Internet as a research tool. Guidelines for creating web surveys;Internet come strumento di ricerca: Linee guida per la creazione di web survey

Psicologia Sociale

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 237-258

  Gabbiadini, Alessandro ^a   Mari, Silvia ^a   Volpato, Chiara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Data collection; Online survey; Web survey

Indexed keywords

EID: 85013462584     PISSN: 18272517     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1482/35134     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Burns, K. E. A., Duffett, M., Kho, M. E., Meade, O. M., Adhikari, N. K. J., Sinuff, T. et al. (2008). A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians. Canadian Medical Association, 179(3), 245-252.
2. Butterfat, LLC (2010). phpESP. [Computer Software]. Consultato il 20 febbraio 2010 da http://www.butterfat.net/wiki/Projects/phpESP/.
3. Couper, M. P., Tourangeau, R., Conrad, F. G. e Crawford, S. D. (2004). What they see is what we get: Response options for web surveys. Social Science Computer Review, 22(1), 111-127.
4. Creative Research Systems (2010). The Survey System [Computer Software]. Consultato il 22 marzo 2010 da http://www.surveysystem.com/.
5. Dandurand, F., Shultz, R. e Onishi, K. H. (2008). Comparing online and lab methods in a problem-solving experiment. Behavior Researh Methods, 40(2), 428-434.
6. Fuchs, M. (2008). Asking for numbers and quantities: Visual design effects in paper & pencil surveys. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 21(1), 65-84.
7. Garrett, J. J. (2002). The elements of user experience: User-centred design for the web. Indianapolis: New Riders.
8. Golden Hills Software Inc. (2010). SurveyGold. [Computer Software]. Consultato il 22 febbraio 2010 da http://www.surveygold.com.
9. Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S. e John, O. P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analisys of six perceptions about Internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59(2), 93-104.
10. Graham, I. (2003). A pattern language for Web usability. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
11. Greenlaw, C. e Brown-Welty, S. (2009). A comparison of web-based and paper-based survey methods: Testing assumptions of survey mode and response cost. Evaluation Review, 33, 464-480.
12. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E. e Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
13. ISO (1998). ISO 9241-11, Human-centred design processes for interactive system.
14. Javascript.html.it (2010). Guida a Javascript. Consultato il 9 febbraio 2010 da http://html. javascript.it.
15. Joinson, A. N., McKenna, K., Postmes, T. e Reips, U. D. (2007). The Oxford handbook of Internet psychology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
16. Kanizsa, G. (1997). Grammatica del vedere. Saggi su percezione e Gestalt - Collana «Biblioteca Mulino». Bologna: Il Mulino.
17. Krug, S. (2006). Don't make me think! A common sense approach to Web usability (2° ed.). Berkeley, CA: New Riders.
18. Limesurvey.org (2010). LimeSurvey. [Computer Software]. Consultato il 25 febbraio 2010 da http://www.limesurvey.org/.
19. Manfreda, K. L., Batagelj, Z. e Vehovar, V. (2002). Design of Web survey questionnaires: Three basic experiments. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 7(3).
20. Mann, C. e Stewart, F. (2000). Internet communication and qualitative research. A handbook for researching online. London: Sage.
21. Microsoft Corporation (2010). ASP.NET (Versione 3.5). [Computer Software].
22. Millisecond Software (2010). Inquisit (Versione 3.0). [Computer Software]. Consultato il 22 Febbraio 2010 da http://www.millisecond.com/.
23. Naglieri, J. A., Drasgow, F., Schmit, M., Handler, L., Prifitera, A., Margolis A. et al. (2004). Psychological testing on the Internet: New problems, old issues. American Psychologist, 59(3), 150-162.
