Sooting tendencies of diesel fuels, jet fuels, and their surrogates in diffusion flames

Fuel

Volumn 197, Issue , 2017, Pages 445-458

  Das, Dhrubajyoti D ^a   McEnally, Charles S ^a   Kwan, Thomas A ^a   Zimmerman, Julie B ^a,d   Cannella, William J ^b   Mueller, Charles J ^c   Pfefferle, Lisa D ^a  

^a Yale University   (United States)

^b CHEVRON ENERGY TECHNOLOGY COMPANY   (United States)

^c SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES   (United States)

^d YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Diesel surrogate; Jet fuel surrogate; NMR fuel characterization; Soot volume fractions; YSI

Indexed keywords

CARBON; DIESEL FUELS; JET FUEL; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; SOOT; VOLUME FRACTION;

13C NMR SPECTROSCOPY; ALKYL SUBSTITUTION; DIESEL SURROGATES; EFFICIENT COMBUSTIONS; FUEL CHARACTERIZATION; FUEL SURROGATES; SOOT VOLUME FRACTION; TRANSPORTATION FUELS;

FIGHTER AIRCRAFT;

EID: 85013763963     PISSN: 00162361     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.01.099     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. [1] World Health Organization. The World Health Report – 2002 < http://www.who.int/whr/2002/en/whr02en.pdf>; 2002 [accessed Nov 2, 2016].
2. [2] Hesterberg, T.W., Bunn, W.B. III, Chase, G.R., Valberg, P.A., Slavin, T.J., Lapin, C.A., Hart, G.A., A critical assessment of studies on the carcinogenic potential of diesel exhaust. Crit Rev Toxicol 36:9 (2006), 727–776, 10.1080/10408440600908821.
3. [3] Ris, C., U.S. EPA health assessment for diesel engine exhaust: a review. Inhalat Toxicol 19:Suppl 1 (2007), 229–239, 10.1080/08958370701497960.
4. [4] Wichmann, H.-E., Diesel exhaust particles. Inhalat Toxicol 19:sup1 (2007), 241–244, 10.1080/08958370701498075.
5. [5] Bond, T.C., Doherty, S.J., Fahey, D.W., Forster, P.M., Others. Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: a scientific assessment, Journal of Geophysical Research: atmospheres 118:11 (2013), 5380–5552, 10.1002/jgrd.50171.
6. [6] Chan, T.W., Meloche, E., Kubsh, J., Brezny, R., Black carbon emissions in gasoline exhaust and a reduction alternative with a gasoline particulate filter. Environ Sci Technol 48:10 (2014), 6027–6034, 10.1021/es501791b.
7. [7] Jacobson, M.Z., Control of fossil-fuel particulate black carbon and organic matter, possibly the most effective method of slowing global warming. J Geophys Res Atmos, 107(19), 2002, 10.1029/2001JD001376.
8. [8] Mueller, C.J., Cannella, W.J., Bays, J.T., Bruno, T.J., DeFabio, K., Dettman, H.D., Gieleciak, R.M., Huber, M.L., Kweon, C.-B., McConnell, S.S., Pitz, W.J., Ratcliff, M.A., Diesel surrogate fuels for engine testing and chemical-kinetic modeling: compositions and properties. Energy Fuels 30:2 (2016), 1445–1461, 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b02879.
9. [9] Mueller, C.J., Cannella, W.J., Bays, J.T., Bruno, T.J., DeFabio, K., Dettman, H.D., Gieleciak, R.M., Huber, M.L., Kweon, C.-B., McConnell, S.S., Pitz, W.J., Ratcliff, M.A., Correction to diesel surrogate fuels for engine testing and chemical-kinetic modeling: compositions and properties. Energy Fuels, 30(10), 2016, 8790, 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b02499 8790.
10. [10] Pitz, W.J., Mueller, C.J., Recent progress in the development of diesel surrogate fuels. Progr Energy Combust Sci 37:3 (2011), 330–350, 10.1016/j.pecs.2010.06.004.
11. [11] Le Pera, M.E., The reality of the single-fuel concept. Army Logistician 37:2 (2005), 41–43.
