Assessing the benefits of slow mobility connecting a cultural heritage

Journal of Cultural Heritage

Volumn 26, Issue , 2017, Pages 153-159

  Maltese, Ila ^a   Mariotti, Ilaria ^a   Oppio, Alessandra ^a   Boscacci, Flavio ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Contingent valuation method; Cultural heritage; Milan; Sustainable mobility; Total economic value

Indexed keywords

EID: 85013642295     PISSN: 12962074     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2017.01.006     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Handy, S., Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P., Correlation or causality between the built environment and travel behavior? Evidence from Northern California. Transport. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 10:6 (2005), 427–444, 10.1016/j.trd.2005.05.002.
2. Ruiz, T., Bernabé, J.C., Measuring factors influencing valuation of non motorized improvement measures. Transport. Res. Part A 67 (2014), 195–211, 10.1016/j.tra.2014.06.008.
3. Litman, T., Evaluating Active Transport Benefits and Costs. 2015, Victoria Transport Policy Institute, 134–140.
4. Litman, T., Evaluating Active Transport Benefits and Costs, Guide to Valuing Walking and Cycling Improvements and Encouragement Programs. 2016, Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
5. Pearce, D., Atkinson, G., Mourato, S., Cost-benefit analysis and the environment: recent developments. 2006, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and development.
6. Pearce, D., Turner, R., Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment. 1990, Harvester Wheatsheaf, London, UK.
7. Noonan, D.S., Contingent valuation and cultural resources: A meta-analytic review of the literature. J. Cult. Econ. 27:3–4 (2003), 159–176.
8. Throsby, D., Determining the value of cultural goods: How much (or how little) does contingent valuation tell us?. J. Cult. Econ. 27:3–4 (2003), 275–285.
9. Mourato, S., Mazzanti, M., Economic Valuation of Cultural Heritage: Evidence and Prospects. De la Torre, M., (eds.) Assessing the Values of Cultural Heritage Research Report, 2002, The Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles, US, 51–76.
10. th, 2016).
11. Tuan, T.H., Navrud, S., Capturing the benefits of preserving cultural heritage. J. Cult. Herit. 9:3 (2008), 326–337.
12. Bedate, A., Herrero, L.C., Sanz, J.Á., Economic valuation of the cultural heritage: Application to four case studies in Spain. J. Cult. Herit. 5:1 (2004), 101–111, 10.1016/j.culher.2003.04.002.
13. Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney, P.R., Leamer, E.E., Radner, R., Shuman, H., Report of the NOOA Panel on Contingent Valuation. Federal Register 58 (1993), 4601–4614.
14. Krizek, K.J., Estimating the economic benefit of bicycling and bicycle facilites: An interpretive review and proposed methods. Essays Transp. Econ., 2007, 219–248, 10.1007/978-3-7908-1765-2-14.
15. Vandermeulen, V., Verspecht, A., Vermeire, B., Van Huylenbroeck, G., Gellynck, X., The use of economic valuation to create public support for green infrastructure investments in urban areas. Landscape Urban Plan. 103 (2011), 198–206.
16. Fix, P., Loomis, J., Comparing the economic value of mountain biking estimated using revealed and stated preference. J. Environ. Plan. Manage. 41:2 (1998), 227–236.
17. Betz, C., Bergstrom, J., Bowker, J.M., A Contingent Trip Model for Estimating Rail-trail Demand. J. Environ. Plan. Manage. 46:1 (2003), 79–96.
18. Litman, T., Evaluating Non-Motorized Transportation Benefits and Costs. 2011, Victoria Transport Policy Institute, 134–140.
19. Lindsey, G., Knaap, G., Willingness to pay for urban greenway projects. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 65:3 (1999), 297–313.
20. Viaud-Mouclier, C., Valuing Attractive Landscapes in the Urban Economy - Cycling and walking path along the river V Esdre–Final Report. 2012, 2012.
