Forest dynamics in the U.S. indicate disproportionate attrition in western forests, rural areas and public lands

PLoS ONE

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2017, Pages

  Yang, Sheng ^a   Mountrakis, Giorgos ^a  

^a 402 Baker Laboratory   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON;

ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; CARBON CYCLE; CLIMATE CHANGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; FOREST ATTRITION; FOREST COVER LOSS; FOREST DYNAMICS; FOREST FRAGMENTATION; FOREST MANAGEMENT; HABITAT LOSS; LAND OWNERSHIP; LANDSCAPE; NONHUMAN; POPULATION SIZE; RURAL AREA; SPECIES RICHNESS; UNITED STATES; URBANIZATION; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FOREST; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; THEORETICAL MODEL;

BIODIVERSITY; CLIMATE CHANGE; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FORESTS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; OWNERSHIP; UNITED STATES; URBANIZATION;

EID: 85013371890     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171383     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Sierra R. Dynamics and patterns of deforestation in the western Amazon: the Napo deforestation front, 1986-1996. Appl Geogr. 2000; 20: 1-16.
2. Lovejoy TE, Bierregaard Jr RO, Rylands AB, Quintela CE, Harper LH, Brown Jr KS, et al. Edge and other effects of isolation on Amazon forest fragments. 1986.
3. Jarzyna MA, Porter WF, Maurer BA, Zuckerberg B, Finley AO. Landscape fragmentation affects responses of avian communities to climate change. Global Change Biol. 2015; 21: 2942-2953.
4. Colwell RK, Brehm G, Cardelús CL, Gilman AC, Longino JT. Global warming, elevational range shifts, and lowland biotic attrition in the wet tropics. Science. 2008; 322: 258-261. doi: 10.1126/science. 1162547 PMID: 18845754
5. Houghton RA, Hackler JL. Changes in terrestrial carbon storage in the United States. I: The roles of agriculture and forestry. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2000; 9: 125-144.
6. Howarth RW, Billen G, Swaney D, Townsend A, Jaworski N, Lajtha K, et al. Regional nitrogen budgets and riverine N & P fluxes for the drainages to the North Atlantic Ocean: Natural and human influences. Biogeochemistry. 1996; 35: 75-139.
7. Carpenter SR, Caraco NF, Correll DL, Howarth RW, Sharpley AN, Smith VH. Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen. Ecol Appl. 1998; 8: 559-568.
8. Bernhardt ES, Likens GE, Buso DC, Driscoll CT. In-stream uptake dampens effects of major forest disturbance on watershed nitrogen export. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2003; 100: 10304-10308.
9. McLauchlan KK, Craine JM, Oswald WW, Leavitt PR, Likens GE. Changes in nitrogen cycling during the past century in a northern hardwood forest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2007; 104: 7466-7470.
10. Turner MG, Gardner RH, O'Neill RV. Landscape ecology in theory and practice: pattern and process. Springer Verlag; 2001.
11. Smith WB. Forest resources of the United States, 2002: US Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station; 2004.
12. Whitney GG. From coastal wilderness to fruited plain: a history of environmental change in temperate North America, 1500 to the present. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press; 1994.
13. Giles P, Burgoyne J. Skole DL and Tucker CJ1993. Tropical deforestation and habitat fragmentation in the Amazon: satellite data from 1978 to 1988. Science 260, 1905-1910. Prog Phys Geogr. 2008;32: 575-580. doi: 10.1126/science.260.5116.1905 PMID: 17836720
14. Laurance WF, Albernaz AK, Costa CD. Is deforestation accelerating in the Brazilian Amazon? Environ Conserv. 2001; 28: 305-311.
15. Brook BW, Sodhi NS, Ng PK. Catastrophic extinctions follow deforestation in Singapore. Nature. 2003; 424: 420-426. doi: 10.1038/nature01795 PMID: 12879068
16. Nepstad DC, Verssimo A, Alencar A, Nobre C, Lima E, Lefebvre P, et al. Large-scale impoverishment of Amazonian forests by logging and fire. Nature. 1999; 398: 505-508.
