In vitro evaluation of osteoblastic cells on bacterial cellulose modified with multi-walled carbon nanotubes as scaffold for bone regeneration

Materials Science and Engineering C

Volumn 75, Issue , 2017, Pages 445-453

  Gutiérrez Hernández, José Manuel ^a,c   Escobar García, Diana María ^b   Escalante, Alfredo ^c   Flores, Hector ^b   González, Francisco Javier ^a   Gatenholm, Paul ^d   Toriz, Guillermo ^c,d  

^a Autonomous University San Luis Potosi   (Mexico)

^b Autonomous University San Luis Potosi   (Mexico)

^c University Guadalajara   (Mexico)

^d CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bacterial cellulose; Bone regeneration; Cell adhesion; Functionalized MWNTs; Osteoblastic cells

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIALS; BIOMECHANICS; BONE; CARBON NANOTUBES; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; CELLS; CELLULOSE; CYTOLOGY; MULTIWALLED CARBON NANOTUBES (MWCN); NANOTUBES; YARN;

BACTERIAL CELLULOSE; BONE REGENERATION; CARBON NANO-MATERIALS; FUNCTIONALIZED; FUNCTIONALIZED MULTI-WALLED CARBON NANOTUBES; GLUCONACETOBACTER XYLINUS; OSTEOBLASTIC CELLS; THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3D) SCAFFOLDS;

SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY);

ADHESION; BACTERIA; CELLS; CELLULOSE;

CARBON NANOTUBE; CELLULOSE;

BONE REGENERATION; CELL LINE; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; GLUCONACETOBACTER XYLINUS; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; METABOLISM; OSTEOBLAST; TISSUE SCAFFOLD; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

