CBT-IA with Internet-addicted patients. J Behav Addict. 2013;2(4):209–15.
51. Bilke-Hentsch O, Seiffge-Krenke I, Stoll M, te Wildt B. Pathologischer Internet- und Medienkonsum bei Jugendlichen und Heranwachsenden: Psychodynamische Aspekte in der klinischen Konzeptbildung. PDP Psychodynamische Psychotherapie: Forum der tiefenpsychologisch fundierten Psychotherapie. 2013;12(2):81–90.
52. Lancini M, Cirillo L. Il trattamento delle dipendenze da Internet in adolescenza. Psichiatria e Psicoterapia. 2013;32(2):89–100.
53. Liu D, Lu N, He J, Tang H, Zhou L. Effects of internet addiction group counseling on Internet using and study management in college students. Chin Ment Health J. 2013;27(7):496–501.
54. Chele GE, Macarie G, Stefanescu C. Management of Internet addictive behaviors in adolescents. Int J Child Adolesc Health. 2013;6(4):443–53.
55. Kim SJ, Park D, Ryu S, Yu J, Ha JH. Usefulness of Young’s Internet addiction test for clinical populations. NordJournal Psychiatry. 2013;67(6):393–9.
56. Thorens G, Achab S, Billieux J, Khazaal Y, Khan R, Pivin E, et al. Characteristics and treatment response of self-identified problematic Internet users in a behavioral addiction outpatient clinic. J Behav Addict. 2014;3(1):78–81.
57. Floros G, Siomos K, Stogiannidou A, Giouzepas I, Garyfallos G. Comorbidity of psychiatric disorders with Internet addiction in a clinical sample: the effect of personality, defense style and psychopathology. Addict Behav. 2014;39(12):1839–45.
58. Naffise M, Mohammad A, Ahmad PB, Omid R, Ayatollahi A, Reza B, et al. The prevalence of Internet addiction among the students of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences. ASEAN J Psychiatry. 2013;14(2):109–16.
59. Yadav P, Banwari G, Parmar C, Maniar R. Internet addiction and its correlates among high school students: a preliminary study from Ahmedabad. India Asian J Psychiatry. 2013;6(6):500–05.
60. Gámez-Guadix M, Orue I, Calvete E. Evaluation of the cognitive-behavioral model of generalized and problematic Internet use in Spanish adolescents. Psicothema. 2013;25(3):299–306.
61. Kuss DJ, van Rooij AJ, Shorter GW, Griffiths MD, van de Mheen D. Internet addiction in adolescents: prevalence and risk factors. Comput Hum Behav. 2013;29(5):1987–96.
62. Rumpf H, Vermulst AA, Bischof A, Kastirke N, Gürtler D, Bischof G, et al. Occurrence of Internet addiction in a general population sample: a latent class analysis. Eur Addict Res. 2014;20(4):8.
63. Li X, Li D, Newman J. Parental behavioral and psychological control and problematic Internet use among Chinese adolescents: the mediating role of self-control. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013;16(6):442–7.
64. Burnett AL, Yozwiak JA, Omar HA. Cyberbullying: a brief review. Int J Child Adolesc Health. 2013;6(4):465–8.
65. Chen S, Gau SS, Pikhart H, Peasey A, Chen S, Tsai M. Work stress and subsequent risk of Internet addiction among information technology engineers in Taiwan. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014;17(8):542–50.
66. Wang ES, Wang MC. Social support and social interaction ties on Internet addiction: integrating online and offline contexts. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013;16(11):843–9.
67. Knabb JJ, Pelletier J. The relationship between problematic Internet use, God attachment, and psychological functioning among adults at a Christian university. Ment Health Relig Cult. 2014;17(3):239–51.
68. Tsitsika A, Janikian M, Greydanus DE, Omar HA, Merrick J. A new millennium: a new age of behavioral disorders? Int J Child Adolesc Health. 2013;6(4):363–6.
69. Hsu S, Shih H. Is Internet addiction a mental disorder? A review of empirical and conceptual studies. Bull Educ Psychol. 2013;44(4):773–92.
70. Spada MM. An overview of problematic internet use. Addict Behav. 2014;39(1):3–6.
71. Kuss DJ, Shorter GW, van Rooij AJ, Griffiths MD, Schoenmakers TM. Assessing Internet addiction using the parsimonious Internet addiction components model—a preliminary study. Int J Ment Heal Addict. 2014;12(3):351–66.
