Superresolution imaging of nanoscale chromosome contacts

Scientific Reports

Volumn 7, Issue , 2017, Pages

  Wang, Yejun ^a   Ratna, Prasuna ^a,b   Shivashankar, G V ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b FIRC INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR ONCOLOGY   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMMUNOGLOBULIN ENHANCER BINDING PROTEIN; PHOSPHOPROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING; SERUM RESPONSE FACTOR; SIGNAL TRANSDUCING ADAPTOR PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; YAP PROTEIN, MOUSE;

ANIMAL; CELL LINE; CELL NUCLEUS; CHROMATIN; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; CHROMOSOME; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENETICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MOUSE; PROCEDURES;

ADAPTOR PROTEINS, SIGNAL TRANSDUCING; ANIMALS; CELL LINE; CELL NUCLEUS; CHROMATIN; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; CHROMOSOMES; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; HUMANS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; MICE; NF-KAPPA B; PHOSPHOPROTEINS; PROTEIN BINDING; SERUM RESPONSE FACTOR; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

EID: 85012108028     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep42422     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Cremer, T. & Cremer, C. Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells. Nature reviews genetics 2, 292-301 (2001).
2. Misteli, T. Beyond the sequence: cellular organization of genome function. Cell 128, 787-800 (2007).
3. Bickmore, W. A. & van Steensel, B. Genome architecture: domain organization of interphase chromosomes. Cell 152, 1270-1284 (2013).
4. Bartman, C. R. & Blobel, G. A. In Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology. 027359 (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press).
5. Pombo, A. & Dillon, N. Three-dimensional genome architecture: players and mechanisms. Nature reviews Molecular cell biology 16, 245-257 (2015).
6. Cremer, M. et al. Non-random radial higher-order chromatin arrangements in nuclei of diploid human cells. Chromosome research 9, 541-567 (2001).
7. Bolzer, A. et al. Three-dimensional maps of all chromosomes in human male fibroblast nuclei and prometaphase rosettes. PLoS Biol 3, e157 (2005).
8. Iyer, K. V. et al. Modeling and experimental methods to probe the link between global transcription and spatial organization of chromosomes. PloS one 7, e46628 (2012).
9. Maharana, S. et al. Chromosome intermingling, Äîthe physical basis of chromosome organization in differentiated cells. Nucleic acids research, gkw131 (2016).
10. Maharana, S. et al. Chromosome intermingling-the physical basis of chromosome organization in differentiated cells. Nucleic acids research, gkw131 (2016).
11. Kaufmann, S. et al. Inter-chromosomal contact networks provide insights into Mammalian chromatin organization. PloS one 10, e0126125 (2015).
12. Khrameeva, E. E., Mironov, A. A., Fedonin, G. G., Khaitovich, P. & Gelfand, M. S. Spatial proximity and similarity of the epigenetic state of genome domains. PloS one 7, e33947 (2012).
13. Schoenfelder, S. et al. Preferential associations between co-regulated genes reveal a transcriptional interactome in erythroid cells. Nature genetics 42, 53-61 (2010).
14. Osborne, C. S. et al. Active genes dynamically colocalize to shared sites of ongoing transcription. Nature genetics 36, 1065-1071 (2004).
15. Noordermeer, D. et al. The dynamic architecture of Hox gene clusters. Science 334, 222-225 (2011).
16. Fanucchi, S., Shibayama, Y., Burd, S., Weinberg, M. S. & Mhlanga, M. M. Chromosomal contact permits transcription between coregulated genes. Cell 155, 606-620 (2013).
17. Matsuda, A. et al. Condensed mitotic chromosome structure at nanometer resolution using PALM and EGFP-histones. PloS one 5, e12768 (2010).
18. Zessin, P. J., Finan, K. & Heilemann, M. Super-resolution fluorescence imaging of chromosomal DNA. Journal of Structural Biology 177, 344-348 (2012).
19. Boettiger, A. N. et al. Super-resolution imaging reveals distinct chromatin folding for different epigenetic states. Nature 529, 418-422 (2016).
20. Schoen, I., Ries, J., Klotzsch, E., Ewers, H. & Vogel, V. Binding-activated localization microscopy of DNA structures. Nano letters 11, 4008-4011 (2011).
21. Doksani, Y., Wu, J. Y., de Lange, T. & Zhuang, X. Super-resolution fluorescence imaging of telomeres reveals TRF2-dependent T-loop formation. Cell 155, 345-356 (2013).
22. Wang, Y., Maharana, S., Wang, M. D. & Shivashankar, G. Super-resolution microscopy reveals decondensed chromatin structure at transcription sites. Scientific reports 4 (2014).
23. Dekker, J. The three'C's of chromosome conformation capture: controls, controls, controls. Nature methods 3, 17-21 (2006).
24. Betzig, E. et al. Imaging intracellular fluorescent proteins at nanometer resolution. Science 313, 1642-1645 (2006).
25. Huang, B., Babcock, H. & Zhuang, X. Breaking the diffraction barrier: super-resolution imaging of cells. Cell 143, 1047-1058 (2010).
26. Maeshima, K., Hihara, S. & Eltsov, M. Chromatin structure: does the 30-nm fibre exist in vivo? Current opinion in cell biology 22, 291-297 (2010).
27. Dupont, S. et al. Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction. Nature 474, 179-183 (2011).
28. Jain, N., Iyer, K. V., Kumar, A. & Shivashankar, G. Cell geometric constraints induce modular gene-expression patterns via redistribution of HDAC3 regulated by actomyosin contractility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, 11349-11354 (2013).
29. Osborne, C. S. et al. Myc dynamically and preferentially relocates to a transcription factory occupied by Igh. PLoS Biol 5, e192 (2007).
30. Xu, M. & Cook, P. R. Similar active genes cluster in specialized transcription factories. The Journal of cell biology 181, 615-623 (2008).