Defining and advancing a systems approach for sustainable cities

Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability

Volumn 23, Issue , 2016, Pages 69-78

  Bai, Xuemei ^a   Surveyer, Alyson ^b   Elmqvist, Thomas ^c   Gatzweiler, Franz W ^d   Güneralp, Burak ^e   Parnell, Susan ^f   Prieur Richard, Anne Hélène ^b   Shrivastava, Paul ^b,g,h   Siri, José Gabriel ⁱ   Stafford Smith, Mark ^j   Toussaint, Jean Patrick ^b   Webb, Robert ^k  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b Future Earth   (Canada)

^c STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^d INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS   (China)

^e TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

^g Gina Cody School of Engineering and Computer Science   (Canada)

^h ICN BUSINESS SCHOOL   (France)

ⁱ UNIVERSITI KEBANGSAAN MALAYSIA MEDICAL CENTER   (Malaysia)

^j CSIRO   (Australia)

^k AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; DESIGN; FINANCE; KNOWLEDGE; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TRADE-OFF; URBAN PLANNING;

EID: 85012249396     PISSN: 18773435     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.11.010     Document Type: Review

References (70)

1. 1• Bai, X., Shi, P., Liu, Y., Society: realizing China's urban dream. Nature 509 (2014), 158–160 This paper discusses how rapid urbanization can be one of the biggest social transformation and experiment in human settlement in history. The authors argue that city level practice will make or break the national government policy attempting to guide the urbanization process.
2. 2 Seto, K.C., Güneralp, B., Hutyra, L.R., Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109 (2012), 16083–16088.
3. 3• Revi, A., Satterthwaite, D., Aragón-Durand, F., Corfee-Morlot, J., Kiunsi, R.B.R., Pelling, M., Roberts, D., Solecki, W., Gajjar, S.P., Sverdlik, A., Towards transformative adaptation in cities: the IPCC's Fifth Assessment. Environ Urban 26 (2014), 11–28 This Chapter of the Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) of the IPCC provides a systematic overview of adaptation in cities, including adaptation in different urban sectors and the role of various stakeholders in achieving transformative adaptation.
4. 4 Grimm, N.B., Faeth, S.H., Golubiewski, N.E., Redman, C.L., Wu, J., Bai, X., Briggs, J.M., Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319 (2008), 756–760.
5. 5 Grubler, A., Bai, X., Buettner, T., Dhakal, S., Fisk, D.J., Ichinose, T., Keirstead, J.E., Sammer, G., Satterthwaite, D., Schulz, N.B., et al. Urban energy systems. In Global Energy Assessment — Toward a Sustainable Future, 2012, Cambridge University Press and the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis pp 1307–1400.
6. 6• Seto, K.C., Dahkal, S., Bigio, A., Blanco, H., Delgado, D.C., Dewar, D., Huang, L., Inaba, A., Kansal, S., Lwasa, S., et al. Human settlements, infrastructure and spatial planning. Edenhofer, O.R., Pichs-Madruga, Y., Sokona, E., Farahani, S., Kadner, K., Seyboth, A., Adler, I., Baum, S., Brunner, P., Eickemeier, B., (eds.) Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2014, Cambridge University Press, 923–1000 This Chapter of the Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) of the IPCC provides an overview of current urban research related to climate change and key knowledge gaps (e.g. limited evaluations of city climate action plans, lack of scientific understanding of how cities can prioritize mitigation actions, strategies, investments, and policy responses and important uncertainties about future urbanization scenarios considering urbanization's large role in determining emissions pathways).
7. 7 UNDP, UNDP Support to the Implementation of the 2030 Agenda. 2016, UNPD.
8. 8 Le Blanc, D., Towards integration at last? The sustainable development goals as a network of targets. Sustain Dev 23 (2015), 176–187.
9. 9 Duarte, F., Rojas, F., Intermodal connectivity to BRT: a comparative analysis of Bogotá and Curitiba. J Public Transp, 2012, 15.