BONE REGENERATION; CELL LINE; CELLULOSE; GLUCONACETOBACTER XYLINUS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; NANOTUBES, CARBON; OSTEOBLASTS; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 85013655956     PISSN: 09284931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2017.02.074     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. [1] Luo, Y., Engelmayr, G., Auguste, D.T., da Silva Ferreira, L., Karp, J.M., Saigal, R., Principles of Tissue Engineering, 2007.
2. [2] Salgado, A.J., Coutinho, O.P., Reis, R.L., Bone tissue engineering: state of the art and future trends. Macromol. Biosci. 4:8 (2004), 743–765.
3. [3] O'Brien, F.J., Biomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater. Today 14:3 (2011), 88–95.
4. [4] Zhu, N., Chen, X., Biofabrication of tissue scaffolds. Adv. Biomater. Sci. Biomed. Appl., 2013, 315–328.
5. [5] Ko, H.-F., Sfeir, C., Kumta, P.N., Novel synthesis strategies for natural polymer and composite biomaterials as potential scaffolds for tissue engineering. Philos. Trans. A. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 368:1917 (2010), 1981–1997.
6. [6] Burg, K.J., Porter, S., Kellam, J.F., Biomaterial developments for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 21:23 (2000), 2347–2359.
7. [7] Kim, I.-Y., Seo, S.-J., Moon, H.-S., Yoo, M.-K., Park, I.-Y., Kim, B.-C., Cho, C.-S., Chitosan and its derivatives for tissue engineering applications. Biotechnol. Adv. 26:1 (2008), 1–21.
8. [8] Bodin, A., Baeckdahl, H., Fink, H., Gustafsson, L., Risberg, B., Gatenholm, P., Influence of cultivation conditions on mechanical and morphological properties of bacterial cellulose tubes. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 96:6 (2007), 1199–1210.
9. [9] Müller, F.A., Müller, L., Hofmann, I., Greil, P., Wenzel, M.M., Staudenmaier, R., Cellulose-based scaffold materials for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials 27:21 (2006), 3955–3963.
10. [10] Keshk, S.M., Bacterial cellulose production and its industrial applications. J. Bioprocess. Biotech. 04:02 (2014), 1–10.
11. [11] Lin, S.P., Loira Calvar, I., Catchmark, J.M., Liu, J.R., Demirci, A., Cheng, K.C., Biosynthesis, production and applications of bacterial cellulose. Cellulose 20:5 (2013), 2191–2219.
12. [12] Rajwade, J.M., Paknikar, K.M., Kumbhar, J.V., Applications of bacterial cellulose and its composites in biomedicine. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 99:6 (2015), 2491–2511.
13. [13] Czaja, W.K., Young, D.J., Kawecki, M., Brown, R.M., The future prospects of microbial cellulose in biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules 8:1 (2007), 1–12.
14. [14] Czaja, W., Krystynowicz, A., Bielecki, S., Brown, R.M., Microbial cellulose — the natural power to heal wounds. Biomaterials 27:2 (2006), 145–151.
15. [15] Grande, C.J., Torres, F.G., Gomez, C.M., Carmen Bañó, M., Nanocomposites of bacterial cellulose/hydroxyapatite for biomedical applications. Acta Biomater. 5:5 (2009), 1605–1615.
16. [16] Ougiya, H., Watanabe, K., Morinaga, Y., Yoshinaga, F., Emulsion-stabilizing effect of bacterial cellulose. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. vol. 61:April (1997), 1541–1545.
17. [17] Svensson, A., Nicklasson, E., Harrah, T., Panilaitis, B., Kaplan, D.L., Brittberg, M., Gatenholm, P., Bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for tissue engineering of cartilage. Biomaterials 26:4 (2005), 419–431.
18. [18] Andrade, F.K., Costa, R., Domingues, L., Soares, R., Gama, M., Improving bacterial cellulose for blood vessel replacement: functionalization with a chimeric protein containing a cellulose-binding module and an adhesion peptide. Acta Biomater. 6:10 (2010), 4034–4041.
19. [19] Lin, W.C., Lien, C.C., Yeh, H.J., Yu, C.M., Hsu, S.H., Bacterial cellulose and bacterial cellulose-chitosan membranes for wound dressing applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 94:1 (2013), 603–611.
20. [20] Harrison, B.S., Atala, A., Carbon nanotube applications for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 28:2 (2007), 344–353.
21. [21] Saffar, K., Jamilpour, N., Rouhi, G., Carbon Nanotubes in Bone Tissue Engineering. Biomed. Eng. (NY), 2008, 477–498.
22. [22] Correa-Duarte, M.A., Wagner, N., Rojas-Chapana, J., Morsczeck, C., Thie, M., Giesig, M., Fabrication and biocompatibility of carbon nanotube-based 3D networks as scaffolds for cell seeding and growth. Nano Lett. 4:11 (2004), 2233–2236.
23. [23] Abarrategi, A., Gutiérrez, M.C., Moreno-Vicente, C., Hortigüela, M.J., Ramos, V., López-Lacomba, J.L., Ferrer, M.L., del Monte, F., Multiwall carbon nanotube scaffolds for tissue engineering purposes. Biomaterials 29:1 (2008), 94–102.
24. [24] Hirsch, A., Vostrowsky, O., Functionalization of carbon nanotubes. Top. Curr. Chem. 245 (2005), 193–237.
25. [25] Sun, Y.P., Fu, K.F., Lin, Y., Huang, W.J., Functionalized carbon nanotubes: properties and applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 35:12 (2002), 1096–1104.
26. [26] Zhang, B., Xing, Y., Li, Z., Zhou, H., Mu, Q., Yan, B., Shim, M., Moore, J., Campbell, P.N., Functionalisation of carbon nanotubes for biocompatibility and biomolecular recognition. Biochem. Educ. 6:2 (2002), 285–288.
27. [27] Vardharajula, S., Ali, S.Z., Tiwari, P.M., Eroǧlu, E., Vig, K., Dennis, V.A., Singh, S.R., Functionalized carbon nanotubes: biomedical applications. Int. J. Nanomedicine 7 (2012), 5361–5374.
28. [28] He, H., Pham-Huy, L.A., Dramou, P., Xiao, D., Zuo, P., Pham-Huy, C., Carbon nanotubes: Applications in pharmacy and medicine. Biomed. Res. Int., vol. 2013, 2013.