12. [12] Dagaut, P., Cathonnet, M., The ignition, oxidation, and combustion of kerosene: A review of experimental and kinetic modeling. Progr Energy Combust Sci 32:1 (2006), 48–92, 10.1016/j.pecs.2005.10.003.
13. [13] Colket, M., Edwards, T., Williams, S., Cernansky, N., Miller, D., Egolfopoulos, F., et al. Development of an experimental database and kinetic models for surrogate jet fuels. 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, vol. 2007, 2007, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virigina, 1–21, 10.2514/6.2007-770.
14. [14] Farrell JT, Cernansky NP, Dryer FL, Law CK, Friend DG, Hergart CA et al. Development of an experimental database and kinetic models for surrogate diesel fuels. In: SAE Technical Paper, vol. 2007-01-02; 2007. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4271/2007-01-0201.
15. [15] Edwards, T., Maurice, L.Q., Surrogate mixtures to represent complex aviation and rocket fuels. J Propulsion Power 17:2 (2001), 461–466, 10.2514/2.5765.
16. [16] Sarathy, S.M., Kukkadapu, G., Mehl, M., Wang, W., Javed, T., Park, S., et al. Ignition of alkane-rich FACE gasoline fuels and their surrogate mixtures. Proc Combust Inst 35:1 (2015), 249–257, 10.1016/j.proci.2014.05.122.
17. [17] Zhang, H.R., Eddings, E.G., Sarofin, A.F., Mayne, C.L., Yang, Z., Pugmire, R.J., Selection of surrogates for jet fuels. Bockhorn, H., (eds.) Combustion Generated Fine Carbonaceous Particles: Proceedings of an International Workshop Held in Villa Orlandi, Anacapri, May 13–16, 2007, 2009, 137–161 Ch. 10, URL: https://books.google.com/books?id=8-Dk399oJwUC.
18. [18] Mueller, C.J., Cannella, W.J., Bruno, T.J., Bunting, B., Dettman, H.D., Franz, J.A., Huber, M.L., Natarajan, M., Pitz, W.J., Ratcliff, M.A., Wright, K., Methodology for formulating diesel surrogate fuels with accurate compositional, ignition-quality, and volatility characteristics. Energy Fuels 26:6 (2012), 3284–3303, 10.1021/ef300303e.
19. [19] Mueller CJ, Cannella WJ, Bays JT, Bruno TJ, DeFabio K, Dettman HD et al. Supporting information for diesel surrogate fuels for engine testing and chemical-kinetic modeling: compositions and properties. Energy Fuels. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b02879.
20. [20] Violi, A., Yan, S., Eddings, E.G., Sarofim, A.F., Granata, S., Faravelli, T., et al. Experimental formulation and kinetic model for JP-8 surrogate mixtures. Combust Sci Technol 174:11–12 (2002), 399–417, 10.1080/00102200215080.
21. [21] Eddings, E.G., Yan, S., Ciro, W., Sarofim, A.F., Formulation of a surrogate for the simulation of jet fuel pool fires. Combust Sci Technol 177:4 (2005), 715–739, 10.1080/00102200590917248.
22. [22] Lemaire, R., Faccinetto, A., Therssen, E., Ziskind, M., Focsa, C., Desgroux, P., Experimental comparison of soot formation in turbulent flames of diesel and surrogate Diesel fuels. Proc Combust Inst 32:1 (2009), 737–744, 10.1016/j.proci.2008.05.019.
23. [23] Mensch, A., Santoro, R.J., Litzinger, T.A., Lee, S.-Y., Sooting characteristics of surrogates for jet fuels. Combust Flame 157:6 (2010), 1097–1105, 10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.02.008.
24. [24] Dooley, S., Won, S.H., Heyne, J., Farouk, T.I., Ju, Y., Dryer, F.L., et al. The experimental evaluation of a methodology for surrogate fuel formulation to emulate gas phase combustion kinetic phenomena. Combust Flame 159:4 (2012), 1444–1466, 10.1016/j.combustflame.2011.11.002.
25. [25] Witkowski, D., Kondo, K., Vishwanathan, G., Rothamer, D., Evaluation of the sooting properties of real fuels and their commonly used surrogates in a laminar co-flow diffusion flame. Combust Flame 160:6 (2013), 1129–1141, 10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.01.027.
