Challenges for evidence-based environmental management: What is acceptable and sufficient evidence of causation?

Freshwater Science

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 240-249

  Nichols, Susan J ^a   Peat, Michael ^a   Webb, J Angus ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANBERRA   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Causal analysis; Eco Evidence; Evidence based management; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; GROUNDWATER ABSTRACTION; GUIDELINE; LITERATURE REVIEW; SOFTWARE; WORLD WIDE WEB;

AUSTRALIA;

EID: 85012883711     PISSN: 21619549     EISSN: 21619565     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/690106     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. ACT Government (Australian Capital Territory Government). 1999. ACT environmental flow guidelines. Department of Environment, Climate Change, Energy and Water, Canberra, Australia. (Available from: http://www.legislation.act.gov.au/di /2006-13/default.asp)
2. ACT Government (Australian Capital Territory Government). 2006. Environmental flow guidelines 2006. Environment Australian Capital Territory, Canberra, Australia. (Available from: http://www.legislation.act.gov.au/di/2006-13/default.asp) Adams,)
3. Adams,dams, S. M. 2005. Assessing cause and effect of multiple stressors on marine systems. Marine Pollution Bulletin 51: 649-657.
4. Barlow, A., R. Norris, and S. Nichols. 2005. Ecological effects of reducing stream baseflows. Final report August 2005. Prepared by Institute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, for Environment Australian Capital Territory, Canberra, Australia. (Available from: http://www.act.waterwatch.org.au/Files /Library/Ecological%20effects%20of%20reducing%20stream %20baseflows%20FINAL.pdf)
5. Beyers, D.W. 1998. Causal inference in environmental impact studies. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 17: 367-373.
6. Bornmann, L. 2011. Scientific peer review. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 45:197-245.
7. Briggs, S. V., and A. T. Knight. 2011. Science-policy interface: scientific input limited. Science 333:696-697.
8. CEE (Centre for Environmental Evidence). 2013. Guidelines for systematic review and evidence synthesis in environmental management. Version 4.2. Environmental Evidence. (Available from: www.environmentalevidence.org/Documents/Guidelines /Guidelines4.2.pdf)
9. Cottingham, P., M. Thoms, and G. Quinn. 2001. Scientific panels and their use in environmental flow assessment in Australia. Australian Journal of Water Resources 5:103-111.
10. Downes, B. J., L. A. Barmuta, P. G. Fairweather, D. P. Faith, M. J. Keough, P. S. Lake, B. D. Mapstone, and G. P. Quinn. 2002. Monitoring ecological impacts: concepts and practice in flowing waters. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
11. Eberhardt, L. L., and J. M. Thomas. 1991. Designing environmental field studies. Ecological Monographs 61:53-73.
12. Environment ACT (Environment Australian Capital Territory). 2004. Environmental flow guidelines: a technical background paper.EnvironmentAustralianCapitalTerritory, Canberra, Australia. (Available from: http://www.environment.act.gov.au /-data/assets/pdf-file/0005/575681/environmentalflowguide lines-atechnicalbackgroundpaper1204pdf.pdf)
13. Evans, W. R., B. F. W. Croke, J. L. Ticehurst, B. Schoettker, and A. J. Jakeman. 2005. Sustainable groundwater yield assessment Sullivans Sub-Catchment, ACT. iCAMClient Report for Environment ACT. Integrated Catchment Assessment and Management (iCAM) Centre, School of Resources, Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia. (Available from: Integrated Catchment Assessment and Management [iCAM] Centre, School of Resources, Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra, 2601 Australia.)
14. Fazey, I., J. A. Fazey, and D. M. A. Fazey. 2005. Learning more effectively from experience. Ecology and Society 10.
15. Fazey, I., K. Proust, B. Newell, B. Johnson, and J. A. Fazey. 2006. Eliciting the implicit knowledge and perceptions of on-ground conservation managers of theMacquarieMarshes. Ecology and Society 11.
