The power of urban planning on environmental sustainability: A focus group study in Finland

Sustainability (Switzerland)

Volumn 6, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 6622-6643

  Säynäjoki, Eeva Sofia ^a   Heinonen, Jukka ^a,b   Junnila, Seppo ^a  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ICELAND   (Iceland)

Author keywords

Decision making; Environmental sustainability; Focus groups; Municipalities; Strategic environmental assessment; Sustainable lifestyles; Urban density; Urban planning

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; LAND USE PLANNING; PRIORITIZATION; STAKEHOLDER; STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABILITY; URBAN PLANNING;

FINLAND;

EID: 84907965328     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20711050     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su6106622     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Myers, D.; Kitsuse, A. Constructing the future in planning: A survey of theories and tools. J. Plan. Educ. Res. 2000, 19, 221-231.
2. Grimm, N.B.; Faeth, S.H.; Golubiewski, N.E.; Redman, C.L.; Wu, J.; Bai, X.; Briggs, J.M. Global Change and the Ecology of Cities. Science 2008, 319, 756-760.
3. Bulkeley, H.; Betsill, M. Rethinking Sustainable Cities: Multilevel Governance and the Urban Politics of Climate Change. Environ. Politics 2005, 14, 42-63.
4. Shane, A.M.; Graedel, T.E. Urban environmental sustainability metrics: A provisional set. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 2000, 43, 643-663.
5. Gunnarsson-östling, U.; Höjer, M. Scenario Planning for Sustainability in Stockholm, Sweden: Environmental Justice Considerations. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 2011, 35, 1048-1067.
6. Svane, ö.; Weingaertner, C. MAMMUT-Managing the Metabolism of Urbanization: Testing Theory through a Pilot Study of the Stockholm Underground. Sustain. Dev. 2006, 14, 312-326.
7. Kyttä, M.; Broberg, A.; Tzoulas, T.; Snabb, K. Towards contextually sensitive urban densification: Location-based softGIS knowledge revealing perceived residential environmental quality. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2013, 113, 30-46.
8. Runhaar, H.; Driessen, P.P.J. Sustainable urban development and the challenge of policy integration: An assessment of planning tools for integrating spatial and environmental planning in the Netherlands. Environ. Plan. B 2009, 36, 417-431.
9. Burton, E. Measuring urban compactness in UK towns and cities. Environ. Plan. B 2002, 29, 219-250.
10. Herold, M.; Scepan, J.; Clarke, K.C. The use of remote sensing and landscape metrics to describe structures and changes in urban land uses. Environ. Plan. A 2002, 34, 1443-1458.
11. Huang, J.; Lub, X.X.; Sellers, J.M. A global comparative analysis of urban form: Applying spatial metrics and remote sensing. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2007, 82, 184-197.
12. Schwarz, N. Urban form revisited-Selecting indicators for characterising European cities. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2010, 96, 29-47.
13. Tang, U.W.; Wang, Z.S. Influences of urban forms on traffic-induced noise and air pollution: Results from a modeling system. Environ. Model. Softw. 2007, 22, 1750-1764.
14. Zhang, M. Exploring the relationship between the built environment and non-work travel through time use modeling: A Boston case study. J. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2005, 73, 244-261.
15. Boyko, C.T.; Cooper, R. Density and Decision-Making: Findings from an Online Survey. Sustainability 2013, 5, 4502-4522.
16. Neuman, M. The Compact City Fallacy. J. Plan. Educ. Res. 2005, 25, 11-26.
17. Van Stigt, R.; Driessen, P.P.J.; Spit, T.J.M. Compact City Development and the Challenge of Environmental Policy Integration: A Multi-Level Governance Perspective. Environ. Policy Gov. 2013, 23, 221-233.
18. Ding, C.; Wang, Y.; Xie, B.; Liu, C. Understanding the Role of Built Environment in Reducing Vehicle Miles Traveled Accounting for Spatial Heterogeneity. Sustainability 2014, 6, 589-601.
19. Kenworthy, J.R. The eco-city: Ten key transport and planning dimensions for sustainable city development. Environ. Urban. 2006, 18, 67-85.
20. Van der Waals, J.F.M. The Compact City and the Environment. Tijdschr. Econ. Soc. Geogr. 2000, 91, 111-121.
21. Janssen-Jansen, L.B. Beyond sprawl: Principles for achieving more qualitative spatial development. Plan. Rev. 2005, 160, 36-41.
22. Heinonen, J.; Junnila, S. A Carbon Consumption Comparison of Rural and Urban Lifestyles. Sustainability 2011, 3, 1234-1249.
23. Heinonen, J.; Junnila, S. Implications of urban structure on carbon consumption in metropolitan areas. Environ. Res. Lett. 2011, doi:10.1088/1748-9326/6/1/014018.
24. Heinonen, J.; Kyrö, R.; Junnila, S. Dense downtown living more carbon intense due to higher consumption: A case study of Helsinki. Environ. Res. Lett. 2011, doi:10.1088/1748-9326/6/3/034034.
25. Ala-Mantila, S.; Heinonen, J.; Junnila, S. Greenhouse Gas Implications of Urban Sprawl in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area. Sustainability 2013, 5, 4461-4478.
26. Heinonen, J.; Jalas, M.; Juntunen, J.K.; Ala-Mantila, S.; Junnila, S. Situated lifestyles: I. How lifestyles change along with the level of urbanization and what the greenhouse gas implications are-A study of Finland. Environ. Res. Lett. 2013, doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/025003.
