Mapping patient safety: A large-scale literature review using bibliometric visualisation techniques

BMJ Open

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2014, Pages

  Rodrigues, S P ^a   Van Eck, N J ^b   Waltman, L ^b   Jansen, F W ^a,c  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; BIBLIOMETRICS; HARM REDUCTION; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT SAFETY; PUBLICATION; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; CLASSIFICATION; RESEARCH; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

BIBLIOMETRICS; DATABASES, BIBLIOGRAPHIC; HUMANS; PATIENT SAFETY; RESEARCH; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84897503277     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004468     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Sherman H, Castro G, Fletcher M, et al. Towards an International Classification for Patient Safety: the conceptual framework. Int J Qual Health Care 2009;21:2-8.
2. Börner K. Atlas of science; visualizing what we know. Cambridge, MA/ London UK: The MIT Press, 2010.
3. Zitt M, Bassecoulard E. Delineating complex scientific fields by an hybrid lexical-citation method: an application to nanosciences. Inf Process Manag 2006;42:1513-31. (Pubitemid 43825590)
4. Waltman L, van Eck NJ, Noyons ECM. A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. J Informetrics 2010;4:629-35.
5. Kessler MM. Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. Am Documentation 1963;14:10-25
6. Small H. Cocitation in scientific literature - new measure of relationship between 2 documents. J Am Soc Inf Sci 1973;24:265-9.
7. van Eck NJ, Waltman L, Dekker R, et al. A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: multidimensional scaling and VOS. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 2010;61:2405-16.
8. van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 2010;84:523-38.
9. Schmid H. Probabilistic part-of-speech tagging using decision trees. 12[4], 44-49. 1994.
10. van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer. ISSI Newsletter. 3[7], 50-54. 9-9-2011.
11. Kim JJ, Rebholz-Schuhmann D. Categorization of services for seeking information in biomedical literature: a typology for improvement of practice. Brief Bioinform 2008;9:452-65.
12. Lu ZY. PubMed and beyond: a survey of web tools for searching biomedical literature. Database 2011;2011:baq036.
13. Cambrosio A, Keating P, Mercier S, et al. Mapping the emergence and development of translational cancer research. Eur J Cancer 2006;42:3140-8. (Pubitemid 44872948)
14. Theodosiou T, Darzentas N, Angelis L, et al. PuReD-MCL: a graph-based PubMed document clustering methodology. Bioinformatics 2008;24:1935-41.
15. Yamamoto Y, Takagi T. Biomedical knowledge navigation by literature clustering. J Biomed Inform 2007;40:114-30. (Pubitemid 46357044)
16. Zulueta MA, Cantos-Mateos G, Vargas-Quesada B, et al. Research involving women and health in the Medline database, 1965-2005: co-term analysis and visualization of main lines of research. Scientometrics 2011;88:679-706.
17. http://www.who.int/patientsafety/research/strengthening-capacity/ measuring-harm/en/index.html 2009.
18. Rodrigues SP, Wever AM, Dankelman J, et al. Risk factors in patient safety: minimally invasive surgery versus conventional surgery. Surg Endosc 2012;26:350-6.