26. [26] ASTM Standard D1322-15, Standard test method for smoke point of kerosine and aviation turbine fuel. 2011, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA 2010, doi: 10.1520/D1322.
27. [27] McEnally, C.S., Pfefferle, L.D., Improved sooting tendency measurements for aromatic hydrocarbons and their implications for naphthalene formation pathways. Combust Flame 148:4 (2007), 210–222, 10.1016/j.combustflame.2006.11.003.
28. [28] Hamins, A., Anderson, D.T., Miller, J.H., Mechanistic studies of toluene destruction in diffusion flames. Combust Sci Technol 71:4–6 (1990), 175–195, 10.1080/00102209008951631.
29. [29] Das, D.D., McEnally, C.S., Pfefferle, L.D., Sooting tendencies of unsaturated esters in nonpremixed flames. Combust Flame 162:4 (2015), 1489–1497, 10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.11.012.
30. [30] Kashif, M., Bonnety, J., Matynia, A., Da Costa, P., Legros, G., Sooting propensities of some gasoline surrogate fuels: combined effects of fuel blending and air vitiation. Combust Flame 162:5 (2015), 1840–1847, 10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.12.005.
31. [31] Xuan, Y., Blanquart, G., Numerical modeling of sooting tendencies in a laminar co-flow diffusion flame. Combust Flame 160:9 (2013), 1657–1666, 10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.03.034.
32. [32] Das DD, Cannella WJ, McEnally CS, Mueller CJ, Pfefferle LD. Two-dimensional soot volume fraction measurements in flames doped with large hydrocarbons. Proc Combust Inst. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2016.06.047.
33. [33] CRC Fuels for Advanced Combustion Engines Working Group (FACE). https://crcao.org/publications/advancedVehiclesFuelsLubricants/FACE/; 2016 [accessed Nov 11, 2016].
34. [34] Colket, M.B., Heyne, J., Rumizen, M., Edwards, J.T., Gupta, M., Roquemore, W.M., et al. An overview of the national jet fuels combustion program. 54th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, no. January, 2016, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia, 10.2514/6.2016-0177.
35. [35] Agosta, A., Cernansky, N.P., Miller, D.L., Faravelli, T., Ranzi, E., Reference components of jet fuels: kinetic modeling and experimental results. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 28:7 (2004), 701–708, 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2003.12.006.
36. [36] Bruno, T.J., Smith, B.L., Evaluation of the physicochemical authenticity of aviation kerosene surrogate mixtures. Part 1: Analysis of volatility with the advanced distillation curve. Energy Fuels 24:8 (2010), 4266–4276, 10.1021/ef100496j.
37. [37] McEnally CS, Cannella WJ, Das DD, Mueller CJ, Rockaway JD, Vella, AJ et al. Sooting tendencies of surrogate diesel fuel mixtures. Combust Flame (in preparation).
38. [38] Bufferand, H., Tosatto, L., La Mantia, B., Smooke, M.D., Gomez, A., Experimental and computational study of methane counterflow diffusion flames perturbed by trace amounts of either jet fuel or a 6-component surrogate under non-sooting conditions. Combust Flame 156:8 (2009), 1594–1603, 10.1016/j.combustflame.2009.03.006.
39. [39] Smooke, M.D., Hall, R.J., Colket, M.B., Fielding, J., Long, M.B., McEnally, C.S., et al. Investigation of the transition from lightly sooting towards heavily sooting co-flow ethylene diffusion flames. Combust Theory Model 8:3 (2004), 593–606, 10.1088/1364-7830/8/3/009.