16. Fazey, I., J. G. Salisbury, D. B. Lindenmayer, J. Maindonald, and R. Douglas. 2004. Can methods applied in medicine be used to summarize and disseminate conservation research? Environmental Conservation 31:190-198.
17. Fox, G. A. 1991. Practical causal inference for ecoepidemiologists. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health 33:359-373.
18. Francis, T. B., K. A. Whittaker, V. Shandas, A. V. Mills, and J. K. Graybill. 2005. Incorporating science into the environmental policy process: a case study from Washington State. Ecology and Society 10.
19. Green, R. H. 1979. Sampling design and statistical methods for environmental biologists. Wiley, New York.
20. Greet, J., J. A. Webb, and R. D. Cousens. 2011. The importance of seasonal flow timing for riparian vegetation dynamics: a systematic review using causal criteria analysis. Freshwater Biology 56:1231-1247.
21. Grove, J. R., J. A. Webb, P. M. Marren, M. J. Stewardson, and S. R. Wealands. 2012. High and dry: comparing literature review approaches to reveal the data that informs the geomorphic management of regulated river floodplains. Wetlands 32:215-224.
22. Harrison, E. T. 2010. Fine sediment in rivers: scale of ecological outcomes. PhD Dissertation, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia. (Available from: https://core.ac.uk/display/30348820)
23. Hedges, L. V., and I. Olkin. 1985. Statistical methods for metaanalysis. Academic Press, Orlando, Florida.
24. Hill, A. B. 1965. The environment and disease: association or causation? Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 58:295-300.
25. Holmes, J., and R. Clark. 2008. Enhancing the use of science in environmental policy-making and regulation. Environmental Science and Policy 11:702-711.
26. Jakeman, A. J., and R. A. Letcher. 2003. Integrated assessment and modelling: features, principles and examples for catchment management. Environmental Modelling and Software 18:491-501.
27. Jones, G. 2009. The adaptive management system for the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area: linking management planning with effectiveness evaluation. Pages 227-258 in C. Allan and G. H. Stankey (editors). Adaptive environmental management: a practitioner's guide. Jointly published by Springer with CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Australia.
28. Kahan, D. M., H. Jenkins-Smith, and D. Braman. 2011. Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research 14: 147-174.
29. Loucks, D. P. 2011. Risk and uncertainty in water resources planning and management: a basic introduction. Pages 230-250 in Q. Grafton and K. Hussey (editors). Water resources planning andmanagement. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
30. MacDonald, B., R. Cordes, and P. Wells. 2007. Assessing the diffusion and impact of grey literature published by international intergovernmental scientific groups: the case of the Gulf of Maine Council on the marine environment. Publishing Research Quarterly 23:30-46.
31. Mayo, D. G., and R. D. Hollander. 1991. Acceptable evidence: science and values in risk management. Oxford University Press, New York.
32. Miller, K. A., J. A. Webb, S. C. de Little, and M. J. Stewardson. 2013. Environmental flows can reduce the encroachment of terrestrial vegetation into river channels: a systematic literature review. Environmental Management 52:1202-1212.
33. Murphy, D. D., and P. S. Weiland. 2011. The route to best science in implementation of the Endangered Species Act's consultation mandate: the benefits of structured effects analysis. Environmental Management 47:161-172.
34. Nichols, S. J., A. Webb, R. Norris, and M. Stewardson. 2011. Eco Evidence Analysis methods manual: a systematic approach to evaluate causality in environmental science. eWater Cooperative Research Centre, Canberra, Australia.