10. 10• McPhearson, T., Pickett, S.T.A., Grimm, N.B., Niemelä, J., Alberti, M., Elmqvist, T., Weber, C., Haase, D., Breuste, J., Qureshi, S., Advancing urban ecology toward a science of cities. BioScience 66 (2016), 198–212 This paper looks at urban ecology as a field of science overarching multiple disciplines and practical applications and argues that the field should mature as an integrated science of urban systems to better inform decision makers who need understanding of complex interactions between social, ecological, economic, and built infrastructure systems.
11. 11•• de Oliveira, J.A.P., Doll, C.N.H., Siri, J., Dreyfus, M., Farzaneh, H., Capon, A., Urban governance and the systems approaches to health-environment co-benefits in cities. Cad. Saúde Públ 31:Suppl. 1 (2015), 25–38 This paper highlights the importance of using a systems approach in order to improve urban and thus dealing more effectively with the complex interactions between environmental change and urban health. The authors suggest five actionable transitional steps in order to facilitate the transition to good governance, from better coordination among urban sectors to bringing together a wide-array of stakeholders in the decision-making processes.
12. 12 Newman, P., Kenworthy, J., The End of Automobile Dependence: How Cities are Moving Beyond Car-Based Planning. 2015.
13. 13• Smith, T.F., Brooke, C., Measham, T.G., Preston, B., Gorddard, R., Beveridge, B., Morrison, C., (eds.) Case Studies of Adaptive Capacity: Systems Approach to Regional Climate Change Adaptation Strategies, 2008, Sydney Coastal Councils Group Inc. This paper discusses the utility of applying the concepts, principles, and methods of systems thinking to the study of complex urban health. Using specific examples, it provides recommendations on how to better incorporate systems thinking methods in urban health research and practice.
14. 14 Fiksel, J., Sustainability and resilience: toward a systems approach. Sustain Sci Pract Policy, 2006, 2.
15. 15 Brondizio, E.S., Gatzweiler, F.W., Socio-cultural context of ecosystem and biodiversity valuation. Kumar, P., (eds.) The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. Ecological and Economic Foundations, 2010, Earthscan.
16. 16 Silva, C.N., Governing metropolitan Lisbon: a tale of fragmented urban governance. GeoJournal 58 (2002), 23–32.
17. 17 Güneralp, B., Seto, K.C., Environmental impacts of urban growth from an integrated dynamic perspective: a case study of Shenzhen, South China. Glob Environ Change 18 (2008), 720–735.
18. 18 Bai, X., Nath, I., Capon, A., Hasan, N., Jaron, D., Health and wellbeing in the changing urban environment: complex challenges, scientific responses, and the way forward. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 4 (2012), 465–472.
19. 19 Roux, A.V.D., Roux, A.V.D., Health in cities: is a systems approach needed?. Cad Saúde Públ 31 (2015), 9–13.
20. 20• Tozan, Y., Ompad, D.C., Complexity and dynamism from an urban health perspective: a rationale for a system dynamics approach. J Urban Health Bull N Y Acad Med 92 (2015), 490–501 This paper discusses the utility of applying the concepts, principles, and methods of systems thinking to the study of complex urban health. Using specific examples, it provides recommendations on how to better incorporate systems thinking methods in urban health research and practice.
21. 21•• Bai, X., Eight energy and material flow characteristics of urban ecosystems. Ambio 45 (2016), 819–830 This paper discusses how the urban energy and material flow studies can reveal some fundamental characteristics of cities as human dominant, complex, adaptive and evolving ecosystems. The paper calls for a conceptual bridging between the urban metabolism and urban ecosystem research communities to achieve a better understanding of urban systems.
22. 22 Kennedy, C.A., Stewart, I., Facchini, A., Cersosimo, I., Mele, R., Chen, B., Uda, M., Kansal, A., Chiu, A., Kim, K., et al. Energy and material flows of megacities. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112 (2015), 5985–5990.
23. 23 Batty, M., Barros, J.S.A., Cities: continuity, transformation and emergence. Garnsey, E., McGlade, J.A., (eds.) Complexity and Co-evolution: Continuity and Change in Socio-economic Systems, 2006, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 61–76.
24. 24 Bai, X., The process and mechanism of urban environmental change: an evolutionary view. Int J Environ Pollut 19 (2003), 528–541.