27. Holden, E.; Norland, I.T. Three Challenges for the Compact City as a Sustainable Urban Form: Household Consumption of Energy and Transport in Eight Residential Areas in the Greater Oslo Region. Urban Stud. 2005, 42, 2145-2166.
28. Bulkeley, H. Cities and the Governing of Climate Change. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2010, 35, 229-253.
29. Jordan, A.; Lenschow, A. Environmental Policy Integration: A State of the Art Review. Environ. Policy Gov. 2010, 20, 147-158.
30. Hall, P.; Pfeiffer, U. Urban Future 21: A Global Agenda for Twenty-first Century Cities; E.&F.N. Spon: London, UK, 2000.
31. Whitehead, M. (Re)analysing the sustainable city: Nature, urbanisation and the regulation of socio-environmental relations in the UK. Urban Stud. 2003, 40, 1183-1206.
32. Gibbs, D.; Jonas, A. Governance and regulation in local environmental policy: The utility of a regime approach. Geoforum 2000, 31, 299-313.
33. Marvin, S.; Guy, S. Towards a new logic of transport planning. Town Plan. Rev. 1999, 70, 139-148.
34. Ramaswami, A.; Hillman, T.; Janson, B.; Reiner, M.; Thomas, G. A Demand-Centered, Hybrid Life-Cycle Methodology for City-Scale Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 6455-6461.
35. Tukker, A.; Poliakov, E.; Heijungs, R.; Hawkins, T.; Neuwahl, F.; Rueda-Cantuche, J.M.; Giljum, S.; Moll, S.; Oosterhaven, J.; Bouwmeester, M. Towards a global multi-regional environmentally extended input-output database. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68, 1928-1937.
36. Burgess, J.; Harrison, C. Environmental communication and the cultural politics of environmental citizenship. Environ. Plan. A 1998, 30, 1445-1460.
37. Bogardus, E. The group interview. J. Appl. Sociol. 1926, 10, 372-382.
38. Merton, R.; Fisk, M.; Kendall, P. The Focused Interview: A Report of the Bureau of Applied Social Research; Columbia University: New York, NY, USA, 1956.
39. Kitzinger, J. The methodology of Focus Groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociol. Health Illn. 1994, 16, 104-121.
40. Morgan, D.L. Focus Groups. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 1996, 22, 129-152.
41. Skop, E. The Methodological Potential of Focus Groups in Population Geography. Popul. Space Place 2006, 12, 113-124.
42. Hemingway, S.; White, J.; Turner, J.; Dewhirst, K.; Smith, G. The Medicine with Respect Project: A stakeholder focus group evaluation. Nurse Educ. Pract. 2012, 12, 310-315.
43. Scott, A. Focussing in on focus groups: Effective participative tools or cheap fixes for land use policy? Land Use Policy 2011, 28, 684-694.
44. Derkzen, P.; Boch, B. Partnership and role perception, three case studies on the meaning of being a representative in rural partnerships. Environ. Plan. C 2009, 27, 75-89.
45. Massey, O.T. A proposed model for the analysis and interpretation of focus groups in evaluation research. Eval. Program Plan. 2011, 34, 21-28.
46. Hollander, J.A. The social contexts of focus groups. J. Contemp. Ethnogr. 2004, 35, 602-637.
47. Morgan, D.L. Focus Groups as Qualitative Research, 2nd ed.; Qualitative Research Methods Series 16; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1997.
48. Guest, G.; MacQueen, K.M.; Namey, E.E. Applied Thematic Analysis; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2012.
49. Wiggins, G.S. The analysis of focus groups in published research articles. Can. J. Program Eval. 2004, 19, 143-164.
50. Hughes, D.; DuMont, K. Using focus groups to facilitate culturally anchored research. Am. J. Community Psychol. 1993, 21, 775-806.
51. Hyden, L.C.; Bulow, P.H. Who's talking: Drawing conclusions from focus groups-Some methodological considerations. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 2003, 6, 305-321.
52. Nielsen, S.B.; Jensen, J.O. Translating measures of sustainable development to urban districts in Copenhagen. In Proceedings of the EASST 010: Practicing Science and Technology, Performing the Social, Trento, Italy, 1-2 September 2010.
53. Turner, G.M.; Baynes, T. Soft-Coupling of National Biophysical and Economic Models for Improved Understanding of Feedbacks. Environ. Policy Gov. 2010, 20, 270-282.
54. Wiedmann, T.; Wilting, H.C.; Lenzen, M.; Lutter, S.; Palm, V. Quo Vadis MRIO? Methodological, data and institutional requirements for multi-region input-output analysis. Ecol. Econ. 2011, 70, 1937-1945.
55. Wang, B.-C.; Chou, F.-Y.; Lee, Y.-J. Ecological footprint of Taiwan: A discussion of its implications for urban and rural sustainable development. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2012, 36, 342-349.
56. Book, K.; Eskilsson, L.; Khan, J. Governing the Balance between Sustainability and Competitiveness in Urban Planning: The Case of the Orestad Model. Environ. Policy Gov. 2010, 20, 382-396.
57. Keskitalo, E.C.H.; Liljenfeldt, J. Working with sustainability: Experiences of sustainability processes in Swedish municipalities. Nat. Resour. Forum 2012, 36, 16-27.
58. Theurillat, T.; Crevoisier, O. The Sustainability of a Financialized Urban Megaproject: The Case of Sihlcity in Zurich. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 2013, 37, 2052-2073.
59. Refsgaard, K.; Magnussen, K. Household behaviour and attitudes with respect to recycling food waste-Experiences from focus groups. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90, 760-771.
60. Morse, J.M.; Barrett, M.; Mayan, M.; Olson, K.; Spiers, J. Verification Strategies for Establishing Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. Int. J. Qual. Methods 2002, 1, 13-22.