35. Norris, R. H., P. Liston, J. Mugodo, S. Nichols, G. P. Quinn, P. Cottingham, L. Metzeling, S. Perriss, D. Robinson, D. Tiller, and G. Wilson. 2005. Multiple lines and levels of evidence for detecting ecological responses to management intervention. Pages 456-463 in I. D. Rutherfurd, I. Wiszniewski, M. J. Askey-Doran, and R. Glazik (editors). Proceedings of the 4th Australian Stream Management Conference: Linking Rivers to Landscapes, Launceston, Tasmania. Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, Hobart, Tasmania.
36. Norris, R. H., J. A. Webb, S. J. Nichols, M. J. Stewardson, and E. T. Harrison. 2012. Analyzing cause and effect in environmental assessments: usingweighted evidence fromthe literature. Freshwater Science 31:5-21.
37. Plowright, R. K., S. H. Sokolow, M. E. Gorman, P. Daszak, and J. E. Foley. 2008. Causal inference in disease ecology: investigating ecological drivers of disease emergence. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6:420-429.
38. Pullin, A. S., T. M. Knight, D. A. Stone, and K. Charman. 2004. Do conservation managers use scientific evidence to support their decision-making? Biological Conservation 119:245-252.
39. Raymond, C. M., I. Fazey, M. S. Reed, L. C. Stringer, G. M. Robinson, and A. C. Evely. 2010. Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management 91:1766-1777.
40. Relman, A. S. 1990. Peer-review in scientific journals-what good is it? Western Journal of Medicine 153:520-522.
41. Ryder, D. S., M. Tomlinson, B. Gawne, and G. E. Likens. 2010. Defining and using 'best available science': a policy conundrum for the management of aquatic ecosystems. Marine and Freshwater Research 61:821-828.
42. Seymour, E., D. Pannell, A. Roberts, S. Marsh, and R. Wilkinson. 2008. Decision-making by regional bodies for natural resource management in Australia: current processes and capacity gaps. Australasian Journal of EnvironmentalManagement 15:211-221.
43. Skinner, D. S., J. A. Webb, S. J. Nichols, and M. J. Stewardson. 2013. Systematic causal inference and knowledge transfer between science and policy: Eco Evidence in water management. Australian Journal of Water Resources 17:202-210.
44. Suter, G. W., S. B. Norton, and S. M. Cormier. 2002. A methodology for inferring the causes of observed impairments in aquatic ecosystems. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:1101-1111.
45. Suter, G. W., S. B. Norton, and S. M. Cormier. 2010. The science and philosophy of a method for assessing environmental causes. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 16:19-34.
46. Sutherland, W. J. 2006. Predicting the ecological consequences of environmental change: a review of the methods. Journal of Applied Ecology 43:599-616.
47. Sutherland, W. J., A. S. Pullin, P. M. Dolman, and T. M. Knight. 2004. Response to Griffiths. Mismatches between conservation science and practice. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 565-566.
48. Thoms, M. C., and F. Sheldon. 2002. An ecosystem approach for determining environmental water allocations in Australian dryland river systems: the role of geomorphology. Geomorphology 47:153-168.
49. Tugwell, B., and R. B. Haynes. 2006. Assessing claims of causation. Pages 356-387 in R. B. Haynes, D. L. Sackett, G.H. Guyatt, and P. Tugwell (editors). Clinical epidemiology: how to do clinical practice research. Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
50. Webb, J.A., K. A. Miller, S.C.deLittle, M. J. Stewardson, S. J. Nichols, and S.R. Wealands. 2015. Anonlinedatabase anddesktopassessment software to simplify systematic reviews in environmental science. Environmental Modelling and Software 64:72-79.
51. Webb, J. A., K. A. Miller, E. L. King, S. C. de Little, M. J. Stewardson, J. K. H. Zimmerman, and N. L. Poff. 2013. Squeezing the most out of existing literature: a systematic re-analysis of published evidence on ecological responses to altered flows. Freshwater Biology 58:2439-2451.
52. Webb, J. A., S. J. Nichols, R. H. Norris, M. J. Stewardson, S. R. Wealands, and P. Lea. 2012. Ecological responses to flow alteration: assessing causal relationships with Eco Evidence. Wetlands 32:203-213.
53. Weed, D. L. 1997. On the use of causal criteria. International Journal of Epidemiology 26:1137-1141.