17. Nepstad D, Carvalho G, Cristina Barros A, Alencar A, Paulo Capobianco J, Bishop J, et al. Road paving, fire regime feedbacks, and the future of Amazon forests. For Ecol Manage. 2001; 154: 395-407.
18. Hansen MC, Egorov A, Potapov PV, Stehman SV, Tyukavina A, Turubanova SA, et al. Monitoring conterminous United States (CONUS) land cover change with Web-Enabled Landsat Data (WELD). Remote Sens Environ. 2014; 140: 466-484.
19. Hansen MC, Stehman SV, Potapov PV, Loveland TR, Townshend JRG, DeFries RS, et al. Humid tropical forest clearing from 2000 to 2005 quantified by using multitemporal and multiresolution remotely sensed data. 2008; 105: 9439.
20. Defries RS, Townshend JRG. Global land cover characterization from satellite data: From research to operational implementation? Global Ecol Biogeogr. 1999; 8: 367-379.
21. Lambin EF. Monitoring forest degradation in tropical regions by remote sensing: Some methodological issues. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 1999; 8: 191-198.
22. Tyukavina A, Hansen MC, Potapov PV, Krylov AM, Goetz SJ. Pan-tropical hinterland forests: Mapping minimally disturbed forests. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2016; 25: 151-163.
23. Turner MG. Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1989: 171-197.
24. Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB. Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: A synthesis. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2007; 16: 265-280.
25. Echeverría C, Newton AC, Lara A, Benayas JMR, Coomes DA. Impacts of forest fragmentation on species composition and forest structure in the temperate landscape of southern Chile. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2007; 16: 426-439.
26. Cattarino L, Mcalpine CA, Rhodes JR. Land-use drivers of forest fragmentation vary with spatial scale. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2014; 23: 1215-1224.
27. Hargis CD, Bissonette JA, David JL. The behavior of landscape metrics commonly used in the study of habitat fragmentation. Landscape Ecol. 1998; 13: 167-186.
28. Kupfer JA. National assessments of forest fragmentation in the US. Global Environ Change. 2006; 16: 73-82.
29. Li S, Yang B. Introducing a new method for assessing spatially explicit processes of landscape fragmentation. Ecol Ind. 2015; 56: 116-124.
30. Haines-Young R, Chopping M. Quantifying landscape structure: a review of landscape indices and their application to forested landscapes. Progress in Physical Geography. 1996; 20: 418-445.
31. Turner MG, Gardner RH, O'Neill R. Landscape Ecology in the Theory and Practice: Pattern and Process; 2001.
32. Li H, Wu J. Use and misuse of landscape indices. Landscape Ecol. 2004; 19: 389-399.
33. Dramstad WE. Spatial metrics-useful indicators for society or mainly fun tools for landscape ecologists?. 2009; 63: 246-254.
34. Riitters K, Wickham J, O'Neill R, Jones B, Smith E. Global-scale patterns of forest fragmentation. Conserv Ecol. 2000; 4: 3.
35. Riitters KH, Wickham JD, O'Neill RV, Jones KB, Smith ER, Coulston JW, et al. Fragmentation of continental United States forests. Ecosystems. 2002; 5: 815-822.
36. Gardner RH, Urban DL. Neutral models for testing landscape hypotheses. Landsc Ecol. 2007; 22: 15-29.
37. Riitters K, Wickham J, Costanza JK, Vogt P. A global evaluation of forest interior area dynamics using tree cover data from 2000 to 2012. Landsc Ecol. 2016; 31: 137-148.
38. Haddad NM, Brudvig LA, Clobert J, Davies KF, Gonzalez A, Holt RD, et al. Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth's ecosystems. Sci Adv. 2015; 1.
