The Wished-For Always Wins Until the Winner Was Inevitable All Along: Motivated Reasoning and Belief Bias Regulate Emotion During Elections

Political Psychology

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 431-448

  Thibodeau, Paul ^a   Peebles, Matthew M ^b   Grodner, Daniel J ^c   Durgin, Frank H ^c  

^a OBERLIN COLLEGE   (United States)

^b TRINITY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SWARTHMORE COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Belief bias; Emotion regulation; Motivated reasoning; Political reasoning; Wason selection task

Indexed keywords

EID: 84942836432     PISSN: 0162895X     EISSN: 14679221     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/pops.12100     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390-412.
2. Bates, D. M., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B. (2012). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html
3. Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20, 351-368.
4. Buhrmester, M. D., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3-5.
5. Cox, J. R., & Griggs, R. A. (1982). The effects of experience on performance in Wason's selection task. Memory & Cognition, 10, 496-502.
6. Dawson, E., Gilovich, T., & Regan, D. (2002). Motivated reasoning and performance on the Wason selection task. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1379-1387.
7. della Quercia, J. (November 1, 2012). 6 bizarre factors that predict every presidential election. Cracked. Retrieved from http://www.cracked.com/article_20139_6-bizarre-factors-that-predict-every-presidential-election_p2.html
8. Ditto, P. H., & Lopez, D. F. (1992). Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 568-584.
9. Evans, J. St. B. T. (1982). The psychology of deductive reasoning. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
10. Gaines, B. J., Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Peyton, B., & Verkuilen, J. (2007). Interpreting Iraq: Partisanship and the meaning of facts. Journal of Politics, 69, 957-974.
11. General Sentiment. (January 2, 2013). The biggest events of 2012. Retrieved from http://www.generalsentiment.com/reports/list.html
12. Gilovich, T. (1991). How we know what isn't so: The fallibility of human reason in everyday life. New York, NY: Free Press.
13. Gingrich, N. (Guest). (2012, November 5). On the Record with Gretta Van Susteren [Television broadcast]. Washington DC: Fox News.
14. Griggs, R. A., & Cox, J. R. (1982). The elusive thematic-materials effect in Wason's selection task. British Journal of Psychology, 73, 407-420.
15. Helzer, E. G., & Dunning, D. (2012). On motivated reasoning and self-belief. In S. Vazire & T. D. Wilson (Eds.), Handbook of self-knowledge (pp. 379-396). New York, NY: Guilford.
16. Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media, Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59, 19-39.
17. Jost, J. T., & Amodio, D. M. (2012). Political ideology as motivated social cognition: Behavioral and neuroscientific evidence. Motivation and Emotion, 36, 55-64.
18. Klauer, K. C., Musch, J., & Naumer, B. (2000). On belief bias in syllogistic reasoning. Psychological Review, 107, 852-884.
19. Klauer, K. C., Stahl, C., & Erdfelder, E. (2007). The abstract selection task: New data and an almost comprehensive model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 680-703.
20. Kohut, A., Doherty, C., Dimock, M., & Keeter, S. (2012). Trends in American values: 1987-2012. The Pew Research Center, June 4, 2012. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/files/legacy-pdf/06-04-12%20Values%20Release.pdf
21. Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498.
22. Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2005). The automaticity of affect for political leaders, groups, and issues: An experimental test of the hot cognition hypothesis. Political Psychology, 26, 455-482.
23. Marcus, G. E., & Mackuen, M. B. (1993). Anxiety, enthusiasm, and the vote: The emotional underpinnings of learning and involvement during presidential campaigns. American Political Science Review, 87, 672-685.
24. Menard, S. (1995). Applied Logistic Regression Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Morris, D. (Guest). (2013, February 6). Piers Morgan Tonight [Television broadcast]. New York, NY: CNN.
26. Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2, 175-220.
27. Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32, 303-330.
28. R Core Team (2012). R : A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
29. Redlawsk, D. P. (2002). Hot cognition or cool consideration? Testing the effects of motivated reasoning on political decision making. Journal of Politics, 64, 1021-1044.
30. Redlawsk, D. P., Civettini, A. J. W., & Emmerson, K. M. (2010). The affective tipping point: Do motivated reasoners ever "Get It"? Political Psychology, 31, 563-593.
31. Rothschild, D., & Wolfers, J. (2012). Forecasting elections: Voter intentions versus expectations. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved from http://assets.wharton.upenn.edu/~rothscdm/RothschildExpectations.pdf
32. Sperber, D., Cara, F., & Girotto, V. (1995). Relevance theory explains the selection task. Cognition, 57, 31-95.
33. Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 755-769.
34. Tetlock, P. E. (2006). Expert political judgment: How good is it? How can we know? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35. Thorisdottir, H., & Jost, J. T. (2011). Motivated closed-mindedness mediates the effect of threat on political conservatism. Political Psychology, 32, 785-811.
36. Wason, P. C. (1966). Reasoning. In B. M. Foss (Ed.), New horizons in psychology. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
37. Wason, P. C. (1968). Reasoning about a rule. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 273-281.
38. Wason, P. C., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1972). Psychology of reasoning: Structure and content. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39. Weston, D., Blagov, P. S., Harenski, K., Kilts, C., & Hamann, S. (2006). Neural bases of motivated reasoning: An fMRI study of emotional constraints on partisan political judgment of the 2004U.S. Presidential Election. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1947-1958.
40. Zajonc, R. B. (1984). On the primacy of affect. American Psychologist, 39, 117-123.