72. Rehbein F, Mößle T. Video game and Internet addiction: is there a need for differentiation? Sucht: Zeitschrift für Wissenschaft und Praxis. 2013;59(3):129–42.
73. Moreno MA, Jelenchick LA, Christakis DA. Problematic internet use among older adolescents: a conceptual framework. Comput Hum Behav. 2013;29(4):1879–87.
74. Zhang J, Xin T. Measurement of Internet addiction: an item response analysis approach. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013;16(6):464–8.
75. Meyer JF, Faust KA, Faust D, Baker AM, Cook NE. Careless and random responding on clinical and research measures in the addictions: a concerning problem and investigation of their detection. Int J Ment Heal Addict. 2013;11(3):292–306.
76. Lai C, Mak K, Watanabe H, Ang RP, Pang JS, Ho RCM. Psychometric properties of the Internet addiction test in Chinese adolescents. J Pediatr Psychol. 2013;38(7):794–807.
77. Watters CA, Keefer KV, Kloosterman PH, Summerfeldt LJ, Parker JDA. Examining the structure of the Internet Addiction Test in adolescents: a bifactor approach. Comput Hum Behav. 2013;29(6):2294–302.
78. Kern L, Acier D. Adaptation française de l’échelle Problematic Internet Use Questionnaire. L'Évolution Psychiatrique. 2013;78(3):357–71.
79. Mak K, Lai C, Ko C, Chou C, Kim D, Watanabe H, et al. Psychometric properties of the Revised Chen Internet Addiction Scale (CIAS-R) in Chinese adolescents. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2014;42(7):1237–45.
80. Sung M, Shin Y, Cho S. Factor structure of the Internet Addiction Scale and its associations with psychiatric symptoms for Korean adolescents. Community Ment Health J. 2014;50(5):612–8.
81. Pontes HM, Patrão IM, Griffiths MD. Portuguese validation of the Internet Addiction Test: an empirical study. J Behav Addict. 2014;3(2):107–14.
82. Tsimtsiou Z, Haidich A, Kokkali S, Dardavesis T, Young KS, Arvanitidou M. Greek version of the Internet Addiction Test: a validation study. Psychiatry Q. 2014;85(2):187–95.
83. Fioravanti G, Primi C, Casale S. Psychometric evaluation of the Generalized Problematic Internet Use Scale 2 in an Italian sample. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013;16(10):761–6.
84. Guertler D, Broda A, Bischof A, Kastirke N, Meerkerk G, John U, et al. Factor structure of the Compulsive Internet Use Scale. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014;17(1):46–51.
85. Qin Y, Liu J, Zhou S. Advancement in the research on magnetic resonance imaging of Internet game addiction. Chinese J Clin Psychol. 2013;21(3):376–8.
86. Brand M, Laier C. Neuropsychologic der pathologischen Internetnutzung. Sucht: Zeitschrift für Wissenschaft und Praxis. 2013;59(3):143–52.
87. Feng Q, Chen X, Sun J, Zhou Y, Sun Y, Ding W, et al. Voxel-level comparison of arterial spin-labeled perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in adolescents with Internet gaming addiction. Behav Brain Funct. 2013;9:1–11.
88. Davis RA. A cognitive behavioral model of pathological Internet use. Comput Hum Behav. 2001;17:187–95. The authors present the first theoretic model to study IA, proposing the classification of generalized and specialized subtypes. Their work has inspired many studies on problematic internet use, as well as scales to measure it, and, as noted in this review, might support the advancement of cyberaddiction in general (and IGD specifically) within the specified subtype.
89. Adiele I, Olatokun W. Prevalence and determinants of Internet addiction among adolescents. Comput Hum Behav. 2014;31:100–10.
90. Van Rooij AJ, Prause N. A critical review of “Internet addiction” criteria with suggestions for the future. J Behav Addict. 2014;3(4):203–13.
91. Graham Jr J. Narrative therapy for treating video game addiction. Int J Ment Heal Addict. 2014;12(6):701–7.
92. Blinka L, Škařupová K, Ševčíková A, Wölfling K, Müller KW, Dreier M. Excessive internet use in European adolescents: what determines differences in severity? International Journal of Public Health 2014
93. Cheng C, Yee-lam LA. Internet addiction prevalence and quality of (real) life: a meta-analysis of 31 nations across seven world regions. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014;17(12):755–60.
94. Matthews N, Farnsworth B, Griffiths MD. A pilot study of problem gambling among student online gamblers: mood states as predictors of problematic behavior. CyberPsychol Behav. 2009;12(6):741–5.