39. Forman RT. Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge university press; 1995.
40. Fahrig L. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. 2003: 487-515.
41. Loiselle BA, Graham CH, Goerck JM, Ribeiro MC. Assessing the impact of deforestation and climate change on the range size and environmental niche of bird species in the Atlantic forests, Brazil. J Biogeogr. 2010; 37: 1288-1301.
42. Githiru M, Lens L. Application of fragmentation research to conservation planning for multiple stakeholders: An example from the Taita Hills, southeast Kenya. Biol Conserv. 2007; 134: 271-278.
43. Gibson L, Lee TM, Koh LP, Brook BW, Gardner TA, Barlow J, et al. Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity. Nature. 2011; 478: 378-381. doi: 10.1038/nature10425 PMID: 21918513
44. Magnani F, Mencuccini M, Borghetti M, Berbigier P, Berninger F, Delzon S, et al. The human footprint in the carbon cycle of temperate and boreal forests. Nature. 2007; 447: 849-851.
45. Strassburg BBN, Rodrigues ASL, Gusti M, Balmford A, Fritz S, Obersteiner M, et al. Impacts of incentives to reduce emissions from deforestation on global species extinctions. Nat Clim Change. 2012; 2: 350-355.
46. Dean C, Kirkpatrick JB, Harper RJ, Eldridge DJ. Optimising carbon sequestration in arid and semiarid rangelands. Ecol Eng. 2015; 74: 148-163.
47. Valdés A, Lenoir J, Gallet-Moron E, Andrieu E, Brunet J, Chabrerie O, et al. The contribution of patchscale conditions is greater than that of macroclimate in explaining local plant diversity in fragmented forests across Europe. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2015; 24: 1094-1105.
48. Stark SC, Breshears DD, Garcia ES, Law DJ, Minor DM, Saleska SR, et al. Toward accounting for ecoclimate teleconnections: intra- and inter-continental consequences of altered energy balance after vegetation change. Landsc Ecol. 2015.
49. Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ, Margules CR. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conserv Biol. 1991; 5: 18-32.
50. Cadenasso ML, Pickett STA. Effect of edge structure on the flux of species into forest interiors. Conserv Biol. 2001; 15: 91-97.
51. Reed RA, Johnson-Barnard J, Baker WL. Contribution of roads to forest fragmentation in the Rocky Mountains. Conserv Biol. 1996; 10: 1098-1106.
52. Richard TTF, Deblinger RD. The Ecological Road-Effect Zone of a Massachusetts (U.S.A.) Suburban Highway. Conserv Biol. 2000; 14: 36-46.
53. Fraver S. Vegetation Responses along Edge-to-Interior Gradients in the Mixed Hardwood Forests of the Roanoke River Basin, North Carolina. Conserv Biol. 1994; 8: 822-832.
54. Dumortier M, Butaye J, Jacquemyn H, Van Camp N, Lust N, Hermy M. Predicting vascular plant species richness of fragmented forests in agricultural landscapes in central Belgium. For Ecol Manage. 2002; 158: 85-102.
55. Matlack GR. Sociological edge effects: Spatial distribution of human impact in suburban forest fragments. Environ Manage. 1993; 17: 829-835.
56. Guirado M, Pino J, Rodà F. Understorey plant species richness and composition in metropolitan forest archipelagos: Effects of forest size, adjacent land use and distance to the edge. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2006; 15: 50-62.
57. Dzwonko Z, Loster S. Distribution of vascular plant species in small woodlands on the Western Carpathian foothills. Oikos. 1989; 56: 77-86.
58. Peterken GF, Game M. Historical factors affecting the number and distribution of vascular plant species in the woodlands of central Lincolnshire. J Ecol. 1984; 72: 155-182.
59. Fahrig L. Rethinking patch size and isolation effects: The habitat amount hypothesis. J Biogeogr. 2013; 40: 1649-1663.