29. [29] Zimmermann, K.A., Leblanc, J.M., Sheets, K.T., Fox, R.W., Gatenholm, P., Biomimetic design of a bacterial cellulose/hydroxyapatite nanocomposite for bone healing applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 31:1 (2011), 43–49.
30. [30] Polo-Corrales, L., Latorre-Esteves, M., Ramirez-Vick, J.E., Scaffold design for bone regeneration. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 14:1 (2014), 15–56.
31. [31] Zhu, J., Marchant, R.E., Design properties of hydrogel tissue-engineering scaffolds. Expert Rev. Med. Devices 8:5 (2011), 607–626.
32. [32] Ruoff, R.S., Qian, D., Liu, W.K., Mechanical properties of carbon nanotubes: theoretical predictions and experimental measurements. Comptes Rendus Phys. 4:9 (2003), 993–1008.
33. [33] Ding, W., Calabri, L., Kohlhaas, K.M., Chen, X., Dikin, D.A., Ruoff, R.S., Modulus, fracture strength, and brittle vs. plastic response of the outer shell of arc-grown multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Exp. Mech. 47:1 (2007), 25–36.
34. [34] Salvetat, J.-P., Bonard, J.-M., Thomson, N.H., Mechanical properties of carbon nanotubes. Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process. 69:3 (1999), 255–260.
35. [35] Matsuoka, M., Tsuchida, T., Matsushita, K., Adachi, O., Yoshinaga, F., A synthetic medium for bacterial cellulose production by Acetobacter xylinum subsp. sucrofermentans. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 60:4 (1996), 575–579.
36. [36] Zhao, X., Inoue, S., Jinno, M., Suzuki, T., Ando, Y., Macroscopic oriented web of single-wall carbon nanotubes. Chem. Phys. Lett. 373:3–4 (2003), 266–271.
37. [37] Hirsch, A., Functionalization of fullerenes and carbon nanotubes. Phys. Status Solidi Basic Res. 243:13 (2006), 3209–3212.
38. [38] de la Cruz, E.F., Zheng, Y., Torres, E., Li, W., Song, W., Burugapalli, K., Zeta potential of modified multi-walled carbon nanotubes in presence of poly (vinyl alcohol) hydrogel. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 7:4 (2012), 3577–3590.
39. [39] Jansen, E.J.P., Sladek, R.E.J., Bahar, H., Yaffe, A., Gijbels, M.J., Kuijer, R., Bulstra, S.K., Guldemond, N.A., Binderman, I., Koole, L.H., Hydrophobicity as a design criterion for polymer scaffolds in bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 26:21 (2005), 4423–4431.
40. [40] Silva, T.S., Machado, D.C., Viezzer, C., Silva Junior, A.N., Oliveira, M.G., Effect of titanium surface roughness on human bone marrow cell proliferation and differentiation: an experimental study. Acta Cir. Bras. 24:3 (2009), 200–205.
41. [41] Deligianni, D.D., Katsala, N.D., Koutsoukos, P.G., Missirlis, Y.F., Effect of surface roughness of hydroxyapatite on human bone marrow cell adhesion, proliferation, differentiation and detachment strength. Biomaterials 22:1 (2000), 87–96.
42. [42] Hatano, K., Inoue, H., Kojo, T., Matsunaga, T., Tsujisawa, T., Uchiyama, C., Uchida, Y., Effect of surface roughness on proliferation and alkaline phosphatase expression of rat calvarial cells cultured on polystyrene. Bone 25:4 (1999), 439–445.
43. [43] Wennerberg, A., Albrektsson, T., On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 25:1 (2009), 63–74.
44. [44] Ozcelik, H., Hindie, M., Hasan, A., Engin, N., Cell, V., Barthes, J., Özçelik, H., Hindié, M., Ndreu-halili, A., Vrana, N.E., Cell Microenvironment Engineering and Monitoring for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine: The Citation Accessed Citable Link Cell Microenvironment Engineering and Monitoring for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine: The Recent Advances. 2014, 2014 no. i.
45. [45] Ding, X., Boney-Montoya, J., Owen, B.M., Bookout, A.L., Coate, C., Mangelsdorf, D.J., Kliewer, S.A., NIH Public Access. 16, 3, 2013, 387–393.
46. [46] Shao, Y., Fu, J., Integrated micro/nanoengineered functional biomaterials for cell mechanics and mechanobiology: a materials perspective. Adv. Mater. 26:10 (2014), 1494–1533.
47. [47] Iguchi, M., Yamanaka, S., Budhiono, A., Bacterial cellulose — a masterpiece of nature's arts. J. Mater. Sci. 35:2 (2000), 261–270.
48. [48] Bäckdahl, H., Helenius, G., Bodin, A., Nannmark, U., Johansson, B.R., Risberg, B., Gatenholm, P., Mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose and interactions with smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials 27:9 (2006), 2141–2149.
49. [49] Lin, H.-B., Cooper, S.L., Synthesis, surface and cell-adhesion properties of polyurethanes containing covalently grafted RGD-peptides. MRS Proc., 331(3), 1993, 105.
50. [50] Vladkova, T.G., Surface engineered polymeric biomaterials with improved biocontact properties. International Journal of Polymer Science, 2010, 2010.
51. [51] Hamerli, P., Weigel, T., Groth, T., Paul, D., Surface properties of and cell adhesion onto allylamine-plasma-coated polyethylenterephtalate membranes. Biomaterials 24:22 (2003), 3989–3999.
52. [52] Khalili, A.A., Ahmad, M.R., A review of cell adhesion studies for biomedical and biological applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 16:8 (2015), 18149–18184.
53. [53] Berrier, A.L., Yamada, K.M., Cell — matrix adhesion. J. Cell. Physiol. 213:June (2007), 565–573.
54. [54] Hirata, H., Sokabe, M., Lim, C.T., Molecular mechanisms underlying the force-dependent regulation of actin-to-ECM linkage at the focal adhesions. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 126 (2014), 135–154.
55. [55] Izard, T., Evans, G., Borgon, R.A., Rush, C.L., Bricogne, G., Bois, P.R.J., Vinculin activation by Talin through helical bundle conversion. Nature 427:6970 (2004), 171–175.
56. [56] Liu, Z., Tabakman, S., Welsher, K., Dai, H., Carbon nanotubes in biology and medicine: in vitro and in vivo detection, imaging and drug delivery. Nano Res. 2:2 (2009), 85–120.