A bibliometric review of research trends in neuroimaging

Current Science

Volumn 112, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 725-734

  Yeung, Andy Wai Kan ^a   Goto, Tazuko K ^a,b   Leung, W Keung ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b TOKYO DENTAL COLLEGE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; Impact factor; Neuroimaging journals; Research evaluation

Indexed keywords

EID: 85013672004     PISSN: 00113891     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.18520/cs/v112/i04/725-734     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Frahm, J., Magnetic resonance functional neuroimaging: new insights into the human brain. Curr. Sci., 1999, 76, 735-743.
2. Jagannathan, N., Functional and pathophysiological study of disease processes in humans and animal systems: role of magnetic resonance imaging and in vivo MR spectroscopy. Curr. Sci., 2004, 86, 42-61.
3. Thomson Reuters, Whitepaper using bibliometrics: a guide to evaluating research performance with citation data; http://ipscience.thomsonreuters.com/m/pdfs/325133_thomson.pdf (accessed on 10 June 2016).
4. Prathap, G., A bibliometric profile of Current Science. Curr. Sci., 2014, 106, 958.
5. Zhang, L. and Feng, Y., Bibliometrics and visualization analysis of artificial blood vessel research. Curr. Sci., 2014, 106, 816-822.
6. Wang, J., Zheng, T., Wang, Q., Xu, B. and Wang, L., A bibliometric review of research trends on bioelectrochemical systems. Curr. Sci., 2015, 109, 2204.
7. Ho, Y.-S., A bibliometric analysis of highly cited articles in materials science. Curr. Sci., 2014, 107, 1565-1572.
8. Shahabuddin, S. M., Mapping neuroscience research in India-a bibliometric approach. Curr. Sci., 2013, 104, 1619-1626.
9. Van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L., van Raan, A. F., Klautz, R. J. and Peul, W. C., Citation analysis may severely underestimate the impact of clinical research as compared to basic research. PLoS ONE, 2013, 8, e62395.
10. Thomson Reuters, Journal Citation Reports. http://adminapps.webofknowledge.com/JCR/help/h_toc.htm (accessed on 10 June 2016).
11. van Eck, N. J. and Waltman, L., Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 2009, 84, 523-538.
12. van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L., Dekker, R. and van den Berg, J., A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: multidimensional scaling and VOS. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2010, 61, 2405-2416.
13. Waltman, L., van Eck, N. J. and Noyons, E. C., A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. J. Inf., 2010, 4, 629-635.
14. Van Eck, N. J. and Waltman, L., Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer. arXiv preprint 2011, arXiv:1109.2058.
15. Heersmink, R., van den Hoven, J., van Eck, N. J. and van den Berg, J., Bibliometric mapping of computer and information ethics. Ethics Inf. Technol., 2011, 13, 241-249.
16. Rodrigues, S., van Eck, N., Waltman, L. and Jansen, F., Mapping patient safety: a large-scale literature review using bibliometric visualisation techniques. BMJ Open, 2014, 4, e004468.
17. Waltman, L., van Raan, A. F. and Smart, S., Exploring the relationship between the engineering and physical sciences and the health and life sciences by advanced bibliometric methods. PLoS ONE, 2014, 9, e111530.
18. Jayaratne, Y. S. N. and Zwahlen, R. A., The evolution of dental journals from 2003 to 2012: a bibliometric analysis. PLoS ONE, 2015, 10, e0119503.
19. Lim, K. J. et al., Characteristics and trends of radiology research: a survey of original articles published in AJR and Radiology between 2001 and 2010. Radiology, 2012, 264, 796-802.
20. López-Abente, G. and Muñoz-Tinoco, C., Time trends in the impact factor of public health journals. BMC Public Health, 2005, 5, 1.
21. Rosenkrantz, A. B. and Ayoola, A., The impact factor of radiological journals: associations with journal content and other characteristics over a recent 12-year period. Acad Radiol, in press, 23, 661-668.
22. Thomson Reuters, Scope notes. http://ip-science.thomsonreuters.com/mjl/scope/scope_scie/#RX (accessed on 10 June 2016).
23. Yeung, A. W. K., Tanabe, H. C., Suen, J. L. K. and Goto, T. K., Taste itensity modulates effective connectivity from the insular cortex to the thalamus in humans. NeuroImage, 2016, 135, 214-222.
24. Seglen, P. O., Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. Br. Med. J., 1997, 314, 498.
25. Bergstrom, C. and West, J., About the eigenfactor project. http://www.eigenfactor.org/methods.htm (accessed on 10 June 2016).
26. Fellows, L. K., Heberlein, A. S., Morales, D. A., Shivde, G., Waller, S. and Wu, D., Method matters: an empirical study of impact in cognitive neuroscience. J Cogn. Neurosci., 2005, 17, 850-858.