Notes on inventive methodologies and affirmative critiques of an affective edu-future

Research in Education

Volumn 96, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 62-70

  Staunæs, Dorthe ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Affective methodologies; Affects; Affirmative critique; Educational leadership; Governance; More than human

Indexed keywords

EID: 85014258781     PISSN: 00345237     EISSN: 20504608     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0034523716664580     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ahmed S (2014) Willful Subjects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
2. Barad K (2007a) Meeting the Universe Haldway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
3. Barad K (2007b) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
4. Bjerg H (2013) Staging the future: Potentializing the self. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 26(9): 1169-1191.
5. Brøgger K and Staunæs D (2016) Standards and (self)implosion. How the circulation of affects accelerates the spread of standards and intensifies the embodiment of colliding, temporal ontologies. Theory & Psychology 26(2): 223-242.
6. Clough P (2016) Rethinking race, calculation, quantification and measure. Cultural Studies: Critical Methodologies. Epub ahead of print 26 June. DOI: 10.1177/1532708616655760.
7. Deleuze G and Guattari F (1994) What is Philosophy? New York: Columbia University Press.
8. Foucault M and Rabinow P (1997) Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth, The Essential Works of Foucault, 1954-1984, Vol 1. New York: New Press.
9. Grek S (2009) Governing by numbers: The PISA 'effect' in Europe. Journal of Education Policy 24(1): 23-37.
10. Haraway D (1992) The promises of monsters: A regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others. In:Grossberg L, Nelson C and Treichler PA (eds) Cultural Studies. New York: Routledge, pp. 295-337.
11. Haraway D (1996) Modest-Witness@Second-Millenium. FemaleManSage. Meets-OncoMouse. Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge.
12. Hvenegaard K and Staunæs D (2015) '...And then we do it in Norway'. Learning leadership and Nordic Whiteness through affective contact zones. In:Andreassen R and Vitus K (eds) Affectivity and Race: Studies from a Nordic Context. London: Ashgate, pp. 77-94.
13. Juelskjær M and Staunæs D (2016) Orchestrating intensities and rhythms: How post-psychologies are assisting new educational standards and reforming subjectivities. Theory & Pscyhology 26(2): 182-201.
14. Kofoed J and Staunæs D (2015) Hesitancy as ethics. Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology 6(1): 24-39.
15. Lury C and Wakeford N (2012) Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social. London: Routledge.
16. MacLure M (2006) The bone in the throat: Some uncertain thoughts on Baroque methods. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 19(6): 729-745.
17. Massumi B (2010) The future birth of the affective fact: The political ontology of threat. In: Gregg M and Seigworth GJ (eds) The Affect Theory Reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 52-70.
18. Puar J (2012) 'I would rather be a cyborg than a goddess': Becoming-intersectional in assemblage theory. philoSOPHIA 2(1): 49-66.
19. Raffnsøe S (2015) What is critique? In:Politic & Philosophy Department of Management and Copenhagen Business School (ed.) The Critical State of Critique in the Age of Criticism. Available at: http://openarchive.cbs.dk/bitstream/handle/10398/9138/WP1-2015-SR.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed 24 August 2016).
20. Sedgwick EK (2003) Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity, Series Q. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
21. Sellar S (2014) A feel for numbers: Affect, data and education policy. Critical Studies in Education 56(1): 131-146.
22. Staunæs D (2011) Governing the potentials of life itself. Interrogating the promises of affective educational leadership. Educational History & Administration 43(3): 227-247.
23. Staunæs D and Kofoed J (2015a) Experimenting with affects and senses: A performative pop-up-laboratory (self) critically revisited. In:Knudsen BT and Stage C (eds)Affective Methodologies: Developing Cultural Research Strategies for the Study of Affects. Basingstoke: Hampshire Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 45-68.
24. Staunæs D and Kofoed J (2015b) Producing curious affects: Visual methodology as an affecting and conflictual wunderkammer. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 28(10): 1229-1248.
25. Staunæs D and Pors J (2015) Thinking educational policy and management through (frictional) concepts of affects. In:Gulson KN, Clark M and Petersen EB (eds)Education Policy and Contemporary Theory: Implications for Research. London: Routledge, pp. 99-109.
26. Taguchi HL (2016) Deleuzo-Guattarian rhizomatics: Mapping the desiring forces and connections between educational practices and the neurosciences. In:Taylor C and Hughes C (eds) Posthuman Research Practices in Education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 37-57.