21. Wilker, J., Rusche, K., Economic valuation as a tool to support decision-making in strategic green infrastructure planning. Local Environment. Int. J. Just. Sustain. 19:6 (2014), 702–713 (Special Issue: Rescaling Sustainability).
22. Hausman, J.A., (eds.) Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment, 1993, North Holland, Amsterdam.
23. Bishop, R.C., Romano, D., Environmental Resource Valuation: Applications of the Contingent Valuation Method in Italy. 1998, Springer Science & Business Media.
24. Bishop, R.C., Heberlein, T.A., Measuring values of extra-market goods: are indirect measures biased?. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 61 (1979), 926–930.
25. Andreoli, S., Brau, R., De Magistris, V., La valutazione economica dei beni culturali: il metodo della Contingent Valuation. Santagata, W., (eds.) Economia dell'arte. Istituzioni e mercati dell'arte e della cultura, 1998, Utet, Torino.
26. Sirchia, G., La valutazione economica dei beni culturali. 2000, Carocci, Roma.
27. Bishop, R.C., Woodward, R.T., Valuation of environmental quality under certainty. The Handbook of Environmental Economics. 1995, Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
28. Lopez-Feldman, A., Introduction to contingent valuation using Stata. 2012, Munich Personal RePEc Archive: Centro de Investigacion y Docencia Economicas (Cide) (MPRA WP 41018).
29. Ciriacy-Wantrup, S.V., Major economic forces affecting agriculture with particular reference to California. 1947, Agricultural Experiment Station, University of California.
30. Danielis, R., La teoria economica e la stima dei costi esterni dei trasporti. In ANFIA-ACI (a cura di). 2001, I Costi e i Benefici Esterni del Trasporto, Turin, Italy.
31. Ahmed, U.S., Gotoh, K., Cost-Benefit Analysis of Environmental Goods by Applying Contingent Valuation Method. 2006, Springer-Verlag, Tokyo.
32. Cooper, J., Hanemann, M., Referendum contingent valuation. How many bids are enough. 1995, USDA Research Service, Food and Consumer Economics Division, Working Paper, May.
33. Marcucci, E., Scelte di trasporto e modelli a scelta discreta. 2011, Collana Economia e Politica Industriale. Franco Angeli, Milano.
34. Riganti, P., Scarpa, R., Categorical nesting and information effects on WTP estimates for the conservation of cultural heritage in Campi Flegrei. Bishop, R., Romano, D., (eds.) Environmental Resource Valuation: Applications of Contingent Valuation Method in Italy, 1998, Kluwer Publisher, Boston, 245–259.
35. Riganti, P., Willis, K.G., Component and temporal value reliability in cultural goods: the case of Roman Imperial remains near Naples. Navrud, S., Ready, R.C., (eds.) Valuing cultural heritage: applying environmental valuation techniques to historic buildings, monuments and artifacts, 2002, Edward Elgar Publishing (Ch. 10, p. 142).
36. Alberini, A., Riganti, P., Longo, A., Can people value the aesthetic and use services of urban sites? Evidence from a survey of Belfast residents. J. Cult. Econ. 27:3–4 (2003), 193–213.
37. Deenihan, G., Caulfield, B., Do tourists value different levels of cycling infrastructure?. Tourism Manage 46 (2015), 92–101, 10.1016/j.tourman.2014.06.012.
38. Lazzeroni, M., Bellini, N., Cortesi, G., Loffredo, A., The territorial approach to cultural economy: new opportunities for the development of small towns. Eur. Plan. Stud. 21:4 (2013), 452–472.
39. Salazar, S.D.S., Marques, J.M., Valuing cultural heritage: the social benefits of restoring and old Arab tower. J. Cult. Herit. 6:1 (2005), 69–77.
40. Bianchi, R., Mattia, S., Il valore dell'Ambiente. 2000, Intervento pubblico e CVM, Guerini, Milan.
41. Hanemann, W.M., Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 8:4 (1994), 19–43.
42. Litman, T., Evaluating Active Transport Benefits and Costs. 2013, Victoria Transport Policy Institute.