40. [40] McEnally, C.S., Pfefferle, L.D., Sooting tendencies of oxygenated hydrocarbons in laboratory-scale flames. Environ Sci Technol 45:6 (2011), 2498–2503, 10.1021/es103733q.
41. [41] Design institute for physical properties, sponsored by AIChE, DIPPR Project 801 – Full Version, < http://app.knovel.com/hotlink/toc/id:kpDIPPRPF7/dippr-project-801-full/dippr-project-801-full>; 2015.
42. [42] Kuhn, P.B., Ma, B., Connelly, B.C., Smooke, M.D., Long, M.B., Soot and thin-filament pyrometry using a color digital camera. Proc Combust Inst 33:1 (2011), 743–750, 10.1016/j.proci.2010.05.006.
43. [43] Ma, B., Long, M.B., Absolute light calibration using S-type thermocouples. Proc Combust Inst 34:2 (2013), 3531–3539, 10.1016/j.proci.2012.05.030.
44. [44] Guo, H., Castillo, J.A., Sunderland, P.B., Digital camera measurements of soot temperature and soot volume fraction in axisymmetric flames. Appl Opt, 52(33), 2013, 8040, 10.1364/AO.52.008040.
45. [45] Snelling, D.R., Thomson, K.A., Smallwood, G.J., Gulder, O.L., Weckman, E.J., Fraser, R.A., Spectrally resolved measurement of flame radiation to determine soot temperature and concentration. AIAA J 40:9 (2002), 1789–1795, 10.2514/2.1855.
46. [46] Kalt PAM, Long MB. OMA – Image processing for Mac OS X, < http://www.oma-x.org>; 2015.
47. [47] Dribinski, V., Ossadtchi, A., Mandelshtam, V.A., Reisler, H., Reconstruction of Abel-transformable images: the Gaussian basis-set expansion Abel transform method. Rev Sci Instr, 73(7), 2002, 2634, 10.1063/1.1482156.
48. [48] Calcote, H., Manos, D., Effect of molecular structure on incipient soot formation. Combust Flame 49:1–3 (1983), 289–304, 10.1016/0010-2180(83)90172-4.
49. [49] Olson, D., Pickens, J., Gill, R., The effects of molecular structure on soot formation II. Diffusion flames. Combust Flame 62:1 (1985), 43–60, 10.1016/0010-2180(85)90092-6.
50. [50] Martel R, Charles C, Leonard A. Hydrogen content as a measure of the combustion performance of hydrocarbon fuels, Tech. Rep. May, Air Force Aero Propulsion Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH (1973).
51. [51] ÖL Gülder Ö, Glavinčevski LB, Baksh MF. Fuel molecular structure and flame temperature effects on soot formation in gas turbine combustors. ASME 1989 International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exposition doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/89-GT-288.
52. [52] Nakakita, K., Akihama, K., Weissman, W., Farrell, J.T., Effect of the hydrocarbon molecular structure in diesel fuel on the in-cylinder soot formation and exhaust emissions. International Journal of Engine Research 6:3 (2005), 187–205, 10.1243/146808705X7400.
53. [53] Frenklach, M., Reaction mechanism of soot formation in flames. Phys Chem Chemiphys. 4:11 (2002), 2028–2037, 10.1039/b110045a.
54. [54] Hanson, M.P., Rouvray, D.H., Novel applications of topological indices. 2. Prediction of the threshold soot index for hydrocarbon fuels. J Phys 91:11 (1987), 2981–2985, 10.1021/j100295a067.
55. [55] Aikawa, K., Sakurai, T., Jetter, J.J., Development of a predictive model for gasoline vehicle particulate matter emissions. SAE Int J Fuels Lubricants 3:2 (2010), 610–622, 10.4271/2010-01-2115.
56. [56] Gülder, Ö.L., Glavinčevski, B., Das, S., Effect of molecular structure on soot formation characteristics of aviation turbine fuels. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 111(1), 1989, 77, 10.1115/1.3240230.
57. [57] Gülder, Ö.L., Influence of hydrocarbon fuel structural constitution and flame temperature on soot formation in laminar diffusion flames. Combust Flame 78:2 (1989), 179–194, 10.1016/0010-2180(89)90124-7.