25. 25 Fujita, M., Mori, T., Structural stability and evolution of urban systems. Reg Sci Urban Econ 27 (1997), 399–442.
26. 26 Ma, S., Wang, R., Social–economic–natural ecosystems. Acta Ecol Sin 4 (1984), 1–9.
27. 27 Portugali, J., (eds.) Self-Organization and the City, 2000, Springer.
28. 28 Portugali, J., Benenson, I., Human agents between local and global forces in a self-organizing city. Schweitzer, F., (eds.) Self-Organization of Complex Structures: From Individual to Collective Dynamics, 1997, CRC Press, 537–546.
29. 29•• Loorbach, D., Wittmayer, J.M., Shiroyama, H., Fujino, J., Mizuguchi, S., (eds.) Governance of Urban Sustainability Transitions, 2016, Springer This book presents how cities can achieve the great sustainability challenges by considering new and innovative methods based on a transitions management. It examines how cities in Europe and Asia are implementing the latter both conceptually and practically.
30. 30 Bai, X., McAllister, R.R., Beaty, R.M., Taylor, B., Urban policy and governance in a global environment: complex systems, scale mismatches and public participation. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2 (2010), 129–135.
31. 31 Grimm, N.B., Grove, J.G., Pickett, S.T.A., Redman, C.L., Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems urban ecological systems present multiple challenges to ecologists — pervasive human impact and extreme heterogeneity of cities, and the need to integrate social and ecological approaches, concepts, and theory. BioScience 50 (2000), 571–584.
32. 32 Bai, X., Integrating global environmental concerns into urban management: the scale and readiness arguments. J Ind Ecol 11 (2007), 15–29.
33. 33 Ramaswami, A., Weible, C., Main, D., Heikkila, T., Siddiki, S., Duvall, A., Pattison, A., Bernard, M., A social–ecological–infrastructural systems framework for interdisciplinary study of sustainable city systems. J Ind Ecol 16 (2012), 801–813.
34. 34 Elmqvist, T., Fragkias, M., Goodness, J., Güneralp, B., Marcotullio, P.J., McDonald, R.I., Parnell, S., Schewenius, M., Sendstad, M., Seto, K.C., et al. Stewardship of the biosphere in the urban era. Elmqvist, T., Fragkias, M., Goodness, J., Güneralp, B., Marcotullio, P.J., McDonald, R.I., Parnell, S., Schewenius, M., Sendstad, M., Seto, K.C., et al. (eds.) Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities, 2013, Springer, 719–746.
35. 35 Pickett, S.T.A., Cadenasso, M.L., Grove, J.M., Nilon, C.H., Pouyat, R.V., Zipperer, W.C., Costanza, R., Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Marzluff, J.M., Shulenberger, E., Endlicher, W., Alberti, M., Bradley, G., Ryan, C., Simon, U., ZumBrunnen, C., (eds.) Urban Ecology, 2008, Springer, 99–122.
36. 36 Padoch, C., Brondizio, E., Costa, S., Pinedo-Vasquez, M., Sears, R.R., Siqueira, A., Urban forest and rural cities: multi-sited households, consumption patterns, and forest resources in Amazonia. Ecol Soc, 2008, 13.
37. 37 Mitlin, D., Satterthwaite, D., (eds.) Urban Poverty in the Global South: Scale and Nature, 2013, Routledge.
38. 38 Bai, X., Chen, J., Shi, P., Landscape urbanization and economic growth in china: positive feedbacks and sustainability dilemmas. Environ Sci Technol 46 (2012), 132–139.
39. 39 Glaeser, E.L., Kahn, M.E., The greenness of cities: carbon dioxide emissions and urban development. J Urban Econ 67 (2010), 404–418.
40. 40 Bai, X., Roberts, B., Chen, J., Urban sustainability experiments in Asia: patterns and pathways. Environ Sci Policy 13 (2010), 312–325.
41. 41 Leichenko, R., Climate change and urban resilience. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 3 (2011), 164–168.
42. 42 ICSU, Report of the ICSU Planning Group on Health and Wellbeing in the Changing Urban Environment: a Systems Analysis Approach., 2011, International Council for Science.
43. 43 Newman, P., Thornley, A., Fragmentation and Centralisation in the Governance of London: influencing the Urban Policy and Planning Agenda. Urban Stud 34 (1997), 967–988.
44. 44 Biermann, F., Pattberg, P., van Asselt, H., Zelli, F., The fragmentation of global governance architectures: a framework for analysis. Glob Environ Polit 9 (2009), 14–40.
45. 45 Beall, J., Parnell, S., Albertyn, C., Elite compacts in Africa: the role of area-based management in the new governmentality of the Durban city-region. Int J Urban Reg Res 39 (2015), 390–406.
