Nucleotide-dependent switch in proteasome assembly mediated by the Nas6 chaperone

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 114, Issue 7, 2017, Pages 1548-1553

  Li, Frances ^a   Tian, Geng ^b   Langager, Deanna ^a   Sokolova, Vladyslava ^a   Finley, Daniel ^b   Park, Soyeon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

AAA+ ATPase; Assembly; Chaperone; Nas6; Proteasome

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; CHAPERONE; NAS6 PROTEIN; NUCLEOTIDE; PROTEASOME; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; NAS6 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; PROTEIN BINDING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; BINDING SITE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; HYDROLYSIS; IMMUNOBLOTTING; IN VITRO STUDY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; STEREOSPECIFICITY; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR MODEL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; HYDROLYSIS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR CHAPERONES; NUCLEOTIDES; PROTEASOME ENDOPEPTIDASE COMPLEX; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAINS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 85012942165     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1612922114     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. da Fonseca PC, He J, Morris EP (2012) Molecular model of the human 26S proteasome. Mol Cell 46(1):54-66.
2. Kish-Trier E, Hill CP (2013) Structural biology of the proteasome. Annu Rev Biophys 42:29-49.
3. Lander GC, et al. (2012) Complete subunit architecture of the proteasome regulatory particle. Nature 482(7384):186-191.
4. Lasker K, et al. (2012) Molecular architecture of the 26S proteasome holocomplex determined by an integrative approach. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(5):1380-1387.
5. Groll M, et al. (2000) A gated channel into the proteasome core particle. Nat Struct Biol 7(11):1062-1067.
6. Förster A, Masters EI, Whitby FG, Robinson H, Hill CP (2005) The 1.9 A structure of a proteasome-11S activator complex and implications for proteasome-PAN/PA700 interactions. Mol Cell 18(5):589-599.
7. Smith DM, et al. (2007) Docking of the proteasomal ATPases' carboxyl termini in the 20S proteasome's alpha ring opens the gate for substrate entry. Mol Cell 27(5):731-744.
8. Rabl J, et al. (2008) Mechanism of gate opening in the 20S proteasome by the proteasomal ATPases. Mol Cell 30(3):360-368.
9. Funakoshi M, Tomko RJ, Jr, Kobayashi H, Hochstrasser M (2009) Multiple assembly chaperones govern biogenesis of the proteasome regulatory particle base. Cell 137(5):887-899.
10. Le Tallec B, Barrault MB, Guérois R, Carré T, Peyroche A (2009) Hsm3/S5b participates in the assembly pathway of the 19S regulatory particle of the proteasome. Mol Cell 33(3):389-399.
11. Kaneko T, et al. (2009) Assembly pathway of the Mammalian proteasome base subcomplex is mediated by multiple specific chaperones. Cell 137(5):914-925.
12. Park S, et al. (2009) Hexameric assembly of the proteasomal ATPases is templated through their C termini. Nature 459(7248):866-870.
13. Roelofs J, et al. (2009) Chaperone-mediated pathway of proteasome regulatory particle assembly. Nature 459(7248):861-865.
14. Saeki Y, Toh-E A, Kudo T, Kawamura H, Tanaka K (2009) Multiple proteasome-interacting proteins assist the assembly of the yeast 19S regulatory particle. Cell 137(5):900-913.
15. Hanssum A, et al. (2014) An inducible chaperone adapts proteasome assembly to stress. Mol Cell 55(4):566-577.
16. Sakata E, et al. (2011) The catalytic activity of Ubp6 enhances maturation of the proteasomal regulatory particle. Mol Cell 42(5):637-649.
17. Park S, et al. (2013) Reconfiguration of the proteasome during chaperone-mediated assembly. Nature 497(7450):512-516.
18. Barrault MB, et al. (2012) Dual functions of the Hsm3 protein in chaperoning and scaffolding regulatory particle subunits during the proteasome assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(17):E1001-E1010.
19. Satoh T, et al. (2014) Structural basis for proteasome formation controlled by an assembly chaperone nas2. Structure 22(5):731-743.
20. Matyskiela ME, Lander GC, Martin A (2013) Conformational switching of the 26S proteasome enables substrate degradation. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20(7):781-788.
21. Śledź P, et al. (2013) Structure of the 26S proteasome with ATP-γS bound provides insights into the mechanism of nucleotide-dependent substrate translocation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(18):7264-7269.
22. Unverdorben P, et al. (2014) Deep classification of a large cryo-EM dataset defines the conformational landscape of the 26S proteasome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(15):5544-5549.