60. Prugh LR, Hodges KE, Sinclair ARE, Brashares JS. Effect of habitat area and isolation on fragmented animal populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105: 20770-20775. doi: 10.1073/pnas. 0806080105 PMID: 19073931
61. Hanski I, Zurita GA, Bellocq MI, Rybicki J. Species-fragmented area relationship. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110: 12715-12720. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1311491110 PMID: 23858440
62. Hanski I, Ovaskainen O. The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape. Nature. 2000; 404: 755-758. doi: 10.1038/35008063 PMID: 10783887
63. Ripple WJ, Bradshaw GA, Spies TA. Measuring forest landscape patterns in the cascade range of Oregon, USA. Biol Conserv. 1991; 57: 73-88.
64. Hansen MC, Potapov PV, Moore R, Hancher M, Turubanova SA, Tyukavina A, et al. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science. 2013; 342: 850-853. doi: 10.1126/science. 1244693 PMID: 24233722
65. Watts RD, Compton RW, McCammon JH, Rich CL, Wright SM, Owens T, et al. Roadless space of the conterminous United States. Science. 2007; 316: 736. doi: 10.1126/science.1138141 PMID: 17478718
66. Vogelman JE, Howard SM, Yang L, Larson CR, Wylie BK, Van Driel N. Completion of the 1990 s National Land Cover Data set for the conterminous United States for Landsat Thematic Mapper data and ancillary data sources. 2001; 67: 650-655.
67. Homer C, Dewitz J, Fry J, Coan M, Hossain N, Larson C, et al. Completion of the 2001 national land cover database for the conterminous United States. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing. 2007; 73: 337-341.
68. Fry JA, Coan MJ, Homer CG, Meyer DK, Wickham JD. Completion of the National Land Cover Database (NLCD) 1992-2001 Land Cover Change Retrofit Product. 2008;1379.
69. Sexton JO, Song X, Feng M, Noojipady P, Anand A, Huang C, et al. Global, 30-m resolution continuous fields of tree cover: Landsat-based rescaling of MODIS vegetation continuous fields with lidarbased estimates of error. Int J Digit Earth. 2013; 6: 427-448.
70. Townshend JR, Masek JG, Huang C, Vermote EF, Gao F, Channan S, et al. Global characterization and monitoring of forest cover using Landsat data: Opportunities and challenges. Int J Digit Earth. 2012; 5: 373-397.
71. Olander LP, Gibbs HK, Steininger M, Swenson JJ, Murray BC. Reference scenarios for deforestation and forest degradation in support of REDD: A review of data and methods. Environ Res Lett. 2008;3.
72. Kim D, Sexton JO, Noojipady P, Huang C, Anand A, Channan S, et al. Global, Landsat-based forestcover change from 1990 to 2000. Remote Sens Environ. 2014; 155: 178-193.
73. Sasaki N, Putz FE. Critical need for new definitions of "forest" and "forest degradation" in global climate change agreements. 2009; 2: 226-232.
74. Hansen MC, Stehman SV, Potapov PV. Quantification of global gross forest cover loss. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107: 8650-8655. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912668107 PMID: 20421467
75. US Bureau of Census. The Census 2000 TIGER/Line® Files Technical Documentation. 2000.
76. The Conservation Biology Institute. Protecting Natural Vegetation:Compartive Analysis of Land Protection Mechanisms. 2014.
77. Omernik JM, Griffith GE. Ecoregions of the Conterminous United States: Evolution of a Hierarchical Spatial Framework. Environ Manage. 2014; 54: 1249-1266. doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0364-1 PMID: 25223620
78. Masek JG, Huang C, Wolfe R, Cohen W, Hall F, Kutler J, et al. North American forest disturbance mapped from a decadal Landsat record. Remote Sens Environ. 2008; 112: 2914-2926.
79. Sleeter BM, Sohl TL, Loveland TR, Auch RF, Acevedo W, Drummond MA, et al. Land-cover change in the conterminous United States from 1973 to 2000. Global Environ Change. 2013; 23: 733-748.
80. Drummond MA, Loveland TR. Land-use Pressure and a Transition to Forest-cover Loss in the Eastern United States. Bioscience. 2010; 60: 286-298.