24. Newman, M. e Landay, J. A. (2000). Sitemaps, Storyboards, and Specifications: A Sketch of Web Site Design Practice as Manifested Through Artifacts. (Technical Report UCB//CSD-99-1062) Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, Computer Science Division.
25. Nielsen, J. (1994). Heuristic evaluation. In J. Nielsen e R. L. Mack (eds.), Usability inspection methods. New York: Wiley.
26. Nielsen, J. (2000). Design Web Usability: The practice of simplicity. Indianapolis: New Riders Publishing.
27. Norman, D. A. (2005). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
28. Norman, D. A. e Draper, S. W. (1986). User centered system design: New perspective on human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: CRC Press.
29. Polillo, R. (2006). Plasmare il web: Road map per siti di qualità. Milano: Apogeo.
30. Quask (2010). Form Artist Presto. [Computer Software]. Consultato il 20 febbraio 2010 da http://www.quask.com/common/home.asp.
31. Reis, H. T., Gosling, S. D. (2010). Social psychological methods outside the laboratory. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert e G. Lindzey (eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (5th ed.) (pp. 82-114). New York: McGraw-Hill.
32. Rosenfeld, L. (1998). Information architecture for the World Wide Web (1° ed.). Cambridge CA: O'Reilly.
33. Schuler, D. e Namioka, A. (1993). Participatory Design: principles and practices. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34. Seffah, A., Donyaee, M., Kline, R. B. e Padda, H. K. (2006). Usability measurement and metrics: A consolidated model. Software Quality Journal, 14(2), 159-178.
35. Shih, T. H. e Fan, X. (2008). Comparing Response Rates from Web and Mail Surveys: A Meta-Analysis. Field Methods, 20(3), 249-271.
36. Smith, E. R. (2000). Research design. In H. T. Reis e C. M. Judd (eds.), Handbook of research methods in social psychology. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 17-39.
37. Sona System (2006). Experimetrix Momentum. [Computer Software]. Consultato il 20 febbraio 2010 da http://experimetrix.com/faq.htm.
38. Sona System (2009). The Experiment Management System. [Computer Software]. Consultato il 20 febbraio 2010 da http://www.sona-systems.com/.
39. StatPac (2010). StatPac Inc. [Computer Software]. Retrieved from http://www.statpac.com.
40. Suarez-Balcazar, Y., Balcazar, F. E. e Taylor-Ritzler, T. (2009). Using the Internet to conduct research with culturally diverse populations: Challenges and opportunities. Cultural diversity and ethnic minority. American Psychological Association, 15(1), 96-104.
41. Survey Crafter Inc. (2010). Survey Crafter Professional. [Computer Software]. Consultato il 27 febbraio 2010 da http://www.surveycrafter.com.
42. SurveyMonkey.com Corporation (2010). Survey Monkey. [Computer Software]. Consultato il 23 febbraio 2010 da http://www.surveymonkey.com.
43. The PHP Group (2010). PHP (Versione 5.2.13). [Computer Software].
44. Time Sharing Experiments for the Social Science. (2010). Consultato il 10 marzo 2010 da http://tess.experimentcentral.org/introduction.html.
45. Toepoel, V., Das, M. e Van Soest, A. (2009). Design of web questionnaires: The effects of the number of items per screen. Field Methods, 21(2), 200-213.
46. Van Selm, M. e Jankowski, N. W. (2006). Conducting on line surveys. Quality & Quantity, 40, 435-456.
47. Vicente, P. e Reis, E. (2010). Using questionnaire design to fight nonresponse bias in web surveys. Social Science Computer Review, 28(2), 251-267.
48. Widgix, LLC (2010). SurveyGizmo. [Computer Software]. Retrieved from http://www.surveygizmo.com.
49. Witte, J. C., Pargas, R. P., Mobley, C. e Hawdon, J. (2004). Instrument effects of images in web surveys: A research note. Social Science Computer Review, 22(3), 363-369.
50. Yee, N., Bailenson, J. N., Urbanek, M., Chang, F. e Merget, D. (2007). The unbearable likeness of being digital. The persistence of nonverbal social norms in online virtual environments. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 10, 115-121.