23. Kim YC, DeMartino GN (2011) C termini of proteasomal ATPases play nonequivalent roles in cellular assembly of mammalian 26 S proteasome. J Biol Chem 286(30):26652-26666.
24. Thompson D, Hakala K, DeMartino GN (2009) Subcomplexes of PA700, the 19 S regulator of the 26 S proteasome, reveal relative roles of AAA subunits in 26 S proteasome assembly and activation and ATPase activity. JBiolChem284(37):24891-24903.
25. Kumar B, Kim YC, DeMartino GN (2010) The C terminus of Rpt3, an ATPase subunit of PA700 (19 S) regulatory complex, is essential for 26 S proteasome assembly but not for activation. J Biol Chem 285(50):39523-39535.
26. Lee SY, De la Mota-Peynado A, Roelofs J (2011) Loss of Rpt5 protein interactions with the core particle and Nas2 protein causes the formation of faulty proteasomes that are inhibited by Ecm29 protein. J Biol Chem 286(42):36641-36651.
27. Tian G, et al. (2011) An asymmetric interface between the regulatory and core particles of the proteasome. Nat Struct Mol Biol 18(11):1259-1267.
28. Estrin E, Lopez-Blanco JR, Chacón P, Martin A (2013) Formation of an intricate helical bundle dictates the assembly of the 26S proteasome lid. Structure 21(9):1624-1635.
29. Tomko RJ, Jr, Hochstrasser M (2011) Incorporation of the Rpn12 subunit couples completion of proteasome regulatory particle lid assembly to lid-base joining. Mol Cell 44(6):907-917.
30. Tomko RJ, Jr, Hochstrasser M (2014) The intrinsically disordered Sem1 protein functions as a molecular tether during proteasome lid biogenesis. Mol Cell 53(3):433-443.
31. Tomko RJ, Jr, et al. (2015) A single α helix drives extensive remodeling of the proteasome lid and completion of regulatory particle assembly. Cell 163(2):432-444.
32. Pathare GR, et al. (2012) The proteasomal subunit Rpn6 is a molecular clamp holding the core and regulatory subcomplexes together. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(1):149-154.
33. Nakamura Y, et al. (2007) Structural basis for the recognition between the regulatory particles Nas6 and Rpt3 of the yeast 26S proteasome. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 359(3):503-509.
34. Vilchez D, et al. (2012) Increased proteasome activity in human embryonic stem cells is regulated by PSMD11. Nature 489(7415):304-308.
35. Ghaemmaghami S, et al. (2003) Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature 425(6959):737-741.
36. Tomko RJ, Jr, Funakoshi M, Schneider K, Wang J, Hochstrasser M (2010) Heterohexameric ring arrangement of the eukaryotic proteasomal ATPases: Implications for proteasome structure and assembly. Mol Cell 38(3):393-403.
37. Lee SH, Moon JH, Yoon SK, Yoon JB (2012) Stable incorporation of ATPase subunits into 19 S regulatory particle of human proteasome requires nucleotide binding and C-terminal tails. J Biol Chem 287(12):9269-9279.
38. Kohlmann S, Schäfer A, Wolf DH (2008) Ubiquitin ligase Hul5 is required for fragment-specific substrate degradation in endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation. J Biol Chem 283(24):16374-16383.
39. Schrödinger, LLC (2010) The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System (Schrödinger, LLC, New York), Version 1.3r1.
40. Pettersen EF, et al. (2004) UCSF Chimera-a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 25(13):1605-1612.
41. Luan B, et al. (2016) Structure of an endogenous yeast 26S proteasome reveals two major conformational states. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113(10):2642-2647.
42. Özalp VC, Pedersen TR, Nielsen LJ, Olsen LF (2010) Time-resolved measurements of intracellular ATP in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae using a new type of nanobiosensor. J Biol Chem 285(48):37579-37588.
43. Beckwith R, Estrin E, Worden EJ, Martin A (2013) Reconstitution of the 26S proteasome reveals functional asymmetries in its AAA+ unfoldase. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20(10):1164-1172.
44. Russell SJ, Steger KA, Johnston SA (1999) Subcellular localization, stoichiometry, and protein levels of 26 S proteasome subunits in yeast. J Biol Chem 274(31):21943-21952.
45. Sokolova V, Li F, Polovin G, Park S (2015) Proteasome activation is mediated via a functional switch of the Rpt6 C-terminal tail following chaperone-dependent assembly. Sci Rep 5:14909.
46. Park S, Kim W, Tian G, Gygi SP, Finley D (2011) Structural defects in the regulatory particle-core particle interface of the proteasome induce a novel proteasome stress response. J Biol Chem 286(42):36652-36666.
47. Finley D, Ozkaynak E, Varshavsky A (1987) The yeast polyubiquitin gene is essential for resistance to high temperatures, starvation, and other stresses. Cell 48(6):1035-1046.
48. Leggett DS, Glickman MH, Finley D (2005) Purification of proteasomes, proteasome subcomplexes, and proteasome-associated proteins from budding yeast. Methods Mol Biol 301:57-70.