46. 46 Simone, A., (eds.) For the city yet to come: Changing African life in four cities, 2004, Duke University Press.
47. 47 Seitzinger, S.P., Svedin, U., Crumley, C.L., Steffen, W., Abdullah, S.A., Alfsen, C., Broadgate, W.J., Biermann, F., Bondre, N.R., Dearing, J.A., et al. Planetary stewardship in an urbanizing world: beyond city limits. Ambio 41 (2012), 787–794.
48. 48 Batty, M., The New Science of Cities. 2013, The MIT Press.
49. 49 Schindler, S., Producing and contesting the formal/informal divide: regulating street hawking in Delhi, India. Urban Stud 51 (2014), 2596–2612.
50. 50 Occelli, S., Rabino, G.A., Cognitive modeling of urban complexity. Portugali, J., (eds.) Complex Artificial Environments, 2006, Springer pp 219–233.
51. 51 Wamsler, C., Pauleit, S., Making headway in climate policy mainstreaming and ecosystem-based adaptation: two pioneering countries, different pathways, one goal. Clim Change 137 (2016), 71–87.
52. 52 Guhathakurta, S., Urban modeling as storytelling: using simulation models as a narrative. Environ Plan B: Plan Des 29 (2002), 895–911.
53. 53 Simon, D., Arfvidsson, H., Anand, G., Bazaz, A., Fenna, G., Foster, K., Jain, G., Hansson, S., Evans, L.M., Moodley, N., et al. Developing and testing the urban sustainable development goal's targets and indicators — a five-city study. Environ Urban 28 (2015), 49–63.
54. 54 Wu, F., He, S., Webster, C., Path dependency the neighbourhood effect: urban poverty in impoverished neighbourhoods in Chinese cities. Environ Plan A 42 (2010), 134–152.
55. 55 da Silva, J., Kernaghan, S., Luque, A., A systems approach to meeting the challenges of urban climate change. Int J Urban Sustain Dev 4 (2012), 125–145.
56. 56 Wilkinson, C., Urban resilience what does it mean in planning practice?. Plan Theory Pract 13 (2012), 319–324.
57. 57 Marshall, G., Nesting, subsidiarity, and community-based environmental governance beyond the local scale. Int J Commons, 2, 2007, 75.
58. 58 Marshall, G.R., A social–ecological systems framework for food systems research: accommodating transformation systems and their products. Int J Commons, 9, 2015, 881.
59. 59 Ostrom, E., Nested externalities and polycentric institutions: must we wait for global solutions to climate change before taking actions at other scales?. Econ Theory 49 (2012), 353–369.
60. 60 Säynäjoki, E.-S., Heinonen, J., Junnila, S., The power of urban planning on environmental sustainability: a focus group study in Finland. Sustainability 6 (2014), 6622–6643.
61. 61 Gunay, Z., Dokmeci, V., Culture-led regeneration of Istanbul waterfront: Golden Horn Cultural Valley Project. Cities 29 (2012), 213–222.
62. 62 Wang, J., “Art in capital”: shaping distinctiveness in a culture-led urban regeneration project in Red Town, Shanghai. Cities 26 (2009), 318–330.
63. 63 McDonough, W., Braungart, M., Design for the triple top line: new tools for sustainable commerce. Corp Environ Strategy 9 (2002), 251–258.
64. 64 Tusquets, O., Diot, M., The Staircase The Architecture of Ascent. 2013, Thames & Hudson Ltd.
65. 65 Barnes PM: Instruments of change — motivating and financing sustainable development, In Theodor Panayotou, 1998. Earthscan, xii+228 pp, £19.95. ISBN 1-85383-467-X. Sustain. Dev. 1999, 7:205–205.
66. 66 Acuto, M., Parnell, S., Leave no city behind. Science, 352, 2016, 873.
67. 67 Nevens, F., Frantzeskaki, N., Gorissen, L., Loorbach, D., Urban transition labs: co-creating transformative action for sustainable cities. J Clean Prod 50 (2013), 111–122.
68. 68 Frantzeskaki, N., Kabisch, N., Designing a knowledge co-production operating space for urban environmental governance — lessons from Rotterdam, Netherlands and Berlin, Germany. Environ Sci Policy 62 (2016), 90–98.
69. 69•• McPhearson, T., Parnell, S., Simon, D., Gaffney, O., Elmqvist, T., Bai, X., Roberts, D., Revi, A., Scientists must have a say in the future of cities. Nature 538 (2016), 165–166 This paper calls for a stronger urban science–policy linkages, including a greater role of science and scientists in international policy processes, and in the implementation of New Urban Agenda adopted at the Habitat III Conference.
70. 70 The New Urban Agenda. Habitat III; 2016.