Motivated Responding in Studies of Factual Learning

Political Behavior

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 79-101

  Khanna, Kabir ^a   Sood, Gaurav ^b  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Data Scientist   (United States)

Author keywords

Biased assimilation; Factual beliefs; Learning; Motivated reasoning; Partisan bias; Polarization; Prior attitude effect; Responding

Indexed keywords

EID: 85014057344     PISSN: 01909320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11109-017-9395-7     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Ahler, D., & Sood, G. (2016). The parties in our heads: Misperceptions about party composition and their consequences. Working paper.
2. Arceneaux, K., & Vander Wielen, R. J. (2013). The effects of need for cognition and need for affect on partisan evaluations. Political Psychology, 34(1), 23–42.
3. Bartels, L. M. (2002). Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions. Political Behavior, 24(2), 117–150.
4. Bechlivanidis, C., & Lagnado, D. A. (2013). Does the “why” tell us the “when”? Psychological Science, 24(8), 1563–1572.
5. Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. J., & Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351–368.
6. Bisgaard, M. (2015). Bias will find a way: Economic perceptions, attributions of blame, and partisan-motivated reasoning during crisis. The Journal of Politics, 77(3), 849–860.
7. Blais, A., Gidengil, E., Fournier, P., Nevitte, N., Everitt, J., & Kim, J. (2010). Political judgments, perceptions of facts, and partisan effects. Electoral Studies, 29(1), 1–12.
8. Bolsen, T., Druckman, J. N., & Cook, F. L. (2014). The influence on partisan motivated reasoning on public opinion. Political Behavior, 36(2), 235–262.
9. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5.
10. Bullock, J. G., Gerber, A. S., Hill, S. J., & Huber, G. A. (2015). Partisan bias in factual beliefs about politics. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 10(4), 519–578.
11. Chaiken, S., & Maheswaran, D. (1994). Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3(66), 460–473.
12. Chambers, J. R., Swan, L. K., & Heesacker, M. (2014). Better off than we know: Distorted perceptions of incomes and income inequality in america. Psychological Science, 25(2), 613–618.
13. Chambers, J. R., Swan, L. K., & Heesacker, M. (2015). Perceptions of U.S. social mobility are divided (and distorted) along ideological lines. Psychological Science, 26(4), 413–423.
14. Crawford, J. T., Kay, S. A., & Duke, K. E. (2015). Speaking out of both sides of their mouths: Biased political judgments within (and between) individuals. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(4), 422–430.
15. Crawford, J. T., & Xhambazi, E. (2015). Predicting political biases against the Occupy Wall Street and Tea Party movements. Political Psychology, 36(1), 111–121.
16. Dawson, E., Gilovich, T., & Regan, D. T. (2002a). Motivated reasoning and performance on the Wason selection task. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(10), 1379–1387.
17. Dawson, E., Gilovich, T., & Regan, D. T. (2002b). Motivated reasoning and susceptibility to the “Cell A” bias. Manuscript submitted for publication.
18. Ditto, P. H., & Lopez, D. F. (1992). Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4(63), 568–584.
19. Ditto, P. H., Scepansky, J. A., Munro, G. D., Apanovitch, A. M., & Lockhart, L. K. (1998). Motivated sensitivity to preference-inconsistent information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1(75), 53–69.
20. Edwards, K., & Smith, E. E. (1996). A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 5.
21. Gaines, B. J., Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Peyton, B., & Verkuilen, J. (2007). Same facts, different interpretations: Partisan motivation and opinion on Iraq. Journal of Politics, 69(4), 957–974.
22. Gerber, A. S., & Huber, G. A. (2009). Partisanship and economic behavior: Do partisan differences in economic forecasts predict real economic behavior? American Political Science Review, 103(3), 407–426.
23. Gilens, M. (2001). Political ignorance and collective policy preferences. American Political Science Review, 95(2), 379–396.
24. Gilovich, T. D. (1991). How we know what isn’t so: The fallibility of human reason in everyday life. New York: The Free Press.
25. Hastorf, A. H., & Cantril, H. (1954). They saw a game: A case study. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49(1), 129.
26. Hochschild, J. L. (2001). Where you stand depends on what you see: Connections among values, perceptions of fact, and political prescriptions. In J. H. Kuklinski (Ed.), Citizens and politics: Perspectives from political psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431.
28. Iyengar, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2015). Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 690–707.
29. Jacobson, G. (2010). Perception, memory, and partisan polarization on the Iraq War. Political Science Quarterly, 1(125), 31–56.
30. Jerit, J., & Barabas, J. (2012). Partisan perceptual bias and the information environment. Journal of Politics, 74(3), 672–684.