81. Masek JG, Goward SN, Kennedy RE, Cohen WB, Moisen GG, Schleeweis K, et al. United States Forest Disturbance Trends Observed Using Landsat Time Series. Ecosystems. 2013; 16: 1087-1104.
82. Krieger DJ. The economic value of forest ecosystem services: a review: Wilderness Society; 2001.
83. Escobedo FJ, Nowak DJ. Spatial heterogeneity and air pollution removal by an urban forest. Landsc Urban Plann. 2009; 90: 102-110.
84. Moskowitz K, Talberth J. The economic case against logging our national forests. 1998.
85. Murphy DJ, Hall MH, Hall CAS, Heisler GM, Stehman SV, Anselmi-Molina C. The relationship between land cover and the urban heat island in northeastern Puerto Rico. Int J Climatol. 2011; 31: 1222-1239.
86. Loughner CP, Allen DJ, Zhang D, Pickering KE, Dickerson RR, Landry L. Roles of urban tree canopy and buildings in urban heat island effects: Parameterization and preliminary results. J Appl Meteorol Climatol. 2012; 51: 1775-1793.
87. Liu C, Li X. Carbon storage and sequestration by urban forests in Shenyang, China. Urban For Urban Greening. 2012; 11: 121-128.
88. McPherson EG, Xiao Q, Aguaron E. A new approach to quantify and map carbon stored, sequestered and emissions avoided by urban forests. Landsc Urban Plann. 2013; 120: 70-84.
89. Zheng D, Ducey MJ, Heath LS. Assessing net carbon sequestration on urban and community forests of northern New England, USA. Urban For Urban Greening. 2013; 12: 61-68.
90. Churkina G, Brown DG, Keoleian G. Carbon stored in human settlements: The conterminous United States. Global Change Biol. 2010; 16: 135-143.
91. Kuemmerle T, Kozak J, Radeloff VC, Hostert P. Differences in forest disturbance among land ownership types in Poland during and after socialism. J Land Use Sci. 2009; 4: 73-83.
92. Li Y, Wu W, Li N, Bu R, Hu Y. Effects of forest ownership regime on landscape pattern and animal habitat: A review. Chin J Appl Ecol. 2013; 24: 2056-2062.
93. Riitters KH, Coulston JW, Wickham JD. Fragmentation of forest communities in the eastern United States. For Ecol Manage. 2012; 263: 85-93.
94. Pe'er G, Zurita GA, Schober L, Bellocq MI, Strer M, Müller M, et al. Simple Process-Based Simulators for Generating Spatial Patterns of Habitat Loss and Fragmentation: A Review and Introduction to the G-RaFFe Model. PLoS ONE. 2013;8.
95. Schaich H, Plieninger T. Land ownership drives stand structure and carbon storage of deciduous temperate forests. For Ecol Manage. 2013; 305: 146-157.
96. Zheng D, Heath LS, Ducey MJ, Butler B. Relationships between major ownerships, forest aboveground biomass distributions, and landscape dynamics in the New England region of USA. Environ Manage. 2010; 45: 377-386. doi: 10.1007/s00267-009-9408-3 PMID: 19967361
97. Zipperer WC, Foresman TW, Walker SP, Daniel CT. Ecological consequences of fragmentation and deforestation in an urban landscape: A case study. Urban Ecosyst. 2012; 15: 533-544.
98. Bender DJ, Contreras TA, Fahrig L. Habitat loss and population decline: a meta-analysis of the patch size effect. Ecology. 1998; 79: 517-533.
99. Manning AD, Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB. Scattered trees are keystone structures-implications for conservation. Biol Conserv. 2006; 132: 311-321.
100. Theobald DM, Crooks KR, Norman JB. Assessing effects of land use on landscape connectivity: Loss and fragmentation of western U.S. forests. Ecol Appl. 2011; 21: 2445-2458. PMID: 22073634