58. [58] Cookson, D.J., Smith, B.E., Calculation of jet and diesel fuel properties using 13C NMR spectroscopy. Energy Fuels 4:6 (1990), 152–156, 10.1021/ef00020a004.
59. [59] Meusinger, R., Moros, R., Determination of octane numbers of gasoline compounds from their chemical structure by 13C NMR spectroscopy and neural networks. Fuel 80:5 (2001), 613–621, 10.1016/S0016-2361(00)00125-3.
60. [60] Kapur, G.S., Ecker, A., Meusinger, R., Establishing quantitative structure–property relationships (QSPR) of diesel samples by proton-NMR & multiple linear regression (MLR) analysis. Energy Fuels 15:4 (2001), 943–948, 10.1021/ef010021u.
61. [61] Yang, Y., Boehman, A.L., Santoro, R.J., A study of jet fuel sooting tendency using the threshold sooting index (TSI) model. Combust Flame 149:1–2 (2007), 191–205, 10.1016/j.combustflame.2006.11.007.
62. [62] Abdul Jameel, A.G., Naser, N., Emwas, A.-H., Dooley, S., Sarathy, S.M., Predicting fuel ignition quality using 1H NMR spectroscopy and multiple linear regression. Energy Fuels, 2016, 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b01690.
63. [63] Benson, S.W., Buss, J.H., Additivity rules for the estimation of molecular properties. Thermodynamic properties. J Chem Phys, 29(3), 1958, 546, 10.1063/1.1744539.
64. [64] Yan, S., Eddings, E.G., Palotas, A.B., Pugmire, R.J., Sarofim, A.F., Prediction of sooting tendency for hydrocarbon liquids in diffusion flames. Energy Fuels 19:6 (2005), 2408–2415, 10.1021/ef050107d.
65. [65] Pepiot-Desjardins, P., Pitsch, H., Malhotra, R., Kirby, S.R., Boehman, A., Structural group analysis for soot reduction tendency of oxygenated fuels. Combust Flame 154:1–2 (2008), 191–205, 10.1016/j.combustflame.2008.03.017.
66. [66] Katritzky, A.R., Kuanar, M., Slavov, S., Hall, C.D., Karelson, M., Kahn, I., et al. Quantitative correlation of physical and chemical properties with chemical structure: utility for prediction. Chem Rev 110 (2010), 5714–5789, 10.1021/cr900238d.
67. [67] Dooley, S., Won, S.H., Chaos, M., Heyne, J., Ju, Y., Dryer, F.L., et al. A jet fuel surrogate formulated by real fuel properties. Combust Flame 157:12 (2010), 2333–2339, 10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.07.001.
68. [68] Edwards T. Personal Communication with Charles McEnally (2016).
69. [69] ASTM Standard D1319-15, Standard test method for hydrocarbon types in liquid petroleum products by fluorescent indicator adsorption. 2015, ASTM International, Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2011, 10.1520/D1319-15.
70. [70] ASTM Standard D5186-150, Standard test method for determination of the aromatic content and polynuclear aromatic content of diesel fuels and aviation turbine fuels. 2015, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 10.1520/D5186-03R09.2.
71. [71] California Air Resources Board, The California Diesel Fuel Regulations, < https://www.arb.ca.gov/fuels/diesel/081404dslregs.pdf>; 2004 [accessed Nov 2, 2016].
72. [72] R. Gieleciak, C. Fairbridge, Detailed Hydrocarbon Analysis of FACE Diesel Fuels Using Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography, Tech. Rep. October, Coordinating Research Council. URL: ; 2013.
73. [73] Dryer, F.L., Jahangirian, S., Dooley, S., Won, S.H., Heyne, J., Iyer, V.R., et al. Emulating the combustion behavior of real jet aviation fuels by surrogate mixtures of hydrocarbon fluid blends: Implications for science and engineering. Energy Fuels 28:5 (2014), 3474–3485, 10.1021/ef500284x.