31. Kahan, D. M. (2013). Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(4), 407–424.
32. Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Dawson, E. C., & Slovic, P. (2017). Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government. Behavioural Public Policy, Forthcoming. Yale Law School, Public Law Working Paper No. 307. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2319992.
33. Kahneman, D. (2013). The marvels and flaws of intuitive thinking. In J. Brockman (Ed.), Thinking: The new science of decision-making, problem-solving, and prediction. New York: Harper Collins.
34. Kim, S., Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2010). A computational model of the citizen as motivated reasoner: Modeling the dynamics of the 2000 presidential election. Political Behavior, 32(1), 1–28.
35. Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: “Seizing” and “freezing”. Psychological Review, 103(2), 263–283.
36. Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498.
37. Lau, R. R., Sears, D. O., & Jessor, T. (1990). Fact or artifact revisited: Survey instrument effects and pocketbook politics. Political Behavior, 12(3), 217–242.
38. Lebo, M. J., & Cassino, D. (2007). The aggregated consequences of motivated reasoning and the dynamics of partisan presidential approval. Political Psychology, 28(6), 719–746.
39. Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(11), 2098–2109.
40. Luskin, R. C., & Bullock, J. G. (2011). “Don’t know” means “don’t know”: DK responses and the public’s level of political knowledge. The Journal of Politics, 73(2), 547–557.
41. Luskin, R. C., Sood, G., & Blank, J. (2013). The waters of Casablanca: Political misinformation (and knowledge and ignorance). Unpublished manuscript.
42. Lyons, J., & Jaeger, W. P. (2014). Who do voters blame for policy failure? Information and the partisan assignment of blame. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 114(3), 321–341.
43. Mata, A., Garcia-Marques, L., Ferreira, M. B., & Mendonça, C. (2015a). Goal-driven reasoning overcomes cell D neglect in contingency judgements. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(2), 238–249.
44. Mata, A., Sherman, S. J., Ferreira, M. B., & Mendonça, C. (2015b). Strategic numeracy: Self-serving reasoning about health statistics. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37(3), 165–173.
45. Muirhead, R. (2013). The case for party loyalty. In S. Levinson, J. Parker, & P. Woodruff (Eds.), Loyalty. New York: New York University Press.
46. Mullinix, K. J., Leeper, T. J., Druckman, J. N., & Freese, J. (2015). The generalizability of survey experiments. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 2(2), 109–138.
47. Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220.
48. Nyhan, B. (2010). Why the “death panel” myth wouldn’t die: Misinformation in the health care reform debate. The Forum, 8(1), 5.
49. Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32(2), 303–330.
50. Palmer, H. D., & Duch, R. M. (2001). Do surveys provide representative or whimsical assessments of the economy? Political Analysis, 9(1), 58–77.
51. Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. (2014). Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(3), 184–188.
52. Prior, M. (2013). Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 101–127.
53. Prior, M., & Lupia, A. (2008). Money, time, and political knowledge: Distinguishing quick recall and political learning skills. American Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 169–183.
54. Prior, M., Sood, G., & Khanna, K. (2015). You cannot be serious: The impact of accuracy incentives on partisan bias in reports of economic perceptions. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 10(4), 489–518.
55. Sears, D. O., & Lau, R. R. (1983). Apparently self-interested political preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 27(2), 223–252.
56. Shani, D. (2006). Knowing your true colors: Can knowledge correct for partisan bias in Political perceptions? Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
57. Shapiro, R. Y., & Bloch-Elkon, Y. (2008). Do the facts speak for themselves? Partisan disagreement as a challenge to democratic competence. Critical Review, 20(1–2), 115–139.
58. Stroud, N. J. (2010). Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 556–576.
59. Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769.
60. Thibodeau, P., Peebles, M. M., Grodner, D. J., & Durgin, F. H. (2015). The wished-for always wins until the winner was inevitable all along: Motivated reasoning and belief bias regulate emotion during elections. Political Psychology, 36(4), 431–448.
61. Weller, J. A., Dieckmann, N. F., Tusler, M., Mertz, C. K., Burns, W. J., & Peters, E. (2012). Development and testing of an abbreviated numeracy scale: A Rasch analysis approach. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26(2), 198–212.
62. Wilcox, N., & Wlezien, C. (1993). The contamination of responses to survey items: Economic perceptions and political judgments. Political Analysis, 5(1), 181–213.